The truth strikes and you use "Artificial Intelligence" to counter say it ain't true.
You're clinging to this tired "AI" accusation - feel free to run my comments through every AI checker you can find; it won't change a thing.
As I said before, and it's even more accurate now: "The truth strikes, and you have no intelligent response."
Your inability to engage with substance speaks loudly enough - you don't have the tools to debate this intelligently.
You misrepresented 'it' as something it was not, and now part of your anti-vax argument clings desperately to the idea of something a research group merely considered.
Your relentless doubling down on a broken and readily debunked argument only serves to highlight the fundamentally broken thinking that underpins it.
I used to see a failing Chinese restaurant in a little strip mall in LA that was very near to a thriving Chinese restaurant.
The workers in the one that wasn't making it were often standing in the shop looking out the front windows hopefully, sadly, but seldom any customers.
I felt it was so sad to see them looking out and waiting for customers that didn't come.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now