Opinion: The president of the senate just said nepotism is not morally wrong; we’re not kidding

[Cake Monster]

7 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Without nepotism, bribery and class preference I dare say this whole lot would be working in rice fields

And the entire Country would be so much better off in terms of people who are actually qualified being placed in positions of higher Authority.

[Lemsta69]

3 hours ago, Henryford said:

I am sure nepotism goes on in the West, cough Hunter Biden, but at least we don't brag about it.

that even worse. at least they're honest about it here then the oh-so-holier than thou West. how many world wars did Thailand start, I forgot.

[Lemsta69]

4 hours ago, Misterwhisper said:

Being a dim-wit standing in front of press cameras and microphones and openly endorsing the malpractice of nepotism may not be against the law -- but it sure as hell is morally wrong.

so is dropping 1000 pound JDAMs on civilians. oops, collateral damage.

[rudi49jr]

8 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Just shows the state of affairs here , everything is on the table

as long as you don't get caught.

regards Worgeordie

Even if you do get caught, you can always buy your way out if you have enough money.

[RobU]

Very normal in american politics, and no one blinks an eye . Quite reasonable really. Family are usually people you can trust so employing your wife as your personal secretary is a good idea. Putting family in positions of authority in your organisation is also a good idea. Seems now that It is not allowed anymore in UK politics, but i suspect it still goes on.

[Rhys]

8 hours ago, Will B Good said:

A very good example of the Thai (political?) mind set.......no intentions whatsoever of serving the public.......just big fat snouts in the trough.

 

Interesting this should be in the news on the day the UK newspapers carry the story of Bunter trying to appoint his dippy girlfriend/mistress to a 100k job in the FO.......and then trying to suppress the story from coming out.....what a PM!!

 

A mafia government........... and people still think he is the right person to lead a nation.....WT...?

.. what do you expect, at least you can commit a crime, serve time, and come to Thailand and become an official..

 

[Grusa]

I hope the writer wears a suitable bulletproof waistcoat. He will need it.

[olfu]

of course its not wrong--its called team work.

[Scott Tracy]

You would have thought we would not be shocked by this. We continue to judge against our own moral standards.

 

We are obviously wrong. 

[Puccini]

6 hours ago, Sydebolle said:

...As long as the voter base is as it is - good luck to all of them.

Joseph de Maistre, French diplomat and philosopher, said it (translation): "Every country has the government it deserves"

[garyk]

More on the order of the job goes to the highest bidder.

[The Old Bull]

17 hours ago, Henryford said:

Doesn't Thailand have a National Anti-Corruption Commission? Of course they would approve of nepotism, nothing corrupt with that.

The Anti Corruption Commission's job is to go after previous administrations ,never the one that's feeding them.

[heybruce]

18 hours ago, KhunLA said:

I don't think it is wrong, for anywhere, for any citation.  Gov't or workplace.

 

As long as they are qualified, or can learn the job, task at hand quickly, why not hire someone you know & trust.

1.  Elected officials and civil servants are supposed to serve the public good.  In order to do that they should hire the best qualified, not a family member who needs a job and who might meet minimum qualifications if given time and training.

 

2.  Family members working in the same government offices are more likely to look the other way, cover up, or participate in incompetence and corruption. 

[KhunLA]

30 minutes ago, heybruce said:

1.  Elected officials and civil servants are supposed to serve the public good.  In order to do that they should hire the best qualified, not a family member who needs a job and who might meet minimum qualifications if given time and training.

 

2.  Family members working in the same government offices are more likely to look the other way, cover up, or participate in incompetence and corruption. 

In your opinion ...

[metisdead]

A grammar police troll post and the replies have been removed.

 

Off topic deflection posts and replies regarding US and UK politics have been removed.

[Edwin Cameron]

That man is a FOOL..! it show's the calibre of Thai politicians

[scorecard]

1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

In your opinion ...

Agree, 99% chance they will look the other way or will be a valuable part of a system to facilitate corruption and cronyism.

[scorecard]

11 hours ago, Grusa said:

I hope the writer wears a suitable bulletproof waistcoat. He will need it.

Not so sure about that. Plenty of folks who admire him for helping his family.

[hotchilli]

22 hours ago, webfact said:

Pornpetch did not disappoint. He said nepotism, in government, is not morally wrong.

From his stance it's the truth.

[thailand49]

16 hours ago, Sydebolle said:

Pornpetch said nepotism, in government, is not morally wrong.

So, what is the problem? The majority of voters still believe in lucky numbers of the three-headed chicken, luck in dinosaur vomit and the tons and tons of clay and stones worn as amulets ....... go figure! 

As long as the voter base is as it is - good luck to all of them. 

So true even before it was said in the news I heard it many times thrown around in backrooms  politicians and lobbyist " American voters are stupid "  this doesn't apply to just U. S. It is world wide! 

[heybruce]

4 hours ago, KhunLA said:

In your opinion ...

What part do you consider opinion?  The part about elected officials and civil servants are supposed to serve the public good?  The part that states they should hire the best qualified, not a family member who needs a job and who might meet minimum qualifications if given time and training?  Or the part about family members working in the same government offices are more likely to look the other way, cover up, or participate in incompetence and corruption?

[Dart12]

I have no problem with it in business.  But in the gov shouldn't happen.

[KhunLA]

21 minutes ago, heybruce said:

What part do you consider opinion?  The part about elected officials and civil servants are supposed to serve the public good?(#1)  The part that states they should hire the best qualified, not a family member who needs a job and who might meet minimum qualifications if given time and training?(#2)  Or the part about family members working in the same government offices are more likely to look the other way, cover up, or participate in incompetence and corruption?

Since you quoted me, guessing you were answering my reply directly.   Apparently you didn't comprehend what I wrote.

 

Since I stated qualified, that eliminates your #1

Since I stated trusted, that eliminates your #2

[herfiehandbag]

On 6/21/2022 at 8:36 AM, ezzra said:

Why ? what has he done or plan to do to justify this statement? i can't believe i read this correct, in practice this man is whit-washing 90% of the corruption in this country...

 He is the President of the Senate.

He presides over the most corrupt organ of government, so yes, either directly or indirectly he also presides over, if not 90%, then certainly a significant proportion of the corruption in the country.

[heybruce]

2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Since you quoted me, guessing you were answering my reply directly.   Apparently you didn't comprehend what I wrote.

 

Since I stated qualified, that eliminates your #1

Since I stated trusted, that eliminates your #2

Difficult to answer such an ambiguous reply.  Do the numbers you edited into my post refer to the sentence that precedes the number or the following sentence?

 

Why don't you clearly answer specific questions?

[KhunLA]

7 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Difficult to answer such an ambiguous reply.  Do the numbers you edited into my post refer to the sentence that precedes the number or the following sentence?

 

Why don't you clearly answer specific questions?

I was trying to save you or whoever, the task of rereading what I posted, and your reply.

I can't be bothered, and I thought it was self explanatory the first time, and you can't comprehend it a second time.

 

3rd time .... if hiring someone qualified & trustfully (honest), then your reply is irrelevant, and not applicable to my original reply.  Let alone need to be repeated.... and yet

 

Have a nice day .... PEACE OUT

Edited June 22, 2022 by KhunLA

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

I was trying to save you or whoever, the task of rereading what I posted, and your reply.

I can't be bothered, and I thought it was self explanatory the first time, and you can't comprehend it a second time.

 

3rd time .... if hiring someone qualified & trustfully (honest), then your reply is irrelevant, and not applicable to my original reply.  Let alone need to be repeated.... and yet

 

Have a nice day .... PEACE OUT

That is arguably correct in private businesses, but not correct in government service. 

 

People with integrity in government service are expected to put service before family, at least on a professional level.  Hiring on any criteria other than qualifications leads to a corrupt patronage system that will hold a country back.

[herfiehandbag]

On 6/21/2022 at 10:24 AM, mikebell said:

The whole country is run on these lines.  The best candidate for a job is not appointed unless related to the boss.  We should start a new movement named 'Do you know who my father is?'

Isn't that The Armed Forces Preparatory School?

[Mavideol]

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

That is arguably correct in private businesses, but not correct in government service. 

 

People with integrity in government service are expected to put service before family, at least on a professional level.  Hiring on any criteria other than qualifications leads to a corrupt patronage system that will hold a country back.

you just, perfectly, defined/described Thailand  555

[zzaa09]

On 6/20/2022 at 6:30 PM, Enzian said:

In this kind of hierarchical social system with fairly distinct classes of high and low, and a commitment to perpetuate such distinctions, it's the normal state of affairs.

Awaiting the revolts of the masses.......decade upon decade upon decade.