Jump to content

BOT governor: Thai economic engines not powerful anymore


Recommended Posts

Posted

screenshot_15814.jpg

 

By Panithan Onthaworn

 

Thailand’s economic engines may not be as strong as they previously were, the central bank governor said on Thursday, as the country’s vital tourism industry has been severely hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. 

 

“The structure of the Thai economy remains unchanged even after 40 years,” Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput, Governor of the Bank of Thailand (BOT), told a business seminar called ‘Looking Beyond Covid-19.’

 

While much of the world has shifted completely, the country is still reliant on exports of automobiles, petroleums, electronics, as well as tourism, Sethaput said.

 

Full story: https://www.thaienquirer.com/35094/bot-governor-thai-economic-engines-not-powerful-anymore/

 

ti.jpg
Posted
19 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand’s economic engines may not be as strong as they previously were, the central bank governor said on Thursday, as the country’s vital tourism industry has been severely hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. 

 

Sounds a bit like the Bangkok water pumps?

Posted
On 11/18/2021 at 1:38 PM, Geoffggi said:

Not wishing to rub salt into the wounds but you know exactly who to thank for this situation, Mr. bumble and his cohorts who think they are doing a sterling job ........LOL

he said even after 40 years.  The blame is therefore equally on all the corrupt individuals and dynasties such as ShinShin etc

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

The structure of the economy has not changed for 40 years. It is based on exports of automobiles, petroleum products and electronics as well as tourism. 

 

That presumably is a criticism, but what should be different, what should they have changed to.? Probably I've missed something. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, rott said:

The structure of the economy has not changed for 40 years. It is based on exports of automobiles, petroleum products and electronics as well as tourism. 

 

That presumably is a criticism, but what should be different, what should they have changed to.? Probably I've missed something. 

1st, important not to overlook that tourism (s3x tourism) is technically an export. Thais generally are too embarrased to admit how reliant the country is on massage parlors. 

 

2nd, what they should have been doing for the last 20-30 years is moving up the food chain rather then assembling stuff. This is how you avoid the middle income trap that they are firmly in. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, HAPPYNUFF said:

You have a country  run by a gang of bumbling old men, who actually think they are soldiers, yet who have never even heard a shot fired in anger, being manipulated  by  Sino/Thais  in the background,  both  groups  having not the slightest interest in the welfare or well being  of their own  people.

Bumbling old Gangsters actually who are merely Puppets for even more Corrupt 'Leaders'.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/20/2021 at 12:04 AM, thaibook said:

he said even after 40 years.  The blame is therefore equally on all the corrupt individuals and dynasties such as ShinShin etc

 

Well to answer your question I suggest that you take a look here.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Thailand

 

Start with #16 Prem Tinsulanonda and work forwards.

 

Then work out hw long Thaksin Shinawatra was in power (He actually won a freely held election, not once but twice. The only Thai PM to do so). He was of course deposed by a military coup as was his sister Yingluck Shinawatra.

 

Strangely enough when Thaksin was PM the country flourished and prospered unlike under the current incumbent. 

 

Under Thaksin the Thai people also prospered And he did a fair number of things for them including the 30 baht health scheme and he also established the Oil Fund scheme.

 

Now ask yourself what the current government has successfully done for the Thai people over the last 7 years, and compare the two.

 

There have been a lot of military coups in the last 40 years

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Well to answer your question I suggest that you take a look here.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Thailand

 

Start with #16 Prem Tinsulanonda and work forwards.

 

Then work out hw long Thaksin Shinawatra was in power (He actually won a freely held election, not once but twice. The only Thai PM to do so). He was of course deposed by a military coup as was his sister Yingluck Shinawatra.

 

Strangely enough when Thaksin was PM the country flourished and prospered unlike under the current incumbent. 

 

Under Thaksin the Thai people also prospered And he did a fair number of things for them including the 30 baht health scheme and he also established the Oil Fund scheme.

 

Now ask yourself what the current government has successfully done for the Thai people over the last 7 years, and compare the two.

 

There have been a lot of military coups in the last 40 years

Yes. And then we have to ask ourselves: What's wrong with this picture?  What's the truer crux of why the cycling military interventions?   

 

The historical answers are quite available to decipher. Doesn't take a genius to ascertain the reality of the picture.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...