Trump’s name reportedly appears multiple times in the Epstein files, according to a new Wall Street Journal report. Justice Department officials say he was told about it back in May, but Trump recently denied ever being briefed. That contradiction alone raises eyebrows, especially as House Republicans abruptly went on early recess amid reports they are trying to block more Epstein-related disclosures.

 

The White House is calling it fake news, but video footage of Trump and Epstein partying together in the 90s already exists. No one is saying being mentioned equals guilt, but for someone who constantly demands transparency, there seems to be a lot of effort going into keeping things quiet. Bottom line, if there's nothing to hide then why are they hiding it all?

 

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-is-in-the-epstein-files-multiple-times.html
 

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wall-street-journal-reports-trump-is-epstein-files-white-house-calls-story-fake-2025-07-23/

Florida judge rules Epstein grand jury records will remain sealed
The records were related to grand juries convened in West Palm Beach.

 

July 24, 2025, 3:26 AM

 

A federal judge in Florida denied one of three Justice Department requests to unseal grand jury records tied to federal investigations into Epstein, according to a public order released Wednesday.

 

The request is one of three made by the Justice Department to judges in New York and Florida seeking to unseal records from federal investigations into Epstein.

 

Judge Rosenberg faulted the Justice Department for failing to outline sufficient arguments to justify the unsealing of the records, which are normally protected under strict secrecy rules.

 

Rosenberg's opinion states her "hands are tied" given existing precedent in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals which only permits the disclosure of such grand jury materials under narrow exceptions.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/judge-denies-justice-department-request-unseal-epstein-grand/story

______________________

From CBSNews:

 

Wednesday's ruling only applies to transcripts of proceedings by federal grand juries that were convened in West Palm Beach in 2005 and 2007. Separate grand juries in New York indicted Epstein in 2019, and Maxwell in 2020. The judges who oversaw those cases are still weighing the administration's request to unseal proceedings, and have asked the government, victims and defense teams for more information before issuing rulings. 

 

The New York federal court is bound by different circuit court precedent, meaning judges there could ultimately pave the way for more information to be released.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-florida-federal-judge/

This makes me want to.....I can't post it. 

Wow. 

 

These ARE the Pedos you're looking for.  (Doesn't wave hand.)

 

 

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

What’s interesting about this is the number of Republicans who defied Trump to back this subpoena.

 

Then we have the problem of people in Trump’s administration refusing to obey Congressional subpoena.

Add to that, Trump’s deputy AG and former defense lawyer Todd Blanche meeting with Maxwell.

 

At the very least this is a representative of a person we know is named in the Epstein files meeting with a material witness.

 

The stench is only getting stronger.

 

 

 

The Pedo files "Lock him up"🤔

9 minutes ago, nick supreme said:

This makes me want to.....I can't post it. 

That stuff you can’t post will be a yard deep all over MAGA land if Trump cuts a deal with Maxwell that lets her out the cage that justice put her in.

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That stuff you can’t post will be a yard deep all over MAGA land if Trump cuts a deal with Maxwell that lets her out the cage that justice put her in.

 

What?

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

Florida judge rules Epstein grand jury records will remain sealed
The records were related to grand juries convened in West Palm Beach.

 

July 24, 2025, 3:26 AM

 

A federal judge in Florida denied one of three Justice Department requests to unseal grand jury records tied to federal investigations into Epstein, according to a public order released Wednesday.

 

The request is one of three made by the Justice Department to judges in New York and Florida seeking to unseal records from federal investigations into Epstein.

 

Judge Rosenberg faulted the Justice Department for failing to outline sufficient arguments to justify the unsealing of the records, which are normally protected under strict secrecy rules.

 

Rosenberg's opinion states her "hands are tied" given existing precedent in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals which only permits the disclosure of such grand jury materials under narrow exceptions.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/judge-denies-justice-department-request-unseal-epstein-grand/story

______________________

From CBSNews:

 

Wednesday's ruling only applies to transcripts of proceedings by federal grand juries that were convened in West Palm Beach in 2005 and 2007. Separate grand juries in New York indicted Epstein in 2019, and Maxwell in 2020. The judges who oversaw those cases are still weighing the administration's request to unseal proceedings, and have asked the government, victims and defense teams for more information before issuing rulings. 

 

The New York federal court is bound by different circuit court precedent, meaning judges there could ultimately pave the way for more information to be released.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-florida-federal-judge/

Its relevant of course, perhaps more out of who were the decision makers in the sweetheart deals Epstein was given.

 

However, releasing the ‘Grand Jury Files’ is a bait and switch move by the Orange Conman.

 

The promise made was release the ‘Epstein Files’, these Grand Jury records are not the ‘Epstein Files’.

 

 

 

9 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

The Pedo files "Lock him up"🤔

 

Lock anyone up who  is involved. 

 

ANYONE.

Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier?

I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

BREAKING - WSJ: Trump’s Name All Over The Epstein Files

"Trump’s name reportedly appears multiple times in the Epstein files, according to a new Wall Street Journal report."

"all over" or "reportedly appears" which one is it?

Try...

BREAKING - WSJ: Trump’s Name Reportedly All Over The Epstein Files.

reportedly: according to what some say (used to express the speaker's belief that the information given is not necessarily true).

 

5 minutes ago, carlyai said:

Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier?

I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

They were "mixing" on Epstein's private island where human trafficking/child exploitation was explicitly being engaged in. There is too much physical evidence supporting this, and NONE of it was created by Obama/Comey/etc.

10 minutes ago, carlyai said:

Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier?

I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

 

Yeh, nothing to see here.

7 minutes ago, carlyai said:

Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier?

I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

 

Then why go to great lengths to lie, deny, obfuscate (trump's new word) trump's mentions in the "Epstein Files"?

 

Why send Congress home to avoid a vote?

 

Why gin up three or four old controversies to distract the public?

 

I'm half-expecting an Oval Office pool spray about Aliens. (extraterrestrial, not from Mexico). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 minutes ago, carlyai said:

Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier?

I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

 

Dig a little deeper. 

It has been and will all be manipulated the full truth will never be known.

WSJ: We'll take your $10 billion lawsuit and publish another bombshell report.

 

Incidentally, the name "The Lolita Express" wasn't coined after Epstein's arrest, but was in use back when Trump was a passenger on it.

 

Trump might try to claim that since he's never read a book, he would have no idea about Nobokov and his book, and maybe Trump was not a fan of James Mason, but that's weak. I do expect Trump to also claim---if asked about Nabokov and the aircraft's moniker---"It's always 'Russia Russia Russia' with you radical leftists!".

 

As a sidenote, I think Obama should sue the Trump Administration for $1 trillion for the claims of a "coup", as Gabbard is now fantasizing.

Epstein once said " Donald likes them young".

 

I don't know why MAGA is so stirred up about this particular issue, Trump has done a truckload of disgusting things in his lifetime.

 

18 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Epstein once said " Donald likes them young".

From 2002:

 

And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

 

https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

I think more victims will come forward, so trump's situation will probably get worse.

 

17 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Epstein once said " Donald likes them young".

 

I don't know why MAGA is so stirred up about this particular issue, Trump has done a truckload of disgusting things in his lifetime.

 

 

MAGAnistas always find a way to justify or explain away everything Trump does or says. They start with Whataboutism, then shift to "he's just trolling the libs" to some Rube Goldberg-esque convoluted justification.

 

Let me try to outrun them here.....

 

Trump's obvious lust for his daughter when she was Epstein-level young, backed up not only by words but also many pre-AI videos of him fondling her backside, would be justified by his Christian Nationalist base by quoting about Job in the Bible, who produced children with his own biological daughters. Trump was just displaying his Biblical roots.

 

Trump's a man of deep fakes faith, you know.

6 minutes ago, Wingate said:

 

MAGAnistas always find a way to justify or explain away everything Trump does or says. They start with Whataboutism, then shift to "he's just trolling the libs" to some Rube Goldberg-esque convoluted justification.

 

Let me try to outrun them here.....

 

Trump's obvious lust for his daughter when she was Epstein-level young, backed up not only by words but also many pre-AI videos of him fondling her backside, would be justified by his Christian Nationalist base by quoting about Job in the Bible, who produced children with his own biological daughters. Trump was just displaying his Biblical roots.

 

Trump's a man of deep fakes faith, you know.

Fool me once, shame on me.

Fool me 9,000+ times, I must be a MAGAnista.

Assuming true... which is a huge assumption.

 

In interviews with *victims* I've never heard Trump's name come up

 

If Trump was in the files it seems like that would have been made thoroughly public over the last 10 years.

 

I'm not into guilt by association whether it's Bill Gates or Donald Trump or prince Andrew.

 

For all these individuals unless there are videos exposing and or witness corroboration the whole thing is just a circle jerk.

 

Many of us live in what is considered to be a very sketchy country.

 

I realized that most leftists posters on this forum don't live in Thailand and a few probably have never even visited

 

How many have noted the raised eyebrows and smirks when you meet people in your home country and tell them you live in Thailand? Why those reactions? This is guilt by association. Thailand's tarnish reputation has rubbed off on you. Sometimes it's warranted maybe it's not.

 

This is all a big bunch of nothing and bull<deleted>. The proof of this is in the fact that there are already dozens of names in the public domain and nothing has been done about anything. That's because nothing can and perhaps should be done about it. They are simply on a list of suspects. 

 

There is no list. Think about it. Maybe a black book (public already), no list. What's the list going to include?

 

Bill Clinton ... Visited on x y z and banged a, b although c his favorite. No, that's all in his head and unimportant.

 

It's video tape.

 

And all the video tape that really has damning evidence has been removed and destroyed although I'm certain that it exists somewhere both in Israel and in secret safes around the US

 

Even then... personally, I don't care if they received HJs by 17yo delinquent teens in Florida. I don't care that European teens that were at or over age of consent in home countries and Caribbean countries decided of their own free will to repeatedly engage in prostitution on Epstein island

 

I care about this man's financial shenanigans and his indirect ties and business to CIA and Mossad. It's gonna be drugs and guns - and blackmailing for Israel imo

50 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

BREAKING - WSJ: Trump’s Name All Over The Epstein Files

"Trump’s name reportedly appears multiple times in the Epstein files, according to a new Wall Street Journal report."

"all over" or "reportedly appears" which one is it?

This is the teaser portion of the WSJ article July 23, 2025, 3:08 pm ET:

 

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
Bondi also told president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims

 

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials. 

 

In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.

 

https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038

 

4 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

 

 

 

How many have noted the raised eyebrows and smirks when you meet people in your home country and tell them you live in Thailand? Why those reactions? This is guilt by association. Thailand's tarnish reputation has rubbed off on you. Sometimes it's warranted maybe it's not.

 

 

I get gender-based reactions.

 

Men envy me.

 

Women look daggers at me.

20 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

From 2002:

 

And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

 

https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

 

This is absolutely nothing it's dragged out time and time and time again

 

It's public statement ffs. How damning could this possibly be?

 

We both like beautiful women. HE prefers them younger than me

 

So what.

 

All the videos of him together with epstein. These are just social moments caught on video it's nothing it's not even circumstantial evidence.

 

He's always been known as a pussy hound. Never made any apologies for it

 

I really really with people would stop dragging this quote out because it substantiates absolutely nothing

@KhaoHom

 

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf

 

 

Just now, SMIAI said:

@KhaoHom

 

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf

 

 

 

What is this?