Jump to content

Is Thailand Pivoting Away From The U.S. With Chinese Arms Deals?


webfact

Recommended Posts

Is Thailand Pivoting Away From The US With Chinese Arms Deals?

The ruling junta has drawn criticism for ramping up arms purchases from China. Is this just practical diplomacy, or something more?

BY JITSIREE THONGNOI

 

Tank:Reuters.jpg

A toy tank in Bangkok's Government House. Photo: REUTERS

 

Thailand’s military junta is pushing ahead with arms deals even as a long-promised election day looms, prompting critics to decry a lack of transparency in the procurement process.

 

Last week, the army announced it was seeking cabinet approval to buy 14 Chinese-made VT-4 battle tanks in a 2.3 billion baht (HK$568 million) deal between Bangkok and the China Ordnance Industries Group Corporation, also known as Norinco.

 

If approved, it will be the third batch of these tanks supplied by the arms manufacturer following a 4.9 billion baht deal in 2016 for 28 VT-4s and another 11 that were delivered in 2017 for 2 billion baht.

 

Full story: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2183707/thailand-pivoting-away-us-chinese-arms-deals

 

-- South China Morning Post 2019-01-28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

of course , thailand is in china's sphere of influence

Not exactly. Sure China is the regional economic and influential power, but Thailand has a long history of military cooperation with the US. Similarly, they have cooperated with China on large infrastructure and other projects. They have tried to strike a balance.

 

However, as the US under Trump has "pivoted" away from, not toward Asia in Trump's supporters' anti-globalism efforts, Thailand would be wise to assess whether this isolationist behavior will be a short term (Trump is impeached or serves one term), or long term policy (Trump survives and wins a 2nd term). 

 

Until then, Thailand's just doing its balancing act.

Edited by keemapoot
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keemapoot said:

Not exactly. Sure China is the regional economic and influential power, but Thailand has a long history of military cooperation with the US. Similarly, they have cooperated with China on large infrastructure and other projects. They have tried to strike a balance.

 

However, as the US under Trump has "pivoted" away from, not toward Asia in Trump's supporters' anti-globalism efforts, Thailand would be wise to assess whether this isolationist behavior will be a short term (Trump is impeached or serves one term), or long term policy (Trump survives and wins a 2nd term). 

 

Until then, Thailand's just doing its balancing act.

That is my take, as well, Thailand doing its attempt to keep allowed independence by playing the two current dominant powers. I realize that it is more complicated with the Chinese family tradition here and increased reliance on Chinese tourism.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

"...If approved, it will be the third batch of these tanks supplied by the arms manufacturer following a 4.9 billion baht deal in 2016 for 28 VT-4s and another 11 that were delivered in 2017 for 2 billion baht.

That same year, the cabinet also approved the procurement of three S26T submarines from China worth 36 billion baht..."

 

A cynic might say that this is the last time that they can get such a large quantity of arms through a legislature. Not to mention the expected "red' envelopes. And, holiday visits to Beijing. And, who knows what else?

 

Thailand must have the largest, most complex military of any country that doesn't particularly have an expected enemy now or in the near future...

 

Truly shameless.....

 

Truly, truly shameless...

 

 

And to make matters worse Samui Bodoh, there's some good allies of Thailand (including the US) out there that would come immediatley to Thailands aid if required, Thailand under Prayut plays a dangerous game if the intention is to pit one country against the other, in a serious stuff up ( War) Thailand may regret the out come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LomSak27 said:

that doesn't particularly have an expected enemy now or in the near future...

Thailand sides with China.

Whatever enemies China has or gets will be Thailand's.

China. A great friend to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wwest5829 said:

That is my take, as well, Thailand doing its attempt to keep allowed independence by playing the two current dominant powers. I realize that it is more complicated with the Chinese family tradition here and increased reliance on Chinese tourism.

That Thai-Chinese family tradition is more cultural than political. Most of those families have been here for so many generations they have little in common with a lot of other Chinese Diaspora and many do not speak any Chinese. However, I agree with you completely that Chinese tourism is the future for Thailand, so they need to nurture that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mikebell said:

They've colonised Sihanoukville & Pattaya; Bangkok is almost there.  The tanks will mute murmurs of discontent from the locals.

Lots of Chinese tourists in Pattaya, thats for sure. Colonised is a little strong when you compare Pattaya with Sihanoukville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stud858 said:
5 hours ago, LomSak27 said:

that doesn't particularly have an expected enemy now or in the near future...

Thailand sides with China.

Whatever enemies China has or gets will be Thailand's.

China. A great friend to have.

Not my quote .... need to pick up the Original and who posted it ... just pointing out , not whinging.:thumbsup:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not read too much into arms sales from China being interpreted as a pivot from the US. First of all the 3rd rate weapons purchased from China are not needed to wage war offensively or defensively with neighbors but keep the peace in Thailand, so first-rate top of the line weapons are not needed. Secondly, and more important, the 30% kickback is very difficult to collect from the US or any western powers as it is against the law in western countries. On the other hand China or Russia, this is standard business operating procedures. Be careful not to get caught but the risks are small and the rewards high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""