Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

U.S. Supreme Court curbs EPA's ability to fight climate change

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

Screenshot_1.jpg.8a973ba1c6f76fdfc60f4faa9e5854c6.jpg

 

(CNN)  The Supreme Court curbed the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to broadly regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants, a major defeat for the Biden administration's attempts to slash emissions at a moment when scientists are sounding alarms about the accelerating pace of global warming.

 

In addition, the court cut back agency authority in general invoking the so-called "major questions" doctrine -- a ruling that will impact the federal government's authority to regulate in other areas of climate policy, as well as regulation of the internet and worker safety.

 

The decision issued Thursday will send shockwaves across the federal government, threatening agency action that comes without clear congressional authorization.

 

The ruling was 6-3. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the conservative majority, with the three liberal justices dissenting.

 

(more)

 

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/politics/supreme-court-climate-change-epa-regulations/index.html

 

CNN.jpg.242d3d98ae7fb42da36dcd0f4b7f7c97.jpg

 

  • Popular Post
33 minutes ago, onthedarkside said:

The Supreme Court curbed the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to broadly regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants,

Idiots. 

The 6-3 ruling in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency limited the federal government's ability to regulate carbon emissions from power plants, which Kagan lamented in her dissent had weakened “the power to respond to the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.”

"The subject matter of the regulation here makes the Court’s intervention all the more troubling," she wrote. "Whatever else this Court may know about, it does not have a clue about how to address climate change.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/west-virginia-v-epa/

  • Popular Post

Awesome. Freedom. At least in some parts of the world common sense remains and is not being overcalled by "scientists" that are certainly on a payroll to follow a specific agenda to curb the freedoms of people.

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, FarAway said:

Awesome. Freedom. At least in some parts of the world common sense remains and is not being overcalled by "scientists" that are certainly on a payroll to follow a specific agenda to curb the freedoms of people.

Thank you for sharing with us so many verifiable facts in such a short comment.

  • Popular Post

Thank You SCOTUS

I've got the feeling the religious clique now in control has just started in rolling back the clock. 

  • Popular Post
8 hours ago, ozimoron said:

"The subject matter of the regulation here makes the Court’s intervention all the more troubling," she wrote. "Whatever else this Court may know about, it does not have a clue about how to address climate change.

I don't think anyone knows how to address climate change.

Shutting down all the power stations in the world won't help anyone.

The EPA were formed to stop big companies polluting the air, water and countryside with toxic substances, not to try and control a harmless gas, CO2, even if it were possible.  

 

IMHO the Supreme Court were right to restrict the actions of an 'out of control' Federal bureau that has twisted and perverted it's original mandate in an attempt to follow liberal political policies.  

Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court ruling limiting Washington's authority makes the fight against climate change harder, U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said

26 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court ruling limiting Washington's authority makes the fight against climate change harder, U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said

Can something that is impossible be made harder?

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I don't think anyone knows how to address climate change.

Shutting down all the power stations in the world won't help anyone.

The EPA were formed to stop big companies polluting the air, water and countryside with toxic substances, not to try and control a harmless gas, CO2, even if it were possible.  

 

IMHO the Supreme Court were right to restrict the actions of an 'out of control' Federal bureau that has twisted and perverted it's original mandate in an attempt to follow liberal political policies.  

A bit of hyperbole, nobody is trying to shut down all power stations.

 

Followed by climate change denial tropes. 
 

But yes, sadly, tackling climate change is left to Liberals and progressives, the rightwing having abandoned science and the environment.

4 hours ago, pegman said:

I've got the feeling the religious clique now in control has just started in rolling back the clock. 

Time to roll back the religious clique.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.