Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

All Newborns Are Forced to Get Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine

Featured Replies

   Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine?

image.png.c5dade2bd392d7dfb115cd0a28fced83.png

 

Sourcehttps://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

= = = 

Tomorrow at the ACIP meeting, the blanket policy to give it to every newborn in the US will at last be re-evaluated. To support this pivotal moment, this article will attempt to establish the actual risks and benefits of the hepatitis B vaccine, along with exposing the forgotten history behind the vaccine, which brought us to where we are now.

 

Story at a Glance:

•The hepatitis B vaccine has been marred by controversy since its inception, particularly since it is now given to every newborn child despite minimal benefit being attributable to this policy.

•Remarkably, much of that controversy (e.g., Congressional hearings, mainstream news programs, and HIV vaccine contamination concerns) has been largely forgotten.

•The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones. While the medical community has insisted for over 50 years that this link remains unproven and requires “further research”, evidence demonstrates this process indeed occurs.

•While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare), and no evidence it has reduced chronic hepatitis cases (which is the justification for the entire program).

 

= = = 

 

  • Replies 122
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TallGuyJohninBKK
    TallGuyJohninBKK

    Predictably, yet another anti-vaxer post from yet another anonymous blogger who's apparently too scared to publicly stand behind the B.S. they're posting.   First, there's no credible eviden

  • TallGuyJohninBKK
    TallGuyJohninBKK

    A popular but proven false anti-vaxer refrain.  

  • How were babies contacting infected blood/bodily fluids?   I've not had the vaccine, but banged loads of hookers, how come at 70, I haven't caught it but all these babies have?

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

Predictably, yet another anti-vaxer post from yet another anonymous blogger who's apparently too scared to publicly stand behind the B.S. they're posting.

 

First, there's no credible evidence I have seen suggesting the Hep B vaccine is in any way "dangerous." To the contrary, the CDC says it is quite safe and effective, and has studies that have documented that.

 

So instead of an anonymous anti-vax blogger, how about some legitimate advice from a qualified and credentialed doctor who puts their name and reputation behind their comments.

 

The birth dose: why are babies immunized against hepatitis B so early?

A look at the evidence behind the birth dose and the push to take it away

 

Sep 15, 2025

 

What is hepatitis B?

"Hepatitis B is a virus that destroys livers. Infants are at highest risk of catching it — when babies are exposed at birth or early infancy, about 90% go on to develop chronic liver infection compared to a 5-10% risk if exposed as an adult. This is why the vaccine is given so early — early in life is the highest risk period. ...About 25% of babies who develop chronic infection will die from liver disease later in life. [emphasis added]

...

Why is the vaccine given to all babies at birth, not just those with high risk moms?

This is a common and very reasonable question. And here’s the answer: if we only gave the vaccine to babies of known ‘high risk’ moms, we would end up missing a lot of infections, and every year babies would fall through the cracks and end up with damaged livers. Here’s why:

 

‘High risk’ routes aren’t the only way of catching it. IV drug use and sexual contact aren’t the only ways hepatitis B spreads. Over a quarter of new hepatitis B cases detected in 2022 had no known risk factor or exposure."

...

The simplest and best answer we have is to look back at history. Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year. Half of them caught it from their mom, and the other half had no clear source of infection — they may have caught it from another family member, someone at daycare, or some other source. If we only give the vaccine when moms screen positive, we’ll miss those 9,000 kids who had no known risk factor but still caught it." [emphasis added]

 

You Can Know Things

https://youcanknowthings.substack.com/p/the-birth-dose-why-are-babies-immunized

 

Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD, is completing a combined emergency medicine residency and research fellowship focusing on health literacy and communication. 

 

The Trump Admin. and the anti-vaxer world of RFK Jr. and Co. want to portray Hep B as a disease that's only caught by drug users and sexual contact. But as the above post makes clear, lots of babies can contract Hep B from their mothers at birth, or from physical contact with family members or playmates when young -- unless they are vaccinated at birth.

 

It's cruel and reprehensible for anti-vaxers, via their misplaced and medically irresponsible zeal to erase the standard use of all kinds of childhood vaccines, including Hep B in this case, to end up sentencing thousands of babies to serious liver disease that often proves fatal later in life.

 

I can imagine getting A and B later ( I did).  I was not aware that B is or was mandated for newborns.  I was born in1957 when there was no such vaccine

  • Popular Post

Here's more of the reasons for giving the Hep B vaccine as a standard childhood vaccination, per the American Academy of Pediatrics:

 

"Hepatitis B can lead to serious lifelong illnesses or even death, and a hepatitis B birth dose provides a critical safety net protecting infants from acquiring a potentially serious infection at the time of birth. Late-stage hepatitis B can lead to cirrhosis of the liver and liver cancer. 

 

The U.S. is currently on track to eliminating perinatal hepatitis B, with only 17 reported cases in 2021 and 13 in 2022. However, eliminating the birth dose would jeopardize this progress. [emphasis added]

...

Newborns respond well to a birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine, and after completing the full 3 to 4-dose vaccine series, 98% of healthy infants achieve full immunity to the virus. 

 

Newborns infected with hepatitis B at birth and infants infected in the first year of life have a 90% chance of developing chronic hepatitis B, and 25% of those who develop chronic hepatitis B will die from the disease." [emphasis added]

 

American Academy of Pediatrics

https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/fact-checked/fact-checked-hepatitis-b-vaccine-given-to-newborns-reduces-risk-of-chronic-infection/

 

 

  • Popular Post
24 minutes ago, gk10012001 said:

I can imagine getting A and B later ( I did).  I was not aware that B is or was mandated for newborns.  I was born in1957 when there was no such vaccine

 

In the U.S. for point of reference (from the sources cited and quoted above):

 

"Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year."

 

With the use of the Hep B vaccine at birth:

 

"The U.S. is currently on track to eliminating perinatal hepatitis B, with only 17 reported cases in 2021 and 13 in 2022. However, eliminating the birth dose would jeopardize this progress."

 

 

14 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

In the U.S. for point of reference:

 

"Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year."

 

With the use of the Hep B vaccine at birth:

 

"The U.S. is currently on track to eliminating perinatal hepatitis B, with only 17 reported cases in 2021 and 13 in 2022. However, eliminating the birth dose would jeopardize this progress."

 

 

How were babies contacting infected blood/bodily fluids?

 

I've not had the vaccine, but banged loads of hookers, how come at 70, I haven't caught it but all these babies have?

  • A birth dose of Hepatitis B Vaccine has been recommended in the U. S. since 1991.

 

  • Hepatitis B is the leading cause of liver cancer in the U.S. and around the world.

 

  • 5,000-6,000 people in the U.S. die from hepatitis B related liver complications every year.

 

  • Babies born to hepatitis B positive mothers have a 90% chance of being healthy if they are given the hepatitis B vaccine at birth and again in two months.

 

University of Michigan Health System

https://med.umich.edu/1libr/IMMS/RecommendHepBUM.pdf

 

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

How were babies contacting infected blood?

 

from mothers at birth, and other means thereafter...

 

'Hepatitis B is spread through blood and body fluids, but this virus can survive outside the body for a week. This means up to 7 days after someone has left blood on something, such as, playground equipment, a water bottle, a school desk, any surface; it can be picked up through an opening in the skin or eyes of another person — a person who isn’t “at risk.” Just because you don’t participate in risky behavior, like having multiple sex partners or injecting IV drugs, doesn’t mean that you can’t catch this disease."

 

https://med.umich.edu/1libr/IMMS/RecommendHepBUM.pdf

 

5 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

from mothers at birth, and other means thereafter...

 

'Hepatitis B is spread through blood and body fluids, but this virus can survive outside the body for a week. This means up to 7 days after someone has left blood on something, such as, playground equipment, a water bottle, a school desk, any surface; it can be picked up through an opening in the skin or eyes of another person — a person who isn’t “at risk.” Just because you don’t participate in risky behavior, like having multiple sex partners or injecting IV drugs, doesn’t mean that you can’t catch this disease."

 

https://med.umich.edu/1libr/IMMS/RecommendHepBUM.pdf

 

Sound like the "caught it from a toilet seat" excuse to me.

I just don't believe all those babies are at risk.

If it's as easy to catch as you say, I should have it.

 

And it they have it passed down from their mom's, a vaccine after their birth won't help, the propaganda is just bs, as any thinking person can see.

  • Author
3 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:
  • A birth dose of Hepatitis B Vaccine has been recommended in the U. S. since 1991.
  • Hepatitis B is the leading cause of liver cancer in the U.S. and around the world.
  • 5,000-6,000 people in the U.S. die from hepatitis B related liver complications every year.
  • Babies born to hepatitis B positive mothers have a 90% chance of being healthy if they are given the hepatitis B vaccine at birth and again in two months.

University of Michigan Health System

https://med.umich.edu/1libr/IMMS/RecommendHepBUM.pdf

 

From the article, and supported with facts and data: 

> While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare), and no evidence it has reduced chronic hepatitis cases (which is the justification for the entire program).

 

  • Popular Post

Says your anonymous blogger... But what the real and identified doctors say is:

 

In the U.S. for point of reference (from the sources cited and quoted above):

 

"Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year." [emphasis added]

 

With the use of the Hep B vaccine at birth:

 

"The U.S. is currently on track to eliminating perinatal hepatitis B, with only 17 reported cases in 2021 and 13 in 2022. However, eliminating the birth dose would jeopardize this progress." [emphasis added]

 

1 minute ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Says your anonymous blogger... But what the real and identified doctors say is:

 

In the U.S. for point of reference (from the sources cited and quoted above):

 

"Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year." [emphasis added]

 

With the use of the Hep B vaccine at birth:

 

"The U.S. is currently on track to eliminating perinatal hepatitis B, with only 17 reported cases in 2021 and 13 in 2022. However, eliminating the birth dose would jeopardize this progress." [emphasis added]

 

Doctors say what they're paid to say, or they get struck off.

And don't forget they all get bonus paid for reaching vaccination targets.

  • Popular Post

And from the U.S. CDC:

 

"Vaccination is the best way to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective.

Vaccine effectiveness

All hepatitis B vaccines are highly effective in preventing HBV infection. Overall, hepatitis B vaccination produces seroprotection in 98% of healthy term infants. For infants with low birth weights, vaccine response can be lower.2 Vaccine response among infants does not vary considerably by maternal HBsAg status or HBIG administration.

 

As a postexposure immunoprophylaxis measure for infants born to an HBsAg-positive birth parent, hepatitis B vaccine without HBIG is 75% effective at preventing perinatal HBV transmission, but when combined with HBIG, the effectiveness is 94%. 345The birth dose also provides protection to infants at risk from household exposure to HBV.

 

https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis-b/hcp/perinatal-provider-overview/vaccine-administration.html

 

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Doctors say what they're paid to say, or they get struck off.

And don't forget they all get bonus paid for reaching vaccination targets.

 

A popular but proven false anti-vaxer refrain.

 

2 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

And from the U.S. CDC:

 

"Vaccination is the best way to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective.

Vaccine effectiveness

All hepatitis B vaccines are highly effective in preventing HBV infection. Overall, hepatitis B vaccination produces seroprotection in 98% of healthy term infants. For infants with low birth weights, vaccine response can be lower.2 Vaccine response among infants does not vary considerably by maternal HBsAg status or HBIG administration.

 

As a postexposure immunoprophylaxis measure for infants born to an HBsAg-positive birth parent, hepatitis B vaccine without HBIG is 75% effective at preventing perinatal HBV transmission, but when combined with HBIG, the effectiveness is 94%. 345The birth dose also provides protection to infants at risk from household exposure to HBV.

 

https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis-b/hcp/perinatal-provider-overview/vaccine-administration.html

 

Again,

Where/how are all these babies contacting infected bodily fluids?

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

Again,

Where/how are all these babies contacting infected bodily fluids?

 

I already answered your question above... You do have some vague idea about how women give birth to babies, right?

 

47 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Predictably, yet another anti-vaxer post from yet another anonymous blogger who's apparently too scared to publicly stand behind the B.S. they're posting.

 

Instead of that, how about some legitimate advice from a qualified and credentialed doctor who puts their name and reputation behind their comments.

 

The birth dose: why are babies immunized against hepatitis B so early?

A look at the evidence behind the birth dose and the push to take it away

 

Sep 15, 2025

 

What is hepatitis B?

"Hepatitis B is a virus that destroys livers. Infants are at highest risk of catching it — when babies are exposed at birth or early infancy, about 90% go on to develop chronic liver infection compared to a 5-10% risk if exposed as an adult. This is why the vaccine is given so early — early in life is the highest risk period. ...About 25% of babies who develop chronic infection will die from liver disease later in life. [emphasis added]

...

Why is the vaccine given to all babies at birth, not just those with high risk moms?

This is a common and very reasonable question. And here’s the answer: if we only gave the vaccine to babies of known ‘high risk’ moms, we would end up missing a lot of infections, and every year babies would fall through the cracks and end up with damaged livers. Here’s why:

 

‘High risk’ routes aren’t the only way of catching it. IV drug use and sexual contact aren’t the only ways hepatitis B spreads. Over a quarter of new hepatitis B cases detected in 2022 had no known risk factor or exposure."

...

The simplest and best answer we have is to look back at history. Before the hepatitis B vaccine was recommended for all infants, about 18,000 babies and children caught hepatitis B every year. Half of them caught it from their mom, and the other half had no clear source of infection — they may have caught it from another family member, someone at daycare, or some other source. If we only give the vaccine when moms screen positive, we’ll miss those 9,000 kids who had no known risk factor but still caught it." [emphasis added]

 

You Can Know Things

https://youcanknowthings.substack.com/p/the-birth-dose-why-are-babies-immunized

 

Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD, is completing a combined emergency medicine residency and research fellowship focusing on health literacy and communication. 

 

The Trump Admin. and the anti-vaxer world of RFK Jr. and Co. want to portray Hep B as a disease that's only caught by drug users and sexual contact. But as the above post makes clear, lots of babies can contract Hep B from their mothers at birth, or from physical contact with family members or playmates when young -- unless they are vaccinated at birth.

 

It's a cruel and reprehensible position for anti-vaxers to take that via their misplaced and medically irresponsible zeal to erase the standard use of all kinds of childhood vaccines, including Hep B in this case, that they would end up sentencing thousands of babies to serious liver disease that often proves fatal later in life.

 

 

So no mention of the relative risk of the problematic vaccine vs the benefits?

 

Maybe there are benefits.  But they need to be weighed against the downsides.

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

So no mention of the relative risk of the problematic vaccine vs the benefits?

 

Maybe there are benefits.  But they need to be weighed against the downsides.

 

Where's the any real, credible evidence that the Hep B vaccine is "problematic,"  besides the nonsense claims of an anonymous anti-vax blogger in the OP post?

 

Per the CDC:

 

Reporting adverse events

"The most common adverse events following hepatitis B vaccination are injection site reactions and mild systemic reactions."

 

https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis-b/hcp/perinatal-provider-overview/vaccine-administration.html

 

 

"Vaccines, like any medicine, can have side effects. Many people who get a hepatitis B vaccine have no side effects at all. The most common side effects include injection site pain, soreness, or redness, headache, and fatigue, and are usually mild lasting 1-2 days."

 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/hepatitis-b.html

 

 

 

A closer look at the safety data

  • A Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) study compared deaths among newborns vaccinated with hepatitis B and unvaccinated newborns. The study found no differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated newborns.1

 

  • CDC reviewed VAERS reports of adverse events following hepatitis B vaccination from 2005 through 2015. During that time, 20,231 reports following hepatitis B or hepatitis B-containing vaccines, were submitted to VAERS. Over half of reports were in persons younger than 2 years of age; the majority of reports (78%) were following hepatitis B-containing vaccines in combination with other vaccines at the same visit. The most frequently reported adverse events for vaccines given in combination were fever, injection site redness, and vomiting. This review of the hepatitis B vaccine did not detect any new or unexpected safety concerns. These findings are consistent with pre-licensure clinical trials and other post-licensure monitoring and research.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/hepatitis-b.html

 

  • Popular Post

TallGuyJohninBKK, thanks for being the poster who cites relevant and peer-reviewed medical articles to support your stance on this and many other medical matters, as opposed to the 'loony', tinhat articles that the antivaxxers cite 🙂

  • Popular Post
8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Where's the any real, credible evidence that the Hep B vaccine is "problematic,"  besides the nonsense claims of an anonymous anti-vax blogger in the OP post?

 

Per the CDC:

 

Reporting adverse events

"The most common adverse events following hepatitis B vaccination are injection site reactions and mild systemic reactions."

 

https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis-b/hcp/perinatal-provider-overview/vaccine-administration.html

 

 

"Vaccines, like any medicine, can have side effects. Many people who get a hepatitis B vaccine have no side effects at all. The most common side effects include injection site pain, soreness, or redness, headache, and fatigue, and are usually mild lasting 1-2 days."

 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/hepatitis-b.html

 

 

 

You're aware that one of the reasons we're having this conversation is that a lot of people don't trust the CDC any more. Largely as a result of the lies and incompetence around the disastrous Covid response that saw businesses devastated, kids falling behind years in development, etc. A lot of which was due to the eenie meanie mini moe around shutdowns and distancing.  

 

So pardon me if I'm skeptical of their recommendations. Remember... 4% if the world's people, more money spent by far, and 16% of the alleged Covid deaths.

 

I think that just shone some light on a lot of what's been coming out of the CDC for a long time.

2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

You're aware that one of the reasons we're having this conversation is that a lot of people don't trust the CDC any more. Largely as a result of the lies and incompetence around the disastrous Covid response that saw businesses devastated, kids falling behind years in development, etc. A lot of which was due to the eenie meanie mini moe around shutdowns and distancing.  

 

So pardon me if I'm skeptical of their recommendations. Remember... 4% if the world's people, more money spent by far, and 16% of the alleged Covid deaths.

 

I think that just shone some light on a lot of what's been coming out of the CDC for a long time.

Lost complete trust in the CDC & FDA decades ago.   Never had trust in WHO, as way too money being thrown around and they all simply can't be trusted.  

 

It really makes no sense for Hep B to be given to newborns, unless mother has tested positive for it.

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

•The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones.

 

Another debunked, disproven claim, as documented by extensive past research:

 

Autoimmune diseases after hepatitis B immunization in adults: Literature review and meta-analysis, with reference to ‘autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants’ (ASIA)

 

11 September 2018

 

Background

"To assess if hepatitis B vaccination in adults is causally associated with autoimmune diseases. Such causation has been claimed based mainly on case reports and uncontrolled studies, and a syndrome ‘Autoimmune/autoinflammatory Disorder Induced by Adjuvants’ (ASIA) has been claimed to be linked to immunization, particularly hepatitis B vaccination.
 

Results

Overall no association between hepatitis B vaccination and the onset of autoimmune diseases was seen. The overall odds ratio was 1.06, with 95% confidence limits of 0.93–1.21, with non-significant heterogeneity. Only one study showed a significant excess risk between hepatitis B immunisation and autoimmune disease.

Conclusions

Despite multiple case reports, there is no reliable scientific evidence of autoimmune diseases being caused by hepatitis B vaccinations."
 
 
 
Screenshot_5.jpg.3a72b27e6d727eca1ad323e692c9c823.jpg
1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

''Hepatitis B is spread through blood and body fluids, but this virus can survive outside the body for a week. This means up to 7 days after someone has left blood on something, such as, playground equipment, a water bottle, a school desk, any surface; it can be picked up through an opening in the skin or eyes of another person — a person who isn’t “at risk.” Just because you don’t participate in risky behavior, like having multiple sex partners or injecting IV drugs, doesn’t mean that you can’t catch this disease."

This nonsense gets my highest award; Monumental Humbug.

 

There is no such thing as a Hepatitis virus. Made up nonsense to make Big Pharma wealthier than what they already are. 

Makes perfect sense for newborns... 😆 

 

"The hepatitis B virus spreads through contact with blood, semen or other body fluids from an infected person."

  • Popular Post

It's now so predictable vaccine threads descend into a contest between peer-reviewed articles in reputable journals, and some anonymous Mid-Western "doctor" making claims that are total dumbf##kery.

 

I am tired of ASEAN giving idiots oxygen.

 

11 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Another debunked, disproven claim, as documented by extensive past research:

 

Autoimmune diseases after hepatitis B immunization in adults: Literature review and meta-analysis, with reference to ‘autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants’ (ASIA)

 

11 September 2018

 

Background

"To assess if hepatitis B vaccination in adults is causally associated with autoimmune diseases. Such causation has been claimed based mainly on case reports and uncontrolled studies, and a syndrome ‘Autoimmune/autoinflammatory Disorder Induced by Adjuvants’ (ASIA) has been claimed to be linked to immunization, particularly hepatitis B vaccination.
 

Results

Overall no association between hepatitis B vaccination and the onset of autoimmune diseases was seen. The overall odds ratio was 1.06, with 95% confidence limits of 0.93–1.21, with non-significant heterogeneity. Only one study showed a significant excess risk between hepatitis B immunisation and autoimmune disease.

Conclusions

Despite multiple case reports, there is no reliable scientific evidence of autoimmune diseases being caused by hepatitis B vaccinations."
 
 
 
Screenshot_5.jpg.3a72b27e6d727eca1ad323e692c9c823.jpg

 

Who funded that study?

 

That's the first thing I ask myself, on any study.

More debunking of the disproven autoimmune claims in the OP:

 

Evidence Refuting the Existence of Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA)

November-December, 2017

 

[by an international team of medical researchers from Australia,New Zealand and Denmark]

Conclusions

"... In our view, and that of others,3,30,35 the association between vaccination and autoimmunity is likely to be spurious, most likely the result of random events or confounding rather than causality (Appendix 1). From our review of the literature, vaccine adjuvant-induced ASIA does not appear to constitute a definable medical condition at this time. This will be of considerable reassurance to physicians administering routine vaccines with aluminum-containing adjuvants as well as those prescribing aluminum-containing allergen-specific IT.
 
We are concerned that fear of ASIA and similar unsubstantiated “disorders” is reducing vaccine uptake rates, leading to an increased risk of death from vaccine- preventable disease including cervical cancer. It is thus timely for international organizations such as the WHO and the International Union of Immunological Societies to convene an independent panel of experts to objectively examine the diagnostic criteria for ASIA and the evidence for its existence."
 
 
  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Who funded that study?

 

That's the first thing I ask myself, on any study.

 

You could actually read, you know...

 

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This arose from work supported by the Accident Compensation Commission of New Zealand. This organisation had no role in the preparation, review, or submission of this report.
 
J. Mark Elwood a, Rohan Ameratunga b
a
School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
b
Department of Virology and Immunology, Auckland Hospital, Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
 
Not some anonymous alleged quack like in the OP post.
 
  • Popular Post
18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This nonsense gets my highest award; Monumental Humbug.

 

There is no such thing as a Hepatitis virus. Made up nonsense to make Big Pharma wealthier than what they already are. 

Right on cue, sadly...............:coffee1:

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.