8 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

Are you suggesting it's fake? 

 

 

No, it must be real. Everything on YouTube is real and accurate. From medicine to religion.

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Post the quote of his actually saying that, as opposed to third party hearsay...if you can.

 

Of course there is no audio or video recording from what Trump said in private, Mr Pedant, but this should do it for everyone, except you of course.

https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/4744762-did-trump-actually-call-veterans-who-died-in-wars-suckers/

 

Despite his claims to the contrary, however, Trump’s own former chief of staff John Kelly previously confirmed Trump called dead veterans “suckers” back in 2018. Discussion of Trump’s comments also did feature in a Biden campaign video earlier this month, which Trump later said should be removed (though no action was ever taken).

 

In reference to the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, the Biden campaign released a one-minute video titled, “What Trump Thinks,” which also noted Trump’s previous mocking of late Sen. John McCain, who had been captured during the Vietnam War.

11 hours ago, CallumWK said:

12 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Post the quote of his actually saying that, as opposed to third party hearsay...if you can.

 

Of course there is no audio or video recording from what Trump said in private, Mr Pedant, but this should do it for everyone, except you of course.

https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/4744762-did-trump-actually-call-veterans-who-died-in-wars-suckers/

As you said, there is no evidence of his ever saying that, only third party hearsay which does not get less false by reposting it time after time.  No one has ever produced evidence of the "suckers and losers" assertion.  Pointing out accuracy over unsubstantiated hearsay is not being  "Mr Pedant", Mr Liar.  The suckers and losers are actually the likes of you and your ilk who continually promulgate that false narrative.  

11 hours ago, CallumWK said:

 

Of course there is no audio or video recording from what Trump said in private, Mr Pedant, but this should do it for everyone, except you of course.

https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/4744762-did-trump-actually-call-veterans-who-died-in-wars-suckers/

 

Despite his claims to the contrary, however, Trump’s own former chief of staff John Kelly previously confirmed Trump called dead veterans “suckers” back in 2018. Discussion of Trump’s comments also did feature in a Biden campaign video earlier this month, which Trump later said should be removed (though no action was ever taken).

 

In reference to the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, the Biden campaign released a one-minute video titled, “What Trump Thinks,” which also noted Trump’s previous mocking of late Sen. John McCain, who had been captured during the Vietnam War.

It should also be noted general Kelley lost a son KIA Mr trump should be thankful the general dident snap his neck on the spot.Ive thought about this a bit and if trump knew Kelley lost his son KIA and still said that….thats really really deeply disturbing and speaks to a depravity of one’s very soul.that would be straight up evil …..

20 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

As you said, there is no evidence of his ever saying that,

 

I didn't say that at all. If you want to play the forum pedant, then at least get your facts straight.
I said Of course there is no audio or video recording from what Trump said in private

 

So you consider John Kelly, who was Trump's chief of staff at that time, not a credible source?

Maybe YOU consider YOURSELF as the only credible source on this forum?

19 hours ago, BLMFem said:

 

Why is Trump rarely called out on his hypocrisy?

 

That's an excellent question!

 

 

you are showing your hypocricy BIAS ..... mi amigo 

 

NY AG James

 

@NewYorkStateAG

 

When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of hardworking people. Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them. There simply cannot be different rules for different people.

 

 

4:30 AM · Feb 17, 2024

·

4.2M

Views

 

5 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

So you consider John Kelly, who was Trump's chief of staff at that time, not a credible source?

Maybe YOU consider YOURSELF as the only credible source on this forum?

Has he been able to verify his claims?  As he hasn't, I reckon that he does not qualify as a credible source.   

As to your daft claim that I consider myself the only credible source, it's ironic that no one has been able to disprove my comments with anything but hearsay while no one has been able to offer empirical proof of any of Kelly's assertions.  If you have that proof, post it.

6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Has he been able to verify his claims?  As he hasn't, I reckon that he does not qualify as a credible source.   

As to your daft claim that I consider myself the only credible source, it's ironic that no one has been able to disprove my comments with anything but hearsay while no one has been able to offer empirical proof of any of Kelly's assertions.  If you have that proof, post it.

 

Very few on this forum are still interested to engage with a known pedant, I guess very few even still see your posts, without clicking "view this post".

The proof of your credibility and approval is shown in your reputation score. Enough said

Probably cuz the haters are too busy hating and also the haters are low IQ losers. 

 

 

 

maybe these same low IQ leftist loons are out in the streets strutting their finely honed Muppet skills. 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

The proof of your credibility and approval is shown in your reputation score. Enough said

No, it is not, that "score" is nothing more than AN posters' opinions, it is not proof of the lack of credibility' of my comments  as most AN posters opinions are a million miles away from credibility. 

As far as "enough said" is concerned, I agree with you; more than enough has been said about hearsay and claiming it to be factual.  If you have something empirical, post it here, until then "enough said".

16 hours ago, blaze master said:

 

No. 

Well, this is not your lucky day/week/month/year, buddy.

15 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

But the ones being deported are illegal aliens, he is not.

Probably not, but he's a 2nd generation immigrant who is a convicted criminal, a sex offender and a traitor.

I'll take the illegal alien any day of the week, mate!

15 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

B0llocks.  Who says that's "fact"?  

Keep this this relentless defense of the indefensible one and you'll soon get an offer from Trump Org. inviting you to buy some alt coins that are sure to x1000 very soon!😆

Why is Trump rarely called out on his hypocrisy?

 

Really? It seems MSM and this subforum provide a minute by minute update 

 

Life is complicated. I could only imagine how difficult Trump has it. Especially now being owned by Israel 

 

 

Hypocrisy was Dark Brandon's middle name but let's all forget that

2 hours ago, darbie-foos said:

maybe these same low IQ leftist loons are out in the streets strutting their finely honed Muppet skills. 

 

 

 

It looks like a dangerous terrorist insurrection, indeed! 🤣🤣🤣

12 minutes ago, candide said:

It looks like a dangerous terrorist insurrection, indeed! 🤣🤣🤣

 

Yes, no wonder the National Guard is called in. This is getting out of control!🤣

 

29 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Probably not, but he's a 2nd generation immigrant who is a convicted criminal, a sex offender and a traitor.

I'll take the illegal alien any day of the week, mate!

More fool you, then.

 

He is not a convicted sex offender, he is not a traitor but, for the time being, he has a pathetic and inconsequential felony on his record.

28 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

15 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

B0llocks.  Who says that's "fact"?  

Keep this this relentless defense of the indefensible one

Again, that's nothing more than your odd opinion which matters not a jot.

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

More fool you, then.

 

He is not a convicted sex offender, he is not a traitor but, for the time being, he has a pathetic and inconsequential felony on his record.

He just tried to overturn an election, after all! 🤣

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

More fool you, then.

 

He is not a convicted sex offender, he is not a traitor but, for the time being, he has a pathetic and inconsequential felony on his record.

Shhh, can you hear that sound? That's the call of the bins. Heed the call, Lou!😆

21 hours ago, illisdean said:

Like what damage? Why were the docs returned? Why did the FBI have to plant and stage evidence for photo a photo shoot?  How about that mouth-piece hater!

Returned to whom?  If you mean the government, then who could possibly know if anyone else had seen some of those documents and possibly even copied them.  Having worked with classified and know that "normal" people having taken that many classified and kept them in uncontrolled spaces, then that "normal" person would still be in prison!

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

Shhh, can you hear that sound? That's the call of the bins. Heed the call, Lou!😆

Maybe not in the courts YET but IMHO the majority of people in the US at least know that he did most likely participate with Epstein and Co. and some FBI agents have testified that they saw the photos so he may escape prison again but IMHO won't be able to escape nature as he seems to me to be failing quickly lately.

2 minutes ago, candide said:

4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

More fool you, then.

 

He is not a convicted sex offender, he is not a traitor but, for the time being, he has a pathetic and inconsequential felony on his record.

He just tried to overturn an election, after all! 🤣

That doesn't make him a traitor; he successfully fought the second impeachment attempt and was subsequently re-elected President.   Some "traitor", eh?

Just now, Presnock said:

Maybe not in the courts YET but IMHO the majority of people in the US at least know that he did most likely participate with Epstein and Co. and some FBI agents have testified that they saw the photos so he may escape prison again but IMHO won't be able to escape nature as he seems to me to be failing quickly lately.

to BLMfem: Young lady, sorry this went to you, as it was meant for illisdean and that person's comments!

6 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Shhh, can you hear that sound? That's the call of the bins. Heed the call, Lou!😆

Could you repost that in intelligible English?

2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That doesn't make him a traitor; he successfully fought the second impeachment attempt and was subsequently re-elected President.   Some "traitor", eh?

Yep, he had lots of co-traitors.

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That doesn't make him a traitor; he successfully fought the second impeachment attempt and was subsequently re-elected President.   Some "traitor", eh?

So how do you call someone who tried to overturn a legitimate election?

3 minutes ago, Presnock said:

to BLMfem: Young lady, sorry this went to you, as it was meant for illisdean and that person's comments!

That's fine, your post was spot on. I am in any case not prone to pearl clutching, something that cannot be said for the emotionally fragile MAGA darlings.😄

7 minutes ago, Presnock said:

22 hours ago, illisdean said:

Like what damage? Why were the docs returned? Why did the FBI have to plant and stage evidence for photo a photo shoot?  How about that mouth-piece hater!

Returned to whom?  If you mean the government, then who could possibly know if anyone else had seen some of those documents and possibly even copied them. 

Exactly, who could possibly know, you could never possibly know and there have been no allegations of that happening so why make the suggestion that it happened?