Jump to content

Nearly one in three Americans say it may soon be necessary to take up arms against the government


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BangkokHank said:

"Everyone knew" that more Democrats than Republicans would vote using absentee ballots, because the media had been brainwashing people into believing that for weeks before the election. The media had been preparing the simple-minded people for that because they KNEW that the Democrats were planning to steal the election.

 

Can you give me any plausible reason why people from one party would be more likely than the people from another to vote using absentee ballots? If they had said that, for example, older people are more likely to vote via absentee ballots because they have trouble getting to the polling stations, that would have been plausible. But to suggest that voters for one entire party are more likely to vote by the way that just happens to be easier to cheat with is patently ridiculous. So please, don't try your "everyone knew" with me. You just make yourself look silly.

"Can you give me any plausible reason why people from one party would be more likely than the people from another to vote using absentee ballots?"

 

Because Trump claimed, repeatedly and without any proof, that voting by mail is subject to fraud.  He objected to states making it easier to vote by mail during the pandemic, but not because of fraud.  https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/08/trump-slams-mail-in-voting-says-it-doesnt-work-out-well-for-republicans.html

 

That discouraged Republicans from voting by mail.  Democrats, who were taking the pandemic much more seriously than Republicans, were more likely to vote by mail to avoid crowded polling stations and lines to vote.  In Pennsylvania almost three times as many Democrats voted by mail as Republicans.  https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-voted-republicans-mail-nearly-021800530.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Credo said:

Since you are posting nonsense, I'll give you a reason.  It's because Democrats work for a living and Republicans don't and have time to stand in line at polling stations.    

 

Unless you can provide some credible evidence to support your ridiculous claim that Democrats work for a living and Republicans don't, then, according to the rules of this forum, it should be removed as misinformation. Or, as far as I'm concerned, it can be left up for its comedic value. I actually laughed out loud when I read it.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

Unless you can provide some credible evidence to support your ridiculous claim that Democrats work for a living and Republicans don't, then, according to the rules of this forum, it should be removed as misinformation. Or, as far as I'm concerned, it can be left up for its comedic value. I actually laughed out loud when I read it.

He was replying in kind to this nonsense post you made:

 

"The media had been preparing the simple-minded people for that because they KNEW that the Democrats were planning to steal the election."

 

Do you have a link to that one?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What all those Trumpers don’t seem to understand is that this would be the story of the century, if the Dems really had stolen the elections. Like Woodward and Bernstein, this would be Pulitzer prize material, multi million dollar book deals, and so on, and so forth. Whoever would discover that this had been the case would be a very rich man/woman indeed.
So I’m sure that many reporters (as well as law enforcement agencies) have looked at it long and hard, and if there had been any shred of evidence it would have been reported by now. But nothing has come up so far. Gee, I wonder why that is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rudi49jr said:

What all those Trumpers don’t seem to understand is that this would be the story of the century, if the Dems really had stolen the elections. Like Woodward and Bernstein, this would be Pulitzer prize material, multi million dollar book deals, and so on, and so forth. Whoever would discover that this had been the case would be a very rich man/woman indeed.
So I’m sure that many reporters (as well as law enforcement agencies) have looked at it long and hard, and if there had been any shred of evidence it would have been reported by now. But nothing has come up so far. Gee, I wonder why that is.

Biden is still POTUS ?

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

Yes. Shocking, isn’t it? And not impeached, not even once. 

Did you not understand what I meant ?

Any potential whistle-blowers, wouldn't blow their whistle whilst hes still POTUS , they would wait until Donald gets his job back as POTUS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Did you not understand what I meant ?

Any potential whistle-blowers, wouldn't blow their whistle whilst hes still POTUS , they would wait until Donald gets his job back as POTUS

Are those the same whistleblowers that desperately tried to find anything that reeked of fraud when trump was president?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Lacessit said:

 

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night, only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." ( George Orwell )

"Quote Investigator:There is no substantive evidence that George Orwell who died in 1950 made this remark."

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/11/07/rough-men/

Edited by JimmyJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Did you not understand what I meant ?

Any potential whistle-blowers, wouldn't blow their whistle whilst hes still POTUS , they would wait until Donald gets his job back as POTUS

Those potential whistle=blowers had more than two months between the election and Biden taking office; two months when Trump was still President.  Why didn't they speak up then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I am not too sure whether they are the same people or not 

 

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Because they didn't want Joe to lose his job 

Do you seriously believe what you're writing here?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Did you not understand what I meant ?

Any potential whistle-blowers, wouldn't blow their whistle whilst hes still POTUS , they would wait until Donald gets his job back as POTUS

Because nobody blew the whistle on Trump when he was President? What's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Could we stick to the topic of the current Government ?

???? didn't you start this.....................

 

38 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Did you not understand what I meant ?

Any potential whistle-blowers, wouldn't blow their whistle whilst hes still POTUS , they would wait until Donald gets his job back as POTUS

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JimmyJ said:

"Quote Investigator:There is no substantive evidence that George Orwell who died in 1950 made this remark."

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/11/07/rough-men/

An interesting read, I suppose it's similar to the question of whether Christopher Marlowe wrote most of Shakespeare's works. Or whether it was Arnold Palmer or Gary Player who said "The more I practice, the luckier I get."

Anything George Orwell said, or was purported to say, gets attention. Who has ever heard of Richard Grenier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2022 at 1:41 PM, rudi49jr said:

Most Americans have absolutely no clue what ‘socialist’ means, they have been brought up to fear it and see it as something evil. Just like the MAGA crowd calls everyone and everything they disagree with “the radical left”. 

That branding happens both ways. But Americans are becoming aware of their current 'radical' problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rudi49jr said:

Yes. Shocking, isn’t it? And not impeached, not even once. 

That he is still there is certainly amazing. Somehow I don't think impeachment will be necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...