28 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Yellowtale, you can repeat another 1000 times that it was her own fault. Then still, you will be 1000 times wrong: the police officer did NOT act according to the guidelines. Even if he ordered her to stop the car, ordered her to get out of the car, and next she disobeys and drives away, the officer acted again the guidelines when he shot her. SO he is WRONG and should be prosecuted. Any judge and jury will agree with my analyses. Period!

Now you are just flat out lying. I never said it was her fault, now apologize,

6 minutes ago, still kicking said:

A woman is dead, and you're making jokes. Classy

16 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

She sat, perpendicular to traffic, blocking the road for several minutes. Honking her horn all the while. What was the purpose, if not to block the agents and prevent them from doing their jobs? Especially with her wife outside filming the whole thing. This was no innocent "oops, sorry I blocked the street" moment. It was planned and discussed ahead of time.

And AFTER sitting, when ordered to exit the vehicle, THEN she decided to take off as if it were all just a big joke. I agree that I don't think she had any malicious intent to run Ross over. He was simply in the way and she either didn't notice or misjudged her manoeuvre.

As for Ross' actions at that point, an investigation will decide whether or not they were justified.

Compliments to ChatGPT for the data.

1. How The Following Applies to ICE & Border Patrol

They are federal agents

ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and CBP/Border Patrol are federal law-enforcement officers

They are fully covered under 18 U.S.C. § 111 and other obstruction statutes

Illegal actions against ICE/CBP include:

Physically blocking arrests or detentions

Surrounding agents to prevent movement

Warning suspects to evade arrest during an operation

Harboring or hiding a person to prevent federal enforcement

Using vehicles, barricades, or crowds to stop agents

These acts can be charged even without violence.

Key point

Even if immigration law itself is controversial, interfering with its enforcement is still illegal unless a court has ruled the action unlawful.

Core Federal Laws

1. 18 U.S.C. § 111 — Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Federal Officers

This is the main statute.

It is a crime to:

Forcibly assault

Resist

Oppose

Impede

Intimidate

Interfere with

a federal officer or agent while they are engaged in official duties.

Penalties

Misdemeanor or felony depending on conduct

Up to 1 year for nonviolent resistance

Up to 8 years or more if force, weapons, or injury are involved

2. 18 U.S.C. § 1501 — Obstruction of Federal Process

Applies when someone:

Obstructs or interferes with the service of warrants, subpoenas, or court orders

This often comes up when people try to block arrests or searches.

3. 18 U.S.C. § 371 — Conspiracy

If two or more people coordinate to obstruct federal officers, conspiracy charges can apply even if no force is used

What Is Usually Lawful

Filming federal agents (from a safe distance)

Peaceful protest

Verbal criticism

Refusing consent to a search (without physical interference)

Asking for a warrant

Bottom Line

Physically or operationally interfering with federal agents is illegal, regardless of political beliefs or disagreement with the law being enforced. Courts have been very consistent on this point.

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

A woman is dead, and you're making jokes. Classy

The joke is on you, Trump supporters claim he had internal bleeding wich is impossible

2 minutes ago, still kicking said:

The joke is on you, Trump supporters claim he had internal bleeding wich is impossible

I have not heard this.

How is it impossible?

23 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

As for Ross' actions at that point, an investigation will decide whether or not they were justified.

And if the officer gets off the hook, there will be riots or more hostility towards ICE ...

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I have not heard this.

How is it impossible?

A clinical nurse posted it.

1 minute ago, still kicking said:

A clinical nurse posted it.

Did she examine him?

A trauma doctor posted that it was possible.

9 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

And if the officer gets off the hook, there will be riots or more hostility towards ICE ...

Is that a good reason to hang the officer?

There is already more hostility against ICE. How about we tone down the rhetoric and let people know that interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime, and that people do it, will be prosecuted.

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

There is no evidence of the shooter calling her a "fu*king bit*h" after he shot her, this is a lie that all the Trump-obsessed haters are regurgitating.

There is evidence that one of the officers (not the shooter) said this.

BS. The killer murdered Renee Good, then casually walked away saying "f***ing b***h, and no amount of pitiful diversions will change that.

It is amazing how many leftists believe that if they keep regurgitating the same lie, that people that know they are lying will be convinced.

On 1/9/2026 at 12:07 AM, EVENKEEL said:

Legit protesting is usually done on the safety of sidewalks, parks and such.

Not interfering with Fed agents.

I live in MPLS. It is insane. The crowds are insane. They are throwing M 89's and cherry bombs at the law. The rioters on in the street blocking traffic. They're smashing car windows. Walz and Frey are encouraging them to harass ICE. The rioters want someone dead, anyone. They don't give a $hit about the women. The rioters got what they wanted, a martyr or another "hero". Walz wants people to forget about the fraud and his kickbacks.

Just now, chondan said:

I live in MPLS. It is insane. The crowds are insane. They are throwing M 89's and cherry bombs at the law. The rioters on in the street blocking traffic. They're smashing car windows. Walz and Frey are encouraging them to harass ICE. The rioters want someone dead, anyone. They don't give a $hit about the women. The rioters got what they wanted, a martyr or another "hero". Walz wants people to forget about the fraud and his kickbacks.

whoops M 80's. They can send a 55 gallon barrel into the air. Fun when I was a kid, but I stayed 30 feet away, well most of the time.

21 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

BS. The killer murdered Renee Good, then casually walked away saying "f***ing b***h, and no amount of pitiful diversions will change that.

There was no murder. You gotta lay off those pills brother. You're all wound up.

6 minutes ago, chondan said:

I live in MPLS. It is insane. The crowds are insane. They are throwing M 89's and cherry bombs at the law. The rioters on in the street blocking traffic. They're smashing car windows. Walz and Frey are encouraging them to harass ICE. The rioters want someone dead, anyone. They don't give a $hit about the women. The rioters got what they wanted, a martyr or another "hero". Walz wants people to forget about the fraud and his kickbacks.

Another summer of love or maybe Winter of love is better.

5 minutes ago, chondan said:

Walz wants people to forget about the fraud and his kickbacks.

exactly, because there is graft going on and people profiting from all this illegal activity.

and Trump and ICE are picking their pockets.

7 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

exactly, because there is graft going on and people profiting from all this illegal activity.

and Trump and ICE are picking their pockets.

How are Trump and ICE picking their pockets?

Just now, Yellowtail said:

How are Trump and ICE picking their pockets?

Well, it's just a theory.

If you deport the criminals, the criminal activity ceases and the kickbacks to the greaseballs with suits and ties that are allowing these illegal criminals to operate ceases. The money stops trickling up.

Unless you have a better theory. Where is all the anti-ICE backlash coming from? I don't believe they are kidnapping innocent legal citizens for no apparent reason.

18 minutes ago, chondan said:

I live in MPLS. It is insane. The crowds are insane. They are throwing M 89's and cherry bombs at the law. The rioters on in the street blocking traffic. They're smashing car windows. Walz and Frey are encouraging them to harass ICE. The rioters want someone dead, anyone. They don't give a $hit about the women. The rioters got what they wanted, a martyr or another "hero". Walz wants people to forget about the fraud and his kickbacks.

The Democratic political leadership is severely lacking; it almost seems as if they are inviting riots.

5 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Well, it's just a theory.

If you deport the criminals, the criminal activity ceases and the kickbacks to the greaseballs with suits and ties that are allowing these illegal criminals to operate ceases. The money stops trickling up.

Unless you have a better theory. Where is all the anti-ICE backlash coming from? I don't believe they are kidnapping innocent legal citizens for no apparent reason.

There is a huge anti ICE campaign in the US, and it included virtually every newspaper and legacy media outlet.

Just look at the reporting on this alone.

Half the people posting here seem to think ICE stopped this woman for no reason and then shot her for no reason. Where do you think that comes from?

The mayor is on TV telling ICE to get the fu*k out, and virtually every democrat politician is calling ICE the Gestapo, and saying/implying ICE is pulling innocent citizens of the streets and "disappearing" them.

The anti-left are publishing the names and addresses of ICE and other law enforcement officers and threatening them and there families.

Tim Walz is on TV telling everyone protesting record everything they see, so that they can use it prosecute law enforcement officers years from now. He has also called out the state National Guard, and is talking like he is going to order them to forcibly remove ICE.

It is insanity. They seem to want war in the streets.

18 minutes ago, Fact said:

The Democratic political leadership is severely lacking; it almost seems as if they are inviting riots.

Almost? They are promoting it. Though they have backed off a since the ICE agent was hospitalized by three illegal aliens.

This year ICE has apprehended over 24,000 sex offenders. This is what the left is fighting.

Imagine putting your own life at risk and the future of your child, to defend criminals that are stealing your taxes and see you/laugh at you as complete mugs and frankly wouldn't urinate on you if you were on fire.

Then getting your annoying girlfriend to film the consequences of your actions.

Her kids will see that.

Bravo Renee. The poster child for dumb Lib Karens across north America.

I hope the dog is OK.

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Almost? They are promoting it. Though they have backed off a since the ICE agent was hospitalized by three illegal aliens.

This year ICE has apprehended over 24,000 sex offenders. This is what the left is fighting.

Yep

Tim Walz is on thin ice, Excuse the pun. He is clearly inciting violence.

Imagine if Harris had won. Its absolutely terrifying.

We ae at a point in the US, where people that defy and spit on law enforcement officers are treated as heroes but the left.

Remember how the left spat on Viet Nam vets when they came back?

6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

She sat, perpendicular to traffic, blocking the road for several minutes. Honking her horn all the while. What was the purpose, if not to block the agents and prevent them from doing their jobs? Especially with her wife outside filming the whole thing. This was no innocent "oops, sorry I blocked the street" moment. It was planned and discussed ahead of time.

And AFTER sitting, when ordered to exit the vehicle, THEN she decided to take off as if it were all just a big joke. I agree that I don't think she had any malicious intent to run Ross over. He was simply in the way and she either didn't notice or misjudged her manoeuvre.

As for Ross' actions at that point, an investigation will decide whether or not they were justified.

You missed something ! She was a trained activist. She was trained to resist fed enforcement.

The world knows what communist front groups who have supported ICEWATCH grassroots organization.

google ai overview:

"Recent reports (January 2026) indicate that "ICE Watch"—a network of activists focused on monitoring, tracking, and disrupting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations—is closely associated with several far-left, communist, and anti-fascist organizations, particularly in Minnesota and other cities". 

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

There is a huge anti ICE campaign in the US, and it included virtually every newspaper and legacy media outlet.

Just look at the reporting on this alone.

Half the people posting here seem to think ICE stopped this woman for no reason and then shot her for no reason. Where do you think that comes from?

The mayor is on TV telling ICE to get the fu*k out, and virtually every democrat politician is calling ICE the Gestapo, and saying/implying ICE is pulling innocent citizens of the streets and "disappearing" them.

The anti-left are publishing the names and addresses of ICE and other law enforcement officers and threatening them and there families.

Tim Walz is on TV telling everyone protesting record everything they see, so that they can use it prosecute law enforcement officers years from now. He has also called out the state National Guard, and is talking like he is going to order them to forcibly remove ICE.

It is insanity. They seem to want war in the streets.

Insanity : The communist and anarchist are inciting evil upon our country.

8 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Ok, so we agree: you said "No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her."
I assume you are a law abiding citizen, who respects the law and has the opinion that also police officers have to act according to the law and guidelines.
The officer who shot Good did not act according to police guidelines.
She was an unarmed woman, with both hands on the steering wheel, turning her front wheels away from officer Ross (check analyses with video, done by NY Times), who was aside the car (even if he were in front of the car, the police guidelines prescribe that even then he is not allowed to shoot, but should step aside. Just check that!).

Even shooting is not allowed in this case:
In the United States, police officers are not allowed to shoot an unarmed burglar who is running away with stolen goods. Deadly force is only permitted when the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Property theft alone is never enough to justify shooting.

This rule comes from both U.S. Supreme Court decisions and modern police use‑of‑force policies across the country.

Yes, but - that won't wash with few let's shoot them taco wacko lovers who keep pushing their flawed beliefs that it's Ok to shoot whoever and whenever you like.

8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

She was a criminal fleeing a crime scene.

I don't think the officer should have shot her.

I do not think she was murdered

An officer is allowed to use deadly force if the officer believes his life is in danger. or the lives of others are in danger,

Not a criminal until charged, tried and found guilty, so at this stage she wasn't a criminal.

8 hours ago, save the frogs said:

This woman does a good job of analyzing the video.

Officer seems out of line to me.

Before the shooting, she is signaling to other agents to drive by. She was not obstructing.

Let see how the taco wacko's spin this one.

7 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

It is insanity. They seem to want war in the streets.

Trump needs to prosecute people at the top responsible, maybe Tim Walz ...