Let The Fraud Begin

[earlinclaifornia]

5 hours ago, Peabody said:

For some reason, your avatar reminds me of your board name!  🙂

T&G I"s this the avatar photo you will have me wear if Trump wins the election? 

 

 

We have a bet and last time @Cryingdick lost but failed to were the one I chose for him!

[radiochaser]

5 hours ago, Peabody said:

For some reason, your avatar reminds me of your board name!  🙂

Now that is funny!!

[radiochaser]

11 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Thats why war is hell.

War can be hell.   One Radio Research unit I was with had an associated aviation company that would fly and make close range radio direction finding (ARDF) on North Vietnamese enemy radio transmitters.   When they had an accurate geo coordinate fix on the transmitter, a crew member would contact a group of B52 bombers circling overhead and pass the coordinates to them. 

 

The B52 crews were supposed to wait 5 minutes before dropping their bomb loads, to allow the ARDF aircraft to fly out of the area.   Several times they were right over the coordinate location and dropped bombs immediately after receiving the coordinates, nearly hitting the ARDF aircraft with 250 or 500 pound bombs!  Fortunately they missed.  

 

Not so lucky was one of our aircraft was shot out of the air in the vicinity of Quan Tri by a surface to air missile (SAM) during the Spring Offensive of 1972.  Sam missiles carried a 1000 pound war head.   Both during the war, shortly after the SAM hit, and years later after searches were made and they could not find any part of the aircraft.  Those were Beech King aircraft in the civilian field.  

[thesetat2013]

On 11/2/2024 at 9:31 AM, Dan O said:

Why are you trying to blow this up. Hahaha, name names of who or why. It appears he voted illegally and then for some reason tried to get his ballot back in the same day. Stupidity seems to be the order of the day. He was caught and will face some type of prosecution. Is it that big a deal for you? Are you afraid it will sway the election?  

You make light of this as do all the people who liked your reply. One vote fraudulent vote will not sway who wins. But they have only caught one so far. There are many more ways to fraudulently vote. Which will sway an election result. 

[pattayasan]

4 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

You make light of this as do all the people who liked your reply. One vote fraudulent vote will not sway who wins. But they have only caught one so far. There are many more ways to fraudulently vote. Which will sway an election result. 

 

Another accusation without a shred of explanation or examples.

[thesetat2013]

9 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Another accusation without a shred of explanation or examples.

Another reply without a shred of knowledge about election fraud. 

[kwonitoy]

 

[kwonitoy]

 

[Yagoda]

55 minutes ago, kwonitoy said:

 

Stupid Trump supporters. Just garbage

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, kwonitoy said:

 

Yeah, back when he was a Democrat 

[pattayasan]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, back when he was a Democrat 

 

Odd that kind of obviously self serving fickelty isn't disqualifying for you.

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Odd that kind of obviously self serving fickelty isn't disqualifying for you.

Like Reagan changed parties? Or like I changed parties? 

 

All the left has is lies. 

 

 

[pattayasan]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Like Reagan changed parties? Or like I changed parties? 

 

All the left has is lies.

 

That's so much projection you could be a cinema. Trump famously lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history. The NYT documented his lies, Are they lying about his lies and they really were the truth?

[Yellowtail]

20 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

That's so much projection you could be a cinema. Trump famously lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history. The NYT documented his lies, Are they lying about his lies and they really were the truth?

Your post is a perfect example of how dishonest the left is. 

 

You asked me if Trump changing parties should disqualify Trump, and when I say no, that that Reagan changed parties, and that I changed parties, you change the subject and start falsely claimed Trump "lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history" and then you lied about the NYT tracking Trumps lies. 

 

As a leftist, you are not really able to have an honest discussion. 

[Dan O]

2 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

You make light of this as do all the people who liked your reply. One vote fraudulent vote will not sway who wins. But they have only caught one so far. There are many more ways to fraudulently vote. Which will sway an election result. 

Your grasping at straws on this without any facts to back you up.  There will always be isolated instances of voting irregularities on both sides. But thats a long way from your implied result of having any significant amount to sway an election. Modern voting process is pretty efficient and large cases of voter fraud would easily be detect if its real. Imaginary voter fraud is impossible to detect. Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

Your grasping at straws on this without any facts to back you up.  There will always be isolated instances of voting irregularities on both sides. But thats a long way from your implied result of having any significant amount to sway an election. Modern voting process is pretty efficient and large cases of voter fraud would easily be detect if its real. Imaginary voter fraud is impossible to detect. Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

[earlinclaifornia]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/donald-trump-says-ufc-stars-34036558

 

Blue Wall Never Going Back

[pattayasan]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Your post is a perfect example of how dishonest the left is. 

 

You asked me if Trump changing parties should disqualify Trump, and when I say no, that that Reagan changed parties, and that I changed parties, you change the subject and start falsely claimed Trump "lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history" and then you lied about the NYT tracking Trumps lies. 

 

As a leftist, you are not really able to have an honest discussion. 

 

Your post included this quote "All the left has is lies". That's why I accused you of projection. Trump is simply the lyingest liar ever and you want to accuse the left of only have lies left.

[Dan O]

10 hours ago, radiochaser said:

I only found out my brother in law was registered to vote after democrats came to the house and was asking for him (he had moved by then).   I told them, that I was the person they were looking for.   I did get strange looks, it isn't a common American name after all.   I asked them how they knew my name and was told it was on the voters list (or what ever they said) ..    

 

When my brother in law came to my house I accessed the voter registrars website and with my brother in laws permission, searched it for his name.   It was there with him registered to vote as a democrat at my residence address.   He and his family lived in my house for 3 years before they moved into an apartment nearby.  

I call bs on your story. If he can read and write English he wouldn't need a translator to fill out documents at dmv. The dmv doesn't register anyone they forward the info to the registers office. Even if he said yes at the dmv to register they wouldnt be able to select any party. As for people coming to your house thats a normal occurrence as both parties can get mailing list with basic info. you are leaving out critical info or guessing 

[Dan O]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

Not up to me to prove someone else's claim. you can read the whole post here as a Iink is already posted above in the thread. If you claim otherwise then you post proof or shut up

[thesetat2013]

11 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Your grasping at straws on this without any facts to back you up.  There will always be isolated instances of voting irregularities on both sides. But thats a long way from your implied result of having any significant amount to sway an election. Modern voting process is pretty efficient and large cases of voter fraud would easily be detect if its real. Imaginary voter fraud is impossible to detect. Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

 

[Yellowtail]

10 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Your post included this quote "All the left has is lies". That's why I accused you of projection. Trump is simply the lyingest liar ever and you want to accuse the left of only have lies left.

And yet another perfect example of how dishonest the left is. 

 

You asked me if Trump changing parties should disqualify Trump, and when I say no, that that Reagan changed parties, and that I changed parties, you change the subject and start falsely claimed Trump "lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history" and then you lied about the NYT tracking Trumps lies. 

 

As a leftist, you are not really able to have an honest discussion. 

[radiochaser]

12 minutes ago, Dan O said:

I call bs on your story. If he can read and write English he wouldn't need a translator to fill out documents at dmv. The dmv doesn't register anyone they forward the info to the registers office. Even if he said yes at the dmv to register they wouldnt be able to select any party. As for people coming to your house thats a normal occurrence as both parties can get mailing list with basic info. you are leaving out critical info or guessing 

Do you now or have you ever been to a Pennsylvania department of motor vehicles office to apply for a drivers license or ID card?  You don't need to fill out documents.

 

"

In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act, commonly known as the “Motor Voter Act,” which required state departments of motor vehicles to provide citizens with the option to register to vote when interacting with the agency.

Some states have taken that mandate a step further and applied what is known as “automatic voter registration.” According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, automatic voter registration is typically implemented in one of two ways: on the front end, where voters need to opt out of being registered when interacting with the agency; or on the back end, where voters are notified after interacting with the agency that they are being automatically registered unless they take action to opt out.

Pennsylvania’s new system is most akin to the front-end system: The registration is automatic and takes the onus off of the voter, but is not instantaneous like in some states.

Pennsylvania joins 23 other states and Washington, D.C., which already use some form of automatic voter registration, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Twenty of the states with automatic voter registration implemented it through legislation or by having voters approve the change."

 

https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2023/09/pennsylvania-automatic-voter-registration-josh-shapiro-penndot/

 

https://www.dmv.pa.gov/Information-Centers/Laws-Regulations/Pages/Motor-Voter-Law.aspx

 

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, thesetat2013 said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

 

 

Is that evidence of actual electoral fraud that is or has taken place or just a definition of the term do you think?

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Not up to me to prove someone else's claim. you can read the whole post here as a Iink is already posted above in the thread. If you claim otherwise then you post proof or shut up

You claimed: "Modern voting process is pretty efficient and large cases of voter fraud would easily be detect if its real."

 

Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

[Dan O]

2 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

 

Posting the description of what voter fraud is doesnt prove anything other than to tell the definition. Thats a pathetic attempt to prove the misleading bs you claim.  Try again. You should be more worried about what the GOP is doing to block citizens and military overseas from voting. They have lawsuits in 3 staes currently and more pending. 

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

And yet another perfect example of how dishonest the left is. 

 

You asked me if Trump changing parties should disqualify Trump, and when I say no, that that Reagan changed parties, and that I changed parties, you change the subject and start falsely claimed Trump "lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history" and then you lied about the NYT tracking Trumps lies. 

 

As a leftist, you are not really able to have an honest discussion. 

 

You may well have relied no but that totally wasn't the subject of my response to you. It was abject hypocrisy of accusing the left of only having lies. Is that clear yet?

[Dan O]

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

And yet another perfect example of how dishonest the left is. 

 

You asked me if Trump changing parties should disqualify Trump, and when I say no, that that Reagan changed parties, and that I changed parties, you change the subject and start falsely claimed Trump "lied on a magnitude greater scale than any other president in history" and then you lied about the NYT tracking Trumps lies. 

 

As a leftist, you are not really able to have an honest discussion. 

Do some research and don't be a mushroom. Its widely available on how many times Trump lied during his presidency and from multiple sources. That doesn't include all the illegal things he has done his whole life and be caught on and charged with. Speak to those or stop posting bs

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

You may well have relied no but that totally wasn't the subject of my response to you. It was abject hypocrisy of accusing the left of only having lies. Is that clear yet?

It's clear that you are unable to have an honest discussion. 

 

 

 

 

[Dan O]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You claimed: "Modern voting process is pretty efficient and large cases of voter fraud would easily be detect if its real."

 

Show some proof with a link showing your claim or don't post bs.  Pretty simple, stop being a sheep. 

You need to prove me wrong a link was already posted. Use you brain. To affect an election thru voter fraud you would need massive fraud in multiple states to even begin to influence the outcome. A local fraud would only affect that locality. Do the math or don't you know how to count