Attorney General Reveals Epstein Client List Under Review Amid Trump’s Directive

[Social Media]

 

During an appearance on Fox News on Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed that she is actively reviewing Jeffrey Epstein’s client list.  

"It's sitting on my desk right now to review," Bondi stated. "That's been a directive by President [Donald] Trump."  

 

Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, was found dead in his jail cell at New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. His death, officially ruled a suicide, sparked a flurry of conspiracy theories, largely due to his known connections to high-profile figures in politics, business, and royalty.  

 

While hundreds of court documents have already been unsealed—containing names such as former President Bill Clinton, Britain’s Prince Andrew, and Trump himself—many of those listed were not accused of wrongdoing. The released records included the names of victims, Epstein’s employees, and individuals with only a tangential connection to the case. The anticipated list of alleged clients tied to Epstein’s sex trafficking operation has yet to be made public, leading to widespread speculation about who it might implicate.  

 

On the campaign trail, Trump previously hinted at his willingness to release the so-called Epstein “client list.”  

 

Fox News host John Roberts pressed Bondi on Friday about whether she had encountered any surprises in the documents.  "Not yet," Bondi replied.  

 

She also addressed the topic during a conversation with conservative commentator Benny Johnson at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), where she reaffirmed that Trump had given clear instructions on the matter.  

 

"I was briefed on that yesterday. I can't talk about that publicly, but President Trump has given a very strong directive and that's going to be followed," Bondi stated. "It involves a lot of documents."  

 

When Johnson asked if Americans could expect real action, Bondi confidently responded, "Donald Trump doesn't make empty promises. I think promises made, promises kept. And that's why we're all there to carry out his directive about making America safe and prosperous."  

 

During her Fox News interview, Bondi also revealed that, per Trump’s orders, she is reviewing files related to the assassinations of former President John F. Kennedy and civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.  

 

On January 23, Trump signed an executive order directing the attorney general and the director of national intelligence to devise a plan for the "full and complete release" of documents concerning the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, King Jr., and Senator Robert Kennedy. The order emphasized that transparency is in the public's interest.  

 

"Their families and the American people deserve transparency and truth. It is in the national interest to finally release all records related to these assassinations without delay," the executive order states.  

 

Bondi has previously spoken out against individuals attempting to keep their names hidden in Epstein-related documents. In a Fox News interview last November, she said, "Anyone named in these documents who is still fighting to keep their names private... they have no legal basis to do so unless they're a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant."  

 

Trump has maintained that he never visited Epstein’s private island, where prosecutors allege Epstein’s abuse of underage girls took place. During a podcast interview in September, he was asked why the names of those who had visited the island remain undisclosed.  

 

"Very interesting," Trump responded. "I would certainly take a look at" releasing that information.  

 

For now, the Trump administration continues to review the potential release of the sealed documents.

 

Based on a report by Newsweek  2025-02-24

 

 

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

Why not just publish it and let us all see?!

 

 

[Tug]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Why not just publish it and let us all see?!

 

 

Most likely to sanitize it for the felons sake

[JonnyF]

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Why not just publish it and let us all see?!

 

 

 

Be careful what you wish for. 

[Chomper Higgot]

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Be careful what you wish for. 

I’m up for it Jonny.

 

I’ve consistently argued for justice without favor. 

 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

Please also publish who created Epstein and set this all up.

It seems his story just does not add up.

[OneMoreFarang]

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Why not just publish it and let us all see?!

 

That would be great.

But I think we should also keep in mind that not everybody who knew Epstein and not ever everybody who was on his island is guilty. 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

That would be great.

But I think we should also keep in mind that not everybody who knew Epstein and not ever everybody who was on his island is guilty. 

That’s fine.

 

But let them explain themselves out in the open.

[spidermike007]

Either this is totally fake news or this will be a very selective review, as many of us are aware of the fact that Trump and Epstein were very close friends for over a decade, and Trump attended many of Epsteins "events" at his mansion, and quite possibly on Orgy Island, so this is likely a smoke screen. 

 

Epstein and Trump had been good friends in the late 1980s and 1990s—Epstein, in fact, told Wolff that he had been “Donald’s closest friend for ten years” before the friendship fell apart after a fight over a property in Palm Beach. And Wolff recorded what he said was around one hundred hours of conversation with Epstein, which included discussions about “his long-standing, deep relationship” with Trump, as well as the “inner workings of the Trump White House,” to which Epstein, somewhat mysteriously, seemed privy.

 

https://yalereview.org/article/michael-wolff-donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-interview

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

That would be great.

But I think we should also keep in mind that not everybody who knew Epstein and not ever everybody who was on his island is guilty. 

Do you think the average man who visited Orgy Island just hung out by the pool on the lounge chairs? I would put the level of guilt of the Men Who agreed to visit Orgy Island at 95%. Weather or not it was with underaged women, or just simply consensual sex with the harem that Epstein supplied is a different story.