Good for her .... teach that guy a good lesson ..... Bravo !!

love that strong smooth legs of her ,  .... continue please  !!

Teach my daughter & grand daughter the same skills .

19 hours ago, robblok said:

Her acts are not great, but how would you respond if someone poured a drink over your head ? I am not one for violence and would probably not start a fight but doing something like that in general starts fights.

Your certainly going to get a reaction.

I am shamefully aroused… ???? 

5 hours ago, RobU said:

There is no excuse whatsoever for what he did. I cant believe that you think assaulting a woman (what he did was physical assault) is a good response to her rejecting you no matter how derogatory her verbal response is.

So, the message here is that women can do as they please? Just because they are female?

 

No matter how derogatory they may be, there can't be any repurcussions?

 

One the one hand, it's apparently ok for men to be violently assaulted when they do something wrong, but a woman can't get a little wet?

 

Come on.........IF she had been insulting, (and we dunno cos we haven't seen or heard that part of the story yet), she certainly deserved some kind of response.

 

If she were a man (or a boy, even), she'd get a bloody nose and a black eye (at least!) and it wouldn't even be news. 

Thai media update on legal matters after female boxer and adversary get fined the same - 1,000 baht

 

Picture: Thai Rath

 

That Rath followed up on the story of a female boxer called Pareploy Saeaia who attacked a man who had earlier poured a beer over her head.

 

Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1249790-thai-media-update-on-legal-matters-after-female-boxer-and-adversary-get-fined-the-same-1000-baht/

20 hours ago, Kenchamp said:

Could there be more to the story than has been reported? Can't believe the idiot poured a beer on her head for only refusing to clink glasses. If he did then not sure he will do it again

I can believe it... he was shunned, and the beer in his stomach swayed his actions.

She should really try to turn her hips into a low kicks (muay thai 101) because after watching the video those kicks would just barely tickle anyone at the very best 

Pretty weak stuff from you that posted she overreacted. Assuming it went down as stated, that guy deserved a quick shot to the chops from at the bf of the offended, and then whatever she wanted to pile on. 

He got off lightly, I have seen my Mrs elbow a guy at Flemington Market to the ground.

 

She was getting some fruits, the crowd was about 3 deep so I stood well back at the counter behind me opposite the crowd, then all a sudden I see this guy drop to the ground and my wife saying, you want to touch me, get up, get up, then guy got up and took off, smart move because I guarantee you he would have been back on the ground quick smart.

 

True story, although it was the 1st time I had seen my wife use these tactics outside the bedroom, and with someone else, can't say that I wasn't a little jealous.

3 hours ago, 2009 said:

One the one hand, it's apparently ok for men to be violently assaulted when they do something wrong, but a woman can't get a little wet?

You can't be serious, as others have said, that is assault and he deserved to be beaten to a pulp, pouring a glass of anything on someone's head is of great insult.

 

So what your saying is it's ok because she wasn't a bloke, and if she was it wouldn't make news, can you not see the difference, woman says NO to the guys advances and he later pours the glass of whatever over her head because he feels rejected.

 

Next you will be saying if a woman gets raped she deserved it because she is a woman.

 

Maybe I should let my wife pour a glass over your head and see how you respond, i.e. if your quick enough and can handle her.

23 hours ago, Kenchamp said:

Could there be more to the story than has been reported? Can't believe the idiot poured a beer on her head for only refusing to clink glasses. If he did then not sure he will do it again

This is exactly what I have been saying.

 

There is two sides to every story, but in this sensationalist female victory story nobody is interested in more in depth reporting.

 

He was trying to be sociable with her (and perhaps the two blokes she was sitting with), and she dismissed him. I wonder if she was unduely rude?

 

Cos, if so, she deserved the drink. If a man is rude he gets beaten up and it ain't news, unless he is killed or in seriously condition.

On 2/8/2022 at 5:05 PM, bbko said:

She does have some good Muay Thai skills

 

and is easy on the eyes.............Oh,munless she kicks you there  ????

Another drunk bitc*-witch

36 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

So what your saying is it's ok because she wasn't a bloke, and if she was it wouldn't make news, can you not see the difference, woman says NO to the guys advances and he later pours the glass of whatever over her head because he feels rejected.

All we know is he was trying to socialize (clink glasses) with her and presumably her two male friends (boyfriend?) who she was sitting with and she somehow communicated to him to leave them alone.

 

We don't know he was even trying to be romantic or flirty - just sociable.

 

What she actually said to him is unknown.

 

40 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

You can't be serious, as others have said, that is assault and he deserved to be beaten to a pulp, pouring a glass of anything on someone's head is of great insult.

Wow. Beaten to a pulp? 

 

If she had poured a drink on him, would she deserve to be beaten to a pulp? 

 

42 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

So what your saying is it's ok because she wasn't a bloke, and if she was it wouldn't make news

I am saying nobody would care if it was a bloke. It wouldn't make news. It would be assumed he said something cheeky and probably deserved it. At least, people would wonder about it.

 

Even if he had gotten the glass on his head and some stitches, not only the beer, it probably wouldn't be news worthy.

 

And he wouldn't be applauded for retaliation and get nationwide praise. Lol. 

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, 2009 said:

All we know is he was trying to socialize (clink glasses) with her and presumably her two male friends (boyfriend?) who she was sitting with and she somehow communicated to him to leave them alone.

Obviously the guy has no idea how to socialise.

 

From my rule book which I would imagine would be the same as most guys with half a brain that know how to socialise.

 

1. Make sure the target engages eye contact with you, smile, if she smiles back, your half way there.

 

2. Raise your glass to her next time she is looking at you, if she does the same, go to 3.

 

3. Give her a hand gesture, i.e. if you can join them, if she is with the other guys, she wouldn't be engaging in 1 & 2, if she is not with the guys and knows that they are not overly jealous or protective of her, then she might just invite you over.

 

4. Always confirm with the other guys, e.g. hi, not cutting anyone's grass here am I, and the usual answer will be no and then your on a good thing.

 

This creep has no etiquette, and obviously things he is God's gift to woman, that said, I have picked up woman sitting with other males, it's not hard if the female is interested in you, but to walk on over uninvited, i.e. forcing yourself in and thinking that clinking glasses is going to get you in, your obviously wrong, as this guy found out and kudos to her to telling him to F off politely, but he couldn't accept the rejection that his was turned down by a woman who can stand up for herself, he then had to show his true character and pour a glass over her head.

 

This is one street smart girl who isn't a sucker, and will stand up for those who want to cut in on her time out with a few mates, not only that, he probably was full of himself and she read him a mile away.

 

If you cannot get what I am saying, then you are in the same shallow mind set to this guy, there is a code in society as to the way you approach someone to socialise and what he did was totally not part of the code, I'm only sorry that her mate didn't put him on his ass as I would have without thinking twice. 

58 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

Obviously the guy has no idea how to socialise.

 

From my rule book which I would imagine would be the same as most guys with half a brain that know how to socialise.

 

1. Make sure the target engages eye contact with you, smile, if she smiles back, your half way there.

 

2. Raise your glass to her next time she is looking at you, if she does the same, go to 3.

 

3. Give her a hand gesture, i.e. if you can join them, if she is with the other guys, she wouldn't be engaging in 1 & 2, if she is not with the guys and knows that they are not overly jealous or protective of her, then she might just invite you over.

 

4. Always confirm with the other guys, e.g. hi, not cutting anyone's grass here am I, and the usual answer will be no and then your on a good thing.

 

This creep has no etiquette, and obviously things he is God's gift to woman, that said, I have picked up woman sitting with other males, it's not hard if the female is interested in you, but to walk on over uninvited, i.e. forcing yourself in and thinking that clinking glasses is going to get you in, your obviously wrong, as this guy found out and kudos to her to telling him to F off politely, but he couldn't accept the rejection that his was turned down by a woman who can stand up for herself, he then had to show his true character and pour a glass over her head.

 

This is one street smart girl who isn't a sucker, and will stand up for those who want to cut in on her time out with a few mates, not only that, he probably was full of himself and she read him a mile away.

 

If you cannot get what I am saying, then you are in the same shallow mind set to this guy, there is a code in society as to the way you approach someone to socialise and what he did was totally not part of the code, I'm only sorry that her mate didn't put him on his ass as I would have without thinking twice. 

Some guys (maybe 2009) too have no clue and seem to think that woman have to do as they say and feel offended when they get no response. 

 

If you get rejected live with it its not the end of the world. Your way is the most sensible way but some guys seem to think they need to go full alpha male to attract a woman and when it does not work they get mad. 

 

2 hours ago, 2009 said:

All we know is he was trying to socialize (clink glasses) with her and presumably her two male friends (boyfriend?) who she was sitting with and she somehow communicated to him to leave them alone.

 

We don't know he was even trying to be romantic or flirty - just sociable.

 

What she actually said to him is unknown.

 

Wow. Beaten to a pulp? 

 

If she had poured a drink on him, would she deserve to be beaten to a pulp? 

 

I am saying nobody would care if it was a bloke. It wouldn't make news. It would be assumed he said something cheeky and probably deserved it. At least, people would wonder about it.

 

Even if he had gotten the glass on his head and some stitches, not only the beer, it probably wouldn't be news worthy.

 

And he wouldn't be applauded for retaliation and get nationwide praise. Lol. 

 

 

 

Was that guy who poured the beer over that woman’s head a buddy of yours of something? I mean, I’ve seen six or seven replies here from you by now, all of them defending him and trying to shift the blame from him to her. 
So again: it doesn’t matter what she said to him, it’s no excuse to pour beer over her head. When you hit on a girl and she says no, doesn’t matter how rude she is in doing so, you suck it up and walk away. And the minute you lay hands on someone (or pour beer over someone’s head), that’s ASSAULT, and all bets are off. 
The guy simply brought it upon himself, so deal with it. 

8 hours ago, 2009 said:

So, the message here is that women can do as they please? Just because they are female?

 

No matter how derogatory they may be, there can't be any repurcussions?

 

One the one hand, it's apparently ok for men to be violently assaulted when they do something wrong, but a woman can't get a little wet?

 

Come on.........IF she had been insulting, (and we dunno cos we haven't seen or heard that part of the story yet), she certainly deserved some kind of response.

 

If she were a man (or a boy, even), she'd get a bloody nose and a black eye (at least!) and it wouldn't even be news. 

So you think that physically assaulting a woman (or man) is a reasonable response to a refusal to engage in dialogue, you need therapy or perhaps imprisonment if you practice such behaviour.

2 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

Was that guy who poured the beer over that woman’s head a buddy of yours of something? I mean, I’ve seen six or seven replies here from you by now, all of them defending him and trying to shift the blame from him to her. 
So again: it doesn’t matter what she said to him, it’s no excuse to pour beer over her head. When you hit on a girl and she says no, doesn’t matter how rude she is in doing so, you suck it up and walk away. And the minute you lay hands on someone (or pour beer over someone’s head), that’s ASSAULT, and all bets are off. 
The guy simply brought it upon himself, so deal with it. 

I just think it's a pity we didn't really get the full story.

 

We don't know exactly what he was doing to be a nuisance, other than try to be sociable at her table and we dunno how she treated him.

 

All we know is what he did with the beer and then what she did with her feet n fists. And that they both got charged with assault (and rightly so).

 

Also, it was really not news worthy: nothing more than a sensationalized story.

52 minutes ago, RobU said:

So you think that physically assaulting a woman (or man) is a reasonable response to a refusal to engage in dialogue, you need therapy or perhaps imprisonment if you practice such behaviour.

Actually, I am the one saying she shouldn't have resorted to violence, while most others are applauding her and saying he got off light.

 

Some are saying he should have been "beaten to a pulp", "knocked out" etc. etc. Literally, the type of violence that could get an attempted murder charge, lol. Who needs therapy?

 

And my point was: if roles were reversed, what would be a reasonable course of action? A woman certainly shouldn't be attacked for pouring a drink on someone. But a man should apparently.

 

I am just trying to apply logic to the situation.

 

And I am skeptical that there isn't more to the story. She comes across as a hot head. I reckon some insults were exchanged.

14 minutes ago, 2009 said:

Actually, I am the one saying she shouldn't have resorted to violence, while most others are applauding her and saying he got off light.

 

Some are saying he should have been "beaten to a pulp", "knocked out" etc. etc. Literally, the type of violence that could get an attempted murder charge, lol. Who needs therapy?

 

And my point was: if roles were reversed, what would be a reasonable course of action? A woman certainly shouldn't be attacked for pouring a drink on someone. But a man should apparently.

 

I am just trying to apply logic to the situation.

 

And I am skeptical that there isn't more to the story. She comes across as a hot head. I reckon some insults were exchanged.

You are persistently stating that it was OK and reasonable for him to resort to violence after she verbally rejected his advances. You have taken this stance in all your many posts no one has ever stated that it is OK for a woman to pour a drink over a mans head and that he should not respond. it is your rather warped interpretation

The guy was a dick head for pouring a beer on her head, a waste of good beer. The female. or whatever they are called these days is a hot head, even when it's been doused with cool beer.

1000 baht fine each is about right.

Wow, I love her, well done

 

Try posting anything vaguely technical or requiring specialist knowledge on this site and 'nuffing'. Fighting, pretty woman, beer.......and nearly 200 posts , 7 pages. Guess we've done Covid to death.  Maybe a war in Europe will stir this site into action.