9 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Nothing protects members of Congress from impeachment proceedings.

 

As for indictment, it would require overcoming a very high evidentiary bar.

True, yet Trump was indicted.

It will be interesting to see what SCOTUS decides on his immunity.

8 minutes ago, candide said:

Comer says! 😀

The House Republicans made a lot of allegations, but failed to provide corroborating details. Like the claim that a Russian woman gave Hunter Biden $3.5 million via wire transfer. Zero evidence that happened.

4 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

This is not about defamation. This is (potentially) about conspiracy to interfere in an election. Not sure they are protected if those charges were brought against them. 

I wish it were likely to succeed.  However, there is probably just too much wiggle room that will allow them to escape.

21 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

The House Republicans made a lot of allegations, but failed to provide corroborating details. Like the claim that a Russian woman gave Hunter Biden $3.5 million via wire transfer. Zero evidence that happened.

It should be noted that this woman, Elena Baturina, whom the Republicans and fellow travelers called a Russian oligarch, is actually an ex-Russian oligarch and has been living in exile in the UK for about 14 years because she's in conflict with the Russian government.

We need more of these topics with their hidden ‘MAGA Kryptonite’.

 

 

So, why were the Russians helping the Biden impeachment inquiry?

So:

- the first miracle witness, Luft  happened to be a bail didger, arms trafficker, and foreign agent for China;

- the second miracle witness  Smirnov, made a false report and has got his information from Russian operatives;

- and now  the last miracle witness, Bobilinski  gas been caught lying under oath.

 

Why do I see a pattern there,? 😀

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

We need more of these topics with their hidden ‘MAGA Kryptonite’.

 

 

Obviously  they have not received instructions about this topic yet! 😀

40 minutes ago, candide said:

Obviously  they have not received instructions about this topic yet! 😀

Especially the question why the Russians were helping the impeachment inquiry. The answer is obvious, even to a small child, but the MAGA types here are terrified of answering honestly.

 

I wonder why.....

On 2/23/2024 at 5:11 PM, HuaHinNew said:

So what, the alleged Biden corruption evidence uncovered has nothing to do with any FBI informative, nice try but no bearing on the Joe Biden impeachment case.

 

Facts for Biden's impeachment: 

 

Key Evidence:

An interactive timeline of the Biden’s pay for play schemes

Oversight Committee report revealing the Bidens’ dealings with foreign countries.

Biden Bank Records Memorandum showing the family created over 20 shell companies

Key Findings from the IRS Whistleblowers

Whistleblowers’ transcripts press release and links

Comer Releases Third Bank Memo Detailing Payments to the Bidens from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine

Sixteen Times Joe Biden Lied About His Family’s Business Schemes

Joe Biden Met Nearly Every Foreign Associate Funneling His Family Millions

Twenty-Two Examples of Joe Biden’s Involvement in His Family’s Influence Peddling Schemes

Comer Reveals $200,000 Payment to Joe Biden the Same Day James Biden Received $200,000 from Americore

Comer Reveals How Joe Biden Received Laundered China Money

Tony Bobulinski’s Transcribed Interview Transcript

Devon Archer’s Transcribed Interview Transcript

 

 

Ah......Links to false information from the cultists playbook on, "How to Spin Lies so that the Maga nuts will Buy into Them" (and send donations as well as buy sneakers that are made in China). Unbelievable, just how dumb are these people?

On 2/23/2024 at 7:11 AM, HuaHinNew said:

 

 

Facts for Biden's impeachment: 

 

Key Evidence:

 

Tony Bobulinski’s Transcribed Interview Transcript

 

 

 

Was Tony Bobulinsky wearing a ski mask when he testified? Do you think he's a credible witness?

I would not be surprised if the MAGA caucus re-opens the Bengazi case, so DT can campaign against Hillary.  Sounds ridiculous?  That's the modern day GOP for ya.

So far this election season he's been campaigning against President Obama, Pelosi, Hunter Biden, (who did I leave out?) and it looks like none of them will win the presidency

 

When it is mentioned that Jordan may be facing charges he gets this facial expression like he may be soiling his pants, I first saw this when he was put forth as a member of the 1/6 congressional committee and Liz Cheney mentioned that he may actually be called as a material witness.  It's always entertaining when a bully is revealed to be a coward.

https://www.newsweek.com/jim-jordan-joe-biden-impeachment-bribery-russia-1871889

 

Comer might consider a new career as a Walmart greeter, or hope he gets kitchen duty in prison.

https://www.newsweek.com/james-comer-resignation-calls-grow-after-russian-intel-bombshell-1871862

 

Hey, these links are to Newsweek, a true booster for DT.  So none of that fake news dismissal.
 

 

15 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Was Tony Bobulinsky wearing a ski mask when he testified? Do you think he's a credible witness?

Bobolinski previously claimed that he had incriminating evidence against Biden stored on his mobile phones. Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal and Fox News meticulously examined the contents of those phones and found nothing.