Jump to content

Social Media Uproar Over New Sanam Luang Sign Showing Two Foreign Women


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, stoner said:

 

is this not defamation according to thai laws ?  

No, it isn't. The target is farang, not Thai. So no defamation took place. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, thecyclist said:

No, it isn't. The target is farang, not Thai. So no defamation took place. 

 

so then defamation laws should not matter to me and i should be able to say what i want ?

Posted

This has nothing to do with the foreign women and everything to do with an authoritarian Government acting like dictatorships. 

 

Cities the world over will be horrible places to live in the future. Anyone who values freedom should go live in rural areas. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

You can see dozens of women similarly attired in Benjakitti or Lumphini this morning

They need one of these.

 

keep-off-grass-sign-s-7266.png

Posted
26 minutes ago, positivevibes said:

This has nothing to do with the foreign women and everything to do with an authoritarian Government acting like dictatorships. 

 

Cities the world over will be horrible places to live in the future. Anyone who values freedom should go live in rural areas. 

 

Freedom to do what is the issue. Live, shoot up, defecate on the streets, shoplift for fun & profit all good now. Plus a lot of other stuff.

 

Rural area, yup.

Posted
54 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

so then defamation laws should not matter to me and i should be able to say what i want 

Sure, you can defame, insult fellow farangs to your heart's content.

Do the same to Thais, especially influential Thais,and you are looking at hefty fines and a nice vacation in the slammer..

  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, thecyclist said:

Sure, you can defame, insult fellow farangs to your heart's content.

Do the same to Thais, especially influential Thais,and you are looking at hefty fines and a nice vacation in the slammer..

 

does the defamation law actually say that ? can you refer me to where you got this info.

thanks

Posted

Firtst of all they complain about the 2 women sunbathing and say there should be a sign telling tourists that it is forbidden to sunbathe in the temple grounds - they get their wish for a sign and now they complain about the sign! They'll be complaining about the sunshine next saying that it is tempting people to sunbathe! Thin skinned or what?

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I think the parallel definition for outraged netizen is "I am somebody that does not have any sort of life whatsoever". 

I thought that was the definition of many serial posters on this forum.

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

does the defamation law actually say that ? can you refer me to where you got this info.

thanks

Well, my comment is ,of course, partly tongue in cheek. But only partly. Decades of living here have taught me, that there is one law for Thais ,who can be very litigious when it comes to their reputation/profit/face, and one for non-Thais. Thais suing farangs and fellow Thais for defamation is a common occurrence, so is violence in regard to loss of face. 

Never heard of a farang suing a fellow farang in Thailand for loss of face. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

 

THAI NETIZENS blasted a new sign put up at Sanam Luang ground forbidding sunbathing in public areas as it shows a photo of two foreign women doing so with a crossed circle over it with this deemed to be inappropriate, TV Channel 7 said today (Jan. 19).

 

The sign put up by Phra Nakhon district officials is in three languages, Thai, English and Chinese, and has graphic images of a person lying down, a bikini and a photo of the two foreign women sunbathing with red crossed circles over them forbidding these two activities and wearing the skimpy garment.

 

However the online uproar arose over the photo of the two foreign women which although their faces had been pixelated was thought to be inappropriate without getting permission from them to use it.

 

This TV Channel’s reporters questioned the district chief about this sign and he explained that in designing it the intention was to clearly convey a message to foreign tourists about what is forbidden so that they immediately understand because violation leads to a 500 baht fine.

 

by TNR Staff

TOP: The sign that was slammed on Thai social media. Photo: TV Channel 7

 

Full story: THAI NEWSROOM 2024-01-20

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Yeah and maybe have to take out aloand to pay that 500 baht fine!  for that amount, I am sure there are probably folks willing to disobey the

signs anyway.  Just my opinion!

Posted
4 hours ago, 10baht said:

So clearly, you can sunbath for 500 baht?

Until they escort you away. And you get your 15 minutes of fame and have to apologize to the Thai people for being lewd and despicable.

  • Confused 1
Posted

Really ? Honestly, who can recognize the two women from the article??
What they did was wrong in Thai eyes , the sign is just a thoughtless childish act of some official.  Much worse than that around the country.

Just add it to “ Funny Thai signs” online. Have a look, some of them are priceless!!! 

Posted
14 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

 

THAI NETIZENS blasted a new sign put up at Sanam Luang ground forbidding sunbathing in public areas as it shows a photo of two foreign women doing so with a crossed circle over it with this deemed to be inappropriate, TV Channel 7 said today (Jan. 19).

 

The sign put up by Phra Nakhon district officials is in three languages, Thai, English and Chinese, and has graphic images of a person lying down, a bikini and a photo of the two foreign women sunbathing with red crossed circles over them forbidding these two activities and wearing the skimpy garment.

 

However the online uproar arose over the photo of the two foreign women which although their faces had been pixelated was thought to be inappropriate without getting permission from them to use it.

 

This TV Channel’s reporters questioned the district chief about this sign and he explained that in designing it the intention was to clearly convey a message to foreign tourists about what is forbidden so that they immediately understand because violation leads to a 500 baht fine.

 

by TNR Staff

TOP: The sign that was slammed on Thai social media. Photo: TV Channel 7

 

Full story: THAI NEWSROOM 2024-01-20

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Uproar:cheesy:

Posted
8 hours ago, arithai12 said:

I thought that was the definition of many serial posters on this forum.

Well I can only speak for myself, I do have a life, I have a very good life. I do rage on this forum occasionally, but I would never describe myself as an outraged netizen, I don't take this stuff very seriously and I'm mostly posting just for fun, and the sort of camaraderie that comes with interactions with other guys on this forum, many of whom are very intelligent and articulate, so speak for yourself. Ha! 

Posted

I guess that sign will do the job. Because I guess most women don't want to be in the press for this.

And this sign is a very clear reminder for anybody that they should think twice what they do.

Is it nice? Not really. But then, it is also not nice from tourist to disrespect Thai cultural heritage.

Would they also sunbath in the Vatican?

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I guess that sign will do the job. Because I guess most women don't want to be in the press for this.

And this sign is a very clear reminder for anybody that they should think twice what they do.

Is it nice? Not really. But then, it is also not nice from tourist to disrespect Thai cultural heritage.

Would they also sunbath in the Vatican?

 

I don't think there is any grass at the Vatican :cheesy:

Posted
On 1/20/2024 at 7:28 AM, ChrisY1 said:

Any more proof needed as to the xenophobic ways of many Thais?

We dont care what you think is inappropriate, only what we do lol!

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...