Teenager Thunberg angrily tells U.N. climate summit 'you have stolen my dreams'

[RideJocky]

You can't figure that out? Ahh..figures. Well, try grasping the point of that golden post of mine rather than focusing on your inability to figure out "how?" 555 I recommend kindly, that you and [mention=56220]thaibeachlovers[/mention] should reread the thread. Ha, you both can't figure it out, wow.
 
Ehh, this thread on the great Activist Greta Thunberg has been taken over by dudes that like to argue not to mention clearly unable read when cognitive dissonance is felt. [emoji123]
 
By the way, establishment supporting republican conservatives are some of the least educated around. IMO. ????‍♀️ 

The left has a stranglehold on education in the US, so it is not surprising that the “better” educated are typically more easily indoctrinated by the them. They want to higher education “free”, so they can pay themselves more, and indoctrinate more people that will support their leftist hate-based ideology.

They (the left) generally confuse education with intelligence, and often look down their nose at people that have not been to university, the way you’re doing now.

What were you, a sociology major or perhaps gender studies?

[brokenbone]

6 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Patrick Moore frequently portrays himself as a founder or co-founder of Greenpeace, and many news outlets have repeated this characterization. Although Mr. Moore played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace.

thats no different from You stating he claim to be founder of greenpeace,

i.e gossip,

im requesting the statement from patrick moore himself,

that you and greenpeace are referring to

[Bluespunk]

8 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

thats no different from You stating he claim to be founder of greenpeace,

im requesting the statement from patrick moore himself,

that you and greenpeace are referring to

I’ll stick to the greenpeace rebuttal of the claims made. 
 

If you want to know more...google is your friend. 
 

But here is another link discussing the validity of his claims to help you out. 
 

https://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2014/06/27/who-founded-greenpeace-not-patrick-moore

[brokenbone]

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I’ll stick to the greenpeace rebuttal of the claims made. 
 

If you want to know more...google is your friend. 

that mean you stick to gossip and forward gossip without checking source,

and with that concluded, theres no reason to bother with your gossip

[Bluespunk]

4 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

that mean you stick to gossip and forward gossip without checking source,

and with that concluded, theres no reason to bother with your gossip

No, it means I have provided a link that disproves Moore’s claims. 
 

Here’s another for you. 
 

https://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2014/06/27/who-founded-greenpeace-not-patrick-moore

[brokenbone]

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

No, it means I have provided a link that disproves Moore’s claims. 
 

Here’s another for you. 
 

https://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2014/06/27/who-founded-greenpeace-not-patrick-moore

thats just more gossip from greenpeace without a source,

just drop it, you are wasting space, and not only that,

you are lying, and spread greenpeace lies

put up or shut up

[Bluespunk]

4 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

thats just more gossip from greenpeace without a source,

just drop it, you are wasting space, and not only that,

you are lying, and spread greenpeace lies

put up or shut up

No, I’m sharing the facts about the false claims Patrick Moore founded greenpeace

[Bluespunk]

5 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

no, its ad hominem attacks based on gossip, put up or shut up

Already done so. 
 

However here is his bio page from an institute he is a policy adviser to. 
 

https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/patrick-moore

 

[Forethat]

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

No, I’m sharing the facts about the false claims Patrick Moore founded greenpeace

No you're not - you're sharing an opinion. And and usual, you accuse people of lying in case they don't share yours.

 

Five quid you'll claim to have provided evidence without having actually done so. 

[Forethat]

Just now, Forethat said:

No you're not - you're sharing an opinion. And and usual, you accuse people of lying in case they don't share yours.

 

Five quid you'll claim to have provided evidence without having actually done so. 

You beat me to it...

[Bluespunk]

13 minutes ago, Forethat said:

No you're not - you're sharing an opinion. And and usual, you accuse people of lying in case they don't share yours.

 

Five quid you'll claim to have provided evidence without having actually done so. 

Oops you missed the link provided above.  I’ll add it again-try to read it this time. 
 

Oh, and who have I called a liar?

 

https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/patrick-moore

 

 

[brokenbone]

43 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Oops you missed the link provided above.  I’ll add it again-try to read it this time. 
 

Oh, and who have I called a liar?

 

https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/patrick-moore

 

 

much appreciated, the video on that link was revealing,

during the past 1 billion years, the average global temperature

has been close to 20 degree, 38% warmer then the ice age we are stuck in today, 14.5 degree

[Bluespunk]

23 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

much appreciated, the video on that link was revealing,

during the past 1 billion years, the average global temperature

has been close to 20 degree, 38% warmer then the ice age we are stuck in today, 14.5 degree

Oh I don’t share or agree with the websites views. 
 

Just exposing the continuing falsehoods being expressed about Moore’s involvement with the founding of Greenpeace. 

[brokenbone]

some eco-anxiety sufferers was concerned that tornadoes/cyclones/wildfires/droughts/etc

are caused by increased global temperature, but no scientist from either side

can see a correlation let alone causation from increasing temperature,

whether natural or human caused

 

[brokenbone]

someone here came up with the theory that wind power

is cheap and reliable enough to replace current electricity generation,

but on the odd chance wind doesnt blow a few days or nights,

what will make up the shortfall ?

 

[Scott]

Troll posts removed.  

 

[Airbagwill]

20 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Nope, I posted a link to a letter, written by Carl Wunsch himself, in reply to a post making claims on his views [taken from a channel 4 documentary}, where he himself made clear the documentary on channel 4 misrepresented his views.

 

Did you read it? 

 

Now please back up your allegations about myself.

Arguing with a climate denier is like playing chess with a pigeon.......... they knock over the piece, poop all over the table and then claim they've "won".

 

 

[brokenbone]

13 minutes ago, Airbagwill said:

Arguing with a climate denier is like playing chess with a pigeon.......... they knock over the piece, poop all over the table and then claim they've "won".

 

 

no, i dont mean to <deleted> on your anxiety, and im not denying we have a climate

that keeps on fluctuate indefinitely

[Airbagwill]

4 hours ago, brokenbone said:

no, i dont mean to <deleted> on your anxiety, and im not denying we have a climate

that keeps on fluctuate indefinitely

QED

[transam]

Has this family, oooops, girl booked seminars in China yet....?

[DrTuner]

18 hours ago, brokenbone said:

much appreciated, the video on that link was revealing,

during the past 1 billion years, the average global temperature

has been close to 20 degree, 38% warmer then the ice age we are stuck in today, 14.5 degree

Liked his comment about why there are only 30M people in Canada: Cold ????

 

Same think with the Nordics. About 10 degrees warmer would be good. They'd still have a manmade disaster though. Socialist taxes. Still not habitable.

[DrTuner]

10 minutes ago, Airbagwill said:

QED

I know I know I can play too.

 

1+1 = 3. QED.

[Crazy Alex]

On 10/20/2019 at 1:50 AM, Sujo said:

The science is settled and she is telling leaders of the world to do their job and do something.

 

how dare she.

No, the science is NOT settled. Not even NASA agrees with you (emphasis added):

 

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals¹ show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

 

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

 

Obviously, the science is not settled. Would you drink out of a can that some stranger handed to you and said it was "extremely likely" it wasn't anything toxic?

[brokenbone]

1 hour ago, Crazy Alex said:

No, the science is NOT settled. Not even NASA agrees with you (emphasis added):

 

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals¹ show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

 

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

 

Obviously, the science is not settled. Would you drink out of a can that some stranger handed to you and said it was "extremely likely" it wasn't anything toxic?

what im wondering is, if its extremely likely that co2 caused the rise in the 1980-2000 interval,

then what is the extremely likely cause for the rise in the 1910-1940 interval ?

i mean, its the same climb, so there has to be some extremely likely cause for the earlier rise too, right ?

or does climate just act like this without an extremely likely cause ?

[rabas]

Hot! October 21, 2019 Settled science changes yet once again!

Antarctic ice cliffs may not contribute to sea-level rise as much as predicted

The predicted 6 foot sea level rise by 2100 can't happen. The theory required sudden collapse of very tall Antarctic ice cliffs into the sea.  Kind of like a run away domino effect. But an MIT study now shows such a collapse doesn't make sense.

 

Don't stop worrying though, said the climatologists, maybe we can find something else.

 

[DrTuner]

1 minute ago, rabas said:

The theory required sudden collapse of very tall Antarctic ice cliffs into the sea. 

Eh. It's a continent. There's ground under a lot of that ice, not sea. D'oh!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica#/media/File:Antarctica_Without_Ice_Sheet.png

[rabas]

2 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

Eh. It's a continent. There's ground under a lot of that ice, not sea. D'oh!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica#/media/File:Antarctica_Without_Ice_Sheet.png

They are talking about the massive ice sheets that extend 100s of miles into the sea. The 6 foot ocean rise was based on a sudden domino collapse that would take it all out without needing to melt. Though you are still right, even a lot of the ice sheets sit on bedrock.

[Opl]

"The Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg has been honoured by having a new species of beetle named after her. The newly described Nelloptodes gretae belongs to a group of some of the smallest known free-living animals. Nelloptodes gretae is less than 1mm long, has no eyes or wings, and belongs to the Ptiliidae family of beetles"

As Greta herself famously said: 'Many people say that Sweden is just a small country and it doesn’t matter what we do. 'But I’ve learned you are never too small to make a difference.'

 

[DrTuner]

26 minutes ago, rabas said:

They are talking about the massive ice sheets that extend 100s of miles into the sea. The 6 foot ocean rise was based on a sudden domino collapse that would take it all out without needing to melt. 

Ah. I guess they didn't play with the melting ice as kids. Was every spring up north. It's sticky and slushy.

[DrTuner]

Actually world would look pretty nice if the ice age ended: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2013/09/rising-seas-ice-melt-new-shoreline-maps/

 

I'd be living on a large island off the coast of Thailand. Bring it on!