Jump to content

Cabinet approves tourist fee of 150-300 baht for all foreign tourists


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

shake dow street. farang pricing is business as usual.  quoted $5k USD. for a hernia operation yesterday.  do you think people will flock to Thailand to get worked. 

Edited by malibukid
  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, zzzzz said:

has anyone seen any thing concerning 
will Khmers, Laos, Burmese, Malays be forced to pay 150 baht each time they cross the land border from their own countries> 

seems unfair if they are, yet work permit holders are exempted> 
 

I'm sure workers will be covered by a work permit or at least under the "MOU" packaage from bordering countries.

If not they are tourists and therefore have to pay 150 like anyone else.

Posted

So all retirees will be taxed? All elite holders and long term visa holders will all be taxed when they buy tickets because they have no Work permits? ???? what a crazy regulation.. I bet the implementation will be pure chaos.. until it settles down...????

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, loong said:

So average of roughly 4 to 6 Baht per tourist per year!

And when TAT works out and applies their tourist number calculations suddenly there will only be about 1% of the supposed income!!! 5555

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ikke1959 said:

But I am a taxpayer in THailand... Do I have to pay while 75% of Thais don't pay tax at all??

You are a tax payer = You have a WP = You do not pay

 

Simple enough

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Robbkk said:

Nah, the tax will be collected by immigration upon arrival which will double the waiting time for everybody as any tourists dont have local currency, etc 

Anybody who's been through a similar process (e.g. the exit tax in Indonesia or Philippines) knows this is a stupid idea that will cost the country more money than it brings. 

 

 

Just stick the 300baht on the price of an airline ticket (Charge 150 baht at the land borders) forget everything about not charging this kind of passport or that kind of permit and get on with it. 

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, zzzzz said:

Wont make a hiccup at all, as no one will even know, as its included in the ticket, same as the departure tax has been for decades 

It cannot be included in the ticket. How will airlines put up with the extra work to see if a passenger is eligible to pay, or not. It must be paid at immigration.

Posted
9 minutes ago, JoePai said:

You are a tax payer = You have a WP = You do not pay

 

Simple enough

Nope.  Retired people don't have work permits, but pay plenty of tax tax - income tax on investment income, 7% VAT on purchases, ludicrous taxes on every bottle of wine bought.  

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
12 hours ago, findlay13 said:

This will go smoothly at Swampy I'm sure.

 

 

Great idea I reckon. Particularly if it's used for insurance purposes. Let's face it 300B will barely cover the cost of a beer or lady drink.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Nope.  Retired people don't have work permits, but pay plenty of tax tax - income tax on investment income, 7% VAT on purchases, ludicrous taxes on every bottle of wine bought.  

Quote not applied to those who hold diplomatic passports, work permits 

 

Nothing to do with the retired who have to pay

Posted
12 minutes ago, Mike Teavee said:

Anybody who's been through a similar process (e.g. the exit tax in Indonesia or Philippines) knows this is a stupid idea that will cost the country more money than it brings. 

 

 

Just stick the 300baht on the price of an airline ticket (Charge 150 baht at the land borders) forget everything about not charging this kind of passport or that kind of permit and get on with it. 

This is the breakdown of taxes and fees on a recently quoted return flight BKK to MNL. Comes to 3510 THB out of a total ticket cost of 9754 THB. Soon to add in 300 THB.

 

 

Screenshot_2023-02-15-07-43-08-181_com.inkglobal.cebu.android.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Bangkocker said:

Great idea I reckon. Particularly if it's used for insurance purposes. Let's face it 300B will barely cover the cost of a beer or lady drink.

Those are some pricey bars you drink in Bangkocker

Edited by WHansen
typo
  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Prince77 said:

I am wondering about the insurance benefits - what is covered in what amounts?

 

The trend on this forum for interpretation to be taken literally when it suits the agenda.

"insurance coverage for tourists" is to insure hospitals are covered for uninsured tourists.

Maybe they should have made insurance mandatory instead.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...