Jump to content
Essential Maintenance Nov 28 :We'll need to put the forum into "Under Maintenance" mode from 9 PM to 1 AM (approx).GMT+7

Trump's Legal Battles and Their Unintended Legacy of Backfiring


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

The extensive efforts to prosecute Donald Trump have paradoxically reinforced his position of legal immunity, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. Despite the unprecedented volume of legal challenges Trump faced, these actions have ultimately fortified his protections, effectively placing him—and his successors—further beyond the reach of the law.  

 

As Trump prepares for his second term, the pursuit of justice for his alleged misconduct during his first presidency appears to have stalled. This pause has only emboldened the notion that holding a sitting or former president accountable is an extraordinary challenge.

 

In a striking development, Special Counsel Jack Smith recently moved to dismiss two pivotal cases against Trump. These included charges related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. Meanwhile, the sentencing for Trump’s conviction on 34 fraud-related charges tied to the New York hush money case has been indefinitely postponed, with the possibility of the case being dismissed altogether. Although the election interference case in Georgia technically remains unresolved, its progress appears uncertain at best.  

 

The most consequential outcome of these prosecutions, however, lies in the Supreme Court's ruling that former presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution for their "official acts." This landmark decision leaves the interpretation of "official acts" deliberately vague, awaiting further clarification only if and when another former president faces indictment. For now, the court’s definition is broad enough to grant Trump—and future presidents—ample confidence that their actions while in office are unlikely to lead to legal consequences.  

 

Critics, particularly among Democrats and progressive legal scholars, argue that the Justice Department’s delay in initiating prosecutions significantly hampered these efforts. They contend that a swifter approach following President Biden’s inauguration might have yielded different results. Jack Smith, for instance, was only appointed in late 2022, and his first indictment came more than six months later. A faster process, some suggest, could have allowed sufficient time to challenge and refine the Supreme Court's interpretation of "official acts," potentially salvaging parts of the January 6 indictment.  

 

While Trump now holds the dubious distinction of being the first former president convicted of a felony, the broader implications of his legal battles overshadow this milestone. After facing four trials and numerous charges, he returns to the presidency more legally insulated than ever before. This outcome not only redefines the boundaries of presidential accountability but also raises pressing questions about the future integrity of the office itself.  

 

Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Social Media said:

Critics, particularly among Democrats and progressive legal scholars, argue that the Justice Department’s delay in initiating prosecutions significantly hampered these efforts. They contend that a swifter approach following President Biden’s inauguration might have yielded different results. Jack Smith, for instance, was only appointed in late 2022, and his first indictment came more than six months later. A faster process, some suggest, could have allowed sufficient time to challenge and refine the Supreme Court's interpretation of "official acts," potentially salvaging parts of the January 6 indictment.

Apparently we have much to thank the Dems incompetence for . Had they been more diligent we might have that diabolical woman as president in waiting.

 

Thank you Mr Biden, good job!

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Social Media said:

The extensive efforts to prosecute Donald Trump have paradoxically reinforced his position of legal immunity, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. Despite the unprecedented volume of legal challenges Trump faced, these actions have ultimately fortified his protections, effectively placing him—and his successors—further beyond the reach of the law.  

Blew up in their faces, didn't it, KA BOOOM.

:cheesy:X 93

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Apparently we have much to thank the Dems incompetence for . Had they been more diligent we might have that diabolical woman as president in waiting.

 

Thank you Mr Biden, good job!

"...diabolical..." and likely drunk as a pig too. Have a listen and you be the judge. 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Social Media said:

the pursuit of justice

Its not justice, it's lawfare, plain and simple. Cannot spin this any other way.

 

LOL, they waited until Trump confirmed his intentions to run for office at which time soon after announcing his candidacy  Biden's DOJ commenced their lawfare to imprison Trump and prevent him from campaigning complete with constitutionally  illegal gag orders, VERY biased left leaning supporting Biden judges, Total hoax, bogus indictments, made up crimes, barred by statute of limitations, fed misdemeanor crimes morphed into state felonies with no actual state felony identified. Some of the actors involved in Bidens failed lawfare attempts to imprison Trump will /should be taken to task on this and jailed for their roles in this illegal persecution of ones political rival as specific deterrence to prevent this from happening again. There's no middle ground on this.  Trumps DOJ, & pending FBI nominee will see to this BiG TIME. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Social Media said:

In a striking development, Special Counsel Jack Smith recently moved to dismiss two pivotal cases against Trump. These included charges related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents.

The weasel better run while he can. Trump's a comin' for him. If he thinks dismissing the cases will save him all it does is prove he built his case on nothing but BS and hate.

Same will happen to all the other BS political persecution cases that were brought by the dark side to try and eliminate him from contention.There have to be a lot of weasels out there sweating now. We know who they are.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The constant legal persecution of Trump pre election was not seen as  justified by American voters. 

Thankfully his election will put a stop to the biased non stop legal proceedings against him. 

Posted
58 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The weasel better run while he can. Trump's a comin' for him. If he thinks dismissing the cases will save him all it does is prove he built his case on nothing but BS and hate.

Same will happen to all the other BS political persecution cases that were brought by the dark side to try and eliminate him from contention.There have to be a lot of weasels out there sweating now. We know who they are.

Quite so, they all thought that Trump couldn't win with all the skullduggery going on, boy are they in  for a shock!:biggrin:

  • Thanks 1
Posted

These charges have only been postponed, not dismissed. In the worst case, they will have to sit dormant for four years until a new president is inaugurated. After that, these charges can be reopened, and the trials and sentencing can continue.

  • Love It 1
Posted

Don't forget Biden and his top administration people are now imune from all of Trumps threats. The imunity handed down by SCOTUS covers  both parties not just republicans. So more empty threats from the KING of tariffs and inflation.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Paul Henry said:

Don't forget Biden and his top administration people are now imune from all of Trumps threats. The imunity handed down by SCOTUS covers  both parties not just republicans. So more empty threats from the KING of tariffs and inflation.

Trump only has to expose all the skullduggery in the Biden camp to make them pariah, even if they don't see the inside of a court. Got to be more bad stuff of Hunter's just waiting to be discovered.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

Announcements




×
×
  • Create New...