22 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

A September 12, 2016, document included an Intelligence Community Assessment that determined ‘foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks’.

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/obama-to-face-treason-charges-over-2016-russia-collusion-hoax-tulsi-gabbard-drops-bombshell-amid-traitor-reports-101752871973625.html

 

So pretty clear finding then.

So they allegedly did not have the capability to be successful. It doen't mean they did not try, as proven by following investigations, including the GOP led Senate Intelligence Committee.

 

That was a pretty clear finding of these investigations. 

Deflection time. Not surprised. Right wingers clasping strow .

1 hour ago, riclag said:

Some of the others, Dirty  Dems 

 

At the very least Obama has some questions to answer on this issue. 

29 minutes ago, candide said:

 

That Russia was not responsible for the leaking is Russian propaganda...

 

Russia did not leak clintons emails

11 hours ago, riclag said:

Tulsi Gabbard released declassified documents.
The 6 ways to Sunday Cabal held back Intel  Assessment about Russia capabilities on cyber attacks.

Clapper,  Brennan  McCain & others manufactured a hoax and conspiracy to subvert the 2016 election.

https://nypost.com/2025/07/18/us-news/obama-admin-assessed-russia-played-no-role-in-2016-election-declassified-documents-show/

 

The story is based on A Nyp report and SCRIBD docs

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25

So Obama knew "before" the election results, that Russia didn't effect the election results. That is some next level denial, denial of something that hasn't happened yet.

MMMMMM Kool aid

36 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Russia did not leak clintons emails

And that's what Russian propaganda says, as I wrote before! 🤣

1 hour ago, Peterw42 said:

So Obama knew "before" the election results, that Russia didn't effect the election results. That is some next level denial, denial of something that hasn't happened yet.

MMMMMM Kool aid

Its quite easy  when you knew the whole story was fabricated to begin with.

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Russia did not leak clintons emails

That was another hoax made up  by 

the 6 ways to Sunday cabal !

 

Riclac= Steven Millers nephew ?

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

At the very least Obama has some questions to answer on this issue. 

I hope the cost behind the  questions 

hit him & his cohorts right where it hurts ( the pocket book).

Security clearances need to be pulled 

from the conspirators who essentially 

ransacked trust in the Intel system.

 

 

Trump to Epstein: "Enigmas never get old"

 

Enigma....an anagram of garmine.....

 

Garmine....a body type portrayed by a sweet, young, slender limbed, street child.

 

He was talking about their victims.

3 hours ago, Wingate said:

MAGAs are creaming their jeans over this, but it is not correct. DNI iS withholding key parts of the story.

 

The intel first came in in July 2016. It had to be taken seriously, as no intel professional could ignore it. It demanded further investigation, which was the job of the FBI, since US Citizens were involved. Brennan handed everything to the bureau, who took it from there. As more intel came in, that, too, was passed from CIMC by Brennan to the bureau (CIMC = the agency Counter Intelligence Mission Center).

 

John Brennan followed the procedure absolutely by the book, as Durham---appointed by Trump---confirmed after his investigation.

 

The key findings in the overall investigation were:

 

---Campaign Chief Manafort did travel to Spain and met with GRU asset Kontantin Kilimnik and gave him internal polling data from the Trump team. Kilimnik gave that to the trolls in the GRU's Internet Research Agency in St Petersburg, who then microtargeted voters in key swing States with made up stories about things like Uranium One and Hillary's health.

 

---Campaign aid Roger Stone was in constant contact with Julian Assange, who had been the recipient of hacked emails from John Podesta's computer. Stone was kept abreast of release dates and informed Trump. Trump even noted in one of his rallies that "In a few days, there's some very interesting information coming out",.

 

Rerpublicans chaired SSCI at that time, as they were the Senate majority. They had access to all the intel, including travel records of Manafort to Spain for his Kilimnik meeting, as well as Stone's association with Assange. All of that was included in their report. If Gabbard wants to suggest Brennan et al did something wrong, she must also toss then-SSCI Chair Marco Rubio into it, too.

 

There WAS willful cooperation between the Trump campaign and Russia. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Oddly, or perhaps not, during the Durham investigation, neither Durham nor his team had any interest in seeing the intel---HUIMINT, SIGINT and liaison---regarding Manafort or Stone. They were not looking for truth, but just hoping to find undotted "i"s and uncrossed "t"s.

 

The intel community's assessment of Russia's effect on 2016 (which includes Putin's funding of Independent Jill Stein's campaign, as Putin had learned from Perot '92 and Nader '00) was that it did not affect the Electoral College outcome. Stein did receive votes that exceeded Trump's margin in Wisconsin and Michigan, but not enough to exceed his Pennsylvania margin over Hillary. He could have lost MI and WI and still won.

 

What I have written are facts. I know John and I am intimately familiar with the Durham probe, which gave the agency and Brennan a clean bill of health. I also know Durham did not want to pursue the actual intelligence; he just tried to find anywhere where things were not run by the book. He found only a single low level FBI person who messed up.

 

What Trump et al are trying to do now is obfuscate and be less than complete in what they release....just as I am sure he will do now re Epstein. It will work with the cult, as can be seen right here in this thread.

 

MAGAs can continue to believe what they want, since it is a cult anyway, where truth and facts do not matter.

 

Knock yourselves silly.

 

 

Excellent post!
 

Just one addition: the FBI’s Russia investigation actually began after the Australian government tipped them off, based on Papadopoulos telling Alexander Downer in May 2016 that Russia had dirt on Clinton. That’s what led to the opening of Crossfire Hurricane on July 31 — not Brennan or the Steele dossier.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-24/mueller-investigation-george-papadopoulos-alexander-downer-speak/11107712

Somebody in wikipedia needs to update the bias!They/ them manufactured all of it.

“Finally, the review did not produce evidence that "political bias or improper motivations influenced" the FBI's usage of confidential sources or undercover agents for interactions with members of Trump's campaign”!

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_Barack_Obama_spying_on_Donald_Trump&wprov=rarw1

 

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25

 

3 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Trump did not lose a chunk of his ear in the fake assassination at Butler, PA.

Desperation, fueled by envy of and hate for Trump prompts democrats and haters to act like morons, do and say stupid things and generally "derange" and unhinge themselves from reality. You are close to that level, must be or you wouldn't say things only your simple mind would believe. LOL, oh well, you are a bit of a legend now, a legend in your mind only. Carry on though, keep saying stupid things, keep embarrassing yourself, ....I'm probably not the only one laughing at you. If you don't fit  the description outlined above, then MAYBE you are special needs person and well, I'm still laffing at you.

4 minutes ago, illisdean said:

Desperation, fueled by envy of and hate for Trump prompts democrats and haters to act like morons, do and say stupid things and generally "derange" and unhinge themselves from reality. You are close to that level, must be or you wouldn't say things only your simple mind would believe. LOL, oh well, you are a bit of a legend now, a legend in your mind only. Carry on though, keep saying stupid things, keep embarrassing yourself, ....I'm probably not the only one laughing at you.

Love you too, buddy!

Just now, BLMFem said:

Love you too, buddy!

special needs? brain damage from a farm accident? 

9 minutes ago, illisdean said:

special needs? brain damage from a farm accident? 

I did pee on an electric farm fence once. Does that count?

Anyway, what's your excuse for the non-stop frothing-at-the-mouth spittle-squealing jibber-jabber? Catholic priests?

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

I did pee on an electric farm fence once. Does that count?

Anyway, what's your excuse for the non-stop frothing-at-the-mouth spittle-squealing jibber-jabber? Catholic priests?

 

  His mom banged her cousin.  Duh.

It was also used by the war hawk on the otherside to push the war, so you can see that US politics is, as George Carlin said  '1 big club, and you aint in it'

13 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

It was also used by the war hawk on the otherside to push the war, so you can see that US politics is, as George Carlin said  '1 big club, and you aint in it'

 

Russian propaganda, buddy. Stupid Russian propaganda. Looking forward to the collapse of your country. Might even chip in with a few Euros for the emergency food rations handed out by NATO troops stationed throughout the former Russian federation.

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

30 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

 

Russian propaganda, buddy. Stupid Russian propaganda. Looking forward to the collapse of your country. Might even chip in with a few Euros for the emergency food rations handed out by NATO troops stationed throughout the former Russian federation.

Its reported on you sheeple MSM stations, if you werent only here trolling youd have know that.

I already said i will buy you a ticket to Ukraine, go and put your face in the action instead of hiding behind your keyboard fingers 

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Its reported on you sheeple MSM stations, if you werent only here trolling youd have know that.

I already said i will buy you a ticket to Ukraine, go and put your face in the action instead of hiding behind your keyboard fingers 

Will you join me, buddy, fighting side by side against the Russian orcs?

19 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Will you join me, buddy, fighting side by side against the Russian orcs?

Nope, i am only buying you a ticket 1 way.

8 hours ago, candide said:

Another lame attempt to hide the fact that Russia interfered. It so obviously violates the intelligence integrity standards it pretends to champion! 🤣

 

BTW, the documents don't refute that Russia was responsible for leaking hacked Democratic emails and organised a campaign of social-media messages, in an attempt to influence the election.

 

 

 

 

The evidence that Russia hacked the DNC is weak at best.  

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

It was also used by the war hawk on the otherside to push the war, so you can see that US politics is, as George Carlin said  '1 big club, and you aint in it'

 

McCain was a real idiot though. You could have told him "Tell them the Russians stole the moon". And he would have done it.

14 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

If they have negotiated a Patsy for the whole saga, I hope it's Brennan. 

Hes a typical CIA scumbag spook that we have had to put up with since the days of Wild Bill. Some only get their just deserts via history

Its escalating, i rally hope the whole house of cards fall...go Tulsi

 

 

32 minutes ago, TedG said:

 

 

The evidence that Russia hacked the DNC is weak at best.  

Maybe, but it's not the only evidence of Russian interference.