Trump Holds Emergency Situation Room Talks On Epstein File Release

 

 

The Trump administration called an emergency Situation Room meeting Wednesday as pressure mounts in the House of Representatives to force the release of secret Department of Justice files on Jeffrey Epstein.

 

According to CNN, senior White House officials met with Rep. Lauren Boebert — one of several Republican lawmakers demanding full disclosure of the Epstein documents. Boebert has co-signed a petition to compel a vote ordering their release and, sources say, is refusing to withdraw her support despite high-level talks.

 

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the meeting, hailing it as proof of the administration’s transparency. “Doesn’t that show the level of transparency when we’re willing to sit down with members of Congress and address their concerns?” she said, while refusing to detail private discussions inside the Situation Room.

 

Jeffrey Epstein

 

President Trump himself has reportedly reached out to Rep. Nancy Mace, another Republican backing the disclosure push, in an effort to manage the growing political storm. The two have been “playing phone tag,” according to sources, but Mace has denied any intention to back down.

 

The internal scramble comes amid escalating public pressure for the release of Epstein’s files following the publication of thousands of his emails by the US House Oversight Committee, exposing deep political and social ties across Washington and London.

 

Boebert and Mace’s petition, if successful, would force the Department of Justice to turn over unredacted Epstein materials — potentially triggering a political earthquake ahead of next year’s election.

 

Key Takeaways:

• Trump officials held emergency talks on House effort to release Epstein files.

• Rep. Lauren Boebert and Rep. Nancy Mace remain committed to forcing disclosure.

• Situation Room meeting underscores rising tension over Epstein revelations.

 

Source: Express US

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Social Media said:

“Doesn’t that show the level of transparency when we’re willing to sit down with members of Congress and address their concerns?”

No, it doesn't.

I doubt that there may be direct evidence of paedophilia in the files, but there's obviously something Trump wants to hide! 

Jeffrey has a smile on his face and they killed him for it before he could turn state's evidence against the rich and powerful.

 

Can only hope that this pig finally gets what is coming to him. The lies and cheating has finally caught up to the grub.

How about, for just a moment, we take 47 OUT of the equation.

 

If we do that, then the White House is heavily involved in covering up crimes by many others. We already know the guy formerly known as prince Andrew was involved and has paid a price. Millions and possibly billions of dollars were funneled through the Epstein financial empire, so possible money laundering on a massive scale is likely.

 

Bottom line, we can't know unless the files are completely made available. This is beyond a Watergate level coverup.

55 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

How about, for just a moment, we take 47 OUT of the equation.

 

If we do that, then the White House is heavily involved in covering up crimes by many others. We already know the guy formerly known as prince Andrew was involved and has paid a price. Millions and possibly billions of dollars were funneled through the Epstein financial empire, so possible money laundering on a massive scale is likely.

 

Bottom line, we can't know unless the files are completely made available. This is beyond a Watergate level coverup.

You can't take "47" out of the equation - he is absolutely central to it. 

 

I'm no mathematician but it would be like trying to write an equation without using any mathematical symbols, +, -, /, x !

 

Can you imagine being at that situation room meeting - all sitting around that table, looking at him, in all his desperate, coiffured, made up fragrant glory, and knowing, just knowing, what he did, along with others, with those children, yet still trying to protect him! I wonder who is going to break first?

 

When a dam is breached all the water comes out, not just the bits you want to!

15 hours ago, candide said:

I doubt that there may be direct evidence of paedophilia in the files, but there's obviously something Trump wants to hide! 

 

Sex tourists on this forum who upvoted you always like to claim that having sex with teens is nor pedophilia. Why change of heart?

43 minutes ago, JAG said:

You can't take "47" out of the equation - he is absolutely central to it. 

 

I'm no mathematician but it would be like trying to write an equation without using any mathematical symbols, +, -, /, x !

 

Can you imagine being at that situation room meeting - all sitting around that table, looking at him, in all his desperate, coiffured, made up fragrant glory, and knowing, just knowing, what he did, along with others, with those children, yet still trying to protect him! I wonder who is going to break first?

 

When a dam is breached all the water comes out, not just the bits you want to!

Of course, legally you can't take him out of this situation. I'm just putting it out there, for the sake of argument, we look at the bigger picture rather than focus on him alone. The White House is covering up potential rape and money laundering by many powerful men for the sake of their dear leader.

"We're being incredibly transparent"....in our efforts to block release of the Epstein files.

 

That is 'spin' as only MAGA can do.

 

That's like when some WH spokesperson recently said that the business and policy actions that directly benefit Trump and his family to the tune of billions of dollars are not corrupt, because we're telling you we're doing it.

2 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

How about, for just a moment, we take 47 OUT of the equation.

 

If we do that, then the White House is heavily involved in covering up crimes by many others. We already know the guy formerly known as prince Andrew was involved and has paid a price. Millions and possibly billions of dollars were funneled through the Epstein financial empire, so possible money laundering on a massive scale is likely.

 

Bottom line, we can't know unless the files are completely made available. This is beyond a Watergate level coverup.

Only sensible reason, Epstein was part of  an undercover operation led by either Mossad or Cia, or both. 

 

Can't see there is any other reason  covering up mess, leading to more distrust against those who might or not might be involved 

30 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Only sensible reason, Epstein was part of  an undercover operation led by either Mossad or Cia, or both. 

 

Can't see there is any other reason  covering up mess, leading to more distrust against those who might or not might be involved 

Interesting theory, but Occam's razor would suggest it's just a bunch of ultra-rich rapists/criminals who don't want to be outed. Otherwise, why would Epstein have been "suicided?"

2 hours ago, Celsius said:

 

Sex tourists on this forum who upvoted you always like to claim that having sex with teens is nor pedophilia. Why change of heart?

I understand there is a question of terminology not ethics or morals.

Pedophilia technically refers to sexual activity or attraction to prepubescent children.

 

Sex with teens under 18 is statutory rape as they cannot legally give consent,

I am skeptical that people on this forum have defended sex with underage individuals.

 

2 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Interesting theory, but Occam's razor would suggest it's just a bunch of ultra-rich rapists/criminals who don't want to be outed. Otherwise, why would Epstein have been "suicided?"

Who could cover up a murder as suicide? His time was up. Either he did it by his own, because he was forced to, or someone helped him on his way, most likely both. 

 

Epstein didnt only have connections with rapists and abusers, but everyone who had power or connections with people in power who could pull some strings.

 

His network was quite impressive when it comes to real power and also economic power.

 

Did he do it on his own? 

4 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Did he do it on his own? 

Of course not. There were too many suspicious circumstances surrounding his death, much like Nixon's secretary having to go through unbelievable gymnastics in order to erase those tapes. It just doesn't pass the smell test, and again I say that too many very powerful criminals do NOT want the truth surfacing. The ONLY WAY we can get to the truth is to release the Epstein files.

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Of course, legally you can't take him out of this situation. I'm just putting it out there, for the sake of argument, we look at the bigger picture rather than focus on him alone. The White House is covering up potential rape and money laundering by many powerful men for the sake of their dear leader.

The big picture is a sitting president is using the power of government to cover up the rape of children.

We already know Trump is in the files.

 

So on no level is there any argument for ‘taking 47 out of the picture’.

 

17 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Interesting theory, but Occam's razor would suggest it's just a bunch of ultra-rich rapists/criminals who don't want to be outed. Otherwise, why would Epstein have been "suicided?"

I’m sure that’s what the people behind setting up Epstein’s child rape syndicate would like us to believe.

 

 

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m sure that’s what the people behind setting up Epstein’s child rape syndicate would like us to believe.

 

 

And we just won't know until the files have been released, will we?

The entire Trump presidency seems to be a reality tv show to many of the cult who tune in to see what absurd crazy dangerous thing the star will do next. And so far they have not been disappointed as the clown car rolls on.

 

Now the audience is demanding to see the final episodes of when the star and maybe  a lot of his very rich buddies go down.  Sort of like the "who killed JR"  except now maybe more "who killed epstein".

 

Does anyone with an IQ in triple digits think for one minute if there is nothing bad in the files that trump would not have them all released and be on fox "news"  and truth social blabbering on and on and on with see i told you it is all a hoax/witch hunt/etc?  

 

Next up: DOJ/FBI:   Oh gee we seem to have lost a few thousand emails, pics, videos, witness statements, etc....can't seem to find them anywhere.  So sorry.  Biden's fault. Hunters laptop.  Clinton stole the files.

 

 

7 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

And we just won't know until the files have been released, will we?

Did I suggest otherwise?

 

 

20 hours ago, Social Media said:

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the meeting, hailing it as proof of the administration’s transparency.

 

Being transparent about being non-transparent.

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

I am skeptical that people on this forum have defended sex with underage individuals.

I’ve personally explained to some members of this forum why sex with minors is rape, including giving reference to the specific federal law.

 

Often repeatedly correcting their insistence it was not rape.

 

 

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

Sex with teens under 18 is statutory rape as they cannot legally give consent,

I am skeptical that people on this forum have defended sex with underage individuals.

America is only a small part of the world.

In most countries underage sex is below 15 or 16.

12 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

America is only a small part of the world.

In most countries underage sex is below 15 or 16.

Not if they're paid for their services.  Pretty much globally, paying for sexual services from an under 18-year-old is illegal.

Just now, brewsterbudgen said:

Not if they're paid for their services.  Pretty much globally, paying for sexual services from an under 18-year-old is illegal.

I doubt Trump, Clinton, Andrew ever paid for anything from anyone, which is what this thread is really about.

5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I doubt Trump, Clinton, Andrew ever paid for anything from anyone, which is what this thread is really about.

Nonsense, all the Epstein girls were paid.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve personally explained to some members of this forum why sex with minors is rape, including giving reference to the specific federal law.

 

Often repeatedly correcting their insistence it was not rape.

 

 

Here we go again:

 

22 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

America is only a small part of the world.

In most countries underage sex is below 15 or 16.

 

2 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Nonsense, all the Epstein girls were paid.

All women are paid for sex, most men just pay indirectly.

America is the odd country out where sex under 18 is against the law, but they dress all high school cheerleaders as sex toys.

 

7 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I doubt Trump, Clinton, Andrew ever paid for anything from anyone, which is what this thread is really about.

That’s not what this thread is about. 
 

But nice try.