Jump to content

Thaksin blames Prawit for political turmoil amid coup fallout


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, JoePai said:

So the poisoned dwarf is slill alive  ☹️

 

The Devil has his number, he isn't long for this World, his chair is prewarmed and ready.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

I believe Thaksin is a bigger threat for the country than Prawit.. 2 coups already took place while Thaksin clan was in charge and now when I read aseannews, there are more topics of Thaksin than of the PM who should be in charge, but it seems that daddy is taking over the party and the Government and I am wondering how far and how long it will be accepted

I do think Thaksins blatant rail-roading of the political scene recently is going to garner influential enemies.

He should quietly stay at home and give orders via zoom meetings....

He's dodged a lots of bullets in his lifetime but it only takes a real one to get through.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Like a Shinawatra family monopoly forever ruling Thailand????

 

If that is what 'the people' want. Yes.

But the rich elite will never let it happen, even if the voters want him.

Same as PITA.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Like a Shinawatra family monopoly forever ruling Thailand????

Still far better for Thailand than ANY military coup government.

  • Confused 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

I do think Thaksins blatant rail-roading of the political scene recently is going to garner influential enemies.

He should quietly stay at home and give orders via zoom meetings....

He's dodged a lots of bullets in his lifetime but it only takes a real one to get through.

Why should he stay quietly at home when all the governmental decisions as the new reports come from him. Even today, 3 articles about what Thaksin says and what will happen. He is literally running the country from behind the PM. The news no longer says anything about how him in a 3rd party sense. He is the one saying things and doing them whereas it should be the PM. 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, John Drake said:

Prayuth was better

No military coup general is ever better than a freely elected PM voted for by the people of the country.

 

He only becomes a dictator.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, thesetat said:

Why should he stay quietly at home when all the governmental decisions as the new reports come from him. Even today, 3 articles about what Thaksin says and what will happen. He is literally running the country from behind the PM. The news no longer says anything about how him in a 3rd party sense. He is the one saying things and doing them whereas it should be the PM. 

It's not in his nature to be a back-seat driver, just as a leopard cannot change it's spots.

Posted
3 minutes ago, billd766 said:

No military coup general is ever better than a freely elected PM voted for by the people of the country.

 

He only becomes a dictator.

 

 

Agreed ! but who is the Freely elected PM ?????

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, animatic said:

Pita

Nearly correct !!  he was not elected !!  he was the head of the PP who won the election but was not voted in as a PM ! by the MPs and Senate

and for your info PM's are not voted in by the people, the people vote for MP's and its the MP's who vote for a PM

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

So teflon Tony still flapping his gums making political statements blatantly contravening His parole. Money talks in the land of scams.

  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Better to let the people have the party they voted for.

But the party that the people voted for could not form a government.

 

IIRC the party with the most seats at the last election did not gain an overall majority. Therefore they needed a coalition with other parties to become the government. As they could not form a coalition government in the required time period, (30 days I think), the party with the next highest number of seats gets the chance to form a coalition government.

 

PTP could and did, form a workable coalition government, otherwise the party with the next number of seats would be given the chance, and so on, until there are no more choices.

 

And it is all perfectly legal.

 

I suppose at that point there has to be a new election.

Posted
15 minutes ago, animatic said:

Pita

Not so, as his party could not form a government.

 

Now if it was a FPTP (First Past The Post system), then theoretically Pita would be elected PM, BUT as a minority government they may well have had a problem ruling the country and passing laws etc. 

  • Sad 1
Posted

Thaksin blames Prawit for political turmoil amid coup fallout    

 

TS better shut up and watch his back someone will soon stop him from Breathing .

That Will shut him up Permanently.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Not so, as his party could not form a government.

 

Now if it was a FPTP (First Past The Post system), then theoretically Pita would be elected PM, BUT as a minority government they may well have had a problem ruling the country and passing laws etc. 

Not correct,  the MFP did form a coalition goverment ! It was because Pita was not voted in, as the PM  by the military-appointed senate That it was decided that  the party would instead allow coalition partner Pheu Thai Party to take over.

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...