On 8/29/2025 at 3:37 PM, Ralf001 said:

We have friends in the same circles.

Yes, Ralf, of course you do.

3 hours ago, thailand49 said:

22 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

He won't need an excuse, there will be no outstanding charges then.

You correct with his family money I'll be surprised any would stand up and complain.

The family's money will be irrelevant, the Statute of Limitations ensures that there will be no outstanding charges even if they were penniless, regardless of complainants.

3 hours ago, paul1804 said:

On 8/29/2025 at 11:35 AM, Liverpool Lou said:

...the maximum charge is reckless driving causing death which is what he is charged with, not manslaughter.

 I said the minimum charge being manslaughter lemons!

Yes, I know, I can read, and you are wrong, "manslaughter lemons" [sic] (whatever the fck they are) charges do not come into it at any level.

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The family's money will be irrelevant, the Statute of Limitations ensures that there will be no outstanding charges even if they were penniless, regardless of complainants.

You again! a dreamer inflexible to reality here straight as a arrow thinking if that was the case why is Thaksins here, sure circumstances are different but as we know one can make a case based on nothing.

Why was based on popular vote Pita was elected them ousted, based on what? then replaced in spite of a vote outside party selected the new PM, then someone got an inch up their behind got Thaksins daughter in and now out.

Regardless, of time limits the coward won't be jumping the gun until mommy and daddy make sure there isn't any opposition.  

Try thinking again you should think hard about quitting while you are ahead but I won't hold my breath 🤣

Unfortunately, this criminal, protected by his status as the son of... will never spend a single day in prison!....Thai Justice!

Quarrelsome and off topic posts removed. Please do not post abbreviated expletives - they're still expletives and contravene the rules that are there to keep us all behaving nicely to one another. Thank you.

 

Rules:

8. You will not post vulgarities, obscenities or profanities.

On 8/29/2025 at 12:17 AM, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes....

Whats the date of that Red alert.? Plus is it still current?

2 hours ago, cynic1 said:

On 8/28/2025 at 9:17 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes....

Expand  

Whats the date of that Red alert.? Plus is it still current?

I don't know but it was published by the Bangkok Post in a 2018 (17?) article.  

On 8/28/2025 at 10:54 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

Is there an Interpol red notice for this shameless billionaire?

 

On 8/28/2025 at 11:04 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourtscalamity/crime-crime/2017/09/12/interpol-posts-boss-red-bull-wanted-listing/

 

https://www.khaosodenglish.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/rbr-696x492.jpg

A search on the interpol site for that name shows he's not on the Interpol website. A search looking for just Thai people produces 3 results and he's not one of them. 

On 8/29/2025 at 2:17 AM, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes....

There are no Red Notices  on Interpol's website for anyone by this name. There are only 3 Thai people wanted and he's not one of them. A search provides 3 results and clicking on one of those results produces  info on the wanted person that on a page that looks nothing like this. Perhaps this is an old page but still there is no person by this name on Interpol's website. For reading a post above it seems like this photo was published in a Bangkok newspaper. After some research on the actual Interpol website today and 5 years ago, it would appear this post is possibly fake or it was removed a long time ago, as there are no Red Notices for this person. Fake or removed makes a person wonder.

As mentioned in one of my earlier posts, there is no one on Interpol's website by the name Vorayuth Yoovidhya or Yoovidhya Vorayuth. There wasn't one now or about 5 years ago (The last time I looked). A search for just Thai people produced the results in the photo and opening up the page for one of those people produce a page that doesn't look like what's being posted on this forum

1 hour ago, firemans35 said:

On 8/28/2025 at 9:17 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes....

Expand  

There are no Red Notices  on Interpol's website for anyone by this name.

Yes, that is well known but, as has been explained numerous times, the publicly accessible part of the website only shows around 10% of Interpol's notices the rest of the database, the vast majority is only accessible by members, i.e. police forces.

1 hour ago, firemans35 said:

it seems like this photo was published in a Bangkok newspaper. After some research on the actual Interpol website today and 5 years ago, it would appear this post is possibly fake or it was removed a long time ago, as there are no Red Notices for this person. Fake or removed makes a person wonder.

As I have specifically stated, that notice was published by the Bangkok Post at the time that Interpol decided to make it publicly accessible.  Here it is, once again...

https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1322891/interpol-posts-fugitive-red-bull-scion-wanted-notice

 

To suggest that the BP faked it is ridiculous, there is a more likely reason that you cannot see it and that is that it has been moved from the publicly viewable part of the website.   The entire Interpol database is not shown on the publicly accessible website.

1 hour ago, firemans35 said:

Fake or removed makes a person wonder.

The only people who are wondering are those that refuse to understand how Interpol's notices work, it may still be there but you (we) may no longer be able to access it because we are not Interpol members.

1 hour ago, firemans35 said:

A search on the interpol site for that name shows he's not on the Interpol website.

Interpol's entire database is not on their website because member police forces do not get their information from the public website.

in summary I bet that the Thai Government has removed the notification. Can any Thai official prove me wrong! Plus it was probably removed  5 years ago as the charges started to expire.

 

Why does not a Thai judge check into that also to see who removed it and why?. If reason is superficial check their bank accounts. Most likely they are involved with the cover up?

 

In summary that will never happen, as the system, being government and law, is so far down the toilet. 

30 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

in summary I bet that the Thai Government has removed the notification. Can any Thai official prove me wrong!

Can you prove that you're right?   What if the notice has been removed...it has been proven that no other country has had any interest in detaining him for a traffic offence, albeit a serious one.   The Thai government has no obligation to prove your unsubstantiated claim to be wrong.   The majority of the notices and the workings of Interpol are not for public consumption.

26 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

Why does not a Thai judge check into that also to see who removed it and why?.

That would not be  the job of any judge.   But what if the notice was removed, what difference would that make to the case?   Do you have any idea of what power or authority an Interpol advisory notice carries?

28 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Can you prove that you're right?   What if the notice has been removed...it has been proven that no other country has had any interest in detaining him for a traffic offence, albeit a serious one.   The Thai government has no obligation to prove your unsubstantiated claim to be wrong.   The majority of the notices and the workings of Interpol are not for public consumption.

Lets look at your response lou.

1. ".it has been proven that no other country has had any interest in detaining him". What proof that no other country has had any interest? Especially considering you don't even know if it had been withdrawn and how long ago?

2,  Yes It was a very very "serious one". a Red Bull heir literally kills a Thai cop and is drug affected driving at high speed, is in my books deserves the maximum punishment. 

3  "The Thai government has no obligation to prove your unsubstantiated claim to be wrong.   The majority of the notices and the workings of Interpol are not for public consumption."  In short  how can I substantiate my claim when all is top secret  and why is it is so secret to the public . What a gibberish response?

41 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That would not be  the job of any judge.   But what if the notice was removed, what difference would that make to the case?   Do you have any idea of what power or authority an Interpol advisory notice carries?

Do you?  I don't think so. Yes I have some idea. but one thing for sure you have not established if the notice is still in operation or not. Your responses have no factual evidence. Your wrong that, it is not the job of a judge. If the judge is involved in determining corruption in such a case and the prosecution raises and requests that investigation then it's up to the judge to decide if that will occur,

1 minute ago, cynic1 said:

48 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

But what if the notice was removed, what difference would that make to the case?   Do you have any idea of what power or authority an Interpol advisory notice carries?

Do you?  I don't think so.

Yes, I do 100%.  You, clearly, do not.

 

"Why does not a Thai judge check into that [the red notice] also to see who removed it and why?"

Thai judges do not investigate...they judge the outcome based on evidence presented by the prosecution and the defence.

15 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

Lets look at your response lou.

1. ".it has been proven that no other country has had any interest in detaining him". What proof that no other country has had any interest? Especially considering you don't even know if it had been withdrawn and how long ago?

A notice was issued by Interpol yet no country detained him for extradition.   That's the proof.

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes, I do 100%.  You, clearly, do not.

 

"Why does not a Thai judge check into that [the red notice] also to see who removed it and why?"

Thai judges do not investigate...they judge the outcome based on evidence presented by the prosecution and the defence.

No the Prosecutor will investigate if the Judge permits new evidence to be added to the trial. May I ask Lou are you on the Red Bull payroll? You seem to act as the defence lawyer?

 

17 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

2,  Yes It was a very very "serious one". a Red Bull heir literally kills a Thai cop and is drug affected driving at high speed, is in my books deserves the maximum punishment. 

Yes, a traffic accident.  What it is in your mind, or our minds, as opposed to Thai law is opinion, that's all.  What is there to suggest that if it comes to court he wouldn't get the maximum penalty?   He cannit be tried if he is not in court to defend himself.

20 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

3  "The Thai government has no obligation to prove your unsubstantiated claim to be wrong.   The majority of the notices and the workings of Interpol are not for public consumption."  In short  how can I substantiate my claim when all is top secret  and why is it is so secret to the public . What a gibberish response?

Exactly, you cannot substantiate your claims because you are not a member of Interpol!  Most Interpol dat is not for public consumption, for the reasons, ask Interpol.   The "gibberish" is not mine.

34 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

No the Prosecutor will investigate if the Judge permits new evidence to be added to the trial

No, the police investigate, the prosecutor decides if the police investigation  and evidence justifies going to trial!

36 minutes ago, cynic1 said:

May I ask Lou are you on the Red Bull payroll? You seem to act as the defence lawyer?

Is there anything that prevents my having an unbiased, rational opinion based on the known facts, so far, or are all forum members required to have the same ranting, partisan opinion?

On 8/29/2025 at 8:17 AM, hotchilli said:

Except the guy that did it is as free as a bird.

Protected species I guess.

13 years and still roaming free....soon enough he will be back in thailand and it will be like nothing ever happened.

On 8/28/2025 at 10:50 AM, mfd101 said:

Run out of brown envelopes. Needing a topup.

 

So, watch this space for nothing to happen (yawn).

The family is worth a mind boggling 45 billion dollars that’s in USD

Rest assumed the brown envelopes will just keep on coming

 

On 8/28/2025 at 9:33 AM, JoePai said:

 

2 down 2 to go then the brat is free but the police go to jail, amazing Thailand