Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
Britons could face higher energy, food and air travel costs for at least eight months after the conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran ends, according to a senior government minister. Darren Jones, the UK government's chief secretary to the Treasury, said the economic effects of the war would continue to filter through the global economy long after fighting stops. He said the government was preparing for possible supply disruptions as the conflict continues to affect energy production and transport routes across the Middle East.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Jones said ministers were closely examining the economic consequences of the war and developing contingency plans.
“Our best estimate is that economic impacts could last eight months or more after the conflict is resolved,” he said. “That means people could see higher energy bills, rising food prices and more expensive flights.”
Supply disruptions and global impact
Energy production and transportation in parts of the Middle East have slowed significantly during the conflict, creating supply chain problems and pushing up prices worldwide.
Earlier this month, UK officials drafted a worst-case scenario in which prolonged disruption could lead to food shortages by the summer. Items such as chicken and pork were identified as particularly vulnerable if supply chains are affected for an extended period.
The government has also attempted to reassure the public that there is currently no need to change daily behaviour. Ministers have urged motorists to continue buying petrol as normal and travellers to avoid altering flight plans because of fears about jet fuel shortages.
Jones suggested that price increases were more likely than widespread shortages on supermarket shelves.
Government planning and emergency measures
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is expected to chair another meeting of a Cabinet committee on Tuesday focused on preparing for potential shortages and supply chain disruptions linked to the war.
A group of ministers is also meeting twice a week to monitor stock levels of key goods and assess risks to supply chains. Jones is leading the government’s contingency planning meetings.
He said the UK had chosen not to become directly involved in the conflict, aside from taking defensive steps to protect national interests.
“This is not our war,” he said previously, adding that the government was working to prepare for any economic or security consequences.
The International Monetary Fund warned last week that the energy shock caused by the conflict could hit the UK harder than other advanced economies. The organisation lowered its forecast for UK economic growth this year to 0.8%, down from a previous estimate of 1.3%.
Food production and CO₂ supply concerns
Officials have also considered potential disruptions to the supply of carbon dioxide, which is widely used in food processing and preservation.
The concern stems from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route, which could affect supplies of natural gas needed for fertiliser production — a process that produces CO₂ as a by-product.
To help maintain supplies, the government has provided funding to restart the Ensus bioethanol plant, which generates carbon dioxide during production. The company says it expects to continue supplying CO₂ for the foreseeable future.
Jones said ministers had even discussed the possibility of pubs running short of draught beer during the summer’s Men’s Football World Cup if CO₂ supplies were disrupted, though he stressed efforts were underway to prevent that scenario.
Political pressure and global tensions
Supermarkets say they are working with the government to plan for possible supply challenges, while the National Farmers’ Union has warned that prices for crops such as cucumbers and tomatoes could rise within weeks, with other agricultural costs potentially increasing over several months.
The Liberal Democrats have called for food security to be made a central government priority. The party has proposed measures including a cut in fuel duty and lower public transport costs to help households cope with rising prices.
Meanwhile, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz remain unresolved. Iran’s chief negotiator said reopening the route would be impossible while the United States maintains a naval blockade of Iranian ports.
Negotiators from Iran travelled to Islamabad on Saturday for talks aimed at ending the conflict.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Americans are becoming increasingly pessimistic about the state of the US economy, with large majorities saying conditions are deteriorating and many blaming President Donald Trump’s policies, according to several national polls released over the past week.

Get today's headlines by email

The surveys indicate rising concern over inflation, high fuel and food costs, and personal financial pressures, even as financial markets have recently reached record highs.
Majority say economy is worsening
A poll by Gallup found that nearly half of Americans, 47%, now describe current economic conditions as “poor,” an increase of seven percentage points since March. At the same time, 73% said the economy is getting worse, also up seven points over the past month.
A separate Fox News survey reported similar sentiment. About 70% of registered voters said they believed the economy was deteriorating, matching a record level previously seen in 2023 and rising 15 points compared with April last year.
In the Fox poll, 41% of respondents rated the economy poorly, while roughly a quarter said it was performing well. Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats to view the economy positively.
The Gallup Economic Confidence Index also fell sharply. The measure dropped from -27 in March to -38 in April, its lowest reading since November 2023. The index ranges from -100, indicating extremely negative sentiment, to +100, representing strong confidence.
Although Republicans remained the only political group giving the economy a positive overall rating, their confidence declined markedly, falling 15 points between March and April. Democrats and independents also reported declines, though less steep.
Concerns about inflation and policy
Several polls suggest many Americans expect price pressures to worsen.
A survey conducted by Marquette Law School found that 70% of respondents believe inflation will increase over the next 12 months, up nine points from January. The same poll found 62% saying Trump’s policies would contribute to higher inflation, compared with 45% who held that view at the end of 2025.
In the Fox News poll, voters said by a two-to-one margin that Trump’s policies were harming the economy rather than helping it. Fifty-six percent said the policies were hurting economic conditions, while 28% said they were helping.

Among Republicans, opinion was divided. Seventy percent of voters identifying with the “Make America Great Again” movement said Trump’s policies were benefiting the economy, compared with 30% of Republicans who do not identify with that group.
Disapproval ratings of the president’s handling of the economy were also high. The Fox News poll showed 66% of voters disapproving and 34% approving, matching a record low approval rating across both of Trump’s terms. The Marquette survey reported similar findings, with 68% disapproving of Trump’s economic management and 76% expressing disapproval of his handling of inflation and the cost of living.
The White House has defended its policies, arguing that tax cuts have increased household incomes. Trump said earlier this month that Republican tax measures had left Americans with more money in their pockets, including through a proposal to eliminate taxes on tips.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also highlighted the administration’s tax policies, saying they had returned a “historic amount of money” to working families.
Rising pressure on household finances
Polls also show many Americans struggling with personal finances and rising living costs.
According to the Fox News survey, six in ten voters described their own financial situation as either “only fair” or “poor,” including 28% who said it was poor. Majorities of Democrats, independents and Republicans all expressed negative views about their finances.
The Marquette poll found that just 20% of Americans said they were financially better off than a year ago, a drop of eight points since January.
High prices appear to be a major concern. Eighty-two percent of respondents in the Marquette survey said grocery prices had risen in the past six months, while 93% said gasoline prices had increased. In January, only 21% reported higher gas prices.
Voters widely described several costs as major financial burdens, including groceries (62%), fuel (60%), healthcare (55%) and housing (52%).
A CNBC survey found many households adjusting their spending to cope with rising costs. Nearly eight in ten respondents said they had taken steps such as reducing spending on entertainment, cutting travel because of fuel costs, or limiting purchases.
More than half said they were travelling less, while around four in ten said they had reduced spending on essential items like groceries or medical care. About three in ten reported putting more purchases on credit cards.
War and labour market concerns
External factors are also shaping public sentiment.
The CNBC poll found 64% of voters said the war involving Iran was not worth the increase in gasoline prices associated with the conflict.
Americans are also increasingly pessimistic about the job market. Gallup reported that 63% of respondents believe it is a bad time to find a job, compared with 33% who said it is a good time. That level matches the worst readings since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Despite strong stock market performance, attitudes toward investing remain cautious. A narrow majority of Americans, 53%, said it would be a bad idea to invest $1,000 in the stock market at the moment.
The polls were conducted between early and mid-April among roughly 1,000 respondents each and carried margins of error of around three to four percentage points.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Iranian attacks on US military facilities across the Gulf region have caused billions of dollars in damage, according to officials familiar with the assessments, raising questions in Washington about the scale of the losses and the information provided to lawmakers. Six people briefed on the damage told NBC News that Iranian strikes hit a range of infrastructure and equipment, including runways, radar systems, aircraft, command centres and satellite communications facilities. The destruction spans several countries in the Middle East and could cost as much as $5bn to repair.

Get today's headlines by email

The estimated figure covers structural damage to bases and infrastructure but does not include the cost of repairing or replacing radar equipment, weapons systems, aircraft and other military assets that were damaged or destroyed.
US defence officials have not publicly detailed the full scale of the damage. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Hill.
Damage reported across multiple bases
According to officials familiar with the assessments, the attacks affected several American installations across the region.
Early in the conflict, an Iranian F-5 fighter jet reportedly struck the US base at Camp Buehring in Kuwait within the first few days of fighting. The war began on 28 February following a wave of US and Israeli strikes.
Other facilities also sustained damage. At Al Dhafra Air Base and Al Ruwais military base in the United Arab Emirates, Iranian strikes reportedly damaged fuel storage sites, aircraft hangars, barracks, warehouses and a medical clinic.
Additional US-linked installations reported damage as well, including Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia and Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.
In Kuwait, officials said Camp Arifjan, Camp Buehring and the Shuaiba Port facility were also affected.
Three officials told NBC News that Iranian attacks later caused extensive damage to the headquarters building used by the US Navy in Bahrain and destroyed at least two air defence systems.
Repairs to the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain alone could cost around $200m, according to a congressional official cited by The New York Times following a Pentagon review.
Independent assessment points to wider impact
An external analysis by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) suggests the damage may extend further.
The think tank said Iranian strikes also hit Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, damaged a runway at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and struck a munitions storage facility at a base in northern Iraq.
Mackenzie Eaglen, a senior fellow at AEI, said rebuilding costs could include repairing damaged infrastructure, reconstructing facilities or replacing equipment entirely.
She noted that in some cases the destruction may require the abandonment or decommissioning of damaged sites.
“War damage also includes estimated costs for infrastructure that is unsalvageable,” Eaglen said in comments reported by NBC News.
Military equipment also affected
Officials familiar with the damage said several aircraft and systems were also hit.
Among the reported losses were at least one fighter jet, a dozen MQ-9 Reaper drones, two MC-130 tanker aircraft, helicopters and an E-3 Sentry surveillance plane.
The cost of repairing or replacing such equipment has not been included in the initial $5bn estimate for infrastructure damage.
Questions over war costs
The scale of the damage has also drawn attention in Congress, where lawmakers say they have received limited information about the financial cost of the conflict.
In March, the Pentagon estimated that the first six days of military operations against Iran cost more than $11.3bn. That figure did not include reconstruction or repair expenses.
Officials also said $5.6bn was spent on munitions during the first two days of fighting.
Some congressional aides said briefings from the Pentagon about the costs of the war have been limited.
“No one knows anything. And it’s not for lack of asking,” one aide told NBC News, adding that staff had repeatedly requested more detailed figures.
The aide said the lack of information has caused concern among lawmakers, particularly as the Pentagon seeks approval for a record defence budget.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Buckingham Palace has confirmed that King Charles III and Queen Camilla will continue with their planned state visit to the United States, despite security concerns raised by a shooting incident in Washington, DC. The palace said on Sunday that the four-day visit would go ahead “as planned” following discussions between British and US officials throughout the day. Some adjustments are expected to be made to parts of the programme for security reasons.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred on Saturday night when a gunman attempted to enter the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at a Washington hotel. Authorities say the suspect fired several shots near a security checkpoint before being detained.
US officials believe the attacker was likely targeting Donald Trump, who was attending the event.
Security concerns after shooting
The palace said the King was “greatly relieved” to learn that the US president, Melania Trump and other guests had not been harmed.
It is understood that the King and Queen privately contacted the Trumps to express sympathy for those affected by the incident.
The suspect, identified by US media as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was arrested at the scene. During the confrontation, one US Secret Service agent was shot but survived because his bullet-proof vest stopped the round. No other injuries were reported.
Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said he was “very confident” that the British monarch would be safe during the upcoming visit. Speaking to NBC News, Blanche said the events of Saturday night demonstrated that US security systems were functioning effectively.
Even before the shooting, preparations for the royal visit had included extensive security arrangements. Officials are now expected to review those plans and implement additional measures.
Programme may see minor changes
Buckingham Palace said there had already been discussions about how the incident might affect operational planning for the trip.
The palace statement thanked officials who had worked quickly on both sides of the Atlantic and said the King and Queen were “looking forward to the visit getting under way tomorrow”.
While the visit will proceed, some events could be modified. Planned engagements include an address to both houses of Congress, a visit to the 9/11 memorial in New York, and a wreath-laying ceremony in Virginia honouring US and UK service members who died in combat.
Political backdrop to the visit
The visit takes place amid diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Reports have suggested the US may reconsider its position on British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, while Trump has criticised the UK government and other allies over their response to the ongoing Iran conflict.
Despite those disagreements, Trump has spoken warmly about the British monarch. In an interview with the BBC earlier in the week, the president said he had known the King for many years and suggested the visit could help strengthen relations between the two countries.
UK leaders respond
British political leaders also reacted to the Washington shooting.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he had offered his “best wishes” to Trump and the first lady following what he described as “shocking scenes”. During a phone call on Sunday, he expressed relief that the couple were safe and wished the injured Secret Service officer a swift recovery.
Opposition figures likewise condemned the violence. Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said political violence must be rejected, while Nigel Farage of Reform UK said it was a relief that no lives had been lost.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was essential that security arrangements for the royal visit were fully reviewed to ensure the monarch’s protection.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Sir Keir Starmer has said the “vast majority” of Labour MPs back his leadership, as speculation grows about a potential challenge to his position as prime minister. Speaking to the Sunday Times after a week of mounting political pressure, Sir Keir said internal party support remained strong despite criticism from opposition parties and some dissent within Labour ranks.

Get today's headlines by email

“In politics, you get this sort of thing all of the time,” he said, adding that there was always speculation about leadership.
Leadership speculation grows
Questions about Sir Keir’s future intensified following controversy over his decision to appoint Lord Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the United States.
Opposition figures have called for the prime minister to step down, pointing to concerns raised by UK security officials during the vetting process for the appointment.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said Sir Keir should resign over the decision. Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Philp said some ministers had been “equivocating” about the prime minister’s future.
He also said a small number of Labour MPs had publicly urged Sir Keir to go and argued that MPs should remove him if he did not step down voluntarily, saying it would be “in the national interest”.
Sir Keir rejected suggestions that criticism reflected wider dissatisfaction among Labour MPs.
“What you never hear from are all the people who are supportive, loyal and just want to get on with the job,” he told the newspaper. “That is the vast majority of people in the Parliamentary Labour Party.”
He added that many MPs were focused on governing rather than internal disputes.
“They’re pleased to be in power,” he said. “They’ve waited a long time to be in power and they just want to get on with their job.”
Dispute over security vetting
The controversy centres on concerns raised by security officials during Lord Mandelson’s vetting process.
Sir Keir told MPs earlier in the week that officials had recommended against granting security clearance but that this information had not been passed on to him at the time.
He also defended his decision to dismiss the Foreign Office’s most senior civil servant, Sir Olly Robbins, who had not informed him of the concerns.
“When there’s a double red flag not to give clearance and showing high concern, then I do not accept the argument that that is something which should not be told to the prime minister,” Sir Keir said.
Sir Olly later told MPs he had not been told there was a formal recommendation to deny clearance. Instead, he said officials had been “leaning against” approving it, and he ultimately authorised the clearance with mitigation measures in place.
Sir Keir dismissed criticism that he should have sought further clarification about the vetting outcome.
“When I’m told there’s security clearance, should I go back and quiz officials and say, ‘Are you telling me the truth?’” he said.
“If I questioned every bit of information put in front of me I would never get anything done.”
Focus on wider challenges
The prime minister said his attention was focused on international conflicts rather than domestic political speculation.
He pointed to the wars in Ukraine and Iran as the most pressing issues facing the UK.
“This is the urgent issue of our time,” he said. “This is going to reshape our country.”
Sir Keir added that tensions involving Iran were having wider effects, including the use of proxies inside the UK.
Meanwhile, Philp said the parliamentary Privileges Committee should investigate whether the prime minister had misled Parliament over the Mandelson appointment. Any inquiry would require approval from MPs in the House of Commons.
Darren Jones, the government’s chief secretary to the Treasury, said the administration had “nothing to hide” over the appointment and described the ongoing debate as frustrating.
He acknowledged that upcoming elections in May would be challenging for Labour and said the controversy had made campaigning more difficult. However, he added that voters he had spoken to during campaigning had not raised the Mandelson issue.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
US authorities believe a suspected gunman who opened fire near the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington was likely aiming at President Donald Trump and senior members of his administration, according to Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche. The suspect, identified by US media as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, was arrested after shots were fired near a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton hotel on Saturday evening. The annual event was being held in a ballroom inside the hotel at the time.

Get today's headlines by email

Blanche said investigators are still examining the suspect’s motive but early findings suggest the attacker intended to target government officials attending the gathering.
The FBI’s criminal division and a terrorism task force are leading the investigation.
Security rushes president to safety
Gunfire was reported at about 20:35 local time (00:35 GMT) in the hotel’s foyer, several floors above where the dinner was taking place.
Secret Service agents quickly escorted President Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and Vice-President JD Vance out of the ballroom. The president had been speaking at the event when the disturbance occurred.
Law enforcement officers exchanged fire with the suspect and subdued him. Officials said they believe the man discharged his weapon during the confrontation. He was not shot but was taken to hospital for evaluation.
Police said the suspect was carrying two firearms as well as knives.
One officer was wounded during the incident but has since been released from hospital. Secret Service communications chief Anthony Guglielmi said the officer’s bullet-resistant vest helped prevent more serious injuries.


Investigators examine suspect writings
Authorities are reviewing documents believed to have been written by the suspect that indicate a desire to target members of the administration, according to a senior US official.
One of Allen’s relatives contacted police before the attack after receiving writings from him. Those documents reportedly did not mention the correspondents’ dinner specifically.
Officials also said investigators believe Allen travelled to Washington by train, first going from Los Angeles to Chicago before continuing to the US capital.
Allen describes himself on LinkedIn as a mechanical engineer, game developer and teacher. He is from Torrance, California, and police are searching a property believed to be linked to him there.
He is expected to appear in federal court on Monday, where he will face charges including assaulting a federal officer and using a firearm during a violent crime.
Event halted amid confusion
Journalists attending the dinner described confusion as the gunshots echoed through the hotel.
The room hosting the event was briefly placed under lockdown before organisers announced the dinner would be rescheduled and began escorting guests out.
Weijia Jiang, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, called the incident “harrowing” and thanked the Secret Service for protecting those present. She said the organisation’s board would meet to determine next steps.
Speaking later from the White House, Trump praised the security services, telling reporters those at the dinner owed them a “tremendous debt of gratitude”. He also thanked journalists for what he described as responsible reporting on the incident and urged people to “resolve our differences peacefully”.
Third known threat against Trump
The president described the suspect as someone who had “a lot of hatred in his heart for a while” and said the man’s family had been aware he was struggling. Trump also said the suspect had produced a manifesto.
The incident marks the third known assassination threat against Trump. In July 2024, a bullet grazed his ear during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Two months later, another suspected gunman was discovered hiding near Trump’s golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida.
World leaders condemned the shooting attempt. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was “shocked” and stressed that attacks on democratic institutions or press freedom must be strongly condemned.
Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney and Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also expressed relief that those attending the dinner were unharmed.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Two former Israeli prime ministers have agreed to merge their political parties ahead of upcoming elections in a coordinated attempt to defeat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and consolidate a divided opposition. Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid announced on Sunday that they would form a joint political faction, with Bennett set to lead the combined party. The move marks a renewed partnership between the two leaders, who previously shared power under a coalition government formed in 2021.

Get today's headlines by email

Lapid’s Yesh Atid party said the merger was designed to strengthen the opposition bloc and improve its chances in the next national vote.
“The move is intended to unite the bloc, put an end to internal divisions and focus all efforts on winning the critical upcoming elections,” the party said in a statement.
The two politicians planned to appear together at a news conference later on Sunday to outline the agreement.
Renewed partnership
Bennett and Lapid previously worked together in a power-sharing arrangement that briefly removed Netanyahu from office. Their 2021 coalition brought together an unusually broad alliance of parties with differing ideological positions.
Under the deal, Bennett served as prime minister first, with Lapid scheduled to take over later in the term.
The coalition ended Netanyahu’s 12 consecutive years in power at the time. Bennett held the premiership during the government’s first year before the alliance began to unravel amid internal disputes.
As the coalition collapsed, Lapid assumed the role of caretaker prime minister for the final six months of the government’s term. Subsequent elections returned Netanyahu to office.
Different political backgrounds
Since that election, Lapid has led Israel’s parliamentary opposition. Bennett, meanwhile, stepped away from political life after the collapse of the coalition government.
Despite having governed together, the two leaders represent different political traditions within Israeli politics.
Bennett is an Orthodox Jew who has taken a more hard-line stance on issues related to the Palestinians. Lapid, by contrast, is secular and generally viewed as a more moderate political figure.
Even so, the two men developed a cooperative working relationship during their time in government, helping them manage the diverse coalition that temporarily replaced Netanyahu’s long-running administration.
Attempt to unify opposition
The planned party merger reflects an effort to consolidate Israel’s opposition landscape, which has been fragmented across several political factions.
Analysts have long noted that the various opposition parties share few ideological similarities. However, many are united in their desire to challenge Netanyahu’s continued leadership.
By combining their parties into a single political force, Bennett and Lapid appear to be seeking greater cohesion among anti-Netanyahu voters ahead of the next election.
Their alliance signals a renewed attempt to build a viable alternative to the current government, which returned Netanyahu to power after the previous coalition collapsed.
Whether the merger can overcome the opposition’s broader ideological divisions remains unclear, but both leaders are presenting the move as a necessary step toward mounting a stronger electoral challenge.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
A shooting outside a Washington hotel during a high-profile media dinner has renewed concerns about security surrounding US President Donald Trump, after a suspected gunman came close to the venue where he was attending the event.

Get today's headlines by email

The incident occurred late on Saturday at the Washington Hilton during the annual White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, which draws senior politicians, diplomats and journalists. Authorities say a suspect armed with multiple weapons exchanged gunfire with security before being subdued.
Trump later remarked on the risks associated with the presidency, saying he could not imagine “any profession that is more dangerous”.
Gunman stopped near security checkpoint
Police identified the suspect as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen. Authorities say he was carrying a shotgun, a handgun and several knives.
According to officials, the man ran toward a security checkpoint inside the hotel before agents opened fire. CCTV footage later shared on social media by Trump appeared to show the suspect charging toward the area before being confronted by officers.
Witnesses reported hearing gunshots outside the ballroom where the dinner was taking place. Wolf Blitzer, who was attending the event, told CNN he saw the suspect fire several shots using what he described as a “very very serious” weapon.
After the shooting, Trump posted an image on social media showing a shirtless man on the floor with his hands restrained while surrounded by Secret Service personnel.


Questions over security arrangements
The suspect’s motive remains unclear, though acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said investigators believed the man may have been targeting government officials, “likely including the president”.
Attention has also turned to security procedures at the hotel. While roads around the building were closed for hours ahead of the dinner, some attendees described relatively limited checks at the entrance.
BBC Chief North America correspondent Gary O'Donoghue, who was present at the event, said staff at the door only briefly glanced at tickets before allowing guests inside. He noted that the tickets displayed table numbers but not the names of attendees, and that identification was not checked.
Guests entered the venue through the hotel lobby before moving down escalators to reach a security checkpoint above the ballroom level.
Authorities said the suspect was staying at the hotel, which remained open to guests even as the event was underway. Access had been restricted to hotel residents and people with tickets to the dinner or related receptions.
Security response praised
Despite the breach, some security experts said the response from agents suggested protective measures worked as intended.
Former FBI agent Jeff Kroeger said Secret Service personnel quickly formed a protective barrier around Trump once shots were heard.
“They converged on the president,” he said, describing how agents shielded him and moved him away from danger.
Former Secret Service agent Barry Donadio said there appeared to be “no lack of agents, officers and police” at the event.
Trump himself praised the Secret Service response and said they had done “a great job” removing him and Vice-President JD Vance from the stage after the gunfire.
The president also criticised the hotel’s layout, calling it “not a particularly secure building”. He used the incident to highlight plans for a new ballroom at the White House, which he said would include bullet-resistant glass and enhanced security features.
Rising political violence in the US
The shooting comes amid wider concerns about increasing political violence in the United States.
Data from the United States Capitol Police show that more than 8,000 threats were investigated in 2023, roughly 50% higher than in 2018.
Several violent attacks against political figures or commentators have taken place in recent years, underscoring deep political divisions in the country.
Trump has also been the target of previous assassination attempts, including a 2024 incident in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a bullet grazed his ear.
Reflecting on the dangers faced by US presidents, Trump said he had studied past attacks on national leaders, including the 1981 shooting of Ronald Reagan.
He added that well-known leaders have historically been targets, citing the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Russian missile and drone strikes killed at least seven people across Ukraine overnight, including five in the central city of Dnipro, as attacks continued across multiple regions. Ukrainian officials said an apartment building in Dnipro was hit during the bombardment, while emergency workers spent Saturday morning searching for survivors trapped beneath rubble.

Get today's headlines by email

President Volodymyr Zelensky said the assault lasted “practically all night”, describing a sustained wave of drones, cruise missiles and ballistic weapons aimed largely at civilian infrastructure.
Dnipro Hit in Overnight Assault
Regional authorities in Dnipro said five people died when a residential building was struck during the attack.
Emergency crews were deployed to the site to search for survivors and clear debris as daylight broke on Saturday.
Elsewhere, officials reported that two people were killed in the northern city of Chernihiv after Russian missiles and drones struck the area. Attacks were also reported in Odesa and Kharkiv.
Ukrainian air defences were activated across the country during the assault. Authorities said more than 600 Russian drones were launched overnight, describing it as one of the largest barrages in recent days.
According to Ukrainian officials, the majority of the drones were intercepted before reaching their targets.
Writing on social media, Zelensky said Russia’s approach to the war had remained unchanged.
“The Russians’ tactics have not changed: strike drones, cruise missiles, and a significant amount of ballistics,” he said, adding that many targets were “ordinary infrastructure in cities”, including residential buildings, energy facilities and businesses.
Long-Range Drone Strikes Inside Russia
While Russia carried out attacks across Ukraine, Ukrainian forces launched long-range drone strikes deep into Russian territory.
In Yekaterinburg, about 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from the Ukrainian border, the regional governor said six people were injured after a building was struck.
In the neighbouring region of Chelyabinsk, a local official said drones targeting an industrial site had been intercepted.
Russia’s defence ministry said its air defence systems shot down 127 Ukrainian drones across more than a dozen regions.
The ministry also claimed Russian forces had captured the village of Bochkove in the Kharkiv region near Ukraine’s northern border. Ukrainian authorities have not commented on the claim, and it has not been independently verified.
Nato Aircraft Scrambled Near Border
During the overnight attack, British Typhoon fighter jets stationed in Romania were scrambled after Russian drones were detected approaching the area.
Romania’s defence ministry later said it was investigating the fall of an unidentified object on its territory near the Ukrainian border.
The ministry clarified earlier comments suggesting British aircraft had shot down drones, saying the jets did not enter Ukrainian airspace and did not engage any targets.
It said the drones never entered Romanian airspace.
A Nato official said the British aircraft had been authorised to engage if necessary but that no action was required because the threats were neutralised outside Romanian territory.
Ukraine Seeks Stronger International Support
The renewed wave of attacks comes as diplomatic efforts to end the war remain stalled.
Ukraine continues to seek international support for its military and defence capabilities.
On Friday, Zelensky met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for talks aimed at strengthening cooperation, including in air defence and military production.
According to officials, the discussions focused on expanding defence collaboration between Ukraine and Gulf partners, particularly as regional countries have shown growing interest in Ukraine’s drone warfare experience.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
The UK government is intensifying contingency planning to guard against possible food and fuel shortages linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, as disruptions to global energy routes raise concerns about supply chains and economic stability.

Get today's headlines by email

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to chair another meeting of a Cabinet committee on Tuesday tasked with addressing potential shortages. A separate group of ministers is meeting twice weekly to monitor supply levels and assess any emerging risks to food, fuel and other essential goods.
The preparations follow the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas normally travels. Since the conflict began, oil prices have surged, prompting governments and businesses to evaluate the potential economic fallout.
Government Planning for Supply Disruptions
Earlier this month, officials drafted a worst-case scenario outlining possible food shortages by the summer if the conflict continues. Among the items highlighted were poultry and pork, both of which rely heavily on stable supply chains and agricultural inputs.
Authorities have also moved to reassure the public. Drivers have been encouraged to continue refuelling as normal and avoid altering travel plans, amid concerns that panic buying or behavioural changes could worsen potential supply pressures.
The contingency planning group is being led by Darren Jones, the government’s Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister. He said the UK had taken the correct decision to stay out of the fighting while taking defensive measures to safeguard national interests.
Jones said ministers were working to prepare for and reduce any domestic consequences of the conflict, including effects on the economy and security.
Economic Risks and Energy Concerns
The potential impact of the conflict has already prompted warnings from international financial institutions. The International Monetary Fund said the energy shock linked to the war could hit the UK more severely than other advanced economies.
The IMF recently lowered its forecast for UK economic growth this year to 0.8%, down from an earlier prediction of 1.3%.
Officials have also been examining risks to the supply of carbon dioxide (CO2), a gas widely used in food production and preservation. CO2 is used in processes such as animal slaughter and packaging that helps keep food fresh.
To strengthen domestic supply, the government has provided funding to restart the Ensus Bioethanol Plant, which produces CO2 as a by-product during bioethanol manufacturing.
A spokesperson for the facility said the company was confident it could continue producing CO2 to meet national demand for the foreseeable future.
Jones said shipments of jet fuel were continuing to reach the UK and that supplies of CO2 had been secured, emphasising that motorists should continue using their vehicles as usual.
Industry and Political Response
Supermarkets have been working with ministers to prepare for possible supply disruptions if the conflict persists.
The National Farmers' Union has warned that some food prices could rise in the coming weeks. It said cucumber and tomato prices may increase within six weeks, while other agricultural products such as milk could see price pressures within three to six months.
Airlines have also sought to reassure travellers, saying they are not currently experiencing shortages of jet fuel because purchases are typically made in advance and airports maintain reserves.
Opposition politicians have called for broader measures to protect consumers. The Liberal Democrats urged the government to prioritise food security legislation in the next King’s Speech and proposed a reduction in fuel duty along with lower public transport costs.
Strait of Hormuz at Centre of Dispute
Tensions remain high around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian negotiators have said reopening the waterway would be impossible while a US naval blockade of Iranian ports continues.
US President Donald Trump has sought to pressure Iran by targeting the country’s shipping tolls through the strait and its oil revenues. Tehran has described the blockade as piracy.
Delegations from Iran were in Islamabad, Pakistan on Saturday for talks aimed at ending the conflict.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 20
webfact
webfact
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has instructed the military to intensify attacks on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, just days after a ceasefire between the two sides was extended by three weeks. The directive was followed by fresh Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon on Saturday that Lebanese officials say killed at least six people.

Get today's headlines by email

The escalation comes amid growing strain on the fragile truce, which has reduced but not completely halted cross-border hostilities.
Deadly strikes in southern Lebanon
According to Lebanon’s health ministry, four people were killed when Israeli strikes hit a truck and a motorcycle in the town of Yohmor al-Shaqeef.
Another attack on the town of Safad al-Battikh left two people dead and injured 17 others, officials said.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it had killed three Hezbollah members travelling in what it described as a vehicle carrying weapons. The military added that another fighter riding a motorcycle was also killed.
The IDF said two additional armed Hezbollah members were killed in the Litani River area, where Israeli troops remain deployed inside a self-declared buffer zone. The army said the individuals posed a threat to Israeli soldiers operating in southern Lebanon.
Later, the Israeli military reported detecting what it called a “suspicious aerial target” near the Israeli border community of Malkia. It described the incident as another breach of the ceasefire agreement.
Hezbollah response and rising tensions
Hezbollah said it had fired on an Israeli army vehicle in southern Lebanon in retaliation for the strike in Yohmor al-Shaqeef.
Following Netanyahu’s order to step up military action, Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency reported several additional Israeli strikes in the region. These included two rapid attacks in towns in Bint Jbeil district, another strike in Tyre district, and further bombardments in Nabatieh district.
The Israeli military said it had targeted infrastructure used by Hezbollah for military purposes across southern Lebanon. It added that operations would continue against what it described as threats to Israeli civilians and soldiers, acting on instructions from the government.
Israel continues to maintain a presence in parts of southern Lebanon and has been carrying out large-scale demolitions in the area.
Concerns over attacks on journalists
Separately, an international press freedom group criticised recent violence affecting journalists covering the conflict.
The Media Freedom Coalition said attacks on journalists in Lebanon were unacceptable after a reporter was killed earlier in the week.
The group — co-chaired by the governments of the United Kingdom and Finland — urged all sides to ensure that media workers can operate safely.
A Lebanese journalist, Amal Khalil, was killed in an Israeli strike on Wednesday. Freelance photographer Zeinab Faraj was injured in the same attack.
Lebanese officials say the journalists had taken shelter inside a house after an initial air strike struck a vehicle nearby, killing two men. They accuse Israeli forces of deliberately targeting them.
The IDF has denied targeting journalists.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Suspected gunshots briefly disrupted the White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington, prompting security agents to rush guests to safety as authorities moved to secure the area. Early accounts from journalists inside the venue describe confusion in the ballroom after several loud bangs were heard, triggering an immediate security response.

Get today's headlines by email

Loud bangs trigger security response
A White House pool reporter said several loud bangs were heard inside the hotel ballroom during the event.
Moments later, members of the United States Secret Service rushed into action with guns drawn, shouting “shots fired” as they moved people away from the area.
Pool reporters said they were quickly pushed back and held by Secret Service personnel while agents worked to secure the scene.
While reporters were being held, some overheard agents saying that a suspected gunman had been taken into custody.
Guests crouch as chaos unfolds
Images taken inside the Washington Hilton, where the dinner is traditionally held, showed guests crouching or taking cover after the sounds were heard.
Security personnel were seen helping some attendees evacuate from the ballroom as the situation unfolded.
Several prominent figures were present at the event. The pool report said Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was seen limping as he moved through the area, while Jeanine Pirro was escorted past reporters by security.
FBI director shielded companion
Among those seated near the disturbance was Kash Patel, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
A journalist seated nearby said Patel reacted immediately when the sounds were heard. According to the account, he covered his girlfriend with his body and dropped to the ground as the situation unfolded.
After several minutes, one of Patel’s security agents signalled to other agents in the room that the FBI director was safe.
As guests began cautiously standing again, Patel was seen sending messages on his phone.
When reporters attempted to ask him what had happened, he was quickly escorted out of the room by security.
Investigation continues
Authorities have not yet publicly confirmed the source of the loud bangs or whether shots were actually fired.
However, agents at the scene indicated that a suspected shooter had been detained as security continued to manage the situation.
Officials are expected to provide further details once the incident has been fully assessed.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Compiled from various sources 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
A U.S. federal appeals court has blocked a directive by Donald Trump that sought to suspend access to asylum for migrants crossing the U.S.–Mexico border unlawfully, ruling that the policy conflicts with federal immigration law.

Get today's headlines by email

The decision, issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, found that the administration cannot bypass legal procedures governing deportation or prevent migrants already in the United States from applying for asylum.
Two judges supported the ruling, while a third agreed only in part.
Court finds policy conflicts with immigration law
Writing for the majority, Judge J. Michelle Childs said the administration’s proclamation and related guidance unlawfully attempted to sidestep the procedures laid out in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
She wrote that the law’s “text, structure, and history” show that Congress did not grant the executive branch the broad authority claimed by the administration to carry out summary removals or deny migrants the right to seek asylum.
Childs concluded that the policy improperly replaced existing removal procedures and disregarded statutory protections that allow individuals to apply for asylum or other forms of protection from deportation.
Judge Cornelia Pillard joined the majority opinion.
Partial dissent on asylum authority
Judge Justin Walker, who was appointed during Trump’s first presidency, agreed with the panel that migrants cannot be stripped of legal protections preventing them from being sent to countries where they could face persecution or torture.
However, he disagreed with the majority’s conclusion regarding the president’s ability to deny asylum applications entirely, arguing that the executive branch has broader discretion in that area.
Legal challenge from rights groups
The lawsuit challenging the policy was filed in February 2025 by immigrant advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union.
Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the organization, said the ruling could save the lives of people fleeing danger who had been denied the chance to present their cases.
The administration can request a review by the full appeals court or ask the Supreme Court of the United States to consider the case.
Policy introduced after Trump returned to office
The dispute stems from actions taken when Trump returned to the presidency in 2025.
On his first day back in office, he ordered officials to suspend the asylum process for migrants seeking protection in the United States, citing what he described as an “invasion” at the southern border.
Following the directive, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security instructed immigration authorities that migrants crossing between official entry points were not permitted to apply for asylum. The guidance also introduced new procedures allowing migrants to be removed quickly through “direct repatriation” or “expedited removal.”
Under those instructions, asylum officers were told not to ask migrants questions about whether they had a credible fear of persecution or torture.
Earlier ruling upheld
In July, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled against the administration, concluding that neither the Immigration and Nationality Act nor the Constitution granted the president the sweeping authority claimed in the directive. He also certified a class action covering migrants affected by the policy.
The Justice Department appealed, but the appellate panel largely upheld the lower court’s decision.
Childs wrote that the law does not permit the president to create new summary removal procedures or suspend migrants’ statutory right to apply for asylum and related protections.
She added that if the government wishes to change the existing asylum system, it must seek action from Congress rather than act unilaterally.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
A US law limiting unauthorized military action is approaching a critical deadline as the Trump administration continues its war with Iran without congressional approval. Under the War Powers Resolution, the president must obtain authorization from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities or end the military operation.

Get today's headlines by email

According to the statute’s timeline, the current conflict reaches that threshold on May 1, though lawmakers disagree about the exact date.
Timeline Set by War Powers Law
The law, enacted after the Vietnam War, establishes a sequence of steps when US troops enter combat without a formal declaration of war.
First, the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities. In his notification regarding the Iran conflict, Donald Trump said he had deployed troops using the president’s constitutional authority to conduct US foreign relations.
Second, Congress must approve the military action within 60 days of receiving that notice. If lawmakers do not grant authorization, the president is required to terminate the operation.
The law also allows a possible 30-day extension if the president argues additional time is needed to ensure the safe withdrawal of US forces.
Debate Over the Deadline
The exact timing of the 60-day limit remains disputed on Capitol Hill. Some lawmakers say the clock began when hostilities started, placing the deadline around April 29. Others point to the law’s wording and argue the countdown began when the White House formally notified Congress, which would make May 1 the key date.
The existence of a ceasefire has further complicated the debate. Some Republicans contend the pause in fighting should not count toward the 60-day total.
Republican Representative Brian Fitzpatrick said ceasefires should not be penalized and indicated he could push for a vote under the War Powers framework if the truce collapses.
Law Rarely Enforced in Practice
Although Congress can vote to revoke a president’s war powers at any time, attempts by Democrats to do so during the current conflict have so far failed.
Several presidents have also questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution. When the law was first passed, Richard Nixon vetoed it, arguing it restricted the president’s ability to defend the country. Congress later overrode that veto.
More recently, Vice President JD Vance has dismissed the law as unconstitutional and said it would not affect how the administration conducts foreign policy.
In practice, the law has never forced a president to end a military campaign. Courts have generally avoided ruling on disputes over its constitutionality despite lawsuits from members of Congress challenging presidential use of force.
Past Workarounds by Presidents
Previous administrations have used various legal arguments to continue military operations beyond the 60-day limit.
In 1983, Ronald Reagan reached a compromise with Congress allowing US Marines deployed in Lebanon to remain for an additional 18 months.
In 2011, Barack Obama allowed US involvement in a NATO bombing campaign in Libya to continue past the deadline. His administration argued that the operations did not amount to “hostilities” because American forces faced limited risk and allied nations carried out most of the combat.
Similarly, Bill Clinton maintained US troops in Kosovo for more than 60 days in 1999, saying Congress had effectively approved the mission by funding it.
Political Pressure Builds in Congress
The Trump administration has not publicly sought congressional backing for the Iran conflict or requested additional funding for the war.
Some Republican lawmakers have been reluctant to challenge the president, reflecting a broader pattern of Congress yielding authority on issues ranging from tariffs to federal spending.
However, the approaching 60-day deadline could test that unity. Some GOP lawmakers argue Congress has a responsibility to vote on whether to authorize a war that continues beyond the legal limit.
Even supporters of the military campaign may hesitate to hold such a vote, wary that the issue could become politically damaging ahead of midterm elections or signal division during wartime.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
King Charles III’s upcoming state visit to the United States is being described by royal insiders as a moment of significant risk and opportunity, unfolding during one of the most strained periods in modern Anglo-American relations.

Get today's headlines by email

The four-day trip, which the King will undertake with Queen Camilla, comes amid geopolitical tensions, political disagreements between Washington and London, and renewed attention on controversies involving the royal family. Officials say the visit will require careful diplomacy as the monarch navigates complex political sensitivities while representing the United Kingdom abroad.
Strained political backdrop
The visit takes place against a turbulent international background that includes conflict in the Middle East and a fragile ceasefire involving Iran. Analysts say the broader geopolitical climate adds to the pressure surrounding the trip.
Andrew Lownie, author of a biography of Prince Andrew, said relations between the United States and the United Kingdom are facing their most serious difficulties in decades. He noted that dealing with President Donald Trump adds an unpredictable element to the diplomatic mission.
Despite those challenges, historians and officials say the King’s role could carry influence. Royal historian Ed Owens described the visit as a “huge global event” occurring during unusually tense political circumstances. He suggested the King may use the platform to promote longstanding Western values such as democracy, liberty and freedom.
Political disagreements between the two governments have recently intensified. President Trump has publicly criticised UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and questioned the strength of British military capabilities, while London has resisted joining the United States in military action related to the Iran conflict.
Officials are also mindful that the president’s unscripted remarks could create awkward moments during the visit, even though organisers have structured the itinerary to limit opportunities for off-the-cuff exchanges.
Diplomatic engagements
The visit will include several high-profile events in Washington and New York. The King is scheduled to address a joint session of the US Congress and attend a formal state dinner hosted by the White House.
Other engagements include a visit to the National September 11 Memorial and a reception in New York. The trip will conclude with an appearance in a national park in Virginia, highlighting natural heritage and environmental themes.
Royal sources say the visit must balance political sensitivities with the longer-term goal of maintaining the historic alliance between the two nations.
Officials have emphasised that state visits are conducted on behalf of the British government. While acknowledging present tensions, they say the trip aims to reaffirm the enduring relationship between the two countries.
Personal and public pressures
The King will also face personal and public scrutiny during the visit.
Campaigners connected to survivors of abuse linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are expected to speak publicly during the trip, urging recognition of their concerns. Some have called for the King to meet victims, particularly given allegations previously made against his brother, Prince Andrew. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and settled a civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre in 2022 without admitting liability.
Queen Camilla’s schedule will include meetings with campaigners working to combat domestic abuse.
The visit also comes as the 77-year-old monarch continues cancer treatment. Despite his health challenges, he is expected to carry out a full programme of engagements.
Symbolism and historical echoes
A central moment of the trip will be the King’s speech to Congress, the first by a British monarch since Queen Elizabeth II addressed lawmakers in 1991.
Diplomats are expected to scrutinise the speech closely, as it could address issues such as NATO cooperation, support for Ukraine and future trade ties between the United Kingdom and the United States.
Observers say the speech will require a careful balance between reaffirming democratic principles and maintaining cordial relations with the current US administration.
Researchers studying past state visits note that such events can leave lasting impressions, from Queen Elizabeth II’s relationship with President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s to other high-profile diplomatic moments involving members of the royal family.
While the visit carries risks, some analysts believe the monarchy’s popularity in the United States could help soften political tensions.
A fragile alliance
Despite longstanding ties, analysts say the broader US-UK relationship has faced difficulties in recent months.
Some observers argue that Britain has attempted to act as a bridge between the United States and Europe, particularly on NATO issues, but with mixed success.
Others suggest the royal visit could help stabilise relations at a delicate moment. Advocates of the trip point to the monarchy’s ability to generate goodwill and influence public opinion in the United States.
Whether the visit ultimately strengthens the transatlantic partnership remains uncertain. But many agree it will represent one of the most consequential diplomatic moments of King Charles’s reign so far.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
US President Donald Trump has cancelled a planned visit by American officials to Pakistan for talks related to the war involving Iran, shortly after an Iranian delegation departed Islamabad. The trip, which had been scheduled for Saturday, was intended to continue diplomatic contacts aimed at easing tensions. But Trump said the visit would waste “too much time”, adding that Tehran could initiate talks directly if it wished.

Get today's headlines by email

“If they want to talk, all they have to do is call,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform, also claiming that Iran’s leadership was divided and unclear about who was in charge.
The move came as diplomatic efforts remain stalled despite a temporary ceasefire extension designed to create space for negotiations.
Diplomatic efforts stall
Earlier in Islamabad, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi held discussions with Pakistani officials, who have been acting as intermediaries between Tehran and Washington.
After the meeting, Aragchi said he had outlined Iran’s position on how the conflict could be brought to an end. However, he said it remained uncertain whether the United States was genuinely prepared to pursue diplomacy.
Posting on social media, Aragchi described the talks in Pakistan as “fruitful” and said he had presented Iran’s proposal for a workable framework to permanently end the war. He added that it was still unclear whether Washington was serious about negotiations.
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the discussions involved a “warm, cordial exchange of views” on the regional situation.
The Iranian diplomat’s trip also includes visits to Oman and Russia, and Iranian state media reported he is expected to return to Islamabad later.
Ceasefire extended amid tensions
The cancelled visit followed Washington’s announcement on Friday that a US delegation led by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner would travel to Pakistan for talks.
The White House had suggested Iran was interested in negotiations. Tehran, however, said there were no plans for direct talks with the United States.
US Vice-President JD Vance had been on standby to join the delegation if discussions appeared promising. His absence from the initial team had already suggested that a major breakthrough was unlikely.
Trump recently extended a ceasefire that had been due to expire on 22 April, in the hope that diplomatic contacts could continue.
Asked whether cancelling the trip meant the war might resume, Trump said it did not necessarily signal renewed fighting.
Strait of Hormuz dispute
The conflict has centred on tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route through which roughly one fifth of the world’s oil supply passes.
Iran restricted passage through the strait after the United States and Israel launched strikes in February. In response, Washington increased its naval presence in the area to block Iranian oil exports.
The confrontation has also been driven by long-standing concerns about Iran’s nuclear programme. Washington and Israel say they believe Tehran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Iran denies the accusation, saying its nuclear activities are intended for civilian energy production, although it has enriched uranium to levels close to weapons grade.
Violence beyond the main conflict
Regional tensions have also continued elsewhere.
Lebanon’s state news agency reported that Israeli strikes in the country’s south killed at least four people on Saturday. Israel’s military said the attacks came after rockets were fired into Israel by Hezbollah.
Despite an existing ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group, both sides have continued to exchange fire in recent weeks while accusing each other of violating the agreement.
A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the military had been ordered to “vigorously attack Hezbollah targets in Lebanon”.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Iran’s political leadership has become the subject of debate among U.S. officials and analysts, after President Donald Trump suggested the country’s ruling system is fractured and struggling to determine who is in charge. Speaking publicly over the past week, Trump said divisions between hardline and moderate factions were hampering decision-making in Tehran and slowing progress in negotiations with the United States.

Get today's headlines by email

However, several security and policy sources familiar with the situation dispute that characterization. They say the Iranian system remains functional, though decision-making has become less centralized following recent military developments.
Leadership after the Khamenei transition
According to officials cited by security sources, authority in Iran has shifted since the death of former supreme leader Ali Khamenei in U.S.–Israeli strikes on 28 February.
His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, is believed to have assumed the role of supreme leader. But sources say he remains in hiding and difficult to reach, complicating the government’s internal coordination.
Rather than a single dominant authority, decision-making now appears to involve a small group of senior figures closely linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the powerful military body founded in 1979 by revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Security officials describe the arrangement as resembling a “politburo-style” system, where several figures collectively shape policy.
Those cited as key participants include IRGC commander-in-chief Ahmad Vahidi, Supreme National Security Council chief Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, military adviser Yahya Rahim Safavi, and parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
Despite differences in style or emphasis among officials, one regional policy source said there is “no clear evidence of fractures at the level of core decision-making.”
Questions over the supreme leader’s condition
Speculation has circulated about Mojtaba Khamenei’s health after reports he was seriously injured during bombing at the start of the war.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said the leader suffered severe wounds and disfigurement. The The New York Times reported he is recovering from burns to his face and lips that may make speaking difficult.
Some officials believe he remains involved in strategic decisions even if not all matters are brought directly to him. Others say he is largely isolated, communicating only through intermediaries and avoiding phone calls or meetings.
One security source said the system appears strained but still operational. “They’re in disarray, but they’re still in control over the country,” the source said.
Military pressure and diplomatic stalemate
The debate over leadership comes as the United States and Israel continue to assess their strategy toward Iran.
Trump has sought to increase economic pressure through a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, while Israeli leaders argue military operations have significantly weakened Iran.
An Israeli official described the campaign as a major achievement, saying Iran is “weaker than it’s ever been.” However, the official added that further action may still be needed and could come through negotiations or other means.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced speculation that he urged Washington to pursue regime change in Tehran. An Israeli official rejected that claim, saying the objective was not to overthrow the government.
Analysts warn, however, that Iran remains heavily militarized and strongly influenced by the IRGC.
Iran retains significant capabilities
Despite battlefield losses, intelligence assessments suggest Iran still possesses substantial military resources.
The U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency said this week that Iran continues to hold thousands of missiles and attack drones. Israeli estimates suggest around 60% of missile launchers have been destroyed, though some could be repaired.
Iran is also believed to retain large stockpiles of ballistic missiles. During the recent conflict, more than 550 long-range missiles were fired toward Israel before a ceasefire was reached in early April.
Questions also remain over Iran’s nuclear programme. The International Atomic Energy Agency says it cannot fully verify the status of Iran’s centrifuges and nuclear materials.
Analysts warn that Iran still holds significant quantities of enriched uranium that could potentially be further refined.
While the war has weakened some of Iran’s capabilities, officials and analysts say the country’s leadership and military structure remain intact, leaving uncertainty over how the conflict and negotiations will develop.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Nato has said its founding treaty contains no mechanism to suspend or expel a member state, following reports that the United States had considered measures against Spain over its stance on the war with Iran. A Nato official said the alliance’s charter “does not foresee any provision for suspension of membership, or expulsion”, responding to a report that Washington had discussed possible retaliation against allies it believed had not supported its campaign.

Get today's headlines by email

The report, first published by Reuters, cited a US official who said an internal Pentagon email outlined potential steps to pressure partners seen as failing to assist.
Pentagon memo reportedly outlines possible retaliation
According to the report, the internal message suggested that Washington could review diplomatic support for certain European territories and consider limiting the influence of countries viewed as uncooperative within the alliance.
One proposal mentioned reassessing the US position on the UK’s sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, which are also claimed by Argentina.
The islands, known in Argentina as the Malvinas, lie roughly 8,000 miles from the United Kingdom and about 300 miles from the Argentine mainland. The two countries fought a conflict over the territory during the Falklands War after Argentine forces invaded the islands.
The email also reportedly suggested removing countries considered “difficult” from influential roles within the alliance.
The official cited by Reuters said the memo did not propose that the US leave the 32-member alliance or close military bases in Europe.
Spain rejects report
Pedro Sánchez dismissed the report, saying the Spanish government does not respond to unofficial communications.
“We do not work based on emails,” he told reporters, adding that Madrid deals only with formal policy statements from the US government.
Spain has refused to allow US forces to launch attacks on Iran from bases on its territory. The United States maintains two military installations in the country — Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base.
Sánchez said Spain supports cooperation with allies but insisted such support must remain “within the framework of international law”.
Growing tensions within the alliance
The dispute comes amid tensions between Washington and some European allies after the US and Israel launched strikes against Iran on 28 February. Iran later restricted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil shipments.
Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised Nato partners for what he says is insufficient support in the conflict.
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said the US had done a great deal for its allies but claimed “they were not there for us”.
“The War Department will ensure the president has credible options to ensure that our allies are no longer a paper tiger and instead do their part,” she said, declining to comment further on internal deliberations.
At a separate news conference, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth criticised European governments for not contributing more to the conflict, saying they rely heavily on US protection.
“Europe and Asia have benefitted from our protection for decades, but the time for free riding is over,” he said.
European leaders urge unity
European leaders have moved to calm speculation about divisions within the alliance.
Giorgia Meloni called for unity among members, describing Nato as a “source of strength” and urging governments to reinforce Europe’s role within the alliance.
A spokesperson for the Germany government also rejected suggestions that Spain’s membership could be at risk, stating that Spain remains a full Nato member and that there was no reason for that to change.
Meanwhile, Keir Starmer said deeper British involvement in the war or the US blockade of Iranian ports would not be in the UK’s national interest.
Britain has nonetheless allowed the US to use its bases to launch strikes against Iranian targets and has deployed aircraft to intercept Iranian drones.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Senior envoys from the administration of Donald Trump are due to travel to Pakistan for discussions with Iranian officials as Washington explores a possible path toward renewed negotiations, the White House said on Friday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential adviser Jared Kushner will depart for Islamabad on Saturday morning. The meeting is expected to involve representatives from Iran, with Pakistan acting as a mediator.

Get today's headlines by email

Leavitt said the administration had seen indications of progress from the Iranian side in recent days but did not provide further details.
“Steve and Jared will be heading to Pakistan tomorrow to hear the Iranians out,” she said during a briefing at the White House. “We hope progress will be made and we hope that positive developments will come from this meeting.”
Possible step toward renewed dialogue
The planned talks follow reports that Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, was expected to arrive in Islamabad on Friday. According to Reuters, Araqchi was due to discuss proposals aimed at restarting peace negotiations with the United States.
Pakistan has positioned itself as a potential intermediary as both sides explore options for returning to diplomatic discussions after earlier efforts stalled.
The visit by Witkoff and Kushner comes as the administration assesses whether recent contacts with Iranian officials could open the door to a broader negotiation process.
Vice president on standby
Leavitt also said JD Vance, who previously led a round of talks with Iranian representatives in Islamabad earlier this month, could travel to Pakistan if discussions begin to show signs of progress.
Those earlier negotiations, led by Vance, did not produce an agreement.
“The president, the vice president, the secretary of state will be waiting here in the United States for updates,” Leavitt said. She added that Vance was prepared to travel if officials determine his presence would help advance the discussions.
Ceasefire extended to allow negotiations
The diplomatic effort comes after Trump extended a temporary ceasefire with Iran earlier this week. The pause in hostilities was prolonged by two weeks shortly before it was due to expire.
Officials said the extension was intended to create additional time for negotiations aimed at ending the conflict.
The upcoming meeting in Islamabad could provide an opportunity for both sides to outline possible terms for restarting formal talks, though it remains unclear whether the discussions will produce concrete results.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
A change to Canada’s citizenship rules is prompting a surge of interest among Americans who may now qualify for dual nationality through their family heritage. Immigration lawyers in both countries say they have been inundated with inquiries since the revised law took effect on Dec. 15. The change expands eligibility for citizenship by descent, potentially allowing millions of people in the United States with Canadian ancestry to claim citizenship.

Get today's headlines by email

For some applicants, the discovery has come as a surprise.
Zack Loud of Farmington, Minnesota, said he learned that he and his siblings are already regarded as Canadian citizens under the new rules because their grandmother was born in Canada.
He said the recognition of citizenship has made the prospect of living or working north of the border more appealing. Loud added that he and his wife had already been considering employment opportunities abroad, but the new status has pushed Canada higher on their list.
Surge in legal inquiries
Immigration attorneys say the level of interest has risen sharply since the change was introduced.
Nicholas Berning, an immigration lawyer at Boundary Bay Law in Bellingham, Washington, said demand for assistance has surged.
He said his practice has been “pretty much flooded” with clients seeking help preparing applications and gathering documentation, forcing the firm to redirect resources away from other legal work.
Amandeep Hayer, an immigration lawyer based in the Vancouver area, said his firm previously handled around 200 citizenship cases annually. Since the new law came into effect, he said, the office has been conducting more than 20 consultations each day.
Expanded citizenship by descent
Canada has modified its citizenship legislation several times over the decades to address historical legal interpretations and discriminatory provisions.
Previously, citizenship passed automatically through only one generation born outside the country — typically from a Canadian parent to their child.
Under the revised framework, individuals born before Dec. 15 may qualify if they can demonstrate descent from a Canadian ancestor, which could include a grandparent, great-grandparent or earlier relative.
For those born on or after Dec. 15, the rules require proof that a Canadian parent lived in Canada for at least 1,095 days.
According to Hayer, individuals who meet the ancestry requirements are already legally considered citizens, but they must obtain a certificate to formally prove their status.
He said the application process effectively confirms a right that already exists. “You are Canadian, and you're considered to be one your whole life,” he explained.
Political and practical motivations
Applicants cite a range of reasons for pursuing citizenship, including family heritage, job prospects and political developments in the United States.
Michelle Cunha of Bedford, Massachusetts, said decades of political activism led her to reconsider her future in the United States. She decided to pursue Canadian citizenship and relocate after concluding that the country offered new opportunities.
Others say international travel or domestic policy debates have encouraged them to explore the option.
Troy Hicks of Pahrump, Nevada, said he began considering citizenship after a recent trip abroad highlighted how American politics shapes perceptions of U.S. travelers.
Maureen Sullivan of Naples, Florida, said she saw Canadian citizenship as a form of security for her family after immigration enforcement activity near her nephew’s school in Minnesota raised concerns.
Costs and processing times
The application fee for proof of citizenship is relatively modest — 75 Canadian dollars, about $55.
However, applicants may incur additional expenses if they hire lawyers or genealogists to track down records such as birth, marriage and death certificates needed to establish family lineage.
Cunha said she expects to spend about $6,500 after hiring legal assistance.
Others have completed applications independently using online guidance. Mary Mangan of Somerville, Massachusetts, said many applicants can likely manage the process without professional help.
Processing times are currently estimated at around 10 months, according to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, with more than 56,000 applications awaiting decisions.
Debate within Canada
The increase in interest from Americans has prompted mixed reactions in Canada.
Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa, said Canadians generally view immigration positively.
However, he said some people worry that a surge in ancestry-based applications could slow processing for refugees and asylum seekers.
Others are skeptical about individuals with only distant family connections seeking passports without substantial ties to the country, a practice sometimes described as “citizenship of convenience.”

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
India has criticised remarks shared by U.S. President Donald Trump that described the country as a “hellhole”, calling the language uninformed and inappropriate as tensions briefly surfaced in the otherwise close relationship between the two nations. The comments originated from conservative radio host Michael Savage during an episode of The Savage Nation. Trump posted a transcript of the programme on his Truth Social platform on Thursday without adding any commentary.

Get today's headlines by email
Remarks linked to birthright citizenship debate
In the transcript, Savage criticised the U.S. policy of birthright citizenship and referenced immigration from several countries.
“A baby here becomes an instant citizen, and then they bring the entire family in from China or India or some other hellhole on the planet,” Savage said, according to the transcript shared by Trump.
Savage also claimed that newer immigrant communities had “almost no loyalty” to the United States, contrasting them with earlier waves of immigrants from Europe. Reuters said it could not immediately reach Savage for comment.
Trump has been pushing to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States, arguing that the policy encourages immigration abuses. The proposal has triggered legal challenges and is currently being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Earlier this month, Trump attended a hearing on the issue in person, marking a rare visit by a sitting president to the court.
India calls comments inappropriate
India’s foreign ministry responded strongly to the remarks late on Thursday.
Foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said the comments were “obviously uninformed, inappropriate and in poor taste”.
“They certainly do not reflect the reality of the India-US relationship, which has long been based on mutual respect and shared interests,” he said in a statement.
The U.S. embassy in New Delhi sought to ease tensions, highlighting Trump’s previous remarks about India.
“The president has said ‘India is a great country with a very good friend of mine at the top’,” the embassy said.
China’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Political reaction in India
India’s main opposition party, the Congress party, condemned the remarks and urged the government to respond more forcefully.
In a post on X, the party described the “hellhole” comment as “extremely insulting and anti-India” and said it offended people across the country.
The party also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to raise the matter directly with Trump and lodge a formal protest.
Government data shows nearly 5.5 million people of Indian origin live in the United States. Indian Americans, along with Chinese Americans, represent the largest groups of Asian origin in the country.
Relations between Washington and New Delhi
Trump and Modi maintained close ties during Trump’s first term in office. However, relations cooled after India faced some of the highest tariffs imposed by the United States last year.
Many of those tariffs were rolled back earlier this year, and the two countries are now working toward a trade agreement intended to prevent new tariff increases and expand bilateral commerce.
Despite occasional disputes, the United States and India have continued to cooperate closely on trade, security and strategic issues.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
Women who say they were abused by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were housed in several London flats paid for by the financier, according to evidence uncovered in a BBC investigation. Documents from the so-called Epstein files indicate that at least four apartments in the London borough of Kensington and Chelsea were rented for young women linked to Epstein. Receipts, emails and bank records show the properties were used in the years after British police chose not to pursue an investigation into trafficking allegations raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015.

Get today's headlines by email

Six women who stayed in the flats have since come forward as victims of Epstein’s abuse, the BBC said. Many of the women were from Russia, eastern Europe and other countries. Some had been brought to the UK after Giuffre told police she had been trafficked to London and forced to have sex with Prince Andrew in 2001, an allegation he has repeatedly denied.
London properties linked to trafficking network
The BBC reviewed millions of pages of documents gathered by the United States Department of Justice as part of its investigation into Epstein.
The records suggest Epstein’s operation in the UK was more extensive than previously known. The flats provided accommodation for women who were sometimes pressured to recruit others into the trafficking network.

Emails in the files also show that some of the women were regularly transported between London and Paris on the Eurostar to visit Epstein.
According to the documents, Epstein purchased at least 53 train tickets for women travelling between France and England from 2011 to 2019. Thirty-three of those tickets were bought after Giuffre made her complaint to the Metropolitan Police.
In the final six months before his arrest in July 2019, women were transported between the two cities ten times, including one journey made just over two weeks before Epstein was detained by US authorities.
Ongoing contact with women in London
Messages found in the files indicate Epstein remained in contact with women living in the London flats shortly before his arrest. In one Skype exchange with a young Russian woman living in one of the properties, he described himself jokingly as her “landlord”, noting that unlike most landlords he paid the rent.
Financial records show Epstein sometimes covered everyday living costs. In one case, a woman living in an apartment had a credit card linked to Epstein’s account and a monthly allowance of $2,000.
Other records show payments for English-language courses and discussions about one of Epstein’s companies acting as a financial sponsor for a university art programme.
Despite the desirable locations, emails suggest the apartments were occasionally overcrowded, with some women sleeping on sofas. Correspondence also indicates that Epstein sometimes responded angrily when the women complained about conditions.
Questions over missed opportunities to investigate
Criticism has been directed at British authorities for failing to launch a criminal investigation into Epstein’s activities in the UK.
Human rights lawyer Tessa Gregory said she was surprised no inquiry had been opened, noting that credible allegations of trafficking place a legal obligation on the state to conduct an effective investigation.
Former Metropolitan Police Service detective Kevin Hyland said police had missed opportunities to pursue the case, arguing that travel and financial data could have been used to identify suspicious patterns involving groups of young women.
The Metropolitan Police said officers followed “reasonable lines of inquiry” after Giuffre’s complaint and interviewed her multiple times while cooperating with US investigators.
Information shared with US investigators
Emails in the files show other British agencies also passed information about Epstein to American authorities.
A 2020 memo from the National Crime Agency to the FBI referenced allegations connected to Clare Hazell, a socialite who had flown on Epstein’s private jet numerous times. Hazell, who denied wrongdoing during her lifetime, died last year.
The NCA also provided financial intelligence to the FBI, including payments linked to the rent of one of the London flats.
The Metropolitan Police said it is currently participating in a national policing group reviewing information released in the Epstein files, including material suggesting London airports may have been used as transit points for trafficking.
Survivors and campaigners are calling for a public inquiry to determine how Epstein’s activities continued for years without a full UK investigation.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
A photograph taken during a White House celebration for US collegiate champions has triggered criticism online after the women athletes being honoured were positioned behind a row of men, partially obscuring them in the image. The University of Georgia women’s tennis team visited the White House on Tuesday as part of an event recognising several National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) title-winning teams. The team secured the NCAA Division I women’s tennis championship in May last year.

Get today's headlines by email

In a photograph posted by a White House press aide, President Donald Trump stands at the front of a stage with five male members of the Georgia athletics staff. Behind them, the female players are arranged on risers in two rows.
Critics said the arrangement appeared to place the athletes being honoured out of view.
Photo arrangement sparks reaction
The men standing beside the president included Georgia deputy athletic director Ford Williams, athletic director Josh Brooks, head coach Drake Bernstein, associate head coach Jarryd Chaplin and assistant coach Will Reynolds.
The players positioned behind them were Anastasiia Lopata, Mai Nirundorn, Aysegul Mert, Sarah Branicki and Alexandra Vecic in the back row; Tatum Buffington, Guillermina Grant, Haley Gaudette and Sofia Rojas in the middle row; and Mell Reasco and Hayden Mulberry at the front.
Dasha Vidmanova, one of the team’s leading players, was not present. She was competing in qualifying matches at the Madrid Open at the time of the visit. Vidmanova is only the third women’s tennis player to win NCAA national titles in team, singles and doubles competition.
Former tennis champion Martina Navratilova was among those who criticised the image, posting on social media: “A photo is worth a thousand words.”
Online commenters also questioned why the athletes appeared behind staff members in the photograph.
Video shows greeting with staff members
A video shared by the same press aide showed Trump approaching the group and shaking hands with the five male staff members standing at the front. In the clip, he does not shake hands with the players positioned behind them.
Later the same day, the Georgia women’s tennis team posted the photograph on its official social media account, writing that it was “an honor” to represent the university at the White House and thanking the president for hosting the team.
The Georgia squad was one of seven championship teams invited to Washington this week to mark recent collegiate sporting victories.
White House sports visits sometimes contentious
Visits to the White House by championship teams are a long-standing tradition in American sport. However, such invitations have occasionally drawn political attention in recent years.
Before 2019, no women’s championship team had visited the White House on its own during Trump’s presidency, though some had attended events that included both men’s and women’s teams.
Four of the teams recognised at Tuesday’s event were women’s teams, alongside a mixed-gender rifle team.
Earlier this year, the US women’s ice hockey team declined an invitation to the White House after winning gold at the Milano Cortina Winter Olympics. Players cited scheduling conflicts and prior commitments.
The decision followed remarks Trump made during a phone call with the US men’s hockey team, in which he joked about needing to invite the women’s team as well. The men later attended a White House event and were guests at the State of the Union address.
Women’s team captain Hilary Knight later described the comment as a “distasteful joke” that overshadowed the team’s Olympic achievement.
Comparisons with earlier criticism
The tennis team photograph has also prompted comparisons with earlier moments during Trump’s presidency that drew criticism over representation.
In 2017, an image showing the president signing an anti-abortion measure in the Oval Office while surrounded by eight male advisers prompted backlash from critics who noted the absence of women in the room.
The latest reaction comes amid scrutiny of the administration after several recent cabinet departures involving female officials.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
The US Justice Department has ended its investigation into Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell over alleged cost overruns linked to renovation projects at the central bank’s headquarters, officials said on Friday. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro confirmed that the criminal inquiry would be dropped, with the matter instead handed to the Federal Reserve’s internal watchdog for further review.


Get today's headlines by email

The decision follows months of political tensions surrounding the central bank and criticism from US President Donald Trump over the cost of upgrading Federal Reserve buildings in Washington.
Internal review to continue
Although the Justice Department has stepped back from the investigation, scrutiny of the renovation project will continue through the Federal Reserve’s Office of Inspector General.
Pirro said in a message posted on social media that authorities would not hesitate to reopen a criminal probe if new evidence justified doing so.
A spokesperson for the White House said the administration believed an internal review would be better suited to determine whether public funds had been mismanaged.
“American taxpayers deserve answers about the Federal Reserve’s fiscal mismanagement,” said White House spokesman Kush Desai. He added that the inspector general’s investigative powers made it “best positioned to get to the bottom of the matter”.
The central bank declined to comment on the decision. The inspector general’s office said it was actively conducting its review and would release its findings to Congress and the public once the process was complete. No timeline was provided.
Political tensions around Powell’s leadership
The investigation emerged during a prolonged dispute between Trump and Powell over monetary policy.
Trump has repeatedly urged the Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates since returning to the White House last year. Powell and other policymakers have resisted those calls, arguing that rate decisions must be guided by economic data rather than political pressure.
During the dispute, Trump publicly criticised Powell, calling him a “knucklehead” and accusing him of doing “a lousy job” for refusing to cut borrowing costs.
Lower interest rates typically stimulate borrowing and economic activity, while higher rates are used by central banks to slow spending and contain inflation.
Trump has long advocated lower rates, reflecting his background as a property developer who frequently relied on borrowed financing.
Renovation costs spark controversy
The dispute intensified last summer after Trump criticised the cost of renovation works at Federal Reserve buildings in Washington.
The president claimed the project could reach $3.1bn (£2.3bn), significantly higher than the central bank’s estimate of roughly $2.5bn.
Federal Reserve officials have said the upgrades — covering the Eccles Building and offices at 1951 Constitution Avenue — are the first major renovation works since the structures were built in the 1930s. The project includes extensive modernisation and the removal of asbestos and lead contamination.
Earlier this year Powell revealed that the Justice Department had issued subpoenas related to testimony he gave to a Senate committee about the renovation programme.
Calling the investigation “unprecedented”, Powell suggested it was linked to political pressure following the Federal Reserve’s refusal to cut interest rates.
He warned at the time that the independence of the US central bank could be at risk if monetary policy became subject to political influence.
Succession battle in the Senate
The probe also became entangled in a political dispute over Powell’s potential successor.
Powell’s term as chair is set to expire on 15 May. Trump has nominated former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to take over the role.
However, Republican senator Thom Tillis had withheld his support for Warsh’s nomination unless the administration abandoned the investigation into Powell.
Powell has indicated he plans to remain in the position until the Senate confirms a successor.


Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 25 April 2026
webfact
webfact
The UK government has reiterated that sovereignty over the Falkland Islands rests with Britain after reports suggested the United States could reconsider its stance on the disputed territory. Downing Street issued the statement following a Reuters report about an internal Pentagon email that allegedly outlined potential diplomatic measures against NATO allies considered unsupportive of the US during its war with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

Among the options discussed in the reported message was the possibility of reviewing Washington’s position on Britain’s claim to the Falkland Islands. The email also reportedly raised the idea of seeking Spain’s suspension from NATO due to its opposition to the conflict.
The British government responded by stressing that the status of the islands is not in question.
UK Emphasises Islanders’ Right to Decide
A spokesperson for the prime minister said the Falkland Islands had voted overwhelmingly to remain a British Overseas Territory and that the government continues to support the principle of self-determination.
“The Falkland Islands have hugely voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory,” the spokesperson said. “We have always stood behind the islanders’ right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK.”
The official added that the government’s position has been communicated clearly to successive US administrations.
“We could not be clearer about the UK’s position,” the spokesperson said. “Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders’ right to self-determination is paramount.”
BBC News said it has not seen the reported Pentagon email and has contacted the US Department of Defense for comment.
NATO Membership Question Raised
The internal communication cited by Reuters reportedly proposed several measures involving NATO partners. One suggestion included seeking Spain’s suspension from the alliance because of its stance against the US military campaign in Iran.
However, a NATO official indicated that the organisation’s founding treaty does not contain any provision allowing for the suspension or expulsion of member states.
Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, also played down the significance of the report, saying his government responds only to formal positions issued by Washington.
“We do not work based on emails,” he said. “We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States.”
Long-Running Dispute With Argentina
The Falkland Islands, located in the South Atlantic about 300 miles (480km) east of Argentina, have long been the subject of a sovereignty dispute between London and Buenos Aires.
Tensions over the territory escalated in 1982 when Argentina’s military ruler at the time, Leopoldo Galtieri, ordered forces to seize the islands. Britain responded by sending a naval task force to retake the territory.
After a 10-week conflict, Argentine forces surrendered. The war resulted in the deaths of 649 Argentine military personnel, 255 British service members and three Falkland Islanders.
Argentina continues to claim sovereignty over the territory, referring to it as the Malvinas.
Diplomatic Tensions With Washington
The report about the possible policy review comes amid strains between the US and the UK over the conflict involving Iran.
President Donald Trump has previously expressed dissatisfaction with the level of British support for the US campaign. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said Britain will not become involved in a broader regional war.
The development also surfaced just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla were scheduled to travel to Washington for a visit that includes a meeting with President Trump at the White House.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.