Jump to content

Trump found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records


webfact

Recommended Posts

Just now, HappyExpat57 said:

"The order does not restrict Trump's statements about Merchan and Bragg."

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-does-gag-order-mean-trumps-hush-money-case-2024-04-12/

 

yeah, sure, but it's still defamation.

I wasn't thinking about the gag order which is now extinct.

 

his statement is defamation, against a judge nonetheless. this kind of misconduct has to be sanctioned immediately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tgw said:

 

yeah, sure, but it's still defamation.

I wasn't thinking about the gag order which is now extinct.

 

his statement is defamation, against a judge nonetheless. this kind of misconduct has to be sanctioned immediately.

I understand the gag order is still in effect until his sentencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Here you go. Add womans rights and see how the female turn out the vote.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx

 

The problem is that Trump plays populist politics in every US issue. He manufactures issues that weren't even issues and then says he'll solve them. For abortion he will just come out and say its a state issue, thereby appeasing many and mitigating responsibility.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Even the Prosecution's opening statement said that they make no claim as to whether the Daniels dustup would have materially affected the 2016 election results.

Was it necessary for the prosecution to show effect or just intent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Fantastic news. Finally

However it doesn't stop him running for the Presidency, even from behind bars!  And all the stupid people who buy into his bull manure will no doubt still vote for him.  It is expected that the verdict will bring forward even more dollars for his campaign.

 

Only in America!

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

 

My take - his attorney threw him under the bus. "It was his decision."

Blanche also said that some issues for appeal were not just during the trial but written decisions Judge Merchan made prior to the trial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

 

My take - his attorney threw him under the bus. "It was his decision."

A simpler answer is Trump was demanding his attorneys made statements in court that were directed at the ‘court of public opinion’.

 

Many of the statements and points his attorneys made sounded very much like they came directly from Trump’s social media account.

 

Great sound bites to be fed to his rubes but lacking any legal standing.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tug said:

facts aren’t trump’s friends…..2 impeachments 34 felony convictions adjudged the worst president in history a rapist a charity embezzler a convicted fraud (trump scam university)

Facts aren't your friends, either...

Two impeachment acquittals...

Thirty four convictions that will be overturned...

No "rape" conviction...

No fraud conviction.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Facts aren't your friends, either...

Two impeachment acquittals...

Thirty four convictions that will be overturned...

No "rape" conviction...

No fraud conviction.


Facts aren't your friends, either...
 

Nor yours or would seem:

 

Thirty four convictions that will be overturned...

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BobBKK said:

 I understand that but how about misdemeanours not prosecuted, many years old, and outside statute of limitations? 

 


What are you talking about? These charges? If they were outside any statute of limitations, even semi-competent lawyers could get them dismissed in a heartbeat.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
9 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

They will be, that is a fact.

That’s the kind of prediction that is perhaps better saved for your days out at Aintree.

Hope springs eternal!

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

Sentencing is going to be very interesting. Trump has hardly endeared himself by accusing the judge of being corrupt, calling his trial rigged and a witch hunt, refusing to accept the verdict of the jury who agreed his guilt so quickly it caught everyone by surprise, continuing to refuse to acknowledge that he did anything wrong at all. No humility, no apology, only ranting against the American legal system and the judge that will sentence him. He just can't keep his ignorant mouth shut, and he is going to pay for that.


Fortunately judges are not supposed to be in the business of being vindictive, so I suspect the sentence will be at the lower end of guidelines and will probably not even involve jail time.
 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

New York convictions are rarely overturned, and those are usually due to DNA evidence. I don't think the convicted felon wants to go there.

So what?  He'll be going there.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gravity101 said:

The SC won't have anything to do with that hot potato if they can escape it I bet.  He'll have to get through two NY appeals courts first anyway. It's certainly not the process that the SC will hear it. They may eventually get a request to hear it but they'll give a reason not to entertain it.


Like they did with Immunity?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moncul said:


Fortunately judges are not supposed to be in the business of being vindictive, so I suspect the sentence will be at the lower end of guidelines and will probably not even involve jail time.
 

 

It isn't a case of being vindictive. It's repeated contempt of court and the legal process. He was already warned, I think, 10 times during the trial, and there are penalties for not recognising the authority of the court.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""