webfact Posted October 21, 2020 Posted October 21, 2020 Pattaya: New development plan condemned for having too much "red area" and not enough "green" Picture: Manager Online A meeting heard that Pattaya's business community is calling for a rethink after a new plan for the redevelopment of the resort showed far too much red area. This is the area where businesses can be established connected to the tourism industry, where construction of big condo buildings, hotels and department stores would be allowed. Picture: Manager Online Delegates at the meeting chaired by deputy mayor Ronnakit Ekkasingh said the plans from civil engineers did not reflect reality and impinged on the rights of residents. They ran contrary to previous plans suggested some years ago. They wanted to see a plan like in Osaka in Japan where there was a great deal of green, where large scale business enterprises could not be established. Picture: Manager Online The criticism and demands for a rethink particularly concerned big buildings that could not be constructed because sois in Pattaya would be too narrow to allow them according to planning regulations. Thaivisa notes that buildings on narrow sois can only be constructed to a certain size due to the problems of fire trucks entering in an emergency. In Bangkok at least some buildings had to have their tops lopped off after being illegally constructed and some have been ordered to be pulled down altogether. Source: Manager Online -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2020-10-21 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates
Popular Post Justgrazing Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, webfact said: New development plan condemned for having too much "red area" and not enough "green but they pass the test on big blue crop circle lookalikes .? 4
Popular Post jacko45k Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) So the large 'green' areas are to be in the sea.....? Edited October 21, 2020 by jacko45k 2 1
Popular Post Brunolem Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, jacko45k said: So the large 'green' areas are to be in the sea.....? Seaweed farming... Red area = braun envelopes Green area = braun dirt The choice is obvious! 2 1
Popular Post JusticeGB Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 Red zones big buildings big brown envelopes good for greedy local officials. 3
Popular Post sammieuk1 Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 The brown areas must be where the sea comes in ???? 2 2
Burma Bill Posted October 21, 2020 Posted October 21, 2020 4 hours ago, webfact said: condemned for having too much "red area" 1
Popular Post mok199 Posted October 21, 2020 Popular Post Posted October 21, 2020 What do you expect from a city that builds a beach from sand bags...then calls it ''world class''.... 1 2 1
Destiny1990 Posted October 21, 2020 Posted October 21, 2020 Whats wrong with red areas since they have already invented blue parks. 1
mrfill Posted October 21, 2020 Posted October 21, 2020 Yellow and purple must be livid at being missed out in this panoply of colour. 1
hotchilli Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 19 hours ago, webfact said: Delegates at the meeting chaired by deputy mayor Ronnakit Ekkasingh said the plans from civil engineers did not reflect reality and impinged on the rights of residents. They ran contrary to previous plans suggested some years ago. They wanted to see a plan like in Osaka in Japan where there was a great deal of green, where large scale business enterprises could not be established. But.... but..... but, less concrete structures means loss of potential profit, that won't do ! 1
mikebell Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 20 hours ago, webfact said: the resort showed far too much red area. The resort showed too much red LIGHT area. 1 1
Benmart Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 Trying to emulate Osaka, Japan? What a laugh. Might as well try to bring a iceberg into Pattaya bay for ice sledding. Greenbelts do not generate revenue, and that is all city hall sees. They are seemingly oblivious to what other resort cities have planned and possess. 1
hotchilli Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Benmart said: Trying to emulate Osaka, Japan? What a laugh. Might as well try to bring a iceberg into Pattaya bay for ice sledding. Greenbelts do not generate revenue, and that is all city hall sees. They are seemingly oblivious to what other resort cities have planned and possess. Pattaya is all about "hotels" and seedy service establishments, green areas do not generate profit or employment and thus are seen as useless. 1
thaibeachlovers Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 They need to see sense and abandon the old area to what it has always been- fun city. The big new hotels etc should be built past Jomptien where they can put in decent roads and infrastructure. Connect everything with the mythical monorail and all good. Destroying the old fun area to build big buildings isn't going to make anyone happy, except those with big pockets.
DefaultName Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 If they build all those buildings and manage to fill them with tourists, what will be left for all those tourists to DO? All the entertaining bits will be gone. 1
a977 Posted October 22, 2020 Posted October 22, 2020 Isn't it a shame that one third of the map area belongs to the Nongprue Municipality, sorry Pattaya this side is strictly for residential living
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now