Jump to content

Amnesty International Condemns Dissolution of Thailand’s Move Forward Party


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, webfact said:

Amnesty International has strongly criticised the dissolution of Thailand's main opposition party, Move Forward, calling it a grave blow to human rights in the country.

..........and just what you gonna do about it??? 😏

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, stoner said:

i guess they missed the memo. thou shalt not talk shhhhhh about our decision.

 

First rule of the Fight Club....Errrr I mean ruling is not to talk about the ruling...  A ruling that squashes freedom cant be questioned...

Edited by redwood1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

MFP's new leader appears to be a woman .

 

Sirikanya Tansakun, is tipped to lead the new party.

Ms Sirikanya, the deputy leader of Move Forward, is not among the 11 party executives who were banned from politics for 10 years  by the Constitutional Court on Wednesday.

 



Move Forward Party deputy leader Sirikanya Tansakun addresses a press conference at party headquarters in Bangkok on Wednesday evening following the court-ordered dissolution of the party earlier in the day. Looking on are now-banned party executives Chaithawat Tulathon (left), chief adviser Pita Limjaroenrat (second from left) and Amarat Chokepamitkul (right). (Image from Move Forward YouTube channel)

Edited by nobodysfriend
  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, webfact said:

Additionally, law faculties at Thammasat and Chiang Mai Universities will hold rallies on their campuses, while students at Maha Sarakham University have planned a separate demonstration.

 

Now the action begins - like student riots of the past?

  • Agree 1
Posted

Should not the Constitutional Court be dissolving itself...? If they make descions that weaken the monachy (under the guise of protecting it)- then they are also guilty of similar offences...?? And by the way...if anyone needs a history lesson (albeit uk history)...we should remember that people's rights were born from the wrangling of the Dukes  on behalf of the people with King John...Was King john weakened? Yes . but it also strengthened the monachy and aligned it with present day thinking.Before the Magna Carta -the king owned everything or the church did.Reform takes place whether we like or not..so clinging to this section 112 as a fall back to protect the monachy is serving who's interests? It's disingenious. Generally speaking if the goal is to protect the monachy- which i think the majority want - if it's aligned with the people's wishes then it will continue and thrive with their support.Critiscism is part of the process in forming consensus.Whoever wrote that into the constitution either did it naively with the best intentions. But never properly considered the future consequences for so many sucessive govt disbandments.What's the econmic,social consequencies of this? It's certainly stifled investment and development.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...