Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The FBI will have a lot of explaining to do if they have to explain why they didn't investigate Biden about the accusations , especially if they don't bring charges about the Mar le go raid 

Will they have a lot of explaining to do if they did investigate that accusation? And what is it with you right wingers. As far as we know there is one accusation, not "accusations".

And 2 "if"s in one sentence. Kind of tendentious, no?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Will they have a lot of explaining to do if they did investigate that accusation? And what is it with you right wingers. As far as we know there is one accusation, not "accusations".

And 2 "if"s in one sentence. Kind of tendentious, no?

I was referring to the accusations about Biden (this story)  and Trumps Mar le go raid . Two accusations and thus plural 

   Well the two "ifs" in one sentence , the FBI have had the accusations about Biden in their hands for about a year now and they probably will have to give an explanation about that and why there's been no investigation  now its been bought to light  and they are taking their time bring oing Trump to Court about the Mar le go raid .

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I was referring to the accusations about Biden (this story)  and Trumps Mar le go raid . Two accusations and thus plural 

   Well the two "ifs" in one sentence , the FBI have had the accusations about Biden in their hands for about a year now and they probably will have to give an explanation about that and why there's been no investigation  now its been bought to light  and they are taking their time bring oing Trump to Court about the Mar le go raid .

Sorry, I'm a bit lost. Which accusation have been in the hands of the FBI for about a year now?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tug said:

Ahhh just so you know there was no (raid) at mar a largo there was a lawfully approved execution of a search warrant that yealded lots and of evidence hope that helps as far as this aspersion against the Biden’s were is the proof?looks like an obvious attempt to slander or  as they said back in the day where’s the beef?lol 

Whatever you want to call it is fine by me  , but we are awaiting charges to be bought and Trump ending up in Court to face those charges , if no charges are about the Mar le go search  , the FBI will have to explain why 

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fox? For the 10 thousandth time? They were not part of the laptop being Russian disinfo misinformation campaign cooked up by Biden's campaign staff like Blinken (https://nypost.com/2023/05/03/blinkens-lies-on-hunter-laptop-letter-just-dont-stop/) and 51 crooked and dishonest ex intel chiefs which we are studiously ignoring and that has shredded the left's integrity and credibility were they? Or the dozens of other hoaxes(white supremacist Rittenhouse carrying guns across state lines, Smollett's attack representing MAGA, years of malicious collusion hoax nonsense and illegitimate president nonsense against Trump that somehow ALL benefitted the democrat narratives yet none were deemed defamatory for some bizarre reason, were they? Maybe we should drop this Oh Fox again routine?

 

Now this current investigation by Grassley is fascinating. It does what every single member of the left here could not do. That is to credibly explain why America's foreign adversaries were paying up to 12 member of the Biden clan. Nobody could ex[lain it. It has been embarrassing to watch. And the lame excuse now the dishonesty is unravelling is ....but Fox!!

 

I suggest posters explain why all this money was paid and why even though the Bidens didnt deny the evidence of payment(that laptop) veracity yet the left moved heaven and earth to falsely claim the evidence was Russian disinformation is because they could not reasonably explain it without admitting their guy is EVERYTHING they falsely accused Trump of, and just before an election too.. Ouch.

Jim Jordan lied about Blinken and shamelessly edited Morel's testimony (see transcript), and now we should believe Comer? ????

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-accuses-house-judiciary-republicans-highly-misleading-hunter-biden-leak

 

Jordan-Blinken-testimony-lie-768x988.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

First ,Thanks for the newsworthy thread!

 

Whether  he belongs in jail remains to be seen.

It was no secret that the Gop would be on oversight offense when they won the majority in the house .It was one of the reasons why they won imop

The Gop have been bragging up to 14 WB have come forward ,this appears to be one of them.

Now going forward hopefully the two recent Whistleblowers will come out in the open and share 

their experiences,live in front of the world.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

House Republicans Weaponization Committee isn't doing real oversight. Have you any news worthy malfeasances that were recovered by any of the committees? 

Yes ,Just the mention of Whistleblowers and that they are voicing complaints ,that’s real newsworthiness. 

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-accused-whistleblower-bribery-scheme-foreign-national-1798194

 

Comer has promised to use his time as chair of the Oversight Committee to investigate "waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in the federal government," echoing several of his Republican colleagues who argue that the federal government has been "weaponized" under the Biden administration.


 

 

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...