Trump is back! He has won.

[Patong2021]

4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

   Biden had been on the wane for the last 2 years of his Presidency , Dems should have thought about that 2 years ago and got themselves a suitable replacement  instead of having Joe going on about him keeping on going 

 

The issue raised was the selection of Harris in July. Could have, should have, would have is not the issue. The fact is that the only viable option in July was a pivot to the running mate.

 

4 hours ago, mogandave said:

You are delusional.

 

Obama’s first two years the court was left and dems controlled the house and senate .This will be no different. 

In fact, the dems are much better at holding the party line than the republicans ever thought about. 

Conservative justices are much less likely to try to legislate from the bench than are the liberals. 

Many more Republicans went against Trump than Democrats went against Biden or Obama, and the left controlled the court for over forty years. 

All the court is supposed to do is interpret the Constitution as it was intended. 

 

The Obama Democrat majority was moderate and  hardly  "leftists". The Obama administration did pass all of its key legislation in the first 2 years of the mandate. 

 

Do you know what legislating from the bench means? It is an expression that gets tossed around alot, and funnily enough, Conservatives are often accused of legislating from the bench too. The Lewis and Clark Law Review describes  Legislating from the bench appears as a kind of catchall term, containing many threads of objections to judicial behavior. Judicial critics do not clearly define or consistently use the phrase, and in some cases this may be part of a deliberate strategy of muddling, serving the purpose of allowing the speaker to project different definitions and emphases depending upon the audience addressed.

 

Conservative justices can and do legislate  from the bench. The SCOTUS took on two cases where there were no injured parties and where the arguments were in large part motivated by hypothetical  scenarios. These cases were the  student loan  management program and the affirmative action suit. For example,  U.S. Rep. Eric Sorensen  was concerned about the impact of several recent Supreme Court decisions, saying the sitting justices are “legislating from the bench.” “That’s not the role of the Supreme Court,” the Democrat from Moline told WCBU . “The Supreme Court should be interpreting laws; the legislative branch of the United States government, we’re the ones to make the laws.” The court handed down a string of controversial decisions just ahead of the long July 4 weekend. Two addressed the world of higher education: ending the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness program and declaring affirmative action policies at major American universities unconstitutional.

 

 

56 minutes ago, tai4de2 said:

There are several US states that have one-party (D) government, the largest being California but also Washington, Oregon, Hawaii, and others. No checks and balances there either, but I don't see Democrats complaining about it.

 

Ok, and yet you are the first to complain about the state of California.

It is not healthy when there is no opposition or system of checks and balances.Many of California's  problems are a reflection of the failure  to have alternative views considered.

And the reality is that an individual state has neither the same  responsibility, nor scope of power that the federal government has.

 

Trump has a mandate to govern. Whether or not he governs responsibly is to be seen. he is a man who needs to have parameters set.

 

 

 

 

 

[Patong2021]

28 minutes ago, georgegeorgia said:

All I can think about it ,is those poor migrants who are crossing the border for a new life will now have this evil man stop them

 

If past history is an indication, the reduction in immigrant numbers will be achieved by reducing the number of visas granted. This was the farce that no one wishes to acknowledge and it is why business was opposed to Trump's immigration strategy, he says he will go after the unauthorized, but in reality he blocked the students, green card holders and migrant workers.  Good luck on deporting the millions of unauthorized people. The USA will require the cooperation of places like Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba, Iraq, Syria, et al.

[IC2000]

11 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

It's fascinating how a supporter of the most divisive, and the most hateful candidate for the office of presidency in the history of America can even talk about unity and harmony, after this man has run the ugliest campaign I've ever witnessed in my lifetime. Talk about hypocrisy. 

Beta much?

[IC2000]

40 minutes ago, georgegeorgia said:

All I can think about it ,is those poor migrants who are crossing the border for a new life will now have this evil man stop them

 

We can only hope that those illegally crossing will be stopped.

 

Thank you beta

[Rhys]

...a different Foreign Policy will take place...

[dinsdale]

The woke nutter progressive left is dead. Let rational thought once again dominate. The Democrats must abandon their blind support of the radical woke progressive left agenda and move back to the centre if they want to get back their actual base. The working class and middle America. These are the people that put Trump into office. Crazy politics indeed when a Republican appeals to the left more than what should be the party of the left. Having said this Trump ain't your typical Republican.

  

Edited 4 hours ago by dinsdale

[Kiwiken]

R.I.P USA enjoy you setting Sun. Now Putin will be more emboldened and Taiwan's days are numbered.

[dinsdale]

Trump will end with 312 (my call was 287. I was wrong). An absolute thumping and as I previously said a total landslide. I got some comments (negative) when I said there would be a huge swing in NY. There was a huge swing in NY. There were swings to Trump across the nation with zero swings to Harris.

[dinsdale]

2 minutes ago, Kiwiken said:

R.I.P USA enjoy you setting Sun. Now Putin will be more emboldened and Taiwan's days are numbered.

The complete opposite.

[mogandave]

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

The issue raised was the selection of Harris in July. Could have, should have, would have is not the issue. The fact is that the only viable option in July was a pivot to the running mate.

The fact is, there was at least two years that he was unfit. The people that pointed it out were called liars. But the people calling them out are the liars, and everyone knows that.

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The Obama Democrat majority was moderate and  hardly  "leftists". The Obama administration did pass all of its key legislation in the first 2 years of the mandate

And Trump is hardly a right-winger. 

 

I hated virtually allnof what Obama did.

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Do you know what legislating from the bench means? It is an expression that gets tossed around alot, and funnily enough, Conservatives are often accused of legislating from the bench too. The Lewis and Clark Law Review describes  Legislating from the bench appears as a kind of catchall term, containing many threads of objections to judicial behavior. Judicial critics do not clearly define or consistently use the phrase, and in some cases this may be part of a deliberate strategy of muddling, serving the purpose of allowing the speaker to project different definitions and emphases depending upon the audience addressed.

 

Conservative justices can and do legislate  from the bench. The SCOTUS took on two cases where there were no injured parties and where the arguments were in large part motivated by hypothetical  scenarios. These cases were the  student loan  management program and the affirmative action suit. For example,  U.S. Rep. Eric Sorensen  was concerned about the impact of several recent Supreme Court decisions, saying the sitting justices are “legislating from the bench.” “That’s not the role of the Supreme Court,” the Democrat from Moline told WCBU . “The Supreme Court should be interpreting laws; the legislative branch of the United States government, we’re the ones to make the laws.” The court handed down a string of controversial decisions just ahead of the long July 4 weekend. Two addressed the world of higher education: ending the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness program and declaring affirmative action policies at major American universities unconstitutional.

 

Ok, and yet you are the first to complain about the state of California.

It is not healthy when there is no opposition or system of checks and balances.Many of California's  problems are a reflection of the failure  to have alternative views considered.

And the reality is that an individual state has neither the same  responsibility, nor scope of power that the federal government has.

 

Trump has a mandate to govern. Whether or not he governs responsibly is to be seen. he is a man who needs to have parameters set.

Roe, the ACA, affirmative action and student loan forgiveness are and have always been unconstitutional. If you can explain how this is wrong, explain it, but do not post links to anything other than our founding documents.

 

Let’s not forget, it was the left that blew up the filibuster that gave the right the court. 

 

The left has half of congress, almost half the court, the press, academia, the administrative state, K-12, the tech industry, and entertainment. To say that Trump will be unopposed is ridiculous.

 

The left has lost all credibility. and people do not believe you anymore. 

 

The lady doth project too much. 

 

 

[mogandave]

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

If past history is an indication, the reduction in immigrant numbers will be achieved by reducing the number of visas granted. This was the farce that no one wishes to acknowledge and it is why business was opposed to Trump's immigration strategy, he says he will go after the unauthorized, but in reality he blocked the students, green card holders and migrant workers.  Good luck on deporting the millions of unauthorized people. The USA will require the cooperation of places like Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba, Iraq, Syria, et al.

Biden/Harris intentionally opened the border and let over ten million illegal aliens in and most went on some sort of public assistance. 

 

The left lied and lied and lied about it. 

 

A middle aged white woman in front her city council crying about being terrified in her own community and no one doing anything about it, and the left laughed and laughed and laughed. 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

8 hours ago, mogandave said:

Every thing you believe seems to be standard issue CNN. 

 

What facts support Trump being a fascist? 

I didn't watch CNN since decades.

I never called Trump a fascist.

Which again proves that you have no idea about me - as expected.

I am sure you see lots of demons out there. You know them exactly. The problem is that they are mostly in your head. 

[Henryford]

Great news for America and the world. Even the Pound jumped half a baht overnight. Well done USA.

[mogandave]

9 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I didn't watch CNN since decades.

I never called Trump a fascist.

Which again proves that you have no idea about me - as expected.

I am sure you see lots of demons out there. You know them exactly. The problem is that they are mostly in your head. 

I did not say you watched CNN, nor did I say the you called Trump a fascist. 

 

Do you agree that Trump is not a fascist, and if so, do you agree that Harris was lying when she said he was? 

 

Given Trump is not a fascist, what makes him unsuitable for office? 

 

What did he do in his first term that yiu did not like?

[IC2000]

Attached is the Aseannow beta-male Biden election night party coming to the realization that all their free tranny-care, medical poisoning of children, drag story hour, queer military, brokie ubi promises and the 80k they still owe on that gender studies degree ain't gonna be forgiven. The plan to stuff battleground states with illegals / criminals thwarted

 

 

[IC2000]

35 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I didn't watch CNN since decades.

I never called Trump a fascist.

Which again proves that you have no idea about me - as expected.

I am sure you see lots of demons out there. You know them exactly. The problem is that they are mostly in your head. 

 

Haha except the demons have been raging in full view since 2015 in the white house (2020), both senate and congress, the entire Biden cabinet, throughout DOJ, FBI, DOS, DIA, NSA, Pentagon, secret service, etc - and of course every MSM outlet. Absurd charges against Trump in three states.

 

A vast plurality of US citizens saw clearly through all that BS and voted against it.

 

70 million people believe you to be utterly wrong

Edited 2 hours ago by IC2000

[Smokey and the Bandit]

10 hours ago, Ben Zioner said:

Or they have higher IQs then Trump supporters.

Looks you are one of those bad losers!........🤣😂

[mogandave]

2 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Looks you are one of those bad losers!........🤣😂

It is interesting how the left lies and lies and lies and when you don’t believe them the most convincing argument they can come up with is to call you stupid. 

[Luuk Chaai]

17 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Democratically elected fascist dictator.

 

What's another word for Sore Loser ?    some thing,,  that starts with jing

[transam]

8 minutes ago, mogandave said:

It is interesting how the left lies and lies and lies and when you don’t believe them the most convincing argument they can come up with is to call you stupid. 

It is interesting how Trump lies and lies and lies and folk believe him, now I call that stupid, so, are you stupid....?  🤔

[Luuk Chaai]

17 hours ago, bangadang said:

 
Won the electoral college, won the popular vote; it's called democracy!

 

..  The AMERICAN PEOPLE have spoken  ..  loud and clear !

[mogandave]

Just now, transam said:

It is interesting how Trump lies and lies and lies and folk believe him, now I call that stupid, so, are you stupid....?  🤔

eh?

[transam]

Just now, Luuk Chaai said:

 

What's another word for Sore Loser ?    some thing,,  that starts with jing

Not so, a disappointed loser, big difference, try thinking...........😋

[transam]

Just now, mogandave said:

eh?

In your case, that is better for me than being called a troll, well done........

[Luuk Chaai]

18 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

This victory speech is going to be hilarious.

 The Biden's not so subtle message to Kamala as Jill left after voting   she actually looks ok in Red

[simple1]

12 hours ago, pedro01 said:

 

OK - so let me get this right...

 

They are looking to reduce costs in government by 80%

They are looking to eliminate waste

They will reduce the excess demand for food, good and housing by reducing the population by 10 million illegals

 

And prices will go up?

 

Just for a starter - 'reduce cost of government by 80%': BS

[Ben Zioner]

3 minutes ago, Luuk Chaai said:

 

..  The AMERICAN PEOPLE have spoken  ..  loud and clear !

Indeed, and in favour of a narcissistic crook, who advertises himself as a successful businessman. They have done so because they believe that he will leave them with a few more bucks in their bank account. Overlooking that the world as we know it might be gone once this unstable, loud, uneducated "leader" leaves the white house.

 

"Money first" and isolationism are just dumb. 

[radiochaser]

16 hours ago, JensenZ said:

You're a sore loser, but is there a need to be stupid? It's impossible to have a dictator in control of the USA due to your 3 branches of government. How do you propose it could happen?

 

As for the Fascist label... most people don't even know what it means. It's just a label people throw out to mean "bad".

When hear them call someone a fascist, I hear, I hate you so I am going to call you the worst political name I can think of!

[pattayasan]

4 minutes ago, radiochaser said:

When hear them call someone a fascist, I hear, I hate you so I am going to call you the worst political name I can think of!

 

According to Trump that would be "communist".

[Bday Prang]

17 hours ago, mokwit said:

All of you who were so convinced Harris would win, maybe time to check your susceptibility to MSM propaganda. They created a false image of popularity. It was just a media creation.

It was an attempt to create a self fulfilling prophecy, fortunately it failed