Just now, Prubangboy said:

The women want a sensitive CEO type. But usually, the CEO is not all that sensitive. They want men who don't exist: 6 foot tall+, 100K+, and politically liberal. That rare guy will not be pounding some fatty loudmouth.

 

I would disagree,

Women want violent men, murderers, drug dealers, gang members for sex.

They might live with soft sensitive guys for the support/cash/asset stripping, but they don't really want to have sex with them.

I agree, at least at the extreme end. The average woman def likes to get a little dewey damp watching True Crime on Netflix, but few will actually jump into the gangsta end of the pool.

 

I have an inlaw who's gone to prison 4 times and impregnated 4 women, either right before, or via conjugal visits.

 

3 of those women have their kids supported by cops! So yeah, the Alpha/fux Beta bux model def has some truth to it.

 

As per Hotel California: We are all prisoners of our own devise.

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

While the feminist thing has gone too far and made women unhappy because unrealistic expectations are unrealistic, no man would like to have lived as a woman back in Victorian days. To be blunt their lives were <deleted>. They almost had it in the 60s after the pill was invented, but the movement got subverted by man hating extremists.

Intellectually they didn't need men, but the genetic imperative to breed was too strong, so they became confused and lost between independence and dependence. It's only in countries that pay them to be mothers so they don't need men other than as sperm donors that they can be "satisfied".

In enlightened countries like Japan women have even gone whole hog and given up on having babies and definitely on men. Careers and independence are so much more satisfying than some man constantly moaning that she won't let him give her unsatisfying sex, or having to cater to the demands of some sprog.

 

As always the above is my OPINION.

 

TBH, this feminism thing gets on my tits.

 

Was on the BBC www the other day looking at the footy reports. It was women's football, all over the place. I don't want to read about women's football. Why mix it up with the men's game?

 

Don't want to see ladies boxing and doing MMA stuff. If they must hurt themselves then artistic mud wrestling is good enough.

 

Women are the life bearers. That, and ensuring a good home for the family, is their role. Why are women so superior to men at some things? If I ruled the world, the very first thing I would do, is make female police officers wear dresses.

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Prubangboy said:

I agree, at least at the extreme end. The average woman def likes to get a little dewey damp watching True Crime on Netflix, but few will actually jump into the gangsta end of the pool.

 

I have an inlaw who's gone to prison 4 times and impregnated 4 women, either right before, or via conjugal visits.

 

3 of those women have their kids supported by cops! So yeah, the Alpha/fux Beta bux model def has some truth to it.

 

As per Hotel California: We are all prisoners of our own devise.

There you have it…. the extreme end. So many describe the extreme end as if it’s the norm. 

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

I think they're ready to bang.

Nothing to do with dominant or submissive.

Feminism teaches women sex is wrong, same as all the Abrahamic religions.

I don't get that. What part of feminism sees sex as wrong. I would have thought it was the opposite. That men are turned off by women who are open and proactive and opiniated about sex. That is what feminism is about. But also that men have to take care that there is consent. If approached correctly surely that's a reasonable thing. 

You often mention how the system did you wrong but you mentioned recently your last relationship in the UK was with a very young lady - an associate with your son or something - not my business but wondering if you may have come a cropper and lost more than you might have liked for reasons other than a feminist dominated court. None of my business though and appreciate one may have nothing to do with the other. 

Even dogs only have sex when the female is on heat. Other than that, if they like each other, they show it in different ways. Even acts of intimacy, such as play fighting; expressing closeness. 
But a few here just talk about the woman having to give them sex on demand 👀Nothing to do with mutual attraction nor even intimacy. They come up with all sorts of slogans and ‘rules’ they can pull together in order to justify their behaviour. 
Then there is the Red Pill, Blue Pill, Purple Pill crowd 🤕 😊

Come on guys… they are people. 🙄 It’s not that difficult. The problem is that some of you are so ‘rudimentary’ in your thinking about women. It’s true that many are totally delusional and want to live in an impossible fantasy land, but so do many of you. Moving to Asia enabled you to create a compromise of sorts. You have money, they need money. Bonus if you are not totally repugnant and you can have a pleasant existence together. That goes for either in the relationship. 

9 minutes ago, NextG said:

Even dogs only have sex when the female is on heat. Other than that, if they like each other, they show it in different ways. Even acts of intimacy, such as play fighting; expressing closeness. 

You should try keeping rabbits, they're up for it all the time, and not bothered about their 'partners' sex or even species.

They even try to shag stuffed toys. Mine are all girls, and they take it in turns to be the 'man'.

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You should try keeping rabbits, they're up for it all the time, and not bothered about their 'partners' sex or even species.

They even try to shag stuffed toys. Mine are all girls, and they take it in turns to be the 'man'.

Are they your main influence? 😊

Just now, NextG said:

Are they your main influence? 😊

I prefer the company of my rabbits to the company of women (or men for that matter).

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

I prefer the company of my rabbits to the company of women (or men for that matter).

But all their ‘activity’ is perhaps influencing your thinking 😊

I care for my animals too, but it’s even better with good human company. 

49 minutes ago, NextG said:

Moving to Asia enabled you to create a compromise of sorts. You have money, they need money. 

Agreed, guys who move to Asia for sex are pragmatists and sexual adventurers, not even 1% will ever even think of taking one week millionaire vacation.

 

As per Red Pill, they have found a beta bux scenario that they can live with. They want thin and friendly, that's hard to come by past 50 where they come from. A very imperfect solution is better than no solution. Guys that no one wants in the west meet up with women that the Thai's typically don't want. 'Can't fault it.

 

Typically, the more moderate they are in their woman-demands and age gap, the likelier they are to have a reasonable romantic relationship here. This forum is possibly unique in the world in showing successful Thai/Whitie relationships. I can't think of anywhere else where such relationships are not portrayed negatively.

 

Feminists are happy that these men are leaving the dating pool. They're like, "Bon Voyage, and don't come back". 

 

Google Trump voters can't get dates. Rightward men are pretty much sexual untouchables these days, at any age. They want to date leftward woman (for a greater potential of sex happening), but it's a hard limit for lefty women to even date a moderate -which how rightward guys typically describe themselves, just to get a swipe back. 

 

Women only swipe right on 6% of the men in total. And .01% of the self-described conservative men. Heading off to a place where most of the woman could not identify a picture of Trump is a very rational idea.

 

 

1 hour ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

 

you mentioned recently your last relationship in the UK was with a very young lady - an associate with your son or something -  

Gagging to hear this story and can easily match it with something worse (or better) from my own sordid past in return.

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I prefer the company of my rabbits to the company of women (or men for that matter).

Wonderful.

 

Have you ever been to that island off Japan where there are 1000s of bunnies?  My daughter wants to go one day.

On 12/7/2023 at 10:54 AM, NextG said:

Is that how a relationship was for you? Constantly moaning at the woman to have sex with you? Why else would you write such a thing?

 

Nah. I just thought that that was normal. When I discovered Thailand I found out how wrong I had been. No need to moan about it as they just did it. Some actually enjoyed it too- so unlike the western woman I thought was Miss right.

On 12/7/2023 at 4:14 PM, Prubangboy said:

Google Trump voters can't get dates. Rightward men are pretty much sexual untouchables these days, at any age. They want to date leftward woman (for a greater potential of sex happening), but it's a hard limit for lefty women to even date a moderate -which how rightward guys typically describe themselves, just to get a swipe back. 

Being a young fella before "feminism" was even a thought in a man hating lesbian, I never thought of people as "left" or "right". Didn't make any difference to whether they did or didn't, as nice girls didn't, and I only knew nice girls.

On 12/9/2023 at 4:05 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

Being a young fella before "feminism" was even a thought 

Yeah, and you made a good living at stage coach repair, I'm sure.

 

Women today are def more left than men. Leftist women are much more prone to have sex than trad women.

 

Trump fandom is a sexual near-death experience (unless you pay).

 

Reality is not exactly going your way.

On 12/18/2023 at 4:59 AM, Prubangboy said:

Yeah, and you made a good living at stage coach repair, I'm sure.

 

Women today are def more left than men. Leftist women are much more prone to have sex than trad women.

 

Trump fandom is a sexual near-death experience (unless you pay).

 

Reality is not exactly going your way.

LOL.

If I had asked anyone what "feminism" was back then, they would probably have thought it was girls wanting to dress up nicely.

Feminism came into widespread understanding in 1968.

 

I was 15. So not dating much -as a "young feller".

 

How old are you that remember shielding women from car's running boards possibly splashing their bustles?

 

Would you really steal tampons from a toilet to impress a date? Do you take sugar packets from Starbucks too?

On 12/7/2023 at 1:56 PM, owl sees all said:

If I ruled the world, the very first thing I would do, is make female police officers wear dresses.

Why stop at police officers? I'd ban all women wearing pants. Short shorts are OK though.

I have a day dream in which I win a billion $ in Lotto and advertise for a "fun loving lady" to be my partner. Obviously there would be thousands coming for the selection process, and my first action would be to ask all the women wearing pants to leave. I doubt many would be left.

 

It's only a day dream though as if I won a billion $ I'd be on the next available first class plane seat back to LOS. I wouldn't waste my time on western women.

On 12/7/2023 at 8:13 AM, NextG said:

There you have it…. the extreme end. So many describe the extreme end as if it’s the norm. 

I think it is the norm!

 

Back in the UK when I became locally known as a 'violent and dangerous man', i suddenly had my choice of women. It was quit extraordinary!

40 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Why stop at police officers? I'd ban all women wearing pants. Short shorts are OK though.

I have a day dream in which I win a billion $ in Lotto and advertise for a "fun loving lady" to be my partner. Obviously there would be thousands coming for the selection process, and my first action would be to ask all the women wearing pants to leave. I doubt many would be left.

 

It's only a day dream though as if I won a billion $ I'd be on the next available first class plane seat back to LOS. I wouldn't waste my time on western women.

You are an American gent TBL. When you say 'pants', I'll speculate that you are referring to 'trousers' or 'strides' as we called them in Essex (England).

I'm not keen on the Hilary Clinton types. Always have trousers on.

But by the by. Or is it bye-the-bye? Americans and Brits; separated by a common language.

 

Back to trousers. Why do ladies were strides? Fat legs? Hairy legs? Knobbly knees? Varicous veins? So! What is the solution? What about if ladies were allowed to wear trousers provided they hung a sign round their necks saying why!?. Not a great big explanation; no! Just one word; 'hairy' or fat' would be fine.

 

I'm no feminist antagonist. No way! My girlfriend of past years; Fatima, had a hairy back, as well as stupendous breasts. I encourage the hair growth. If I ruled the world; I'd have a National HairyLlady annual contest. Different sections; back, legs, arms etc. And the winners in each country would go forward to the big one. Just like Miss World. No Trans  obviously. Viewing figures would go through the roof.

 

 

4 hours ago, owl sees all said:

You are an American gent TBL. When you say 'pants', I'll speculate that you are referring to 'trousers' or 'strides' as we called them in Essex (England).

I'm not keen on the Hilary Clinton types. Always have trousers on.

But by the by. Or is it bye-the-bye? Americans and Brits; separated by a common language.

 

Back to trousers. Why do ladies were strides? Fat legs? Hairy legs? Knobbly knees? Varicous veins? So! What is the solution? What about if ladies were allowed to wear trousers provided they hung a sign round their necks saying why!?. Not a great big explanation; no! Just one word; 'hairy' or fat' would be fine.

 

I'm no feminist antagonist. No way! My girlfriend of past years; Fatima, had a hairy back, as well as stupendous breasts. I encourage the hair growth. If I ruled the world; I'd have a National HairyLlady annual contest. Different sections; back, legs, arms etc. And the winners in each country would go forward to the big one. Just like Miss World. No Trans  obviously. Viewing figures would go through the roof.

 

 

There are websites full of hairy women,not really my thing but whatever you like.

On 11/14/2023 at 5:36 PM, jvs said:

Has it gone too far?

Too much equality and too much entitlement?

They have killed chivalry and most feminists always seem angry.

Luckily not so much here in Thailand yet but in the West it is scary.

In the military, at the beginning, they wanted equality so that they could get field pay.  This was in the late '70s Once they found out that there were no showers that going to the bathroom was a marked area with a shovel and they had to stand picket that changed lol

 

The new breed of girls came along and thank god they realized and accepted that if they wanted it they had to live with it.

 

Then again you have the US women's sports team.  Even though they got great benefits because Men's sports have a larger crown and draw a higher viewership, they should get paid the same as men.  

 

Now, it is interesting to watch people like me gain Rapihoe complaints about how trans genders should have equal access to women's sports.  Wonder what she would have done if she had to compete for her posiiton.

Delete

16 hours ago, owl sees all said:

You are an American gent TBL. When you say 'pants', I'll speculate that you are referring to 'trousers' or 'strides' as we called them in Essex (England).

I'm not keen on the Hilary Clinton types. Always have trousers on.

But by the by. Or is it bye-the-bye? Americans and Brits; separated by a common language.

Not American by a long chalk, LOL, though I do refer to trousers as what men wear ( and I used to use strides in conversation a long time ago ).

I use pants as what females like to wear, given they have to be huge in the bum area, around here.

It's an interesting psychological problem as to why they wear them, and I never knew a pants wearing female well enough to ask.

 

If I can hazard a guess, it's because they are warmer in cold climates, panty hose are an abomination to wear, stockings are regarded as a man's wet dream, and doesn't every modern western woman harbour a secret desire to be a man?

21 hours ago, owl sees all said:

I'm not keen on the Hilary Clinton types. Always have trousers on.

Is this better for you?

 

21 hours ago, owl sees all said:

If I ruled the world; I'd have a National HairyLlady annual contest. 

 

 

Feminist or fetishist?

 

'Not throwing stones, I like a 70's style bush myself. I envy you shaving Fatima's back.

39 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Is this better for you?

 

Can see why hubby Bill gets so excited.

 

Got a pic of Monica by any chance BMT?

44 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Feminist or fetishist?

 

'Not throwing stones, I like a 70's style bush myself. I envy you shaving Fatima's back.

Shaved Fatima's hairy back?!?! Absolute sacrilege!

 

I liked to grab hold of it.

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If I can hazard a guess, it's because they are warmer in cold climates, panty hose are an abomination to wear, stockings are regarded as a man's wet dream, and doesn't every modern western woman harbour a secret desire to be a man?

Could be right there TBL. Leg warmers better.

 

My mum said never to trust a woman if she don't wear a vest. Kept that in mind through my life. Obviously that has limited by bed-partners, but at least I didn't upset mum. I don't like stockings much. Tights are a big no no for me. I like natural.

 

I'm not so sure about all western ladies wanting to be a man. But I reckon modern lesbians have that fantasy.