Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes taken off YouTube hours after rejoining despite MAGA reinstatement hopes

 

"Newly created YouTube accounts for the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and far-right commentator Nick Fuentes were both taken down hours after their creation, despite anticipation that the platform would begin reinstating banned accounts.

...

Many on the right had been expecting a flood of reinstated accounts in the coming days. Rep. Jim Jordan, the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee, shared a letter earlier this week from YouTube’s parent company, where Alphabet said it would give creators who were banned for repeat violations of Covid-19 and elections-related content policies that are no longer in effect the chance to rejoin. [emphasis added]

...

YouTube wrote on X on Thursday the reinstatement effort hadn’t begun yet. “We terminated these channels as it’s still against our rules for previously terminated users to start new channels,” according to the company. “The pilot program for terminations that many people have been referencing this week isn’t available yet and will be a limited pilot program to start. We’ll have more on how the program will work, who is eligible, and how creators can access it soon.“

 

Jones and Fuentes may not be eligible to rejoin under the program even when it does get going. Jones was taken off YouTube prior to the pandemic in 2018 for violations including hate speech and child endangerment, and Fuentes was banned in 2020 for hate speech. [emphasis added]

 

(more)

 

The Independent

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/uknews/alex-jones-and-nick-fuentes-taken-off-youtube-hours-after-rejoining-despite-maga-reinstatement-hopes/ar-AA1Njqxy

 

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-09-23-letter-to-hjc.pdf

 

More admissions  that a censorship campaign was in full force

this after Twitter and Meta admissions to the same coercion and pressure to censor  content that was not against their terms or against the law.

 

 

 

PS. Alex Jones was right again.

 

 

 

  

51 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Jones and Fuentes may not be eligible to rejoin under the program even when it does get going. Jones was taken off YouTube prior to the pandemic in 2018 for violations including hate speech and child endangerment, and Fuentes was banned in 2020 for hate speech. [emphasis added]

He didnt join in with the hiveminds forced vax fascism either. His real crime?

13 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

He didnt join in with the hiveminds forced vax fascism either. His real crime?

Naa he jealous of Typhoid Mary and wants that title for himself….or perhaps you want it.

Ohh.... Jones is such a wonderful guy who deserves to be foisted on the world...

 

"Among many other conspiracy theories, Jones has alleged that the United States government either concealed information about or outright falsified the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks, and the 1969 Moon landing.^[10] He has also claimed that several governments and large businesses have colluded to create a globalist "New World Order" through "manufactured economic crises, sophisticated surveillance tech and—above all—inside-job terror attacks that fuel exploitable hysteria".^[11]

 

Jones has provided a platform for white nationalists and neo-Nazis on his website, Banned.Video, as well as providing an "entry point" to their ideology.^[12] 

...

In October 2022, for Jones's defamatory falsehoods about the Sandy Hook shooting, juries in Connecticut and Texas awarded a total of $1.487 billion in damages from Jones to a first responder and families of victims; the plaintiffs alleged that Jones's lies led to them being threatened and harassed for years.^[11][19][20] On December 2, 2022, Jones filed for personal bankruptcy."

...

On August 13, 2025, Texas Judge Maya Guerra Gamble ordered Infowars assets to be turned over to a state receiver to be sold to pay the families.^[

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones

 

 

 

Big payouts for Youtube (Google) commie tactics. Just go ask President Trump.

 

 

No problem , Jones doesn't need youtube.

Plenty of other sources to see or hear him.

Most importantly , he is on X thanks to Musk.

 

And Jones is not a conspiracy theorist.

Jones gets vindicated time after time.

1 minute ago, FlorC said:

No problem , Jones doesn't need youtube.

Plenty of other sources to see or hear him.

Most importantly , he is on X thanks to Musk.

 

And Jones is not a conspiracy theorist.

Jones gets vindicated time after time.

 

 

Not a conspiracy theorist?

 

Sandy Hook?

5 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Not a conspiracy theorist?

 

Sandy Hook?

Quit the sandy hook bs.

Jones did nothing wrong.

11 minutes ago, FlorC said:

Quit the sandy hook bs.

Jones did nothing wrong.

 

Did nothing wrong and yet..........

 

 

 

•  Connecticut Jury (2022): Awarded $965 million to families of victims and an FBI agent for emotional distress and reputational harm caused by Jones’s repeated claims that the shooting was a hoax.

•  Additional Penalties: A separate Texas jury awarded $49 million in a related case.

•  Total Exposure: Combined judgments exceed $1 billion.

 

 

Seems a tad harsh for having done nothing wrong?

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

Did nothing wrong and yet..........

 

 

 

•  Connecticut Jury (2022): Awarded $965 million to families of victims and an FBI agent for emotional distress and reputational harm caused by Jones’s repeated claims that the shooting was a hoax.

•  Additional Penalties: A separate Texas jury awarded $49 million in a related case.

•  Total Exposure: Combined judgments exceed $1 billion.

 

 

Seems a tad harsh for having done nothing wrong?

Democrat lawfare.

A kangaroo trail.

12 hours ago, FlorC said:

Democrat lawfare.

A kangaroo trail.

^ Trial not trail.

While YouTube has every right to block whomever it pleases from membership, it's definitely unwise. Speech should be free. Extreme exceptions can be made in the commonly cited "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" but that should be literally construed. Not figuratively.

The same goes for Tiktok which also suppresses free speech.

10 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

While YouTube has every right to block whomever it pleases from membership, it's definitely unwise. Speech should be free. Extreme exceptions can be made in the commonly cited "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" but that should be literally construed. Not figuratively.

The same goes for Tiktok which also suppresses free speech.

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is not a thing anymore.  

 

The “shouting fire in a crowded theater” analogy from Schenck v. United States (1919) is no longer the standard for limiting speech. The Supreme Court abandoned Holmes’s “clear and present danger” test and replaced it with the “imminent lawless action” standard from Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).

🔑 Today, U.S. law says:

• Speech is protected, even if it’s offensive, dangerous, or false.

• The government can only punish speech if it is intended to incite and likely to produce imminent unlawful action (e.g., telling a mob to immediately riot).

• Simply causing anger, discomfort, or even potential harm is not enough.

So when people use the “fire in a theater” phrase, they’re usually misunderstanding the law — it’s more of a rhetorical cliché than a valid legal doctrine now.

Related to Monique Fuentes?

16 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is not a thing anymore.  

 

 

The “shouting fire in a crowded theater” analogy from Schenck v. United States (1919) is no longer the standard for limiting speech. The Supreme Court abandoned Holmes’s “clear and present danger” test and replaced it with the “imminent lawless action” standard from Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).

🔑 Today, U.S. law says:

• Speech is protected, even if it’s offensive, dangerous, or false.

• The government can only punish speech if it is intended to incite and likely to produce imminent unlawful action (e.g., telling a mob to immediately riot).

• Simply causing anger, discomfort, or even potential harm is not enough.

So when people use the “fire in a theater” phrase, they’re usually misunderstanding the law — it’s more of a rhetorical cliché than a valid legal doctrine now.

Thanks for the correction.

Well, looks like the sad, partisan right-wing U.S. Supreme Court finally did something right for once. Color me shocked!

Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones' appeal of $1.4 billion defamation judgment

"Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones over a $1.4 billion defamation judgment against him for his false claims that the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School was a hoax.

 

In rejecting Jones' case, the Supreme Court leaves in place the record-breaking sum he was ordered to pay after he was found liable in 2021 for damages in lawsuits brought by the families of children who were killed in the massacre. Jones had separately asked the high court last week for emergency relief while it considered whether to take up his case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied Jones' bid to halt the judgment later Monday, likely because the Supreme Court denied his appeal.

...

Jones, the founder of InfoWars, had repeatedly claimed that the 2012 shooting that killed 20 students and six teachers was staged by "crisis actors" as part of a plan to enact more restrictive gun laws. Relatives of the victims and an FBI agent testified during the defamation trial that they were threatened and harassed by Jones' listeners who believed his lies about the massacre."

 

CBS News

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/supreme-court-rejects-alex-jones-appeal-of-1-4-billion-defamation-judgment/ar-AA1OrPK0

 

19 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Supreme Court rejects Alex Jones' appeal of $1.4 billion defamation judgment

 

And the 'leftists' claim that Trump is a fascist  ??

...this judgement

is the end to the first amendment right there...no trial by jury 

the judge decided and instructed the jury not to listen to anything Jones said he was gagged in the court room  ,

plaintiffs awarded a ridiculous $1.4 billion.

This sets a very dangerous precedent..and  by the way Alex Jones did not kill anyone  or call for harassment of the families or poor done by FBI agents. He doesn't have $1.4 billion and the families will never receive that  but it was never about the money..it was always about shutting him up. (which will not work)

There is also the case of Mike Lindell (the pillow guy)

with a similar stupid amount of money and no trial for claiming that computers can be hacked.

1984 is here for sure..ministry of defence = ministry of war 

MAGA = MIGA  roll on WWIII.