'My God' is, true enough, a common expression....I made it into a joke in relation to using the word 'MY'......hence the joke.....selfish.
Three people attached laughing emojis so it wasn't too far out there.
I.Q.? Because you may disagree with someone, it does not mean they have a low IQ, and you have a high IQ. That, to me, is appallingly arrogant and not a sign of high IQ. Did you watch the dinner? Hugely funny and intelligent by Trump and embarrassingly cringe-worthy of Harris. I think it's very close, but silent voters might turn it Trump's way. It's exciting, and I will watch it all night. If Harris wins, I will not denigrate her supporters as having low IQs, although I have my suspicions.
Surely the "whatabout Trump though" message is what most of the rest of the country and the world is rationally thinking isn't it? Who in their right mind would want a lying divisive narcissist felon to preside over an the largest economy in the world?
Yes I got caught out very badly once by not surveying the area at night time
I'm talking 2-4 AM where directly across the narrow soi was an Ice crushing
"factory" during the day it was a nice quite (ish) soi but in the dead of night they turned up with huge blocks of ice on a six wheeler truck and very loudly offloaded them after which the crushing started an horrendous cacophony all soundproofing attempts where futile..and no I did not get used to it and earplugs are horrid when you hear the thumping of your heart instead..be very careful choosing a location... rent it first just in case is a wise move !!!
I believe it is since the important part is the age during the tax year. But I don't have an official statement from TRD to confirm this so I presume it must be regarded as opinion!
I'm not at all confused. I am well aware that Labour were overwhelmingly elected at the last UK general election.
I am also well aware that this particularly policy originated from the last Tory administration. If - as appears to be the case here - the current Labour government believes that some policies initiated by the previous Tory administration are worth continuing with, why shouldn't they do so? That seems to be an eminently sensible and pragmatic course of action. Indeed, to ditch policies for no other reason that the other party thought of it first would be childish and worthy of criticism.
I suspect that the reason that 'The Telegraph and you now decide to criticise the policy is - as you correctly point out - simply because a Labour Administration is now in government. Whether it is good policy or not is immaterial.
If you are so against this policy, why weren't you more vocal with your criticism of it last November?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now