12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

FBI Embedded 275 Plainclothes Agents In Jan. 6 Crowds, Blaze Reports, As House Panel Probes Informants’ Roles

Separately, The Blaze reported on Sept. 25, 2025, citing a senior congressional source, that the FBI told Congress it had 275 plainclothes agents in the Jan. 6 crowds. The Dallas Express has not independently verified that figure.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fbi-embedded-275-plainclothes-agents-111534839.html

Another "conspiracy theory" turns fact. Cheney, Pelosi and Kinzinger will be in full panic mode. Rightly so. 

FAFO😅

49 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

FBI Embedded 275 Plainclothes Agents In Jan. 6 Crowds, Blaze Reports, As House Panel Probes Informants’ Roles

Separately, The Blaze reported on Sept. 25, 2025, citing a senior congressional source, that the FBI told Congress it had 275 plainclothes agents in the Jan. 6 crowds. The Dallas Express has not independently verified that figure.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fbi-embedded-275-plainclothes-agents-111534839.html

 

36 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Another "conspiracy theory" turns fact. Cheney, Pelosi and Kinzinger will be in full panic mode. Rightly so. 

FAFO😅

The Dallas Express, citing The Blaze (🙂) citing an unknown source, that's your idea of proof? 🤣🤣🤣

 

From the IG report:

“On the morning of January 6, the FBI had personnel in the MPD JOCC, the WFO command post, and SIOC, as well as an IA in DHS’s virtual situation room. The FBI also had tactical teams and other specialized resources on standby. After the Capitol had been breached on January 6 by rioters, and in response to a request from the USCP, the FBI deployed several hundred Special Agents and employees to the US Capitol and the surrounding area."

 

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/review-federal-bureau-investigations-handling-its-confidential-human-sources-and

 

 

1 hour ago, candide said:

I know. I was taunting Darbie-Foss' post!

It did not come out that way to me, hence my post!

 

PS;  I thought that taunting/baiting posters was against Forum rules!

13 minutes ago, DezLez said:

It did not come out that way to me, hence my post!

 

PS;  I thought that taunting/baiting posters was against Forum rules!

Sorry for the confusion generated by my post.

 

My point is that, contrary to MAGA propaganda, Comey has been likely indicted for leaks about Hillary's emails, as explained in the link I posted.

2 hours ago, darbie-foos said:

 

Nonsense we all see what Donald trump twice impeached felon 34 times over convicted sexual assaulter (the judge thinks he’s a rapist)president.hes had a lifetime of experience avoiding going to trial and the means to do it.every time we do manage to get this fraud into court he loses because he’s a criminal.Its obvious to lucid people he’s corrupting the system to intimidate his detractors.Remember we all have seen him breaking the law.hes not the victim here he’s the perp.Its a sad state of affairs but in my view that pretty much sums it up.sad 

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Nonsense we all see what Donald trump twice impeached felon 34 times over convicted sexual assaulter (the judge thinks he’s a rapist)president.hes had a lifetime of experience avoiding going to trial and the means to do it.every time we do manage to get this fraud into court he loses because he’s a criminal.Its obvious to lucid people he’s corrupting the system to intimidate his detractors.Remember we all have seen him breaking the law.hes not the victim here he’s the perp.Its a sad state of affairs but in my view that pretty much sums it up.sad 

Was the anti Trump lawfare nonsense that nobody, especially you, understands (the FA), worth it now that the payback (the FO) is upon us?🤣

5 minutes ago, Tug said:

over convicted sexual assaulter (the judge thinks he’s a rapist)

When was Trump convicted of sexual assault?  I'll answer the question for you.  He was not convicted of sexual assault.  You can only be convinced this is in criminal court. 

 

This case against was nothing but a he said she said, and the lawsuit was funded by Reid Hoffman. 

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Was the anti Trump lawfare nonsense that nobody, especially you, understands (the FA), worth it now that the payback (the FO) is upon us?🤣

Please. We've seen this predictions before. You're going to need a judiciary and jury as obsessed with revenge as you and others of your ilk are to enjoy the kind of success you anticipate.

 

6 hours ago, Schoggibueb said:

Well I'm sure she has everything in her toolbox she needs for this job. 

😂

She has light colored or streaked hair

3 minutes ago, gk10012001 said:

She has light colored or streaked hair

Nothing to colour her face?

2 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Please. We've seen this predictions before. You're going to need a judiciary and jury as obsessed with revenge as you and others of your ilk are to enjoy the kind of success you anticipate.

 

Fact check. False

 

The process is the punishment. We learned this from your team. Comeys life is in tatters. His allies are turned against him. His family are terrified. He will be sedated and his people frantic trying to find a way forward.

Ringing any bells? Russia collusion hoax? Document?? CSI plot??? Paying a lawyer 34 times for legal expenses?

 Biggest back fire in history. Comey is right now in full panic. His world is crashing around on him and HIS FAMILY. Pure agony. His life is ruined. You guys invented it. Now enjoy it. We are.

 

Twelve or more grand jurors did not concur in finding an indictment against James Comey as to Count I.

 

LMAO maga

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fact check. False

 

The process is the punishment. We learned this from your team. Comeys life is in tatters. His allies are turned against him. His family are terrified. He will be sedated and his people frantic trying to find a way forward.

Ringing any bells? Russia collusion hoax? Document?? CSI plot??? Paying a lawyer 34 times for legal expenses?

 Biggest back fire in history. Comey is right now in full panic. His world is crashing around on him and HIS FAMILY. Pure agony. His life is ruined. You guys invented it. Now enjoy it. We are.

 

Which allies have turned against Comey? In fact, you couldn't be more wrong. Remember how infuriated Democrats were with Comey for his dubious conduct during the 2016 presidential campaign? What's their stance now? As for the rest of your rant, it reads like bad, overwrought fiction. 

11 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Adam Schiff will be in full panic mode. He knows he's next, we know he's next.

Game on fellas, game on!

You have to make up a crime to indict Schiff. Maybe you cult members can try some form of lese majeste? You're all anti-American, so that might fit.

 

What we do know is that stealing classified documents with an obvious intent to monetize them (why would Trump steal HCS, which have real names of foreign human clandestine sources?) is not a crime in MAGAStan, trying to overthrow an election ("Just find me 11,780 votes) is not a crime in MAGAstan, and Insurrection and Sedition are not crimes in MAGAstan.

 

We also know that conspiracy to hang the Vice President of the United States in a pardonable offense...kind of like stealing a pack of gum from a 7-11 (unless you're black), and beating and bear spraying 140 Capitol police officers is "just typical tourists" in MAGAstan, and if anyone takes exception to the beatings, and does their job like investigate or prosecute, those officials must be fired.

 

That is the America you created. It was not the America I served. Of course you never served so you never had any skin in the game.

 

Bone spurs?

9 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Another "conspiracy theory" turns fact. Cheney, Pelosi and Kinzinger will be in full panic mode. Rightly so. 

FAFO😅

You do seem excited about all these folks you fantasize about being "in full panic mode".

 

I bet you're getting a micro-woody just thinking about it, but best you stop the self abuse/onanism and calm down.

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

His life is ruined. You guys invented it. Now enjoy it. We are.

And that's the problem with your attitude and many of your ilk.

55 minutes ago, Wingate said:

You do seem excited about all these folks you fantasize about being "in full panic mode".

 

I bet you're getting a micro-woody just thinking about it, but best you stop the self abuse/onanism and calm down.

Their fantasizing never ends no matter how often reality torpedoes their reveries.

When Justice Dept IG Horowitz released his report about the FBI's conduct and misconduct in the Trump's investigation, he debunked claims that there was a deep state conspiracy in the Justice Dept. against Trump. AG Barr and his special counsel Durham took the unusual step of issuing public statements that were strongly skeptical of Horowitz' conclusions. For the rest of his tenure, Barr closely collaborated with Durham in his investigation. He even went so far as to accompany Durham to Italy as part of the investigation. Durham's investigation lasted for over 3 years. The only people he ended up prosecuting with evidence that he developed on his own were 2 parties he accused of lying to the FBI. In both cases they were acquitted. The only person he managed to convict was a low level line lawyer at the Justice Dept. Durham used evidence developed by by IG Horowitz. The line lawyer pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor.

3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

And that's the problem with your attitude and many of your ilk.

More significantly, he claimed that Comey's allies were abandoning him, when, in fact, the opposite is the case. Just another unhinged rant from SunnyinBangrak.

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fact check. False

 

The process is the punishment. We learned this from your team. Comeys life is in tatters. His allies are turned against him. His family are terrified. He will be sedated and his people frantic trying to find a way forward.

Ringing any bells? Russia collusion hoax? Document?? CSI plot??? Paying a lawyer 34 times for legal expenses?

 Biggest back fire in history. Comey is right now in full panic. His world is crashing around on him and HIS FAMILY. Pure agony. His life is ruined. You guys invented it. Now enjoy it. We are.

 

The problem with this is we all saw trump commit crimes it’s on tape on audio in print the only reason he not in the penitentiary now is he lucked out with that corrupt judge cannon otherwise we would have got him on trial before a jury and we know how that turns out.

guilty?

7 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fact check. False

 

The process is the punishment. We learned this from your team. Comeys life is in tatters. His allies are turned against him. His family are terrified. He will be sedated and his people frantic trying to find a way forward.

Ringing any bells? Russia collusion hoax? Document?? CSI plot??? Paying a lawyer 34 times for legal expenses?

 Biggest back fire in history. Comey is right now in full panic. His world is crashing around on him and HIS FAMILY. Pure agony. His life is ruined. You guys invented it. Now enjoy it. We are.

 

1) Stating "fact check" before listing your interpretations and opinions does not make them facts. They remain your interpretations and opinions, you present no evidence which is rather needed to make them facts.

 

2) I know relatively little about Comey, and nothing about his family. May I ask why you are so full of glee at the prospect of the world crashing down around them?

8 minutes ago, JAG said:

1) Stating "fact check" before listing your interpretations and opinions does not make them facts. They remain your interpretations and opinions, you present no evidence which is rather needed to make them facts.

 

 

Given that the only "fact" that was checkable is clearly false, makes his claim only more ludicrous.

Eight months into his second term, Trump has fulfilled his pledge to make retaliation a central feature of his presidency. He has revoked security clearances and Secret Service protection for people he doesn’t like. He has issued executive orders punishing law firms he disfavored. His administration has fired attorneys who worked on cases against Trump and his supporters, while the president set those supporters free with pardons.

 

Trump’s eagerness to use the power of government to silence critics, punish opponents and reward loyalists is unparalleled since the Watergate scandal toppled the presidency of Richard M. Nixon in 1974. In the following decades, politicians, top officials and rank-and-file lawyers adopted norms intended to insulate the Justice Department from the White House. Trump and his allies chipped away at those norms during his first term and have obliterated them in the second.

 

“Other prosecutors will feel even more pressure now to bring charges against whomever displeases the president,” said Brendan Nyhan, a professor of government at Dartmouth College. “And you don’t want to live in a country where displeasing the president can put you in jail.”

 

The end of democracy in America? The beginning of autocracy and Fascism? Quite possibly. 

The clearest way to understand the extraordinary nature of the indictment on Thursday of James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, is to offer up a simple recitation of the facts.

 

An inexperienced prosecutor loyal to President Trump, in the job for less than a week, filed criminal charges against one of her boss’s most-reviled opponents. She did so not only at Mr. Trump’s direct command, but also against the urging of both her own subordinates and her predecessor, who had just been fired for raising concerns that there was insufficient evidence to indict.

 

“What we are seeing is the almost wholesale collapse of the Justice Department as an organization based on the rule of law,” said Alan Z. Rozenshtein, a former department official who now teaches at the University of Minnesota Law School.

 

That Mr. Trump could successfully initiate such a case also increases the potential costs of opposing him, an expansion of presidential power that could chill public dissent across the country.

 

Mr. Trump’s own remarks about the case could come back to haunt him.

 

Over the weekend, Mr. Trump preemptively declared on social media that Mr. Comey, Ms. James and Mr. Schiff were “all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done.” A prejudicial statement like that could easily be featured in a motion accusing the Justice Department of taking part in an improperly vindictive prosecution.

41 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

The clearest way to understand the extraordinary nature of the indictment on Thursday of James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, is to offer up a simple recitation of the facts.

 

An inexperienced prosecutor loyal to President Trump, in the job for less than a week, filed criminal charges against one of her boss’s most-reviled opponents. She did so not only at Mr. Trump’s direct command, but also against the urging of both her own subordinates and her predecessor, who had just been fired for raising concerns that there was insufficient evidence to indict.

 

“What we are seeing is the almost wholesale collapse of the Justice Department as an organization based on the rule of law,” said Alan Z. Rozenshtein, a former department official who now teaches at the University of Minnesota Law School.

 

That Mr. Trump could successfully initiate such a case also increases the potential costs of opposing him, an expansion of presidential power that could chill public dissent across the country.

 

Mr. Trump’s own remarks about the case could come back to haunt him.

 

Over the weekend, Mr. Trump preemptively declared on social media that Mr. Comey, Ms. James and Mr. Schiff were “all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done.” A prejudicial statement like that could easily be featured in a motion accusing the Justice Department of taking part in an improperly vindictive prosecution.

When we finally rid ourselves of this fraud he’s going to need that auto pen to sign the hundreds of pardons he will need to cover his minions……that is if he doesn’t stroke out first!!

56 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Eight months into his second term, Trump has fulfilled his pledge to make retaliation a central feature of his presidency. He has revoked security clearances and Secret Service protection for people he doesn’t like. He has issued executive orders punishing law firms he disfavored. His administration has fired attorneys who worked on cases against Trump and his supporters, while the president set those supporters free with pardons.

Same as the lefties were doing.

I completely understand his actions, they used the law against him with numerous spurious legal actions, it's only fair he gets to return the favour.

Just now, BritManToo said:

Same as the lefties were doing.

I completely understand his actions, they used the law against him with numerous spurious legal actions, it's only fair he gets to return the favour.

No, it's not the same thing lefties weredoing against. Did the by the administration revoke secret service protection against political opponents? Did it punish lawyers who gave counsel to political opponents? Did it fire career attorneys or FBI agents who worked on investigations that targeted Democrats?

59 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

No, it's not the same thing lefties weredoing against. Did the by the administration revoke secret service protection against political opponents? Did it punish lawyers who gave counsel to political opponents? Did it fire career attorneys or FBI agents who worked on investigations that targeted Democrats?

Don't care, their job now as Secret Service and FBI is to support their president.

If they don't like him, they can quit or be fired.

Just now, BritManToo said:

Don't care, their job now as Secret Service and FBI is to support their president.

If they don't like him, they an quit or be fired.

No. Their job is to uphold the rule of law. They are not Trump's private police force.

9 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

No. Their job is to uphold the rule of law. They are not Trump's private police force.

Don't they all take an oath to the President?

 

And secret service, would you want to be protected by someone that opposes you?

Or do you think it's OK for them to let snipers shoot at Donald from nearby roofs?