Nigel Farage pledges tough action against civil servants who allow sex-offender migrants into the UK. The Reform UK leader is pushing to revoke pensions of those deemed responsible, redirecting the funds to victims’ charities.

 

This promise follows reports of rising crimes by foreign nationals, with official data showing a 62% increase in sexual offenses. Farage blames "misguided liberalism" for compromising public safety and insists on holding civil servants accountable.

 

Under his plan, any civil servant found guilty of permitting migrants who later commit violent crimes could face prosecution and pension forfeiture. Farage emphasizes that the safety of women and girls should not be sacrificed, highlighting high-profile cases like the recent brutal attacks involving Afghan asylum seekers.

 

The proposal includes creating a new criminal offense for dishonestly handling asylum claims, with severe penalties for violators. Farage targets the "Civil Service blob," criticizing both Conservative and Labour governments for failing to manage asylum processing adequately.

 

Critics warn of systemic flaws, noting reports of widespread abuse and inefficiencies in the asylum process. Farage’s stance underscores tensions in the ongoing immigration debate, amid rising public concern over safety and border control.

 

Reform UK’s approach reflects increasing demands for stricter immigration enforcement. With civil servants under scrutiny, the focus remains on ensuring robust procedures to prevent future incidents and protect the UK’s national interests.

 

 

Key Takeaways

• Farage vows to revoke pensions of officials linked to migrant crimes.
• Redirects funds to victims’ charities, urging stronger safeguards.
• Push for stricter accountability and new offenses in asylum processing.

 

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Mail Online 2025-12-08

 

 

 

A reminder 

 

It is the BREXIT that Farage promoted that removed the UK from the EU’s criminal data sharing scheme.

 

The UK can no longer check the biometrics and criminal records against EU nation’s police and immigration data bases of anyone arriving from Europe.

So home goal #n+1 to Farage.

 

Furthermore, Farage’s idiot plan to remove the UK from the ECHR will further reduce cooperation between European police and courts with the UK.

 

Maybe Farage should lead by example and give up his MEP pension….. ah… thought not!

 

16 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

...

 

Maybe Farage should lead by example and give up his MEP pension….. ah… thought not!

 

Farage has not been allowing criminals unchecked into the UK has he?  Stop trying to defend the indefensible by 'whatery'

37 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A reminder 

 

It is the BREXIT that Farage promoted that removed the UK from the EU’s criminal data sharing scheme.

 

The UK can no longer check the biometrics and criminal records against EU nation’s police and immigration data bases of anyone arriving from Europe.

So home goal #n+1 to Farage.

 

Furthermore, Farage’s idiot plan to remove the UK from the ECHR will further reduce cooperation between European police and courts with the UK.

 

Maybe Farage should lead by example and give up his MEP pension….. ah… thought not!

 

 

Total cobblers again . EU "pillars" and poor policy have allowed these economic migrants easy access to continental Europe and, so, on to northern France. Even after accepting hundreds of pounds, any meaningful cooperation that might have been had is nulled by French inaction, which allows these people and their smugglers into their country and then let them crowd these "jungles" near Calais for as long as they want until they get a place on a small boat to cross the Channel. 

 

The French and the EU have been and are enabling this problem. The ungrateful French have rather short memories.  

 

33 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Farage has not been allowing criminals unchecked into the UK has he?  Stop trying to defend the indefensible by 'whatery'

Nobody has ‘allowed’ criminals into the UK unchecked.

 

But as explained, when they arrive from Europe the British authorities are unable to access any criminal record they have Europe

 

Stop trying to deflect from the facts.

 

 

25 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Total cobblers again . EU "pillars" and poor policy have allowed these economic migrants easy access to continental Europe and, so, on to northern France. Even after accepting hundreds of pounds, any meaningful cooperation that might have been had is nulled by French inaction, which allows these people and their smugglers into their country and then let them crowd these "jungles" near Calais for as long as they want until they get a place on a small boat to cross the Channel. 

 

The French and the EU have been and are enabling this problem. The ungrateful French have rather short memories.  

 

Got any links Nauseus?

 

I have:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56529359#:~:text=When the UK left the,Information System (SIS II).

 

Away with you and your ‘cobblers’!

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Got any links Nauseus?

 

I have:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56529359#:~:text=When the UK left the,Information System (SIS II).

 

Away with you and your ‘cobblers’!

 

Everyone knows that the Brexit deal was bad but it is not the reason for the immigration problem. Your BBC "link" is 5 years old and this SIS II system has data on established criminals but it does not include data about migrants being smuggled through Europe. Because most of the migrants arrive with no passports, nor other ID, and there is no formal record of them in the EU, then there's nothing lost because there is nothing about them in the EU databases.

 

So, unless the EU somehow manages to obtain and store data that is not volunteered by each migrant to the UK Border Force, what you say is, in fact, a load  of cobblers.

 

 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Got any links Nauseus?

 

I have:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56529359#:~:text=When the UK left the,Information System (SIS II).

 

Away with you and your ‘cobblers’!

 

 

Ooohoo

 

My links are brighter than yours, is it??

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

 

 

Ooohoo

 

My links are brighter than yours, is it??

Yes my statements are substantiated, you pulled yours out of somewhere that’s best left out of discussion.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yes my statements are substantiated, you pulled yours out of somewhere that’s best left out of discussion.

 

Even my "somewhere" is more relevant to the topic than your goose chase posts.

Why let migrants enter in the first place if they do not have the appropriate visa and documentation ? Should they be with or without a criminal record.

 

Why not plainly send them back in airline charters to their homelands and take immediate financial sanctions against the countries that refuse to take their own back or invent some absurd bureaucratic rule. 

 

Asking asylum when there is a war and on humanitarian grounds is one thing. But a majority of the migrants are plainly economic migrants from nations that are not at war at all. 

Don't remove their pensions.

 

Jail them for treason. 

9 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Don't remove their pensions.

 

Jail them for treason. 

And remove their pension!!

The civil service doesn't make policy they just follow it. However most of the senior ones are toffs that live their lives far away from the migrant flow and that could account on slowness to act. Sir Humphrey ?

Removing pensions would presumably mean that they have definitive proof that the Civil Servants involved deliberately allowed the migrants to enter illegally in the full knowledge that they (the migrants) intended to commit these crimes. Quite a stretch that!

 

The truth is that the Civil Servants are working for (perhaps not particularly diligently) a hopelessly inadequate system, overwhelmed by numbers and whose inadequacy is tolerated, encouraged and a result of the policies of successive political masters.

 

I am no fan of the Civil Service (as the joke has it, when the Army received it's then new rifle in the 1990s it was known as The Civil Servant as it didn't work and couldn't be fired!) but this is a bit like criminalising bus drivers because you don't like bus lanes!

Is there anything he hasn't tried to blame immigrants for? 

That sound pathetic 

Just use the system in place 

Jail time will sort them out 

17 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Don't remove their pensions.

 

Jail them for treason. 

 

6 hours ago, JAG said:

Removing pensions would presumably mean that they have definitive proof that the Civil Servants involved deliberately allowed the migrants to enter illegally in the full knowledge that they (the migrants) intended to commit these crimes. Quite a stretch that!

 

The truth is that the Civil Servants are working for (perhaps not particularly diligently) a hopelessly inadequate system, overwhelmed by numbers and whose inadequacy is tolerated, encouraged and a result of the policies of successive political masters.

 

I am no fan of the Civil Service (as the joke has it, when the Army received it's then new rifle in the 1990s it was known as The Civil Servant as it didn't work and couldn't be fired!) but this is a bit like criminalising bus drivers because you don't like bus lanes!

 

Compare and contrast. A latter day 'Voice of Reason' and a reasonable voice.

 

The sad thing is that some will agree with the first post.

5 hours ago, RayC said:

 

 

Compare and contrast. A latter day 'Voice of Reason' and a reasonable voice.

 

The sad thing is that some will agree with the first post.

 

Nothing worse than a traitor supporting sex offenders.

6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Nothing worse than a traitor supporting sex offenders.

 

Anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow-minded, racist, xenophobic bigotry is labelled a traitor. And this charge from a bloke who loves his country so much that he never misses an opportunity to run it down, lives permanently 6,000 miles away and has stated that he will never return (Thank whoever, for small mercies I suppose).

 

As for the charge of supporting sex offenders, it's no such thing. Re-read the contents of the post by  @JAG . That is what I am agreeing with as I'm sure you know.

 

You really are a piece of work.

Should be adopted in Thailand.