No 60 minutes and no debate, even on Fox. I have no link because it was just shown on TV.

Why does he need a debate? He is gonna win biggie.

7 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Why does he need a debate? He is gonna win biggie.

No interview no debate, just what you lot accused Harris of. The chicken was even disastrous with Laura Ingram. 555

60 Minutes host to Kamala 'The Trump campaign canceled an interview that they had agreed to participate in this broadcast' @ 19mins 30secs.

 

 

he already said he wouldn't do it unless they apologised for the way they behaved last time

3 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

 

 

I have to admit, the interviewer did a much better job than I expected. He asked good questions, even pushed back on occasion at the word salads he was confronted with.  

This interview should confirm that she is in no way Presidential material.  There were no 'gotcha' questions, no interruptions from an angry journalist. Yet she could not answer the most basic and obvious questions with any level of detail or effect. An absolute lightweight in far over her head.

 

12 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

I have to admit, the interviewer did a much better job than I expected. He asked good questions, even pushed back on occasion at the word salads he was confronted with.  

This interview should confirm that she is in no way Presidential material.  There were no 'gotcha' questions, no interruptions from an angry journalist. Yet she could not answer the most basic and obvious questions with any level of detail or effect. An absolute lightweight in far over her head.

See the mainstream media are not an evil cabal of liars. CNN debate was fair too.

It's hard for her or any politician to acknowledge failures such as Biden's poor record on  immigration for the first 3 years.  She gave the only answer she could in my opinion - note that Trump had a deal rejected after 3 years - things are better now - and look to the future. Call it a non answer but how to answer better as the media would make such a big deal out of an admission of failure and it may be seen as throwing Biden under the bus. But there are plenty of successes - the economy in 2024 is about as get as it gets with inflation a tad high but overall the economy better than most if not all developed economies. That's a big deal. 

How you can consider Trump anything but the lightest of lightweights is beyond me in terms of his grasp of policy. At least she'll be likely to work as part of a team of experts and not - like Trump - think she knows everything about everything. 

 

10 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

 

See the mainstream media are not an evil cabal of liars. CNN debate was fair too.

It's hard for her or any politician to acknowledge failures such as Biden's poor record on  immigration for the first 3 years.  She gave the only answer she could in my opinion - note that Trump had a deal rejected after 3 years - things are better now - and look to the future. Call it a non answer but how to answer better as the media would make such a big deal out of an admission of failure and it may be seen as throwing Biden under the bus. But there are plenty of successes - the economy in 2024 is about as get as it gets with inflation a tad high but overall the economy better than most if not all developed economies. That's a big deal. 

How you can consider Trump anything but the lightest of lightweights is beyond me in terms of his grasp of policy. At least she'll be likely to work as part of a team of experts and not - like Trump - think she knows everything about everything. 

 

I consider Trump better based on past performance. That is the standard metric when looking at a job seeker, as Trump and Harris are in effect seeking the job of President. Trump did well- booming economy, low interest rates, very real progress on domestic issues (sentence reform for certain crimes, funding for HBCUs), very real progress in foreign policy (Abraham Accords, shaking up NATO to stop riding Uncle Sugar's coat tails). Harris hasn't so much as run a lemonade stand in her entire life. 

 

If she wants to run on the Biden/Harris economy or the Biden/Harris border policy, I say good luck to her. Those are issues that the public sees Trump as being the better candidate to handle. 

 

And I do admit I was wrong in the run up to this rather short and highly edited interview. There have been flashes of journalism in the corporate media lately. But even you have to admit that the VP debate was a travesty.

7 hours ago, frank83628 said:

he already said he wouldn't do it unless they apologised for the way they behaved last time

Chicken

6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

I consider Trump better based on past performance. That is the standard metric when looking at a job seeker, as Trump and Harris are in effect seeking the job of President. Trump did well- booming economy, low interest rates, very real progress on domestic issues (sentence reform for certain crimes, funding for HBCUs), very real progress in foreign policy (Abraham Accords, shaking up NATO to stop riding Uncle Sugar's coat tails). Harris hasn't so much as run a lemonade stand in her entire life. 

 

If she wants to run on the Biden/Harris economy or the Biden/Harris border policy, I say good luck to her. Those are issues that the public sees Trump as being the better candidate to handle. 

 

And I do admit I was wrong in the run up to this rather short and highly edited interview. There have been flashes of journalism in the corporate media lately. But even you have to admit that the VP debate was a travesty.

He chickened out, that's the topic

11 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

I have to admit, the interviewer did a much better job than I expected. He asked good questions, even pushed back on occasion at the word salads he was confronted with.  

This interview should confirm that she is in no way Presidential material.  There were no 'gotcha' questions, no interruptions from an angry journalist. Yet she could not answer the most basic and obvious questions with any level of detail or effect. An absolute lightweight in far over her head.

Classic right-wing playbook at work here:

 

Setup: Offering a token compliment to appear fair, an improvement on 'I never voted for Trump' but it’s still really disingenuous—setting the stage for further criticism.
 

Attack: Using vague buzzwords like "word salad" to dismiss Kamala's responses, implying she’s incoherent without providing specifics. The “no gotcha questions” claim is a strawman—suggesting she should only be tested under unfair conditions.
 

Conclusion: Calling her unpresidential and a "lightweight," relying on personal attacks rather than substantive critique. It’s a mix of confirmation bias, strawman fallacies, and ad hominem, designed more to reinforce preexisting biases than to engage honestly.

He was busy honouring the Jewish victims of the murderous Hamas animals. 

 

BTW, Didnt see Kamala doing that. Shes already lost the Muslim vote, but doesnt want to offend her Jew hating leftist base.

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

He was busy honouring the Jewish victims of the murderous Hamas animals. 

 

BTW, Didnt see Kamala doing that. Shes already lost the Muslim vote, but doesnt want to offend her Jew hating leftist base.

BS and more BS.

8 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Classic right-wing playbook at work here:  [ . . . ]

 

To be succinct and a bit crude:  It's like when somebody makes a loud commotion about 'UGH!  Who farted?' you know it was them that did.

 

Every thing that DT accuses Biden-Harris world of is stuff he and his are doing.  Example, holding back disaster aid for non-politically aligned regions was HIS thing.

Trump refused to give California wildfire aid until told how many people there voted for him, ex-aide says

 

Trump’s False Claim of Stolen Disaster Relief Funds

 

The more you look, the more is revealed.  And why is he so adverse to fact-checking?   

 

6 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

BS and more BS.

Where are the pictures of Kamala honouring the murdered children? Naw, she just again whined about the Gazans.

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?539019-1/president-trump-marks-year-anniversary-hamas-attack-israel

13 minutes ago, bendejo said:

 

To be succinct and a bit crude:  It's like when somebody makes a loud commotion about 'UGH!  Who farted?' you know it was them that did.

 

Every thing that DT accuses Biden-Harris world of is stuff he and his are doing.  Example, holding back disaster aid for non-politically aligned regions was HIS thing.

Trump refused to give California wildfire aid until told how many people there voted for him, ex-aide says

 

Trump’s False Claim of Stolen Disaster Relief Funds

 

The more you look, the more is revealed.  And why is he so adverse to fact-checking?   

 

'he said' but no proof, kind of like Adam Schiff and his imaginary phone call

37 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Classic right-wing playbook at work here:

 

Setup: Offering a token compliment to appear fair, an improvement on 'I never voted for Trump' but it’s still really disingenuous—setting the stage for further criticism.
 

Attack: Using vague buzzwords like "word salad" to dismiss Kamala's responses, implying she’s incoherent without providing specifics. The “no gotcha questions” claim is a strawman—suggesting she should only be tested under unfair conditions.
 

Conclusion: Calling her unpresidential and a "lightweight," relying on personal attacks rather than substantive critique. It’s a mix of confirmation bias, strawman fallacies, and ad hominem, designed more to reinforce preexisting biases than to engage honestly.

exactly what you all do when referring to Trump.

 

how AN members post to Threads

 

insert misinformation+add personal attack+use buzzwords+ wait for others to rant and cry as you did+use more buzzwords and personal attacks.

Gee, Trump is a weak old lying clown.

Harris is useless. 
 

Voters have to decide who will be the least bad. 
 

Just shows how bad the USA is if these are best two people they could find to be President.

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, bendejo said:

 

To be succinct and a bit crude:  It's like when somebody makes a loud commotion about 'UGH!  Who farted?' you know it was them that did.

 

Every thing that DT accuses Biden-Harris world of is stuff he and his are doing.  Example, holding back disaster aid for non-politically aligned regions was HIS thing.

Trump refused to give California wildfire aid until told how many people there voted for him, ex-aide says

 

Trump’s False Claim of Stolen Disaster Relief Funds

 

The more you look, the more is revealed.  And why is he so adverse to fact-checking?   

 

Exactly, a textbook example of projection straight out of Nazi Goebbels’ playbook—accuse others of the very things you’re doing. It’s a tactic to deflect criticism and shift focus, making it seem like your opponent is guilty of your own shortcomings, also known as 'Accusation in a mirror'.

Accusation in a mirror - Wikipedia

5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

He chickened out, that's the topic

 

Your accusation is not much of a "topic", let's face it.

1 minute ago, LosLobo said:

Exactly, a textbook example of projection straight out of Nazi Goebbels’ playbook—accuse others of the very things you’re doing. It’s a tactic to deflect criticism and shift focus, making it seem like your opponent is guilty of your own shortcomings, also known as 'Accusation in a mirror'.

Accusation in a mirror - Wikipedia

Godwin's Law in action. A classic page from the leftist playbook.  

5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Chicken

you could well be, but Trump refused due to the last interview with Lesley Stahl, where she Refused to acknowledge the Biden laptop was real

52 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Classic right-wing playbook at work here:

 

Setup: Offering a token compliment to appear fair, an improvement on 'I never voted for Trump' but it’s still really disingenuous—setting the stage for further criticism.
 

Attack: Using vague buzzwords like "word salad" to dismiss Kamala's responses, implying she’s incoherent without providing specifics. The “no gotcha questions” claim is a strawman—suggesting she should only be tested under unfair conditions.
 

Conclusion: Calling her unpresidential and a "lightweight," relying on personal attacks rather than substantive critique. It’s a mix of confirmation bias, strawman fallacies, and ad hominem, designed more to reinforce preexisting biases than to engage honestly.

 

Aw, diddums.

12 hours ago, frank83628 said:

he already said he wouldn't do it unless they apologised for the way they behaved last time

He wanted an apology for something they never did! How about that.

30 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Where are the pictures of Kamala honouring the murdered children? Naw, she just again whined about the Gazans.

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?539019-1/president-trump-marks-year-anniversary-hamas-attack-israel

Deflecting a lot lately, the topic has nothing to do with Gaza no matter how much you push it

12 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Your accusation is not much of a "topic", let's face it.

Not accusation, fact.

4 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

He wanted an apology for something they never did! How about that.

she denied the laptop was real, go and watch the interview.. your whole thread is just you lying

24 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

exactly what you all do when referring to Trump.

 

how AN members post to Threads

 

insert misinformation+add personal attack+use buzzwords+ wait for others to rant and cry as you did+use more buzzwords and personal attacks.

It's your playbook al over again

2 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Not accusation, fact.

its a made up lie. 

1 minute ago, bubblegum said:

Not accusation, fact.

I have no link because it was just shown on TV.