Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Could be nothing, could be something, just have to wait for the investigation to determine that. Everyone in the biden fan club needs to be patient.

 .What a tangled web the bidens and the three letter agencies have created imop It’s so critical to get the subpoena docs  to get a better understanding of what this one particular WB is claiming !

 

 

“The subpoena seeks all FD-1023 forms that were "created or modified in June 2020" and that contain the word "Biden," as well as any related documents and attachments”.

“An FD-1023 form is generally a report about an informant and may involve someone speaking to the FBI about alleged crimes”.

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-bribery-allegations-explained-what-we-know-what-we-dont-1798224

Posted
1 minute ago, riclag said:

 .What a tangled web the bidens and the three letter agencies have created imop It’s so critical to get the subpoena docs  to get a better understanding of what this one particular WB is claiming !

 

 

 

They're the conspiracy theorists?

Posted
1 hour ago, radiochaser said:

Of course he said that.   It's what he gets paid to do!

Yes, that's what spokespeople are paid to do. You have anything to comment about what was actually said?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 hours ago, placeholder said:

Yes, that's what spokespeople are paid to do. You have anything to comment about what was actually said?

You want me to repeat what I wrote?   Why?

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, radiochaser said:

You want me to repeat what I wrote?   Why?

 

No. To repeat what you wrote would not be a comment on what was actually said but merely about the person who said it.

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, placeholder said:

No. To repeat what you wrote would not be a comment on what was actually said but merely about the person who said it.

 

But that was my comment.   The spokesman is paid to say what he said.  Whether or not it is true, whether or not anyone believes it, whether or not the spokesman believes or does not believe what he reported.  He does not do it for free, right?

Posted
1 minute ago, radiochaser said:

 

But that was my comment.   The spokesman is paid to say what he said.  Whether or not it is true, whether or not anyone believes it, whether or not the spokesman believes or does not believe what he reported.  He does not do it for free, right?

Still not addressing the merits or demerits of what was actually said.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Off topic posts and replies regarding Trump, Clinton and more have been removed.  Stay on topic which is:

 

Is it Joe Bidens turn to face JAIL?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 

 

"Can I add your name to this list?” Morell asks Brennan in the email. 

“Trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on [Oct. 22, 2020], a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue,” Morell explains, admitting the letter was to help Biden during his showdown with Trump. 

Brennan responded: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign on.” 

The smoking-gun email exchange shows that Brennan knew Morell’s political motivation before he signed on to the letter. "

https://nypost.com/2023/05/05/ex-cia-chief-michael-morell-wrote-hunter-biden-laptop-disinfo-letter-for-biden-to-use-as-during-debate/

 

IMO All 51 of these intel chiefs need to be in jail along with biden for destroying democracy and destroying trust in government institutions by orchestrating a campaign to discredit evidence of a candidate's corruption.

In this case your opinion is clearly worthless. The signers were no longer government employees. They were entitled to the same 1st Amendment rights as any other citizen. You got a problem with the 1st Amendment?

Posted
5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

sorry, can you explain the relevance your misleading comments on election denialism (which both parties are guilty of) to this thread about biden finally getting his turn to face jail? Who are you talking about that "only accept results that they like regardless of the truth" is that the democrat election deniers, the republican election deniers or both? And again, relevance?

 

I can't get beyond the levels of collusion and deep state interference necessary to get their man in the white house at all cost. Collusion and interference we were absolutely told in no uncertain terms never happened, and yet......

William Barr appointed John Durham as special prosecutor to ferret out "collusion and interference" from govt. agents. Even going to the improper length of having weekly meetings with him. Even going to the extent of travelling to Europe to pressure allies into disclosing non-existent intelligence to support his belief. How did that turn out?

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Pink Mist said:

Off topic posts and replies regarding Trump, Clinton and more have been removed.  Stay on topic which is:

 

Is it Joe Bidens turn to face JAIL?

Answer: No.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, dotcalm said:

Biden investigation: GOP subpoenas FBI Director Wray for details on alleged 'criminal scheme'

Rep. James Comer (R-KY) issued a subpoena to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday, ordering him to hand over a bureau form that allegedly describes a “criminal scheme” involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and an unnamed “foreign national.”

 

Forget abut Barr, Durham, they're ancient history now compared to the voluminous details emerging of the Biden corruption scandal currently ongoing. Haven't you noticed?

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/comer-subpoenas-wray-fbi-form-biden

Noticed what?

Posted
1 hour ago, dotcalm said:

Biden investigation: GOP subpoenas FBI Director Wray for details on alleged 'criminal scheme'

Rep. James Comer (R-KY) issued a subpoena to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday, ordering him to hand over a bureau form that allegedly describes a “criminal scheme” involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and an unnamed “foreign national.”

 

Forget abut Barr, Durham, they're ancient history now compared to the voluminous details emerging of the Biden corruption scandal currently ongoing. Haven't you noticed?

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/comer-subpoenas-wray-fbi-form-biden

Which details?

Posted
10 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Biden investigation: GOP subpoenas FBI Director Wray for details on alleged 'criminal scheme'

Rep. James Comer (R-KY) issued a subpoena to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday, ordering him to hand over a bureau form that allegedly describes a “criminal scheme” involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and an unnamed “foreign national.”

 

Forget abut Barr, Durham, they're ancient history now compared to the voluminous details emerging of the Biden corruption scandal currently ongoing. Haven't you noticed?

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/comer-subpoenas-wray-fbi-form-biden

Comer is flailing about, hoping to find something he can stick on Biden, but primarily to give the illusion of action and progress.  Only readers of the Washington Examiner believe the illusion is real.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...