Jump to content

The Exodus of Left-Wing Voices: Where Will They Bleat Now?


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Last week, The Guardian, a cornerstone of left-leaning media, announced its departure from Twitter, or X as it’s now known, marking a symbolic moment in the shifting dynamics of social media. “The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for too long,” the paper declared, “that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.”  

 

The Guardian's withdrawal from Twitter is just the latest chapter in what has been a turbulent time for the publication. From counseling its staff after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory to grappling with a global political shift to the right, the paper has found itself navigating a world increasingly at odds with its ideological leanings. The same UK government The Guardian once cheered into power is now implementing policies that it strongly opposes, from changes in education to agricultural reforms.  

 

The platform itself has changed dramatically since Elon Musk took over. Where leftist voices once dominated, the platform now leans more conservative, a transformation that hasn’t gone unnoticed. The departure of The Guardian—and even the Clifton Suspension Bridge’s Twitter account—underscores how Musk’s ownership has reshaped the platform’s character. The bridge’s social media team announced its own exit, humorously leaving users to ponder how such a decision might have rattled Musk himself.

 

For some, Twitter has always been a microcosm of modern social dynamics, a space where vanity and debate intertwine. It’s a digital stage for self-expression, righteous indignation, and at times, outright vitriol. Critics argue that social media, Twitter included, has done little to enhance public discourse and much to foster division, bullying, and performative outrage.  

 

The Guardian's decision raises questions about where its audience and other left-leaning individuals will turn. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram still host The Guardian’s content, but they, too, come with their own controversies and limitations. Yet the issue remains: without a common battleground like Twitter, can those on the left find a new venue to engage their ideological adversaries?  

 

Meanwhile, conservatives and right-leaning voices seem content to remain on Twitter, where they enjoy what they perceive as newfound freedom from relentless self-righteous critiques. With their critics leaving en masse, the dynamics of the platform may further shift, creating a space more homogeneous in thought and tone.  

 

For now, the question lingers: where will these “poor lambs” go to bleat? Will they find a new haven where they can engage in the debates they once relished on Twitter, or will their absence leave them out of the fray entirely? One thing is certain—social media’s influence on political discourse is far from over, and its evolution continues to mirror the changing tides of society itself.

 

Based on a report by The Daily Telegraph 2024-11-19

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Confused 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Plenty of lefties still bleating on here. 

 

The Guardian is just sulking because they lost. All their propaganda failed. No biggie. 


The Guardian isn’t doing too badly, unlike The Telegraph it’s not seeking a buyer.

 

Which hyper wealthy rightwing individual will buy it I wonder?

 

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:


The Guardian isn’t doing too badly, unlike The Telegraph it’s not seeking a buyer.

 

Is that why they are constantly begging for donations on their website?

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

Which hyper wealthy rightwing individual will buy it I wonder?

 

 

Talking of lefty bleating. 😆

 

At least they still have one reader believing their drivel. 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Is that why they are constantly begging for donations on their website?

 

 

Talking of lefty bleating. 😆

 

At least they still have one reader believing their drivel. 


Donating to keep a newspaper out of the hands of the hyper wealthy rightwing clique that control the majority of the UK’s press isn’t a bad thing at all.

 

The Guardian have a lot more than one reader who have access to news stories and points of view you object to, which is why you continually bleat about it.

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Donating to keep a newspaper out of the hands of the hyper wealthy rightwing clique that control the majority of the UK’s press isn’t a bad thing at all.

 

I'm sure Owen Jones enjoys your continued support 😆.

 

They won't be missed on X that's for sure.

 

If I need to know what they are saying about various issues, I can always check your posts. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

Disney does the opposite and returns to X, perhaps didn't find anywhere else to bleat..........lol

 

Bob Iger’s Disney, entertainment firms resume X advertising after yearlong Elon Musk feud

https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/business/bob-igers-disney-entertainment-firms-resume-x-advertising/

 

That's a shame, I was enjoying not seeing the likes of Rachel Zegler and her inane Woke ideology in my feed. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

What exactly do they want? Seems they want a Time Machine to take them back to the days they had the loudest voice.

They want to go back to when they were protected from counter points by 3,000 censors.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...