Drunken foreign trouble making thug gets bottle smashed over his head.

[pomchop]

On 4/5/2025 at 10:26 AM, ujayujay said:

Fat Falang starts the Fight......Thais cowards cannot fight 1:1 as usual 

Watch the fb video as to who started it all....and fat falang is twice the size of the thai guy but don't let that stop u from blaming thais jumping it to level the field...so it's ok for fat falang to be big tough guy and start a fight with a guy half his size but not ok for the small guys friends to jump in and teach fat falang a lesson?

 

fat falang brought a big gut and no brain to a fight and people somehow blame the thais?  

[Scouse123]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Jomtien isn't Pattaya. No bar scene to talk of, loads of condos and since the sea got polluted there too, not much reason to bother visiting except immigration.

 

I know Jomtien very well, thanks.

 

And Bang Saray.

[Dan O]

1 hour ago, MalcolmB said:

Similar to the Brit who was throwing bottles of petrol around, stealing knives and motorbikes and pushing children off motorbikes yesterday in Phuket.

We were not there, probably those Thai children had done something to make the Brit react right?
 

 

That's the stupidist analogy anyone could ever make. Not even close to being comparable.  You really should at least try to use your brain sometimes. 

[MalcolmB]

25 minutes ago, Dan O said:

You really should at least try to use your brain sometimes. 

Says the guy who can not speak Thai despite living in Thailand.

Get teerak to translate what happened for you.

[Dan O]

45 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Says the guy who can not speak Thai despite living in Thailand.

Get teerak to translate what happened for you.

You have no idea if I can speak thai or not. You post moronic bs when called out for your nonsensical posts. 

[SMIAI]

@MalcolmB There were at least two locals who were in agreement with the foreigner. One, who got up from the mat next to where the video began and appeared to request the two jailbirds to leave. He got pushed by one of them. So that was actually the first physical interaction. I noticed you omitted any mention of that.

The other local was set upon later in the video by the jailbird 'victim'. Again, no mention of that by your good self.

In addition, that was not the first interaction between the jailbirds and the foreigner. In the previous interaction, the jailbird raised his hand to the foreigner, but the foreigner deflected it downwards. Then the foreigner walked away. 

Something must have occurred a second time for the foreigner to go back and for the local to get off the mat and suggest the jailbirds go elsewhere.

 

All this you deliberately ignore in your attempt to bait and troll. 

Do I need to read nationalist comments on Facebook from people who weren't there?

 

[Dan O]

7 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

@MalcolmB There were at least two locals who were in agreement with the foreigner. One, who got up from the mat next to where the video began and appeared to request the two jailbirds to leave. He got pushed by one of them. So that was actually the first physical interaction. I noticed you omitted any mention of that.

The other local was set upon later in the video by the jailbird 'victim'. Again, no mention of that by your good self.

In addition, that was not the first interaction between the jailbirds and the foreigner. In the previous interaction, the jailbird raised his hand to the foreigner, but the foreigner deflected it downwards. Then the foreigner walked away. 

Something must have occurred a second time for the foreigner to go back and for the local to get off the mat and suggest the jailbirds go elsewhere.

 

All this you deliberately ignore in your attempt to bait and troll. 

Do I need to read nationalist comments on Facebook from people who weren't there?

 

Exactly my point. If you dont see the whole interaction you can't judge from a short video on what actually happened or what instigated the conflict. The media's job is to get readers so they tend to sensationalise everything to accomplish that goal. 

[richard_smith237]

4 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

12 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Boomer comment - not really worth discussing.

 

 

Social media makes the information more available to us with videos etc - takes some mental discipline not to immediately believe everything we see and read. 

 

Overweight part - yep, I get your point... thats not a new thing, its just easier to eat poorly these days - too much cheap junk food about.

 

 

(nice try) I'm not sure about that - he wasn't drink driving.

It sounds like despite the video evidence of the farang starting it you are trying to blame the Thais?

You are consistent.

Underlying issues.

 

No it doesn't - it just reads as though I've outed your unhinged pile of utter rubbish yet again... 

 

Its clear to other posters that my comment was irrational and flawed.

 

As correctly stated by  Dan O (below)  - we have no idea what led up to the event, but we have every idea of your bias now, you've made your conclusions based solely on the video report without any critical thinking as to what may have happened leading up to the confrontation. 

 

As I wrote: it 'takes some mental discipline not to immediately believe everything we see and read' - in lieu of pushing your delusional rhetoric, you clearly have none.

 

3 hours ago, Dan O said:

You dont know if they were harmless or not as you weren't there and all you have to reference is a video and that doesn't show what really lead up to it. Im not condoning the fat guys actions but either way to come from behind and hit someone with a bottle in the head like he did was a pussy move. 

 

I completely agree with you Dan...  my comment outed the halfwits bias... 

[MalcolmB]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Exactly my point. If you dont see the whole interaction you can't judge from a short video on what actually happened or what instigated the conflict. The media's job is to get readers so they tend to sensationalise everything to accomplish that goal. 

Ah yes the friendly farang was just minding his business and the two Thais jumped out of nowhere and started attacking him for no reason.

Happens all the time.

Who started the violence?

[MalcolmB]

17 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

All this you deliberately ignore in your attempt to bait and troll. 

Do I need to read nationalist comments on Facebook from people who weren't there?

No but you might want to listen to the eye witness interview and you will see how wrong you are.

You, Richard and Dan were not there and are just making things up to suit your own biased narratives as usual. And then if anyone disagrees with your anti Thai chorus you accuse me of trolling which is ironic.

The eye witnesses blamed Fatty Farang. 

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

You have no idea if I can speak thai or not. You post moronic bs when called out for your nonsensical posts. 

What did the eye witness say?

[SMIAI]

@MalcolmB As I have already pointed out, it was the jailbirds who started the violence. The first push was to a local who tried to plead with the jailbirds. He got pushed away by the friend of the 'victim'. That was the first strike that we saw.

[richard_smith237]

16 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

All this you deliberately ignore in your attempt to bait and troll. 

Do I need to read nationalist comments on Facebook from people who weren't there?

 

4 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Exactly my point. If you dont see the whole interaction you can't judge from a short video on what actually happened or what instigated the conflict. The media's job is to get readers so they tend to sensationalise everything to accomplish that goal. 

 

100% – 'the' dim-witted little troll has only one pathetic goal: to spew negativity. He’s clearly nursing some warped obsession with slandering foreigners in Thailand, like a broken record.

 

Yes, everyone with a functioning brain recognises that some foreigners misbehave in Thailand — but the likes of MalcolmB, with their laughably one-eyed, brain-dead prejudice, can’t even begin to acknowledge that plenty of Thais behave atrociously too.

 

He clings to cropped, context-free videos like a drowning man to a twig, desperately flogging them in his twisted crusade. He latches onto any half-baked headline or offhand quote that supports his ridiculous narrative and parades it as gospel. It’s not just idiotic - it’s impressively stupid.

 

And... to be clear: while the foreigners in these videos should be called out for their actions, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking can see that the “trigger” - the part that actually explains what caused the incident - is suspiciously missing.

 

But not our frothing little friend. His bias is so rabidly entrenched that he’d deny the sun was out if a foreigner told him so.

 

Even more revealing? The thunderous silence from these bigoted clowns when it’s Thais attacking foreigners - suddenly they vanish, slinking away like cockroaches when the lights come on. Because acknowledging that doesn’t fit their bitter, hate-driven script. Its pathetic.

 

 

 

 

[Dan O]

11 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Ah yes the friendly farang was just minding his business and the two Thais jumped out of nowhere and started attacking him for no reason.

Happens all the time.

Who started the violence?

I never said that so don't be a retard.

 

There was interaction before that short video clip to start with. It wasn't just 1 thai fighting with the fat foreigner, there were at least three if you even watched the video. But none of that fits your narrative and we know you cant ever admit when your wrong.

[richard_smith237]

5 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

No but you might want to listen to the eye witness interview and you will see how wrong you are.

You, Richard and Dan were not there and are just making things up to suit your own biased narratives as usual. And then if anyone disagrees with your anti Thai chorus you accuse me of trolling which is ironic.

The eye witnesses blamed Fatty Farang. 

 

Of course, the eye witness statements are 100% reliable...  or someone of your bias certainly believes so...   No person in such a situation ever misrepresented the facts or truth, right ?

 

It has been said by everyone - the foreigner behaved terribly...  You are refusing to accept that the Thai guys 'also' behaved terribly.

 

You 'wish' to believe that the foreigner attacked the Thai guys for no reason, with no provocation and that the Thai guys were simply innocent victims.

 

Your delusion & your bias is extremely idiotic - no surprises.

 

 

[Dan O]

9 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

What did the eye witness say?

He said you you post bs and idiotic replies on AN forum.

[SMIAI]

@richard_smith237

 

To be fair, they are getting precisely the reaction from you that they wanted. That's the point of baiting and trolling. To get a reaction. Better to counter them with intelligence. 

[MalcolmB]

5 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Even more revealing? The thunderous silence from these bigoted clowns when it’s Thais attacking foreigners - suddenly they vanish, slinking away like cockroaches when the lights come on. Because acknowledging that doesn’t fit their bitter, hate-driven script. Its pathetic.

 

 

 

 

Once again Richard has argued himself into a complete circle.

I was the one who posted this OP about Thais attacking foreigners. ( a foreigner)

Pull yourself together.

 

Unfortunately on this forum there is a small subgroup that will always take the foreigners side despite video evidence. 
If they don’t like Thai people they really should move to another country, nobody wants them here.

[richard_smith237]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

I never said that so don't be a retard.

 

There was interaction before that short video clip to start with. It wasn't just 1 thai fighting with the fat foreigner, there were at least three if you even watched the video. But none of that fits your narrative and we know you cant ever admit when your wrong.

 

He’ll twist, distort, and outright lie about anything you write if it doesn’t prop up his tired, blinkered rhetoric. It’s like watching a malfunctioning parrot squawk the same nonsense over and over.

 

This inability to process even the simplest information without injecting his frothing, delusional bias reeks of something seriously wrong upstairs.

 

We’re not talking about a minor lapse in judgment — this is full-blown mental rot masquerading as opinion.

 

Yes, obviously - blindingly obviously - the foreigner in the video behaved like a complete idiot. No one is defending him. No one. But it takes more than a rabid keyboard warrior to pretend that’s the entire story.

 

Anyone not suffering from terminal idiocy can see there's a gaping hole in the narrative - the 'trigger point' is conspicuously absent. But acknowledging that would require critical thinking, and for this clown, that's clearly asking far too much. He doesn’t want the truth - he only wants to troll with his delusions to fuel whatever festering little fantasy he’s living in.

 

 

 

 

 

[Dan O]

12 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

No but you might want to listen to the eye witness interview and you will see how wrong you are.

You, Richard and Dan were not there and are just making things up to suit your own biased narratives as usual. And then if anyone disagrees with your anti Thai chorus you accuse me of trolling which is ironic.

The eye witnesses blamed Fatty Farang. 

How is pointing out the thai's behaved equally bad or worse with using a bottle to hit the foreigner making things up

? Or stating that it wasn't just 1 fat foreigner against 1 small thai guy, there were 3 thais fighting him. Or pointing out that you or I  weren't there so we don't know what started the whole thing.  Facts don't lie but they certainly get in the way of your faulty logic.

[richard_smith237]

7 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

@richard_smith237

 

To be fair, they are getting precisely the reaction from you that they wanted. That's the point of baiting and trolling. To get a reaction. Better to counter them with intelligence. 

 

 

These fools are incapable of engaging in anything resembling intelligent discourse. Instead, they contort facts like cheap circus performers, bending reality to fit their own pathetic, self-serving rhetoric.

 

There is clearly a glaring absence of information regarding the trigger point in this incident - anyone with half a functioning brain can see it. But these intellectually bankrupt cretins rush to lap up every scrap of media narrative like obedient little dogs, never stopping to question the gaping holes in the story. Critical thinking? Utterly foreign to them.

 

The original news commentary either deliberately omits or is too incompetent to capture what actually sparked the situation. But rather than ask the obvious questions, these deluded simpletons swallow it whole - blind, brainwashed, and utterly pathetic.

 

To miss such an obvious gap in the narrative isn’t just careless, it’s staggeringly stupid. It's either a sign of wilful ignorance, unhinged delusion, or a bias so corrosive it’s eaten away whatever shreds of objectivity they may have once had.

 

[SMIAI]

@MalcolmB

 

I see in some news they are referring to the victim as a beach mat vendor. This seems unlikely. I think the real beach mat vendor is the one standing with the foreigner. That ended up with him being punched in the face and thrown to the ground. Why don't you mention that unprovoked attack by the 'victim' against the beach mat vendor?

The 'victim' is a jailbird. Surely up to no good. 

 

 

[SMIAI]

Or @richard_smith237 he could just be winding you up deliberately.

[MalcolmB]

32 minutes ago, Dan O said:

He said you you post bs and idiotic replies on AN forum.

So I was right that you can not speak Thai.

 

He actually said that it was the farangs fault but some people like to blame Thai people for these incidents without knowing what had happened.

Which is exactly what you three are doing. 
The irony. 
 

Now you probably will scoff, but as I said as your teerak to translate it for you and you will see you three name calling clowns are wrong.

 

I know it would be too much for you to apologize.

[MalcolmB]

8 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

@MalcolmB

 

I see in some news they are referring to the victim as a beach mat vendor. This seems unlikely. I think the real beach mat vendor is the one standing with the foreigner. That ended up with him being punched in the face and thrown to the ground. Why don't you mention that unprovoked attack by the 'victim' against the beach mat vendor?

The 'victim' is a jailbird. Surely up to no good. 

 

 

Can you provide a link please to this news you are referring to.

 

[richard_smith237]

2 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

Or @richard_smith237 he could just be winding you up deliberately.

 

He's clearly been trying to do that for over year already...  

 

I've got an hour to kill... sometimes its just entertaining to get involved while chilling at home... 

[MalcolmB]

4 minutes ago, SMIAI said:

Or @richard_smith237 he could just be winding you up deliberately.

Richard has a history of winding himself up.

I was warned by many others when I first joined the forum.

[MalcolmB]

2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

He's clearly been trying to do that for over year already...  

 

I've got an hour to kill... sometimes its just entertaining to get involved while chilling at home... 

This is my OP that you have decided to join.

I have never commented on any of your OPs. I simply ignore them.

[SMIAI]

@MalcolmB

 

Let's deal with the 'evidence' the you have relied upon thus far.

Perhaps you can address my assertion that it was a local who made the first strike(against another local who pleaded with him) and in addition, the attack by the 'victim' on the beach mat vendor(clearly standing there with beach mats in his hand).

[richard_smith237]

9 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Yes, the foreigner started it.

 

The foreigner walked up to two Thai's, and out of the blue, for no reason whatsoever simply started assaulting them...  

 

No trigger point, no lead up, no dispute and nothing happened before the video started... 

... the foreigner just walked up to Thai's and for no reason whatsoever started on them because he felt like it..  

 

9 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Clear as day, video evidence backed up by witnesses, sorry it doesn’t fit with your drunken foreigners in Pattaya are always innocent t narrative.

 

No narrative - a lot of foragers in Pattaya are utter tools, they drink drive, act out, are idiot bigots, treat Thai's with exceptional levels of disrespect....   There is no narrative from anyone (myself included) that suggest this does not occur too frequently. 

 

But, it is also fairly clear that events such as this (shown in your video) have a trigger point - something that led to someone turning on their phone and start filming....

 

 

I don't believe even the most stupid of trolls can truly believe the videos show the whole story,