2 hours ago, TedG said:

Liz Warren is an exampe of what is wrong with congress.   Old and out of touch. 

 

As well as lying her whole life about being native American and taking the benefits for that, and now being a traitor.

7 hours ago, Purdey said:

Did the crowd then violently enter the GOVENMENT BUILDING?

 

Ah, so you accept that the words 'Fight Back' are mere rhetoric!  For all except Trump.

QED.

 

By the way, I've seen video of a mob of Dems attempting to force entry to a Government building illegally (they were locked out) and they crowd around and abuse a lone security guard tasked with preventing their forced access. Quite abusive and threatening they were. I felt sorry for the security man and admired his bravery in facing the mob down on his own. These were not just any old civilians either, but elected members of the Democratic party. Shameful and disgusting. Hypocrites.

 

GET OUT OF OUR WAY! WE PAY YOU!

Cowards and liars.

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Do you really think Elon Musk should be allowed to do that?

 

I understand and agree that the government should be more efficient. But the way this is handled is just not the right way. Musk and his team have way too much permissions - as far as I know often without security clearance. 

I think Musk is the ideal guy to go after the same corrupt departments that went after him in an attempt to shut him down in 2024.

The tables have turned.

The boot is on the other foot.

The gloves are off.

Let them suck it up.

 

 

It's actually a great thing for Democracy in America and around the world. Corrupt officials and departments which use lawfare, and abuse their power and positions to victimise citizens, should remember that they may face the wrath of the law themselves one day.

3 minutes ago, Flyguy330 said:

I think Musk is the ideal guy to go after the same corrupt departments that went after him in an attempt to shut him down in 2024.

The tables have turned.

The boot is on the other foot.

 

 

Don't forget he(and Rogan) were liberals until the hivemind turned on them and the rest, as they say, is history. Hows that working out for the liberals?

Som num blinking naa

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Do you really think Elon Musk should be allowed to do that?

 

I understand and agree that the government should be more efficient. But the way this is handled is just not the right way. Musk and his team have way too much permissions - as far as I know often without security clearance. 

What does a security clearance have to do with reviewing records of USAID and other govt agencies?  If he does not have a security clearance, then he won't have access to classified data.

'Ocasio-Cortez urged Democrats to “blow this place up.” (The Senate).

Mere RHETORIC of course....

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/05/senate-democrats-trump-musk-resistance-012557

1 hour ago, Flyguy330 said:

 

GET OUT OF OUR WAY! WE PAY YOU!

Cowards and liars.

Lets see them try that at Area51.

5 hours ago, TedG said:

You are old and out of touch. 

TedG plays, "I know you are, but what am I?"

 

19 minutes ago, Peabody said:

TedG plays, "I know you are, but what am I?"

 

 

You only play stupid.   It comes naturally to you. 

If you believe these billionaires are fighting for YOUR BEST INTERESTS, well that's a very special level of delusion. Window licking level. Trying to bite your own ear level.

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

If you believe these billionaires are fighting for YOUR BEST INTERESTS, well that's a very special level of delusion. Window licking level. Trying to bite your own ear level.

The magas seem to be that delusional. They use the argument that super rich people can't be corrupted because they already have enough money. You have to wonder what planet they're from. 

5 hours ago, howlee101 said:

What does a security clearance have to do with reviewing records of USAID and other govt agencies?  If he does not have a security clearance, then he won't have access to classified data.

You think he's just reviewing? OMG -- so clueless.

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

The magas seem to be that delusional. They use the argument that super rich people can't be corrupted because they already have enough money. You have to wonder what planet they're from. 

 

Where is the corruption? 

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

If you believe these billionaires are fighting for YOUR BEST INTERESTS, well that's a very special level of delusion. Window licking level. Trying to bite your own ear level.

 

Saving tax payer money is not in ones best interest?

12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

5 hours ago, howlee101 said:

What does a security clearance have to do with reviewing records of USAID and other govt agencies?  If he does not have a security clearance, then he won't have access to classified data.

You think he's just reviewing? OMG -- so clueless.

Clueless window licker. I had to obtain a secret clearance to have access to lower levels of personal employee information.

40 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You think he's just reviewing? OMG -- so clueless.

Yes you are.  And no one on this forum knows whether or not he has a security clearance...nor if the files he is "just reviewing" is even classified.  You typically respond / post with vague statements or innuendos so state something more substantive.

31 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Clueless window licker. I had to obtain a secret clearance to have access to lower levels of personal employee information.

So you had a Secret security clearance to access personal employee information?  Was the employee information classified?  Typically a person is required a Public Trust clearance to access sensitive information such as employee information but they do not have access to classified information.  The position you are hired for may require getting a Secret clearance but not because of your job duties to access employee information.  Clueless window licker?  You must be in a teenager 😄 

The woman lied about being native american. She should get thrown out for that alone

11 minutes ago, howlee101 said:

So you had a Secret security clearance to access personal employee information?  Was the employee information classified?  Typically a person is required a Public Trust clearance to access sensitive information such as employee information but they do not have access to classified information.  The position you are hired for may require getting a Secret clearance but not because of your job duties to access employee information.  Clueless window licker?  You must be in a teenager 😄 

You shouldn't make foolish comments on things you are clueless about.

Remember, if you remain silent, no one is sure whether or not you're a fool. Posts like this prove you are.

38 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

You shouldn't make foolish comments on things you are clueless about.

Remember, if you remain silent, no one is sure whether or not you're a fool. Posts like this prove you are.

Pot meet kettle. 

What is Warren's complaint other than I hate Trump? 

16 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Have you considered that the above is true and not in the interest of American people? 

No, he is not seizing power, although I question some of his tactics. The end result will end up cutting a lot of wasteful spending and outright corruption.  Better to take the medicine now before the disease becomes terminal.

7 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

 

Ah, so you accept that the words 'Fight Back' are mere rhetoric!  For all except Trump.

QED.

 

By the way, I've seen video of a mob of Dems attempting to force entry to a Government building illegally (they were locked out) and they crowd around and abuse a lone security guard tasked with preventing their forced access. Quite abusive and threatening they were. I felt sorry for the security man and admired his bravery in facing the mob down on his own. These were not just any old civilians either, but elected members of the Democratic party. Shameful and disgusting. Hypocrites.

Democrats are exempt from the rules.  The rules do not apply to them.  Don't you know that?

8 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

No, he is not seizing power, although I question some of his tactics. The end result will end up cutting a lot of wasteful spending and outright corruption.  Better to take the medicine now before the disease becomes terminal.

Deep cuts.

Less services to the American people.

Saved money?

No.

Money to be used to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.

These idiots think government is a business.

Nope.

It's about serving the American people. They just want to screw the American people.

As far as illegally seizing power. Yes they are and we are soon headed to a constitutional crisis. The fascist Trump regime is already ignoring court orders on their radical illegal unconstitutional actions. So what recourse is there? Well in normal times the U.S. justice department would send in Marshals. But Trump has installed a yes lady who will do nothing of the kind. So the rule of law under Trump can't be enforced. 

Also to add to the dystopian new reality, there are deep cuts to the FBI and CIA. That means it's almost definite there will be major terrorist attacks including cyber. So then what happens? Trump declares martial law and installs a total dictatorship. We've seen this before in other countries. Morons thinking it can't happen in the U.S. It is happending right now, and rapidly. 

 

13 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Absolutely spot on, some of the things that Trump is doing are good, but the way he is going about it is all wrong. The man is a huge bull in a China closet in his approach to everything in life. Expect a lot of destruction, and not the good kind. 

Agree.  Unfortunately, there will be collateral damage, but the benefits will out way most of it. 

Just now, Hawaiian said:

Agree.  Unfortunately, there will be collateral damage, but the benefits will out way most of it. 

Mao said the same thing when he did the cultural revolution.

 

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Deep cuts.

Less services to the American people.

Saved money?

No.

Money to be used to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.

These idiots think government is a business.

Nope.

It's about serving the American people. They just want to screw the American people.

As far as illegally seizing power. Yes they are and we are soon headed to a constitutional crisis. The fascist Trump regime is already ignoring court orders on their radical illegal unconstitutional actions. So what recourse is there? Well in normal times the U.S. justice department would send in Marshals. But Trump has installed a yes lady who will do nothing of the kind. So the rule of law under Trump can't be enforced. 

Also to add to the dystopian new reality, there are deep cuts to the FBI and CIA. That means it's almost definite there will be major terrorist attacks including cyber. So then what happens? Trump declares martial law and installs a total dictatorship. We've seen this before in other countries. Morons thinking it can't happen in the U.S. It is happending right now, and rapidly. 

 

You must have an awfully large crystal ball.  Is it the same one that predicted Kamala Harris would beat Donald Trump?

And your Chicken Little warnings are becoming old.

Just now, Hawaiian said:

You must have an awfully large crystal ball.  Is it the same one that predicted Kamala Harris would beat Donald Trump?

And your Chicken Little warnings are becoming old.

Nothing to do with election predictions. What a lame response.

It's obvious that you're simply not paying attention and/or you're deep in the maga bubble and do not care.

 

As far as what Trump voters wanted.

They most strongly wanted lower prices and mass deportations.

Nothing actually the reverse on prices and even the deportations have turned out to be mostly fascism theater.

They also wanted to scapegoat trans people and they did get that.

With maga cruelty is the point.

The majority of Trump voters didn't want the total chaos and insanity that they're getting!

Annex Gaza? Come on, man, we've got a total madman and his bizarro sidekick Musk in office.