Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, Skeptic7 said:

He can't even pronounce it, so much as define it. 🤣

Where as kamala doesn't have it in her vocabulary?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
17 hours ago, stevenl said:

Do i get this right, you're complaining about the media not doing something in a thread you started about the media doing exactly what you're saying they're not doing?

He's one of those "special people" who want to scream "FREEDUMB!!!!" while burning down their own house. 

  • Like 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

It seems that is what many American voters want.

Green Day predicted this years back. 
idiot nation controlled by the media.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

With no details. No policy.
And he does include the odd detail or two it could be described as an alternative truth. 
He is a plonker.

Given details. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
20 hours ago, riclag said:

You gotta watch this, short clip!

 

Jon Stewart called out Sen. Bernie Sanders, Bill Clinton and other major Democratic figures for hypocrisy at the Democratic National Convention .

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6360949866112

 

 

 

That was sooooo funny........you really should have warned people..........🤭

 

 

Leave it a day or two before you post again.....give people a chance to recover.

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, MalcolmB said:

Green Day predicted this years back. 
idiot nation controlled by the media.

 

 

 

No, sorry, that was a different story.

At that time Green Day and many of us thought George W is such an idiot that it can't possibly get worse with American politics. In the hindsight it is amazing how wrong and naive we were. 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And why does he do that?

Because the masses don't care about the truth. They want to laugh and shout and point the finger at all those others. The bad people.

Trump would have no chance if not so many people would enjoy what he does.

And Kamala Harris is also not giving out clear information what she wants and supports. With her it's about vibes and coconuts and some shade or green and whatever.

It seems that is what many American voters want. Otherwise, the leading American politicians wouldn't do it.

You need new and improved talking points:

 

Every four years, Democrats from across the country join together to craft our party’s platform.

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

American media is about money, like almost everything else in that country. Will that change anytime soon? No. 

So, what? It's always been that way.

 

Political campaigns are about bypassing the media, when necessary. 

Posted
4 hours ago, mdr224 said:

Facts are this country is in massive decline and its american medias job to deny and deflect the blame. Id expect a change in president every four years from here on out until the two party system becomes obsolete

You really hate America, don't you?

 

Trump calls America a "third world country". Which is why he will lose.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You really hate America, don't you?

 

Trump calls America a "third world country". Which is why he will lose.

IMO he will lose because in pandering to the Christian far right, he forgot there are more women voters than men. He made it worse by picking Vance as his VP.

 

The women voters have a choice between someone of their own gender, or a sexual predator who boasts of overturning their right to choose. Only the rusted-on head cases will be voting for him.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So, what? It's always been that way.

 

Political campaigns are about bypassing the media, when necessary. 

So what? Do you want politicians who work for you, or do you want politicians who want that job because they want to get rich and have power?

 

Nobody is able to completely bypass the media. They all try to own their part of the media, and they try to manipulate everyone. 

  • Confused 1
Posted

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/25/republican-fight-inflation-reduction-act-00176223

 

No Republican voted for the Inflation Reduction Act two years ago, and conservatives consistently charge that its hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for electric vehicles, wind, solar and other technologies will drive up prices, distort the markets and benefit China.

 

But the law is undeniably bringing federal money; private investments and jobs into communities around the country overwhelmingly represented by Republicans and the once-united opposition is fraying.

 

Other GOP lawmakers and groups are firing back, accusing the letter-signers of hypocrisy and flip-flopping.

 

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/25/republican-fight-inflation-reduction-act-00176223

 

No Republican voted for the Inflation Reduction Act two years ago, and conservatives consistently charge that its hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for electric vehicles, wind, solar and other technologies will drive up prices, distort the markets and benefit China.

 

But the law is undeniably bringing federal money; private investments and jobs into communities around the country overwhelmingly represented by Republicans and the once-united opposition is fraying.

 

Other GOP lawmakers and groups are firing back, accusing the letter-signers of hypocrisy and flip-flopping.

 

IMO in a capitalist society taxpayer money should never be used for private business. It distorts the economy and creates a skewed playing field. If the federal government has too much money they should either lower taxes or use the money for public good.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

IMO he will lose because in pandering to the Christian far right, he forgot there are more women voters than men. He made it worse by picking Vance as his VP.

 

The women voters have a choice between someone of their own gender, or a sexual predator who boasts of overturning their right to choose. Only the rusted-on head cases will be voting for him.

 

Women voters gravitate towards the stronger candidate, as Hitler showed in 1933. It's a fallacy to assume that women automatically vote left, they don't.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Women voters gravitate towards the stronger candidate, as Hitler showed in 1933. It's a fallacy to assume that women automatically vote left, they don't.

And Harris looks a lot stronger than Trump. plus addressing the desires of women on policy, like contraception, health care, day care, school lunches and other facets of life ignored by the pro-birth crowd.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Mid September polls will tell the story. That's if debates happen.

And if a prison sentence is imposed. Trump is already chickening out on the debate he asked for.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...