Jump to content

Fetterman Rejects Diplomacy, Urges Trump Administration to Strike Iran’s Nuclear Sites


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/24/2025 at 8:15 PM, bunnydrops said:

So, there are lingering effects from having a stroke!

NO, he is a pure Democrat but sometimes he comes up with a good idea.  You like IRan with nukes that can reach the US??

Posted
2 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

NO, he is a pure Democrat but sometimes he comes up with a good idea.  You like IRan with nukes that can reach the US??

I don't want any country to have nukes that can reach another country. Anyway, even if they did get nukes and developed a missile that could fly that far, do you think they would start a fight they knew they would surely lose?

Posted

Despite what some people see to think, the USA and Israel cannot be assured of any success in destroying Iran's nuclear program.  The sites are well protected and are scattered all over Iran.  And it's unrealistic to assume that Russia and China won't be dragged into the conflict.  What happens then is anyone's guess.

 

According to some analysts, the US now has some low yield nukes specifically designed to attack the types of targets that would have to be hit in Iran.  And Trump may well use those weapons.  A big mistake.  Once that genie is out of the bottle, what then? 

 

In short, it might be better for the world if this war was avoided.  

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, flexomike said:

talk about diversion, Iran is subsidizing terrorist groups in how many countries, fighting a proxy war, kind of like what we are doing in the Ukraine. Typical leftist reply

What a shame that you still cannot or will not define the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is, nor do you ex[lain who decides between a terrorist and a freedom fighter.

 

When you can come back with a reasonable answer, I may be bothered to respond to your post, or not.

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

none of the above are organizations focused on building  a civil society.

These organizations were created as a result of oppression by external powers namely Israel and USA. Get your head out of the sand. 

Posted
1 hour ago, AustinRacing said:

These organizations were created as a result of oppression by external powers namely Israel and USA. Get your head out of the sand. 

 No they were not. The militias were created to overthrow incumbent governments and/or to impose Shiite religion on the local people and/or to extend Iranian control. You are  reciting the leftist liberation mantra from 20+ years ago. Not everything has to do with either Israel or the USA.

 

- Hezbollah wants full control of Lebanon and it's goal is to create a Shiite state.  The  fight with Israel is a side issue and they are  doing this in large part to ensure the support of Iran.

- Asaib Ahl al Haq and the Badr Organization are Shiite groups who wish to have an Shiite state.  They were also opposed to  Saadam Hussein when he ruled. 

- Harakat Hezbollah al Nujaba (Movement of the Party of God’s Nobles),  Kataib Sayyad al Shuhada ( Masters of the Martyrs Brigade),  Zaynabiyoun Brigade  were all various factions aligned with Assad. They were not fighting with Israel or the USA.

- Ansar Allah (aka Houthis)  overthrew the legal government of Yemen and has installed a religious state.  They were at war with Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The fight with Israel is recent and came at the instruction of Iran.

-Fatemiyoun Division is intended to  establish Iranian influence in Afghanistan

- Saraya al Ashtar , as a  sponsored unit of Iranian Guards,    Saraya al Mukhtar are intended to overthrow the government of bahrain. they have nothing to do with Israel and the USA.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...