Jump to content

Federal Jury Orders Donald Trump to Pay $83.3 Million in Defamation Case


Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

What would be the legal basis for voiding the initial defamation verdict?

 

Do you think that Alina Habba is going to convince them of anything?

Error in allowing and disallowing evicencce.

 

Ms. Habba is  not on the appeal.

Posted
10 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

I'm about to find out - going for a free DEI Starbucks coffee.

How is it free?

The NYT, my aged buddy used to take at Starbucks without paying  because nobody cared.

He also threw away all his medical bills. A real Skel

  • Confused 4
Posted
18 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

In your dreams.

 

Each day trump is being shown to be what he has always been: a totally self-serving, childish loser.

 

The so-called billionaire will be appealing to his goobers for their Pornhub membership money, so he can afford to order his KFC buckets. As Everett Dirksen sort of said, "$83.3 million here, $370 million there, and pretty soon we're talking real money". And that is likely money trump doesn't have. trump also owes lots of money to Russian oligarchs that funded him---according to donny, jr and Punxsutawney eric---via SIVs set up by Detsche Bank. Those guys won't take kindly to being stiffed, and a couple of secret service agents are no match for Wagner Group thugs.

 

trump is also going to lose---even among his cult---as Nikkei Haley goes on the offensive and emasculates him:

 

"Come on, donny, show us what you've got", she said on Wednesday, calling him to debate her. His team probably fears that more than anything, as trump;s increasing dementia would be live for all the world to see and the gaffe machine he has become would be clear to all.

 

Nikki might even take more starch out of donny's sail than did Stormy Daniels, when she said, "Not quite freakishly small, but well below average". An emasculated, small Johnson kind of guy offers little through which his goobers can live vicariously.

 

trump has a limited appeal. He's never going to pull any new members to the cult any more than Jim Jones could do that now. The Kool Aid has been drunk by all those susceptible to trump's silly and banal siren song. He might retain the biggest losers among his cult, but increasingly those not fully afflicted are going to slip away

How is it that everyone loved him until he went into politics?  You've been brainwashed.  If anyone is drinking Kool Aid it's you by the gallon.  

  • Confused 4
  • Haha 2
Posted
11 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If ever proof was needed that the US "justice system" is a very bad joke, this is it.

If it was anyone but Trump would the penalty be as large?

Wish he would defame me. He can call me names for 20 years if I get $83m.

Posted
Just now, still kicking said:

I had an Irish coffee after I read the news.

I’m saving adding the good stuff for the ruling from Trump’s NY Fraud Trial.

 

Given the brouhaha kicked up by his fluffers over $83.3million, the $hundred of millions in the NY case should have a few heads exploding.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, candide said:

You seem to be very confused about this issue.

1. Fox News claimed elections have been rigged. Its staff and boss admitted they were lying about it. They did not believe it, as evidenced by messages and testimonies.

2. Plaintiffs and their experts stated there is no evidence Dominion machines have been hacked before.

3. The reason why one expert was able to write a malicious code was because he was given access to the system. The only other way is a breach, but it doesn't get unnoticed (see what happened to the Kraken lawyer and her team)

4. The breach by the Kraken lawyer's team is one of the may cause of the lawsuit, as they put the software on a server.

 

So the current concern in this lawsuit is not that the Dominion machines may have been hacked during the previous elections. It is that it may be easier to hack it since the software leak by Republicans in 2021.

 

"Evidence of it first emerged as a result of the Coalition for Good Governance case, and the plaintiffs argue the software leak makes it easier for bad actors to find ways to subvert the machines in Georgia.

“That software is still ricocheting around with all sorts of actors with all sorts of motives,” said Marilyn Marks, the executive director of The Coalition for Good Governance. Not addressing those risks before 2024, she added, would create “enormous risk of post-election chaos.”

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/09/georgia-court-voting-machines-trump-election-fraud-00134420

Use pen and paper. Show ID. Problem solved.

  • Confused 4
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...