Jump to content

Thailand tourist arrivals in February fall 44.3% due to coronavirus


webfact

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, saengd said:

It's an important difference we all need to understand. Ask yourself, how many people fly long haul to Bangkok, clear customs and Immi. only to check in straight away and fly to yet another country, precious few I imagine.

I have often flown into Swampy on one international airline and transferred to another international airline to fly out if Thailand without going through passport control or customs. Bags are checked through to the final destination from the first port of boarding. Go to the transfer desk at Swampy and pick up the new boarding pass for the second airline.

Seems to be some confusion about this simple process.

Edited by emptypockets
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kwak250 said:

But it will get worse before it gets better. Even when they have zero cases i don't expect a sudden rush of tourists for months.

Going to be a rough few months for local businesses .

Yes Songkran and April are done. I mean if entries are just 60% down, that I think would be a low number. Let’s face it May follows April hence super low arrivals still. Huge parties for Songkran are canceled. This includes the full moon party in April and huge gay parties in BKK and most other events and parties for everyone. Many people come for a week or so In April just for these events. I think even Khao Sarn water play will even be watered down ( excuse the pun lol ) or truly canceled with police out saying no no.  If Hong Kong arrivals are really canceled ( as another poster just reported ) that is a HUGE factor for tourism as well. 

Edited by alex8912
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mrmicbkktxl said:

Exactly, I have a few friends left around the world and most of them are frequent visitors of Thailand.50% cancelled their April and May Thailand trips,the other half is waiting with a booking.I think only idiots would book a Thai vacation at this time

Thanks, I arrived yesterday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week three regular customers arrived at swampy on different days at different times. Every one told me when they got to immigration it was simply walk around the tapes, and choose your desk.........deserted............average 2 minutes to clear passport.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AhFarangJa said:

Last week three regular customers arrived at swampy on different days at different times. Every one told me when they got to immigration it was simply walk around the tapes, and choose your desk.........deserted............average 2 minutes to clear passport.

Been like that since before Christmas.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, kwak250 said:

But it will get worse before it gets better. Even when they have zero cases i don't expect a sudden rush of tourists for months.

Going to be a rough few months for local businesses .

Waiting for cheap prices

 

Airlines are the problem

 

If cheap id book tomorrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so it clear the Chinese are going back to work(pollution levels on the rise in China) you can hide a lot but you can not hide that, what does that mean travel wise? will the Chinese go back to work and save their holiday for next year, or will they escape China now?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The odd thing is that if you are North American or European, the chances are that you will be safer from Coronavirus in Thailand than at home. Reason - home is still chilly which is perfect for the transmission of the virus whereas Thailand is in the mid 30sC, which is the reason there has been relatively little transmission there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

..another misleading head-line....i think there are other contributing factors as well..not been mentioned..such as, currency, air-quality, unscrupulous tour operators and vendors, political instability, student unrest, mass closure of factories and small businesses, abuse of children, human trafficking, unsafe drivers/riders, etc. etc...all tend to put off first-time travellers..IMHO based on observations and personal experiences.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wensiensheng said:

Your post is contradictory. If people hoard cash (presumably instead of spending), they hoard it in bank deposits. Which increases bank liquidity. And Thai banks are surprisingly well capitalised.

 

people won’t hoard cash notes, they have nasty virus bugs on them.

...i always nuke my notes for a few minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Airalee said:

Too bad personal debt levels will remain at 2019 levels.  But not to worry...the banks will accommodate them rather than asset strip them.

My Thai wife told me this morning that Thai finance companies here in Phuket as of yesterday have started offering existing car borrowers a 6 month moratorium on their car payments as they have stated they do not want any more cars returned. This goes for taxis and minibuses also , not just private.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zaZa9 said:

My Thai wife told me this morning that Thai finance companies here in Phuket as of yesterday have started offering existing car borrowers a 6 month moratorium on their car payments as they have stated they do not want any more cars returned. This goes for taxis and minibuses also , not just private.

Good to hear they are accommodating the borrowers.

Edited by saengd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tandor said:

..another misleading head-line....i think there are other contributing factors as well..not been mentioned..such as, currency, air-quality, unscrupulous tour operators and vendors, political instability, student unrest, mass closure of factories and small businesses, abuse of children, human trafficking, unsafe drivers/riders, etc. etc...all tend to put off first-time travellers..IMHO based on observations and personal experiences.

...your always 'confused'

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not down playing the seriousness of this virus and I take it very seriously. I, like many, don’t want to take the risk of getting the disease despite the fairly low death rate which may drop the percentage rate even further when you add the true amount of infected, which will likely never be known as many experience mild symptoms and put it down to flu or the common cold. This scenario never enters the statistics as they never get tested. But my point to this is that human nature is to initially recoil in horror or distress especially with the media hyping it all up but like all things people eventually get used to it as wears thin on our psyche. It will soon simply become a fact of life like SARS and MERS both of which you can still get and have not been eradicated forever. We as a species cannot huddle together for too long before we get <deleted> off with ourselves and accept the risk and move on. The development of a vaccine of sorts would immediately change the game and would offer some psychological comfort. Human nature will get over the hype and eventually become annoyed at all the inconvenience this is causing and start living life again normally while accepting the risk. If the death rate was 30% or 50% or higher this would be an entirely different ball game and would very much reset the world population back a century. Unfortunately we have to go through this period of uncertainty and all that it brings because it part of our collective natural response to these situations. This virus will simply have to run its course. Governments were too slow to react and the genie is now out. Hopeful the next time they will learn to react quicker to prevent a much longer economic and health impact then delay and hope it will all go away. It’s at times like these that we see just how useless our governments actually are!

if everyone had shut down flights, trains, cruise ships ferry’s and any form of passenger carrying transport  from the country where the epicentre of the outbreak from day one we might be facing a different situation and the world could have sent supplies towards the problem and contain and treat it there. Now, every country is too busy containing its own outbreaks which were all imported because of they did not stop it when they should have. Who knows we might have been seeing it tapering off already. Let’s hope China and the rest of the world put a complete ban on the importation and sale of wild animals for food. First SARS and now COVID-19 both originating out of China from widely accepted animal to human transmission. Can’t really be allowed to continue, now can it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Airalee said:

As I said.  It depends on the agreement between airlines.  Are you going to call every airline to verify?  Some, you can go straight to the transit counter...hence...no need to go through immigration.  Others, you go through immigration and customs and then fly straight out.  I know many who have done it both ways.  It’s really no mystery.  No reply is necessary.  You were wrong.  

    As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't really matter one way or the other.  If TAT is always using one system to count arrivals to give their monthly and yearly tourism totals,  then the only important thing is whether TAT is still in 2020 using the same system when it compares data from one year to the next.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

85 %  less Chinese and 44 % of normal.  I think many people were booked with a go or lose the money so they came.       I think the number for the rest of the year will be lower than 44%. I can see wealthy Chinese  coming but not the average  Joe's for at least a year And demand for exports will be lower.   People who have lost 20% in retirement accounts  are not going to risk travel for a year.  This virus possibly will be endemic for years to come.   Pollution  and military  rule are not ok with western people.  They will be lucky to see 20 million tourists but my money is on 15. 

Edited by Elkski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, newnative said:

    As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't really matter one way or the other.  If TAT is always using one system to count arrivals to give their monthly and yearly tourism totals,  then the only important thing is whether TAT is still in 2020 using the same system when it compares data from one year to the next.  

Exactly that, it's the year on year comparison that's important, the other stuff is just a smoke screen to try and support a case for bad numbers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Elkski said:

85 %  less Chinese and 44 % of normal.  I think many people were booked with a go or lose the money for bookings so they came.   I think the number for the rest of the year will be lower than 44%. I cam see wealthy Chinese  com ik ng but not the average  Joe's for at least a year And demand for exports will be lower.   People who have lost 20% in retirement accounts  ate not going to risk travel for a year.  This virus possibly will be endemic for years to come.   Pollution  and military  rule are not ok with western people.  They will be lucky to see 20 million tourists but my money is on 15. 

Nobody cares about Westerner tourist numbers and pollution is the norm, it's defacto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, saengd said:

Good to hear they are accommodating the borrowers.

They are not accommodating the borrowers at all.

They are simply allowing borrowers 6 Months grace on their Loan repayments.

The Loans will still be there at the end of the 6 Months period, and will probably carry some charge or another for the privilege of being able to offset the payments for that period.

Loan Companies are the same as Banks,- they give the Customer NOTHING AT ALL, and this repayment offset is to reduce the amount of stock vehicles on NPL they will hold and have to sell at a loss.

Keep the numbers low, and hopefully the price stays fairly high for selling on

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, saengd said:

Good to hear they are accommodating the borrowers.

No it's more likely they have filled their repo lots and have nowhere to sell the cars and vans they take back. Better to push things off and hope for a recovery than to take back a car and have an immediate loss.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...