Is anyone else as confused as me as to why the US hasn't seized the opportunity to eliminate Putin & Kim Jong un at the same time

[Purdey]

There are people who don't understand ethics and morals. The good guys are not supposed to do the same as the bad guys. 

[Moonlover]

15 hours ago, steven100 said:

Why hasn't or doesn't the US go after Putin and Kim Jong and exterminate them as soon as possible.

Why not give Ukraine every available long range missile, fighter jet, cluster bomb, attack helicopters, and anything else to attack Russian hard and decisive ?

It seems the US are deliberately letting Russia hold ground on the front line and keep the war going ?

 

I'm not sure what the US is trying to achieve but if I poured billions of $$ into this war I'd want it over asap ......   ?   it's really getting strange that the US & NATO let it drag on ....

 

 

 

This is just about the dumbest idea I've read this year.

 

As if mankind isn't making a big enough mess of this planet as it is, do you really want us to add nuclear Armageddon to the mix?

[bkk6060]

They need a guy like Stauffenberg, but get it right this time.

[yardrunner]

15 hours ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

I am  not suggesting it should happen but if you follow your logic then the Russians or North Koreans would be justified in assassinating the leaders of any country which provides weapons to be used against their forces. 

[Zapitapi]

16 hours ago, save the frogs said:

one prediction i came across.

russia will lose the war.

putin regime will be replaced by a pro-USA regime

russia will become part of EU.

is it bs? 

 

wishful thinking.. remember when they said 1 russias economy will crumble 2 they running out of missiles 3..4..5.. and none of the predictions have happened 

its complete BS

sanctions have backfired..ukr is loosing bad..bricks building and getting more momentum.. 

in short its a disaster for the western powers

[Zapitapi]

41 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

This is just about the dumbest idea I've read this year.

 

As if mankind isn't making a big enough mess of this planet as it is, do you really want us to add nuclear Armageddon to the mix?

couldn't agree with u more..

the idea to take them out must stem from a MSN distorted view of reality ..some spy movies..and sorry for the jab but he is probably american 

[Gandtee]

It's very tempting but that would be a declaration of war. A similar incident started World War 1.

[Seppius]

16 hours ago, Furioso said:

I don't know, seems unlikely. I doubt Russia will lose.

Russia has already lost this war, it's getting worse for them as the weeks go by.

 

This just about sums it up why

https://impakter.com/how-russia-already-lost-war/

[JensenZ]

16 hours ago, save the frogs said:

one prediction i came across.

russia will lose the war.

putin regime will be replaced by a pro-USA regime

russia will become part of EU.

is it bs? 

 

Another common prediction is that if Putin is replaced, his successor will be even more tyrannical and the situation will get worse. Russian has had a lot worse than Putin over its checkered past.

[Skeptic7]

16 hours ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

I agree and the US should start right at home with The Tyrant Creature of Mar-a-Lagoon❗????

[Freddy42OZ]

17 hours ago, steven100 said:

Why hasn't or doesn't the US go after Putin and Kim Jong and exterminate them as soon as possible.

Why not give Ukraine every available long range missile, fighter jet, cluster bomb, attack helicopters, and anything else to attack Russian hard and decisive ?

It seems the US are deliberately letting Russia hold ground on the front line and keep the war going ?

 

I'm not sure what the US is trying to achieve but if I poured billions of $$ into this war I'd want it over asap ......   ?   it's really getting strange that the US & NATO let it drag on ....

 

 

 

 

 

Are you really advocating for starting WW3 ?!???!!?!   

 

[Artisi]

2 hours ago, Berkshire said:

That's funny.  Russia hasn't had a free and fair election in decades.  Even if Putin was eliminated (by external forces, i.e., US), those in power will want to stay in power.  Now if Putin was taken out by internal forces (i.e., Russians), whole different ballgame.

Not much different to Thailand, those who were in power have, somehow managed to get back in power, even though they had to tolerate a few years of military intervention. 

[nauseus]

17 hours ago, StayinThailand2much said:

Not to mention that others (deputies, military, etc.) might react with nuclear strikes. (Quite plausible in the case of Kim's sister.)

Yes, nobody mentioned that. Well done.

[Grusa]

Where is 006½ when you need him?

 

Or the A-team..... Mission impossibe....... Superman......

[Artisi]

1 hour ago, yardrunner said:

I am  not suggesting it should happen but if you follow your logic then the Russians or North Koreans would be justified in assassinating the leaders of any country which provides weapons to be used against their forces. 

And don't think for one minute they wouldn't given the opportunity, how many Russians and Korean official / military guys have fallen out of windows, died or vanished mysteriously recently. 

Edited September 16, 2023 by Artisi

[TimeMachine]

The nuclear codes are tied in with their pacemakers. They must be kept alive at all costs 

[Chongalulu]

17 hours ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

How about informing yourself on WHO actually killed Sadam and Gaddafi? I'll wait...

[LukKrueng]

17 hours ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

It's not, and those (as many other USA involvement in souvereign countries) is wrong, and usually never ends the way the US thought it will

[Sharp]

If anyone should be taken I'd point west 

[ThaiFelix]

18 hours ago, freeworld said:

Are you suggesting extrajudicial murder of two different countries leaders.

 

That in itself is also criminal.

Thats why they have the CIA isnt it?

[ThaiFelix]

26 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Was it Liam Neeson?

close hahaha!

 

[ThaiFelix]

18 hours ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

Youre not still eating that pie are you.  And this is not the same.  Saddam and Gadaffi were taken out over oil, gold and hahahaha sorry, WMD's hahaha!

[The Theory]

18 hours ago, steven100 said:

Why not give Ukraine every available long range missile, fighter jet, cluster bomb, attack helicopters, and anything else to attack Russian hard and decisive ?

Because it's all about business. Do you really think they are after quick victory ????This war make some guys very rich. US military needs new advanced weapons, but where to dump all old ones ? You got the answer. Who paid for old ones ? Americans. Who will pay for new ones ? Americans. Who makes money ? Gun makers who support 2 parties. Who is the middle man for guns ? Example : Biden's son (and some other on the top). 

[daejung]

18 hours ago, SuperSaiyan said:

It's a terrorist attack because they are "civil leaders", not military leaders, the same way Zelensky is still alive today.

Russians tried to kill him

[daejung]

17 hours ago, steven100 said:

why wouldn't it make sense to get rid of them ...  the war would cease tomorrow imo.

A nuclear war would start

[SuperSaiyan]

5 minutes ago, daejung said:

Russians tried to kill him

RIght, by an airstrike once he visits some random location instead while he's saying hello to all the politicians right in front of his presidential palace. CNN much?

[Taboo2]

Because we do not care about those two men with micro sized members in their pants.  They are psychological deviants.

[Jingthing]

38 minutes ago, The Theory said:

Because it's all about business. Do you really think they are after quick victory ????This war make some guys very rich. US military needs new advanced weapons, but where to dump all old ones ? You got the answer. Who paid for old ones ? Americans. Who will pay for new ones ? Americans. Who makes money ? Gun makers who support 2 parties. Who is the middle man for guns ? Example : Biden's son (and some other on the top). 

Conspiracy theory garbage.

[Nick Carter icp]

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Conspiracy theory garbage.

Its a  persons opinion , its rather rude and dismissive just to post what you did .

   Kind of like Big Brother : Don't think or speak, just accept what you are told without question 

  

[Jingthing]

2 hours ago, Zapitapi said:

wishful thinking.. remember when they said 1 russias economy will crumble 2 they running out of missiles 3..4..5.. and none of the predictions have happened 

its complete BS

sanctions have backfired..ukr is loosing bad..bricks building and getting more momentum.. 

in short its a disaster for the western powers

Mostly false.

The Russian economy is in trouble. 

The ruble has tanked.

Both sides have supply problems with arms.

Neither side is losing badly. 

A disaster for the west?

It's been unifying for the west.

As far as Russia do you think it's a good look to go begging to North Korea?