Thailand succeeds reducing greenhouse gas emission below limit

[Soikhaonoiken]

What a joke, is it April 1

[Srikcir]

10 hours ago, brain150 said:

solar system as a whole has a negative energy balance

Shall we cite science?

If the solar system as a whole has a negative energy balance from the sun (disregarding non-solar energy incoming from outside the solar system), then the totality of all bodies within the system must absorb more than 100% of solar energy to give a negative balance. That's simply not a mathematical possibility.

 

In the alternative, if the solar system as a whole has perfect energy balance from the sun, then its bodies (planets, moons, asteroids) as a whole would not reflect back into space any unabsorbed solar energy back into space. "Albedo" is a measure of how much solar energy is reflected into space. Here is a summary of the the major bodies:

 

Venus     75%     Mars  29%     Saturn     47%     Jupiter  52%   

Mercury   6%     Earth  30%     Neptune  41%     Uranus  51%     Pluto  14%

Asteroid Belt   5%    Earth Moon 14%    Saturn moon Enceladus  99%

 

http://sciencing.com/albedo-planets-5203.html

http://wiki.astro.com/astrowiki/en/Albedo

 

Clearly, as plain as day the solar system as a whole has a positive solar energy balance - roughly 50%!

 

[dabhand]

On ‎12‎/‎06‎/‎2017 at 8:27 AM, Srikcir said:

Versus the GreenWatch Publication, The Climate Change Performance Index that shows Thailand's ranking has worsened every year from 24th in 2012 to 49th in 2016. From 2014 to 2015 saw the worst increase in Thailand's rank going from 38th to 47th.

 

Climate_Change_Performance_Index_2016.pdf

You seem to have missed the improvement in Thailand's ranking to 42nd in 2017. An innocent omission, I'm sure.

 

https://germanwatch.org/en/ccpi

 

[brain150]

7 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Shall we cite science?

If the solar system as a whole has a negative energy balance from the sun (disregarding non-solar energy incoming from outside the solar system), then the totality of all bodies within the system must absorb more than 100% of solar energy to give a negative balance. That's simply not a mathematical possibility.

 

In the alternative, if the solar system as a whole has perfect energy balance from the sun, then its bodies (planets, moons, asteroids) as a whole would not reflect back into space any unabsorbed solar energy back into space. "Albedo" is a measure of how much solar energy is reflected into space. Here is a summary of the the major bodies:

 

Venus     75%     Mars  29%     Saturn     47%     Jupiter  52%   

Mercury   6%     Earth  30%     Neptune  41%     Uranus  51%     Pluto  14%

Asteroid Belt   5%    Earth Moon 14%    Saturn moon Enceladus  99%

 

http://sciencing.com/albedo-planets-5203.html

http://wiki.astro.com/astrowiki/en/Albedo

 

Clearly, as plain as day the solar system as a whole has a positive solar energy balance - roughly 50%!

 

So how about the energy you need to create the system including building the factory and any transportation ? [If you look into the system as a whole and not only on solar input versus solar output !]

How about the environmental friendliness of batteries ? How about the energy maintaining the system ?

 

Solar energy the way we use it is not sustainable or environmentally friendly.

The overall energy balance of the system is negative over it's lifetime.

 

That's pretty simple physics and mathematics in contradiction to government propaganda that needs new ways to keep the economy going.

There are much easier ways to produce electricity. Sadly we are not allowed to have these technologies as they would make us independent and set us free

from the control that is imposed on us through energy and the monetary system.