I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science, unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs. We need the best and brightest immigrants from Asia and all the Jews across the planet.

15 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science, unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs. We need the best and brightest immigrants from Asia and all the Jews across the planet.

We'll trade Europe our Muslims for their Jews!

26 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science,

Just waiting for EP and Nick to object to this discriminatory statement.

45 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

More Run comment.

What does that mean ? You do k ow my comment was meant to be sarcastic right.

25 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Just waiting for EP and Nick to object to this discriminatory statement.

Why dont you explain why you think that its descriminatory ?

2 hours ago, blaze master said:

What does that mean ? You do k ow my comment was meant to be sarcastic right.

It means he's a low value poster

While the UK descends into Sharia law with roving rape gangs wielding machetes the US can retain the intellectual elite who advance science and technology. Very good move.

On 1/19/2026 at 8:37 AM, blaze master said:

Bingo.

sarcasm ,and indeed humour in general , are not his strong points , never have been

3 hours ago, Taboo2 said:

More Run comment.

another who just doesn't do sarcasm or humour, What is wrong with people these days?

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How many blacks were on the crew you worked?

I worked in Alabama, Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, Virgina, West Virgina, South Carolina, North Carolina, Nevada, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Arizona and California.

Crew? I ain't a pirate, me hearty. Answer, none. Which was the point. I was shocked.

What were you, a road navvie, spreading tarmac, or a bin man, picking up trash along the Interstate, as some bloke in the background hums along to "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot". You have a wierd way to describe work colleagues, as if you were working in the 1920s or summit.

I dont think the vast majority of UK citizens would be disappointed to see them go

There are jews that dont support the Israeli genocide and they of course are welcome to stay, the rest off to USA with you deserve it

2 minutes ago, poohy2 said:

I dont think the vast majority of UK citizens would be disappointed to see them go

There are jews that dont support the Israeli genocide and they of course are welcome to stay, the rest off to USA with you deserve it

Thankfully you're not in charge there.

UK citizens of whatever kind are entitled to have their own opinions about anything.

7 hours ago, JimCM said:

Totally off topic, and frankly a disgusting remark, suggesting I am antisemitic.

Which part of my post do you disagree with?

There is no reason for me to suggest anything, your posts speak loud and clear. Since you became a member of AN in July, 2025, you have started 64 topics, 56 of which have dealt with Israel, the Gaza conflict or Jews.

You didn't cite any source for your rather astounding claims about Jews in today's U.S. or in pre-Nazi Germany. I was asking about the source of your info.

I disagree with everything you wrote in the comment below, which I already quoted in full:

On 1/31/2026 at 2:56 AM, JimCM said:

You/they obviously have no idea how powerful and influential Jews are in the US government.

Mind you, pre 1933, there were many influential Jews in German authorities.

It's a myth Jews have undue influence on the U.S. government. Some Jewish individuals are indeed "powerful and influential," but they don't act on behalf of Jews on the whole or push a faith-based agenda. The religious group with most influence on the U.S. government is the evangelical Christians, followed by Catholics and Mormons.

Only a very small number of Jews held positions of influence in pre-Nazi Germany, mostly in the early years of the Weimar Republic. Post-WW1 Germany's most influential Jew, Walther Rathenau, was assassinated in 1922 while serving as Foreign Minister.

2 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Crew? I ain't a pirate, me hearty. Answer, none. Which was the point. I was shocked.

That's what assumed, very limited exposure.

2 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

What were you, a road navvie, spreading tarmac, or a bin man, picking up trash along the Interstate, as some bloke in the background hums along to "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot". You have a wierd way to describe work colleagues, as if you were working in the 1920s or summit.

It does not surprise me you look down your nose at anyone that does muscular labor.

1 hour ago, Evil Penevil said:

There is no reason for me to suggest anything, your posts speak loud and clear. Since you became a member of AN in July, 2025, you have started 64 topics, 56 of which have dealt with Israel, the Gaza conflict or Jews.

You didn't cite any source for your rather astounding claims about Jews in today's U.S. or in pre-Nazi Germany. I was asking about the source of your info.

I disagree with everything you wrote in the comment below, which I already quoted in full:

It's a myth Jews have undue influence on the U.S. government. Some Jewish individuals are indeed "powerful and influential," but they don't act on behalf of Jews on the whole or push a faith-based agenda. The religious group with most influence on the U.S. government is the evangelical Christians, followed by Catholics and Mormons.

So what if I start topics about a country that is involved in a Genocidal destruction of Gaza -  a country that the USA is supporting and according to the International court, possible complicit in the genocide,as well as my country(England) to a lesser degree. Show me one sentence that I wrote that is anti jewish, or give it a rest. 

As you know, Miriam Adelson(an Israeli) gave Trumps campaign $400 million -  do you think this hasn't allowed her to influience his ME policy -  was she involved in Trump getting a US Embassy or Consulate in Jerusalem? 

President-elect Donald Trump has begun shaping his cabinet, rolling out nominations that feature people deeply connected to the Jewish and pro-Israel communities, including Mike Huckabee, Steve Witkoff, and Marco Rubio.

His first national security picks are diehard Israel supporters, some of whom have denied the existence of the Palestinian people and back the annexation of the occupied West Bank.

https://www.jewishpresstampa.com/articles/jewish-guide-to-trumps-picks-for-cabinet-advisors/

Stephen Miller (deputy chief of staff and homeland security adviser)

Mike Huckabee (US Ambassador to Israel) -   trusted by both Trump and Netanyahu. A Baptist minister who has visited Israel more than 100 times since 1973!  

Huckabee said, “There’s really no such thing as a Palestinian.” 

Marco Rubio(Secretary of State) -  no words needed!

Steven Witkoff (special envoy)to the ME  -  brokered the Abraham Accords

Pete Hegseth (Secretary of Defense) -  fake news on Fox News about Israel and very anti Iran. 

Mike Waltz (national security adviser) - said the U.S. should allow Israel to strike Iran’s nuclear program!

Elise Stefanik (U.S. ambassador to the U.N.)

Lee Zeldin (EPA administrator) 

Matt Gaetz (Attorney General)

A question -  was there an unusual amount of Jewish members of Biden's high ranking staff?

2 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

It's a myth Jews have undue influence on the U.S. government. Some Jewish individuals are indeed "powerful and influential," but they don't act on behalf of Jews on the whole or push a faith-based agenda. The religious group with most influence on the U.S. government is the evangelical Christians, followed by Catholics and Mormons.

Only a very small number of Jews held positions of influence in pre-Nazi Germany, mostly in the early years of the Weimar Republic. Post-WW1 Germany's most influential Jew, Walther Rathenau, was assassinated in 1922 while serving as Foreign Minister.

It is false to suggest that Jewish networks, donors, advocacy organisations, and individuals have not played a disproportionately significant role in certain areas of U.S. political life - particularly in foreign policy, media, finance, and law. This is a matter of documented participation and institutional presence, not conspiracy or religious agenda.

Second, comparing influence solely on the basis of religions (evangelicals, Catholics, Mormons) is an error. Evangelical influence largely operates through mass voting power, while Jewish influence has historically functioned through elite institutions, political fundraising, lobbying organisations, think tanks, and professional networks. These are different mechanisms of power, not mutually exclusive ones.

Third, the claim about pre-Nazi Germany is historically inaccurate by omission. While Jews were a small percentage of the population, they were overrepresented in politics, academia, journalism, law, and finance during the Weimar period. 

Influence is real, varied, and contextual. Denying it outright is no more honest than exaggerating it.  

1 minute ago, JimCM said:

It is false to suggest that Jewish networks, donors, advocacy organisations, and individuals have not played a disproportionately significant role in certain areas of U.S. political life - particularly in foreign policy, media, finance, and law. This is a matter of documented participation and institutional presence, not conspiracy or religious agenda.

Second, comparing influence solely on the basis of religions (evangelicals, Catholics, Mormons) is an error. Evangelical influence largely operates through mass voting power, while Jewish influence has historically functioned through elite institutions, political fundraising, lobbying organisations, think tanks, and professional networks. These are different mechanisms of power, not mutually exclusive ones.

Third, the claim about pre-Nazi Germany is historically inaccurate by omission. While Jews were a small percentage of the population, they were overrepresented in politics, academia, journalism, law, and finance during the Weimar period. 

Influence is real, varied, and contextual. Denying it outright is no more honest than exaggerating it.  

All you are saying is that the rich have more influence than the poor.

And don't worry, Jews only thrive when there is meritocracy, and if the left has their way, they will end that.

How welcome are Jews at US elite universities?

5 minutes ago, JimCM said:

It is false to suggest that Jewish networks, donors, advocacy organisations, and individuals have not played a disproportionately significant role in certain areas of U.S. political life

3 minutes ago, JimCM said:

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How welcome are Jews at US elite universities?

Is there any discrimination of Jews getting into university?

In fact is there any sphere in The USA where Jews are discriminated?

Of course not but some fools are saying there is a rise in antisemitism as they don't know what that word means. It is beneficial to be Jewish in the USA!

Beats nepotism and cronyism getting a job.

8 hours ago, Taboo2 said:

I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science, unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs. We need the best and brightest immigrants from Asia and all the Jews across the planet.

What a racist post! Be specific, who are these 'parasites' with low IQs? Say it like a man, you might fool some.

23 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Is there any discrimination of Jews getting into university?

Yes

23 minutes ago, JimCM said:

In fact is there any sphere in The USA where Jews are discriminated?

yes

23 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Of course not but some fools are saying there is a rise in antisemitism as they don't know what that word means. It is beneficial to be Jewish in the USA!

Indians are richer

23 minutes ago, JimCM said:

.

Beats nepotism and cronyism getting a job.

Ahhhh

57 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

1 hour ago, JimCM said:

Is there any discrimination of Jews getting into university?

Yes

Such a weird reply, even from you, I decided to ask AI. Here's what they said-

I don’t think that claim holds up today, and it’s important to separate history, admissions policy, and campus climate.

First, there is no credible evidence of systemic discrimination against Jewish applicants in U.S. university admissions today. Jews are not classified as underrepresented, and they are often well represented at selective universities. While antisemitism absolutely exists on campuses, it is primarily a cultural and political problem, not an admissions gatekeeping mechanism.

Second, in some contexts, being Jewish may even be neutral or mildly advantageous in admissions - particularly at private universities that value religious, cultural, and geographic diversity. Jewish identity can contribute to diversity goals in the same way other non-underrepresented identities can, especially when tied to community leadership or service. That is very different from discrimination.

Third, it helps to look at groups where discrimination has been studied more seriously. Asian-American applicants, for example, were shown in major lawsuits (including Harvard) to have higher academic metrics but lower “personal” ratings, functioning as de facto negative balancing. No comparable evidence exists showing Jews are penalized in this way today.

Fourth, Muslim applicants deserve a separate mention. After 9/11, there were legitimate concerns about bias against Muslims in the U.S., and Islamophobia absolutely exists in society and on campuses. However, as with Jews, there is no solid evidence of systemic admissions discrimination against Muslim applicants today. In fact, Muslims are often underrepresented, and at many institutions Muslim identity, community service, or first-generation status may actually support an application rather than harm it. The real challenges Muslims face tend to be social and political, not admissions-based.

Context matters:

• Elite private universities use holistic admissions that historically harmed Jews (quota era), but that system no longer disadvantages them.

• Public universities rely on transparent, metrics-based criteria and show little evidence of religion-based discrimination.

Why do these claims persist?

1. Historical memory (Jewish quotas were real but ended decades ago)

2. Conflation of campus antisemitism or Islamophobia with admissions policy

3. Borrowing arguments from Asian-American admissions cases, where the evidence actually exists

1 minute ago, JimCM said:

Such a weird reply, even from you, I decided to ask AI. Here's what they said-

Do you think Jews have been subjected to discrimination on US college campuses?

2 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Such a weird reply, even from you, I decided to ask AI. Here's what they said-

I don’t think that claim holds up today, and it’s important to separate history, admissions policy, and campus climate.

First, there is no credible evidence of systemic discrimination against Jewish applicants in U.S. university admissions today. Jews are not classified as underrepresented, and they are often well represented at selective universities. While antisemitism absolutely exists on campuses, it is primarily a cultural and political problem, not an admissions gatekeeping mechanism.

Second, in some contexts, being Jewish may even be neutral or mildly advantageous in admissions - particularly at private universities that value religious, cultural, and geographic diversity. Jewish identity can contribute to diversity goals in the same way other non-underrepresented identities can, especially when tied to community leadership or service. That is very different from discrimination.

Third, it helps to look at groups where discrimination has been studied more seriously. Asian-American applicants, for example, were shown in major lawsuits (including Harvard) to have higher academic metrics but lower “personal” ratings, functioning as de facto negative balancing. No comparable evidence exists showing Jews are penalized in this way today.

Fourth, Muslim applicants deserve a separate mention. After 9/11, there were legitimate concerns about bias against Muslims in the U.S., and Islamophobia absolutely exists in society and on campuses. However, as with Jews, there is no solid evidence of systemic admissions discrimination against Muslim applicants today. In fact, Muslims are often underrepresented, and at many institutions Muslim identity, community service, or first-generation status may actually support an application rather than harm it. The real challenges Muslims face tend to be social and political, not admissions-based.

Context matters:

• Elite private universities use holistic admissions that historically harmed Jews (quota era), but that system no longer disadvantages them.

• Public universities rely on transparent, metrics-based criteria and show little evidence of religion-based discrimination.

Why do these claims persist?

1. Historical memory (Jewish quotas were real but ended decades ago)

2. Conflation of campus antisemitism or Islamophobia with admissions policy

3. Borrowing arguments from Asian-American admissions cases, where the evidence actually exists

If I were poorly read, and not able to think for myself, or just lazy, I would rely on AI as well.

Just now, Yagoda said:

Do you think Jews have been subjected to discrimination on US college campuses?

Wait a moment, he has to ask AI what he thinks

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

That's what assumed, very limited exposure.

It does not surprise me you look down your nose at anyone that does muscular labor.

Here we have it. A MAGA Commie with an enormous chip on his shoulder about Class Warfare. Much like the British MP Lee Anderson, who started off as a Trotskyist, became a Red Tory, and now is Reform Loon. You live by the politics of envy (disparaging those with an education), like the "Left" you frenetically disparage (calling members of the Conservative Party "Leftists"). You're a Communist and don't even realise it. So far Right, you are now Left in the circle of politics.

Limited exposure, right. Also worked in Tennessee, West Missouri. Lived around the world, in Hong Kong, Germany, Bahrain, Canada, as well as a multude of settings within the UK, from East and West Belfast, the East Eng of Glasgow, Irvine, Essex, London, etc

40 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

If I were poorly read, and not able to think for myself, or just lazy, I would rely on AI as well.

Instead, where you have gaps in your knowledge, you head to the library, and exercise your expert understanding the Dewey Decimal system, and conduct primary research calling KOLs to confirm statements in print. Oh, wait, you Google and post links to blogs.

35 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

Here we have it. A MAGA Commie with an enormous chip on his shoulder about Class Warfare. Much like the British MP Lee Anderson, who started off as a Trotskyist, became a Red Tory, and now is Reform Loon. You live by the politics of envy (disparaging those with an education), like the "Left" you frenetically disparage (calling members of the Conservative Party "Leftists"). You're a Communist and don't even realise it. So far Right, you are now Left in the circle of politics.

Limited exposure, right. Also worked in Tennessee, West Missouri. Lived around the world, in Hong Kong, Germany, Bahrain, Canada, as well as a multude of settings within the UK, from East and West Belfast, the East Eng of Glasgow, Irvine, Essex, London, etc

Sure you did, a legend in your own mind/

5 hours ago, stevenl said:

Just waiting for EP and Nick to object to this discriminatory statement.

There's nothing discriminatory about the words in Taboo2's post you quoted.

5 hours ago, Taboo2 said:

I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science,

He is generalizing, but not all generalizations are discriminatory in the negative sense of the word. What he has written is a truism. You could substitute any religion or ethnicity for "Jews" and be equally correct.