Jump to content

Does COVID-19 origin really matter?


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

D38E1F71-F22F-4368-9614-7C8072AEA50F.png

 

The answer is “Yes” and “No”. “Yes” because a non-politicised knowledge can help prevent or soften a future pandemic a great deal, if the world manages to get out of this one. “No” because the possibility of the issue being extremely and dangerously politicized is nearly one hundred percent.

 

At the moment, the world’s biggest superpowers cannot even agree on whether the “origin” is a settled question. China, backed by a World Health Organisation investigation, insists that it is and that there is no use reopening it. The United States, backed by some Western allies, demands a new probe.

 

Tension is already high even before a new investigation can begin. Imagine what can happen if the new probe’s results confirm the US claims that the coronavirus came from a lab leak in China. Imagine that the new probe confirms Beijing has been right all along and Washington has been wrong all the time.

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/does-covid-19-origin-really-matter/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2021-06-04
 
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snoop1130 said:

The answer is “Yes” and “No”. “Yes” because a non-politicised knowledge can help prevent or soften a future pandemic a great deal, if the world manages to get out of this one. “No” because the possibility of the issue being extremely and dangerously politicized is nearly one hundred percent.

That's one opinion.  There are others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Logosone said:

I very much doubt it was the case, but if the Chinese Wuhan lab accidentally leaked a gain of function experiment very obviously this is of massive importance.

 

But why Biden is focusing on this when scientists have examined the virus and found a man-made origin unlikely is anyone's guess.

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

The fact is that gain of function research has been done over the years and many SARS chimeras have been produced.  Is it impossible that this is lab based?

This article discusses both the natural origin and the possibility of lab chimeras escaping a lab. At the moment it would seem that additional unbiased research is still needed to answer the question.

Quote

 

"CRITIQUE OF “THE PROXIMAL ORIGIN OF SARS-COV-2″

Due to the broad-spectrum of research conducted over almost 20 years on bat SARS-CoVs justified by their potential to spill over from animal to human,[48]a possible synthetic origin by laboratory engineering of SARS-CoV-2 cannot be excluded." <emphasis is mine>
"The widely cited article of Andersen et al.[2stated that SARS-CoV-2 has most likely a natural origin."

-- The genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory origin, SARS-COV-2 chimeric structure and furin cleavage site might be the result of genetic manipulation

Rossana Segreto, Yuri Deigin

17 November 2020

So there is still two sides to this ongoing story. Both should be investigated.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, internationalism said:

untill now scientists still investigate, from where spanish flu, the previous large pandemic, have originated 100 years ago.

still only wild estimation of 17 to over 100mln deaths.

Yeah right, we all know where that came from.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cali farong said:

Since they won’t allow investigators in and they

destroyed documents, and people have gone

missing and some BS story about a pangolin 

use common sense    A wet market or a lab

seems obvious to me

 

Is that worth debating at this time or should we wait a bit longer?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, covidiot said:

yes, and i boldly predict people will be chasing their own tails like dogs and we still won't know where covid came from. 

 

I think your point of 'boldly predict or should it be predict boldly is worth debate but only after the debate on covid origin comes to a conclusion.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“proof” standard will be “ beyond reasonable doubt” or “no other feasible explanation”  ?

based on available evidence, as for the UK Novichuk case ?

China trying to “shut down” current investigation is also circumstantial “evidence”..... against them.......

range of “missing” or “ unavailable” documents is further such evidence

will be politically impossible to come to a conclusion of “unknown cause”........

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...