Jump to content

Trump administration moves to remove 700,000 people from food stamps


Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump administration moves to remove 700,000 people from food stamps

By Tom Polansek

 

2019-12-04T171052Z_1_LYNXMPEFB31MX_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP.JPG

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue speaks during an event hosted by U.S. President Donald Trump with workers on "Cutting the Red Tape, Unleashing Economic Freedom" in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, U.S., October 17, 2018. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

 

The Trump administration said on Wednesday it will make it harder for states to keep residents in the U.S. food stamp program in a move that is projected to end benefits for nearly 700,000 people

 

President Donald Trump has argued that many Americans receiving food stamps through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, do not need it given the strong economy and low unemployment. The program provides free food to 36 million Americans.

 

The administration has now finalized a rule that tightens guidelines on when and where states can waive limits on how long certain residents can receive benefits. The changes will move more "able-bodied" adults into the workplace, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said.

 

"States are seeking waivers for wide swaths of their population, and millions of people who could work are continuing to receive SNAP benefits," he told reporters.

 

The United States generally limits the amount of time that adults ages 18-49, who do not have dependents or a disability, can receive food stamps to three months in a 36-month period, unless they meet certain work requirements.

 

States can apply for waivers to this time limit due to tough economic conditions. However, counties with an unemployment rate as low as 2.5% have been included in waived areas, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs SNAP.

 

The agency is stiffening guidelines defining where recipients can reside to be eligible for waivers and standards for demonstrating whether an area has enough jobs to justify a waiver.

 

The U.S. unemployment rate was 3.6% in October.

 

"We need everyone who can work to work," Perdue said.

 

But critics say the moves will hurt poor Americans.

 

"This is an unacceptable escalation of the administration's war on working families, and it comes during a time when too many are forced to stretch already-thin budgets to make ends meet," said U.S. Representative Marcia Fudge, an Ohio Democrat.

 

The administration has sought to tighten requirements for food stamps without congressional approval after Congress blocked a Trump-backed effort to pass new restrictions through the Farm Bill last year.

 

The latest rule will take effect next year and save the U.S. government $5.5 billion over five years by removing about 688,000 people from food stamps, said Brandon Lipps, a USDA deputy undersecretary.

 

"For those impacted it will mean less nutritious meals, or meals that are skipped altogether," said Cassie Ramos, policy associate for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, an advocacy group.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-12-05
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Tug said:

Hummmm let’s see wreck healthcare check,tax break for the rich check,lock up immigrants kids check,starve the poor check!merry Christmas from the trumps!

Promises made, promises kept.... check!

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Tug said:

Hummmm let’s see wreck healthcare check,tax break for the rich check,lock up immigrants kids check,starve the poor check!merry Christmas from the trumps!

<deleted>.....Check

  • Haha 1
Posted

>Welfare was never intended to be a career position. It was rife with fraud and waste after obama gave away the farm. Now it's time to be responsible. Plenty of jobs.

 

Eh? I don't understand.

Where is your hysterical, angry, Orange Man Bad rant. 
Usually posters on TV just shriek fascist racist, whenever Trump's name is mentioned

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, jany123 said:

Promises made, promises kept.... check!

Agree, he told everyone he was going to do theses things ... and more.  So he was voted in on these promises.  It’s rare as hens teeth that a politician follows through campaign promises.  I think it’s all wrong minded.  That said, these and other things (eg dealing with China, upping investment in the military etc) are why he was elected.  So check, check stop complaining and let the man destroy the land of the free and home of the brave.  They have had it too good for too long.

Posted
1 hour ago, toast1 said:

>Welfare was never intended to be a career position. It was rife with fraud and waste after obama gave away the farm. Now it's time to be responsible. Plenty of jobs.

 

Eh? I don't understand.

Where is your hysterical, angry, Orange Man Bad rant. 
Usually posters on TV just shriek fascist racist, whenever Trump's name is mentioned

Plenty of jobs.

The US is probably just like the UK, it's possible to have no work and no money/income, and be classified as being "employed".

 

Their "record low unemployment" was achieved simply by changing the definition of what employment is.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Curt1591 said:

In my youth, I had many friends who received food stamps. None of them truly "needed" them. Many of them were better off than I was. 
 

Apparently lotsa people who work at Walmart qualify for food stamps, and they work for one of the wealthiest families in the world, <deleted>'s that all about.

If you listen to The Orange One, or the Tories in the UK, they'll try & tell you that there's no such thing as poverty.

  • Like 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, chilli42 said:

Agree, he told everyone he was going to do theses things ... and more.  So he was voted in on these promises.  It’s rare as hens teeth that a politician follows through campaign promises.  I think it’s all wrong minded.  That said, these and other things (eg dealing with China, upping investment in the military etc) are why he was elected.  So check, check stop complaining and let the man destroy the land of the free and home of the brave.  They have had it too good for too long.

Upping investment in the military. A recent estimate says that Iraq & Afghanistan cost the US taxpayer $6.3 trillion, about one third of the national debt.

 

Shoulda listened to Eisenhower!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 276

      Shock discovery! Zelensky owns a suit!!

    2. 0

      Illegal Poker Den Busted in Bangkok Warehouse, 52 Arrested, 50 Million in Chips Seized

    3. 5

      Watch Live: Trump to deliver address to Congress

    4. 0

      Thailand Eases Alcohol Ban for Tourists on Buddhist Holidays

    5. 632

      Zelinsky: The End Is Near

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...