Jump to content

Donald Trump’s New Tax Promise: Eliminating Income Taxes for Americans Abroad


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, timendres said:

It is what we call an "empty promise", since the US and Thailand have a DTA.

For ten years, I never paid a dime in US taxes on income earned in Thailand.

I am sure there are some who would benefit, but the number would be small.

I thought the DTA rules were that you don't pay tax on earnings that have already been taxed by the US>

Surely this means that if you are not paying tax in US, then the income stream becomes taxable ?
 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Increasing the debt to invest in infrastructure (Capital expenditure) makes sound economic sense.

 

Increasing the debt to cut taxes does not.

 

What really matters about taxes and spending is "who" pays for them and who receives them.

 

"The near unanimity in public discourse about the evil of deficits might seem to suggest that economists are similarly unanimous. In fact, however, they disagree fundamentally about whether deficits matter, and, if so, then why."

 

The main distinction is that the federal government, with its power to raise taxes and print money, faces less default risk than would a household that regularly spent more than it took in. In addition, our debt is mainly internal: owed by American taxpayers to American bondholders (two groups that overlap).

https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/751120.html

 

There is, fundamentally, no economic issue with the US deficit, that we know of currently. The US is fantastically wealthy, more wealthy than God. The US could pass a tax and wipe out the deficit in a short time.

 

The US deficit only matters in terms of who pays for it, ie future generations, to enable current generations to spend. It has political significance, but in economic terms we do not know if it has any. We do not know for instance what savings rate is appropriate. Is deferring spending for consumption in the future desirable? These are questions we cannot answer.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No, I mean he might be doing it to help out the already hyper wealthy.

 

 

 

So rather than focus on a large population of people that actually aren't that wealthy living abroad you cant stand the fact that a tiny handful of wealthy might benefit. 

Posted

There are a lot of people living in places like Tokyo, Singapore, London etc. that make more than allowed to that would have immediate increases in the quality of their lives. Some poor sod making $150K in Tokyo which is okay before getting sacked twice can now go on vacations. Digital nomads would love it.

 

Chomper made me think that although it wont move the needle this election in the future as more people move abroad it might help down the road. It would basically encourage people who have thought of doing it toi take the leap. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

So rather than focus on a large population of people that actually aren't that wealthy living abroad you cant stand the fact that a tiny handful of wealthy might benefit. 

That’s a rather twisted interpretation of my comments.

 

My argument is precisely that this suggested tax giveaway is targeted in favor of the hyper wealthy.

 

The vast majority of Americans expats already have a generous zero tax bracket.

 

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/foreign-earned-income-exclusion#:~:text=However%2C you may qualify to,deduct certain foreign housing amounts.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

There are a lot of people living in places like Tokyo, Singapore, London etc. that make more than allowed to that would have immediate increases in the quality of their lives. Some poor sod making $150K in Tokyo which is okay before getting sacked twice can now go on vacations. Digital nomads would love it.

 

Chomper made me think that although it wont move the needle this election in the future as more people move abroad it might help down the road. It would basically encourage people who have thought of doing it toi take the leap. 

There is no prohibition stating how much American expats are ‘allowed’ to earn.

 

Your poor expat earning $150,000 already has a $120,000 tax free allowance, so might have to pay tax on 1/5th of their income, assuming they do not take advantage of numerous other avail tax reductions, such as health savings plans etc.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
19 hours ago, Celsius said:

 

Indian, black or caucasian?

don't forget the recent new accent   start at 2:14 on the video  with Stephan Colbert

 

Posted
20 hours ago, JCauto said:

For once he's showing some sense and planning for the future. Like always however, it's for his own future, nothing to do with anyone else. Once he's been tossed into the dustbin of history after he gets his butt kicked in the election by an ethic woman, he's surely heading for Russia or anywhere other than America, a place he clearly despises as he says in practically every location he goes. So he's greasing the skids so that he doesn't get taxed in America from whichever dictatorship offers him sanctuary. 

 

By the way, where are those budget hawks that our RW friends inevitably turn into once the Democrats win the election? Aren't you concerned about the deficit all this tax-cutting will result in? You do know that Trump raised the deficit by over $4 Trillion when he was President, right? 

 

Mostly due to Covid. Biden beat that in just 3 years.

Posted

Not going to buy my vote with this. My vote is for sale, however, to whomever will add $200 or $300 to my Social Security check above and beyond the COLA.

Posted
23 hours ago, blue manc said:

I thought the DTA rules were that you don't pay tax on earnings that have already been taxed by the US>

Surely this means that if you are not paying tax in US, then the income stream becomes taxable ?
 

 

i paid income tax to Thailand, of course. Hence no tax due in the US.

You can still owe tax to the US, depending on the circumstances, but the taxes paid in Thailand offset those due to the US.

Posted
On 10/11/2024 at 3:47 PM, blue manc said:

I thought the DTA rules were that you don't pay tax on earnings that have already been taxed by the US>

Surely this means that if you are not paying tax in US, then the income stream becomes taxable ?
 

If the Thai tax rates are higher, you still have to pay tax, minus what you paid to the US.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, timendres said:

 

i paid income tax to Thailand, of course. Hence no tax due in the US.

You can still owe tax to the US, depending on the circumstances, but the taxes paid in Thailand offset those due to the US.

It's the other way around, the US gets the first grab of your money for US income.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...