46 minutes ago, bannork said:

Daddy loves Russia, loves Putin. 

Putin bombs apartment blocks, kills children and innocent civilians, and what does Daddy do?

'I'll........I'll.......in 20 days/ 50 days....(.whenever). I'm very disappointed in Putin' ( nobody else is because they realised long ago he's a heartless killer only interested in might)

Daddy is very tired these days.

What do the people of Europe do other than watch? 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Unlike you I’m not going to assume a motive or any affiliation of the killer.

 

Because you know it was a leftist lunatic.

13 minutes ago, bannork said:

So the right are going for blind faith whilst the left, having given that up, are trying to make life meaningful via human constructions devoid of any reference to greater deities.

 

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Because you know it was a leftist lunatic.

I would not jump to conclusions. Could be a right-winger that hates Israel or even a Muslim. 

 

A lot of nut-sacks out their. 

9 minutes ago, bannork said:

The left wrestling with human rights

 

Still valid those sketches 

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Because you know it was a leftist lunatic.

No.

 

Because I’m not going to waste time guessing in the absence of evidence.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I would not jump to conclusions. Could be a right-winger that hates Israel or even a Muslim. 

 

A lot of nut-sacks out their. 

It could be someone with any number of motivations.

 

So I agree, don’t jump to conclusions.

Just now, Yellowtail said:

I would not jump to conclusions. Could be a right-winger that hates Israel or even a Muslim. 

 

A lot of nut-sacks out their. 

Anyone else who could be interested in more polarizing climate in Us? 

 

Russia is an interesting theory, but first we need to wait for the shooter being catched. And if he have been to Cuba or Russia for training camp we can start speculating 

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"What a stupid title".

What an even more stupid comment/question.

 

Did you just alter my statement when you quoted me ?  Thought that was against the rules or is this like Animal Farm ?

18 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

 

You are unarmed in this discussion. 

 

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/religion-partisanship-and-ideology/#:~:text=The religious profiles of U.S.,wide as among White Americans.

 

Generally speaking, Americans who are highly religious are the most solidly Republican constituency. U.S. adults with lower levels of religious engagement more commonly identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party.⁶⁶

 

Read my reply again

And how many just call themselves Christian ?

 

Do you see Trump as an true Christian? 

50 minutes ago, baansgr said:

blm activist probably

I wonder what people find so funny about my comment,

Just now, Yellowtail said:

I would not jump to conclusions. Could be a right-winger that hates Israel or even a Muslim. 

 

A lot of nut-sacks out their. 

 

No it couldn't. Kirk was very balanced on both Israel and Islam. On the one hand he spoke up for Palestinian activists' right of free speech and on the other he defended Israel repeatedly. Due to his faith he  was very partial to Israel. 

 

Anyone who hates Israel would pick a totally different target, same for any Muslim. There are much more obvious targets for both.

 

Kirk is an obvious target for a leftist extremist.

https://imgur.com/a/PccMRCL

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No it couldn't. Kirk was very balanced on both Israel and Islam. On the one hand he spoke up for Palestinian activists' right of free speech and on the other he defended Israel repeatedly. Due to his faith he  was very partial to Israel. 

 

Anyone who hates Israel would pick a totally different target, same for any Muslim. There are much more obvious targets for both.

 

Kirk is an obvious target for a leftist extremist.

Again zero evidence.

 

But a lot of attempts at political point scoring out of Kirk’s assassination.

26 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’s at least two questions.

 

1. Will the FBI catch the killer?

2. Does the killer have any political affiliation?

 

3. How much was the killer paid?

28 minutes ago, Hummin said:

And you are wrong, do you have any statistics about which camp is more religious than the other?

 

I’m doing this to remind that I proved my point with real data.  LOL

Must have been a top class marksman so could have been a war veteran with PTSD.This is pure speculation.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

“I can’t stand the word ‘empathy,’ actually. I think ‘empathy’ is a made-up new-age term that does a lot of damage.” - Charlie Kirk
 

So typically, dishonest of the left. Even the portion of the quote that you clipped does not mean he has no empathy, it only means he does not like the word, or the way it is being weaponized. The word did not even exist 120 years ago. 

 

But like a good leftist, you misquoted him, and of course clipped off the portion that clarifies it: 

 

"I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new-age term does a lot of damage, but, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That’s a separate topic for a different time.” 

Charlie Kirk

 

Always classy the left. 

Just now, Anthony mellows said:

Must have been a top class marksman so could have been a war veteran with PTSD.This is pure speculation.

 

200 yards is the equivalent of a chip shot to a weekend deer hunter.  I'm not dismissing any possibilities, though.

5 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

You’re losing the plot here.  

Okay, 

 

well out of the link you posted, here is the break down between the camp out of the religious on each side

 

30 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Of course the FBI will catch the killer. Even if it takes 2 months. :In the end, they will catch him. He was caught on camera. There were witnesses. They'll get him.

 

The FBI and Kash Patel didn't get off to a good start by claiming they had the suspect in custody only to have to admit they didn't.  Keystone Cops comes to mind.

7 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

3. How much was the killer paid?

I did say at least 2 questions, you’ve presented a 3rd, there are more.

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So typically, dishonest of the left. Even the portion of the quote that you clipped does not mean he has no empathy, it only means he does not like the word, or the way it is being weaponized. The word did not even exist 120 years ago. 

 

But like a good leftist, you misquoted him, and of course clipped off the portion that clarifies it: 

 

"I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new-age term does a lot of damage, but, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That’s a separate topic for a different time.” 

Charlie Kirk

 

Always classy the left. 

I provided a quote.

 

You don’t dispute the quote.

2 minutes ago, Anthony mellows said:

Must have been a top class marksman so could have been a war veteran with PTSD.This is pure speculation.

One does not have to been military to be an expert marksman. And 200m is a bit tough, it is not that difficult, and the shooter almost missed. 

32 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

 

I never followed Charlie Kirk.  I don’t know all the much about what he talked about, other than his YouTube shorts of him engaging college kids in discussion. 

I didn't know much about him either until this shooting, however it turns out that he was a racist bigot and some......see below:-

 

 

 

On that last quote, "It's certainly worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other god-given rights".

Too true Charlie and praise be to the lord for allowing this.....almost like saying that he was "hoist by his own petard"!!!!

 

 

2 hours ago, Peabody said:

Common sense. 

 

Charlie Kirk marked the end of affirmative action by ranting against various Black women in power.

“Three weeks ago, if we would’ve said that Joy Reid, and Michelle Obama, and Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would’ve been called the racist,” Kirk said Thursday on his talk show.

“But now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us,” the far-right commentator continued. “They’re coming out and they’re saying, ‘I’m only here because of affirmative action.’ Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.”

yep, common sense.

 

You agree, right?

3 minutes ago, xylophone said:

I didn't know much about him either until this shooting, however it turns out that he was a racist bigot and some......see below:-

 

 

 

On that last quote, "It's certainly worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other god-given rights".

Too true Charlie and praise be to the lord for allowing this.....almost like saying that he was "hoist by his own petard"!!!!

 

Pour that hate on brother, it's a great day for the left. 

The only person on the right I would shed a tear for is Tucker - don't know why but that's how I feel. 

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You misquoted and truncated the quote od a dead man. But that's okay, you're a leftist so you can say and do anything to further your evil ideology. 

What ideology have I furthered.

 

Kirk thought empathy is a made up new age word that does a lot of damage.

 

Empathy didn’t kill him.