Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, riverhigh said:

All I see is a fat obese drunkard that trashed a homeowners's  vehicle barrier and then got evicted from his digs for his loud boozy behaviour. As expected, no apology from this drunkard for his behaviour and the problems he caused. Instead all we hear is complaints, complaints about the condition of his cell and treatment from police. Just another narcissistic self-centered pr&%K. Never taking resposibility for his actions and always blaming others.

Yeah good riddance to lardy

Posted
2 hours ago, jippytum said:

Sounds like a troublesome  Brit. thet deserved to be arrested. However the bribe story probably has some truth about it

A very 'dignified' fat Brit who looks more like 75 than 55, he probably deserved all he got and some. A month on the tread mill with bread and water would do him some good.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chivas said:

Whatever the rights or wrong over the original "detention" I doubt there is a single member here who doesnt believe that he indeed did pay a bung to get out of it

What a terrible slur - that is tantamount to not believing the police when they state categorically that they can find no evidence of prostitution in Pattaya!

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

returned to his digs only to be refused entry due to his penchant for loud, boozy antics, leading to further disturbances and yet another arrest.

The guy is a disrespectful, troublemaker. 

 

Lots arriving these days. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Dave0206 said:

Atm time and amount of  withdrawal would help to corroborate his story

I’m 200% certain they will find no record of such transaction. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Two things in the Brits favour.

 

1. Denial by the Police Chief.

2. The mention of an ATM machine.

 

Anything else seems irrelevant if the past form is anything to go by.   

  • Confused 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

What a terrible slur - that is tantamount to not believing the police when they state categorically that they can find no evidence of prostitution in Pattaya!

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

As far as payment goes  of course it happens. 

TIT.

Normally a visit to the 2nd floor and some negotiating takes place. 

I know people who have been through this. 

Same the Friday night Buchao checks for DIU...

A quick accompanied walk to the ATM and 10,000 later  all disappears. 

Along with the threats of reporting to immigration and visa cancellation. 

Or 3 nights in the cells until Monday morning court appearance.

 

They have a quota to reach. 

End of month and the pressures on to boost the coffers. 

 

As far as the cells go.

That's a pretty good illustration of the conditions...

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TheFishman1 said:

Totally believable corruption in the police department everywhere top to bottom

Why kick up a storm now. 

Obviously doesn't want to come back here 

  • Like 1
Posted

I paid 20k to get out of a drink drive matter a few years ago at soi 9. They even have a special Negotiation Room". Was released given my car keys back and met the officer in Jomtien the next day to give the 20k. He held onto some id/license as security. These incidents are the norm over here.

Posted
3 hours ago, jippytum said:

However the bribe story probably has some truth about it

 

Some? 

Posted

give him his money back and bang him up again then.   Is that what he really wants?  most would be happy to be able to buy their way out of a problem 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, jimn said:

I paid 20k to get out of a drink drive matter a few years ago at soi 9. They even have a special Negotiation Room". Was released given my car keys back and met the officer in Jomtien the next day to give the 20k. He held onto some id/license as security. These incidents are the norm over here.

and long may it continue

Posted
16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

IMG_5134_cleanup.jpeg

Picture of Andrew Hopkins courtesy of The Nation

 

By Bob Scott

 

A British tourist’s claims of bribing his way out of a Pattaya jail have been denounced as “largely untrue” by a Pattaya police chief. However, in a bid for transparency, the Pattaya police chief promises a thorough review of the evidence.

 

Police Colonel Nawin Theerawit, head of the Pattaya Police Station in Chon Buri province, issued a strong denial yesterday, February 3, in response to foreign media reports.

 

A controversial story had surfaced, alleging that hapless Brit Andrew Hopkins was forced to shell out 15,000 baht to secure his release from a Thai cell.

 

Hopkins’s ordeal was told in vivid detail by the British tabloid Daily Mail. The newspaper reported that the 55 year old was staying at an Airbnb in Pattaya when a late-night stroll allegedly went awry.

 

In a comedy of errors, he accidentally knocked over an entrance sign en route, rousing the ire of two local security guards who immediately descended upon him, bellowing in Thai.

 

Hopkins claimed that it wasn’t long before the local police arrived, swiftly bundling him into the back of a pick-up truck and carting him to a cell, where he languished for 36 hours amidst squalor: a picture painted with photos showing grime and overcrowding.

 

 

Seizing the narrative, Hopkins alleged that his release came only after an Italian man informed him of the need to pay 15,000 baht in cash. He described being frog marched to an ATM before his freedom was seemingly bought once two senior officers pocketed the cash.

 

Undeterred, Pol. Col. Nawin set the record straight. The kerfuffle allegedly started on November 22 of last year, when Hopkins, under the influence, reportedly trashed a vehicle barrier. Officers stepped in to calm him down, imposing a mere 100 baht fine before releasing him.

 

But the drama didn’t end there. Pol. Col. Nawin recounted how Hopkins returned to his digs only to be refused entry due to his penchant for loud, boozy antics, leading to further disturbances and yet another arrest.

 

Emphasising procedural integrity, Pol. Col. Nawin insisted Hopkins was subjected to due process, with all his belongings duly returned and documented through photographs. He staunchly defended the state of the cells, asserting daily cleaning and round-the-clock CCTV surveillance, reported The Nation.

 

Nevertheless, the incident now undergoes further scrutiny to ensure all concerned parties are satisfied. As the world watches, Pattaya’s reputation hangs in the balance, poised between reputational ruin and redemption.

 

Source: The Thaiger

-- 2025-02-04

 

image.png

 

image.png

Largely untrue?

Posted
2 hours ago, thesetat said:

Completely untrue. Everyone already knows about Pattayas reputation as well as the local police tactics. Nothing one man claims will change what years of news stories and incidents have proven already. No investigation into this will change their image. 

I think you are suffering from an irony deficiency.

Ask your doctor, maybe he can recommend a dietary supplement.

Posted
2 hours ago, jacko45k said:

Hangs in a precarious position based on the word of a senior Thai police officer, against the UK's Daily Mail!

Putting it that way makes it easy which story to believe.

 

The cop is right lol. 

 

Daily mail hasn't missed a crap hit piece never lets facts get in the way.

 

Thailand should sue for slander daily mail seems to thrive on one sided hit piece's 

  • Like 1
Posted

The whole incident took place last November.  This story was printed in the Daily Mail after he returned.  All readers advocating the Brit's deportation are barking at the moon; he's gone and will never dare come back.  Calls for camera footage at the ATM will be useless; it is highly unlikely RTP will grant permission to view, even if the footage has not been erased already.

The main question is do we believe a drunk as quoted in a scurrilous UK rag or senior officers in the Pattaya police force?

The choice is yours.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Is that the most important thing of the day for all of the foreigners that are living in Thailand I think there's like several several thousand just living in one province of one from one country but this is all the crap that is news 

Posted
2 hours ago, simon43 said:

 

Clearly he has no hap....  It can't be good if you have no hap.  How he came to lose or mislay his hap is not told in this news story.

 

I understand that he was also legless, although harmless and now --- penniless 🙂

Hap is an abreviation for happy! 😅

hapless
adjective [ before noun ]
   formal

uk /ˈhæp.ləs/ 

us /ˈhæp.ləs/

unlucky and usually unhappy
Posted
45 minutes ago, kiwikeith said:

Why kick up a storm now. 

Obviously doesn't want to come back here 

The Daily Mail pays for such stories.  Articles about Western tourists who have bad experiences abroad are hugely popular and attract tons of online hits.  Moreover, blubbering to the press can sometimes help in getting insurance payouts in cases where losses can't be documented.  No insurance company wants to read comments from readers that state travel insurance is useless because it never pays out.  Insurance claims are more likely to be approved in high publicity cases.

 

27 minutes ago, mikebell said:

The main question is do we believe a drunk as quoted in a scurrilous UK rag or senior officers in the Pattaya police force?

The choice is yours.

 Neither the British tourist nor the Pattaya police chief give a convincing version of events, but the cop's version has fewer holes.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...